Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Establishing the Tort of Outrage in Washington: Grimsby v. Samson et al.

Establishing the Tort of Outrage in Washington: Grimsby v. Samson et al.

Date: Jan 10, 1975
Establishing the Tort of Outrage in Washington: Grimsby v. Samson et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Arne M. Grimsby v. Werner E. Samson et al. (85 Wn.2d 52, 1975), the Supreme Court of...
Scope of the Rescue Doctrine for Professional Rescuers: Maltman v. Sauer

Scope of the Rescue Doctrine for Professional Rescuers: Maltman v. Sauer

Date: Jan 8, 1975
Scope of the Rescue Doctrine for Professional Rescuers: Maltman v. Sauer Introduction Maltman v. Sauer (84 Wn. 2d 975, 1975) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington, en banc....
Procedural Discretion in Post-Conviction Bail: State v. Smith and Forsyth

Procedural Discretion in Post-Conviction Bail: State v. Smith and Forsyth

Date: Nov 1, 1974
Procedural Discretion in Post-Conviction Bail: State v. Smith and Forsyth Introduction The case of The State of Washington, Petitioner, v. David Terron Smith, Respondent and Ronald G. Forsyth,...
Judicial Affirmation of SEPA's Applicability in Limited Access Highway Hearings

Judicial Affirmation of SEPA's Applicability in Limited Access Highway Hearings

Date: Aug 23, 1974
Judicial Affirmation of SEPA's Applicability in Limited Access Highway Hearings Introduction In the landmark case of Leschi Improvement Council et al. v. Washington State Highway Commission et al....
Proximate Cause and Mitigation in Governmental Tort Claims: An In-depth Commentary on King v. City of Seattle

Proximate Cause and Mitigation in Governmental Tort Claims: An In-depth Commentary on King v. City of Seattle

Date: Aug 16, 1974
Proximate Cause and Mitigation in Governmental Tort Claims: An In-depth Commentary on King v. City of Seattle Introduction In John P. King et al. v. The City of Seattle, 84 Wn.2d 239 (1974), the...
STATE v. CAROTHERS: Affirming Aiding and Abetting Liability and Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony

STATE v. CAROTHERS: Affirming Aiding and Abetting Liability and Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony

Date: Aug 16, 1974
STATE v. CAROTHERS: Affirming Aiding and Abetting Liability and Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony Introduction Case: The State of Washington v. John Vincent Carothers Court: The Supreme Court...
The Right to Counsel in Permanent Parental Deprivation Proceedings

The Right to Counsel in Permanent Parental Deprivation Proceedings

Date: Jul 26, 1974
The Right to Counsel in Permanent Parental Deprivation Proceedings Introduction In the Matter of the Welfare of Alexander H. Lustier et al., Minors (84 Wn. 2d 135), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Establishing the 'Manifest Injustice' Standard for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. KENNETH LLOYD TAYLOR

Establishing the 'Manifest Injustice' Standard for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. KENNETH LLOYD TAYLOR

Date: Apr 12, 1974
Establishing the 'Manifest Injustice' Standard for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. KENNETH LLOYD TAYLOR Introduction THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. KENNETH LLOYD TAYLOR is a landmark...
Affirmation of Statutory Guaranty Acts under Equal Protection and Due Process: AETNA v. Washington Guaranty Association

Affirmation of Statutory Guaranty Acts under Equal Protection and Due Process: AETNA v. Washington Guaranty Association

Date: Mar 22, 1974
Affirmation of Statutory Guaranty Acts under Equal Protection and Due Process: AETNA v. Washington Guaranty Association Introduction The case of AETNA Life Insurance Company et al. v. Washington Life...
Morris v. McNicol et al.: Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment in Property Damage Cases

Morris v. McNicol et al.: Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment in Property Damage Cases

Date: Mar 1, 1974
Morris v. McNicol et al.: Clarifying the Standards for Summary Judgment in Property Damage Cases Introduction Morris v. McNicol et al., 83 Wn.2d 491 (1974), is a seminal case decided by the Supreme...
STATE v. GLUCK: Defining Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest in Vehicular Contexts

STATE v. GLUCK: Defining Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest in Vehicular Contexts

Date: Feb 8, 1974
STATE v. GLUCK: Defining Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest in Vehicular Contexts Introduction State of Washington v. Peter Gluck is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of the Washington Habitual Traffic Offenders Act: Upholding Police Power in Motor Vehicle License Revocation

Affirmation of the Washington Habitual Traffic Offenders Act: Upholding Police Power in Motor Vehicle License Revocation

Date: Oct 12, 1973
Affirmation of the Washington Habitual Traffic Offenders Act: Upholding Police Power in Motor Vehicle License Revocation Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Richard R....
Sego v. State: Establishing the 'Clear, Cogent, and Convincing' Standard for Permanent Deprivation of Parental Custody

Sego v. State: Establishing the 'Clear, Cogent, and Convincing' Standard for Permanent Deprivation of Parental Custody

Date: Aug 31, 1973
Sego v. State: Establishing the 'Clear, Cogent, and Convincing' Standard for Permanent Deprivation of Parental Custody Introduction In the Matter of the Welfare of JOHNNY LEE SEGO et al., Minors. (82...
Comprehensive Commentary on THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. J-R DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al.

Comprehensive Commentary on THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. J-R DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al.

Date: Jul 28, 1973
Establishing Strict Standards for Obscenity Prosecutions: Insights from THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. J-R DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al. Introduction In the landmark case THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. J-R...
Overruling Dual Sovereignty: Washington Supreme Court Reinforces Unified Double Jeopardy Protections

Overruling Dual Sovereignty: Washington Supreme Court Reinforces Unified Double Jeopardy Protections

Date: Jul 27, 1973
Overruling Dual Sovereignty: Washington Supreme Court Reinforces Unified Double Jeopardy Protections Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Jose Arthur Roybal, 82 Wn. 2d 577 (1973),...
Comprehensive Commentary on THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. RALPH WILLIAMS' NORTH WEST CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC. (82 Wn. 2d 265)

Comprehensive Commentary on THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. RALPH WILLIAMS' NORTH WEST CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC. (82 Wn. 2d 265)

Date: May 18, 1973
Establishing Comprehensive Enforcement Mechanisms in Washington’s Consumer Protection Act Introduction In the landmark case THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. RALPH WILLIAMS' NORTH WEST CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH,...
Priority of Liens for Optional Loan Advances and Fiduciary Duties of Escrow Agents: An Analysis of National Bank of Washington v. Equity Investors et al. (81 Wn. 2d 886)

Priority of Liens for Optional Loan Advances and Fiduciary Duties of Escrow Agents: An Analysis of National Bank of Washington v. Equity Investors et al. (81 Wn. 2d 886)

Date: Feb 9, 1973
Priority of Liens for Optional Loan Advances and Fiduciary Duties of Escrow Agents: An Analysis of National Bank of Washington v. Equity Investors et al. (81 Wn. 2d 886) Introduction The case of...
Enhanced Due Process in Sentencing: Analysis of State v. Frazier

Enhanced Due Process in Sentencing: Analysis of State v. Frazier

Date: Dec 8, 1972
Enhanced Due Process in Sentencing: Analysis of State v. Frazier Introduction State of Washington v. Yolanda Annette Frazier, 81 Wn. 2d 628 (1972), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Mail-Order Sweepstakes as Unlawful Lotteries under Consumer Protection Act

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Mail-Order Sweepstakes as Unlawful Lotteries under Consumer Protection Act

Date: Sep 29, 1972
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Mail-Order Sweepstakes as Unlawful Lotteries under Consumer Protection Act Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Reader's Digest...
Property Ownership Requirement for Candidacy Violates Equal Protection: Sorenson v. City of Bellingham

Property Ownership Requirement for Candidacy Violates Equal Protection: Sorenson v. City of Bellingham

Date: Apr 28, 1972
Property Ownership Requirement for Candidacy Violates Equal Protection: Sorenson v. City of Bellingham Introduction In Ron Sorenson v. The City of Bellingham et al., 80 Wn. 2d 547 (1972), the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert