Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Criminal Procedure Advancement: Speedy Trial Protocol Established in State v. Striker

Criminal Procedure Advancement: Speedy Trial Protocol Established in State v. Striker

Date: Dec 17, 1976
Criminal Procedure Advancement: Speedy Trial Protocol Established in State v. Striker Introduction State of Washington v. Paul Striker, et al., 87 Wn.2d 870 (Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc,...
Reaffirmation of Felony Murder Statute: The State of Washington v. Bernard J. Kroll

Reaffirmation of Felony Murder Statute: The State of Washington v. Bernard J. Kroll

Date: Dec 17, 1976
Reaffirmation of Felony Murder Statute: The State of Washington v. Bernard J. Kroll Introduction The State of Washington v. Bernard J. Kroll (87 Wn. 2d 829) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Choice of Law in Wrongful Death Actions: Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp. Establishes Significant Relationship Standard

Choice of Law in Wrongful Death Actions: Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp. Establishes Significant Relationship Standard

Date: Oct 22, 1976
Choice of Law in Wrongful Death Actions: Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp. Establishes Significant Relationship Standard Introduction Johnson v. Spider Staging Corporation et al. is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Mandatory Minimum in Guilty Pleas: Upholding Informed and Voluntary Plea Standards

Affirmation of Mandatory Minimum in Guilty Pleas: Upholding Informed and Voluntary Plea Standards

Date: Sep 24, 1976
Affirmation of Mandatory Minimum in Guilty Pleas: Upholding Informed and Voluntary Plea Standards Introduction GLENN ELLIOTT WOOD, the petitioner, was charged with first-degree murder in March 1974,...
Balancing Hearsay Admissibility and Confrontation Rights: Insights from State v. Boast

Balancing Hearsay Admissibility and Confrontation Rights: Insights from State v. Boast

Date: Aug 27, 1976
Balancing Hearsay Admissibility and Confrontation Rights: Insights from State v. Boast Introduction State of Washington v. Edward Orville Boast, 87 Wn. 2d 447 (1976), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Establishing Duty in Negligent Infliction of Mental Distress: Hunsley v. Giard

Establishing Duty in Negligent Infliction of Mental Distress: Hunsley v. Giard

Date: Aug 20, 1976
Establishing Duty in Negligent Infliction of Mental Distress: Hunsley v. Giard Introduction In the landmark case of Marie Hunsley v. Kenneth Giard, et al., decided on August 19, 1976, the Supreme...
STATE v. ARNDT: Unanimity Not Required for Multiple Means of a Single Crime

STATE v. ARNDT: Unanimity Not Required for Multiple Means of a Single Crime

Date: Aug 6, 1976
STATE v. ARNDT: Unanimity Not Required for Multiple Means of a Single Crime Introduction State of Washington v. Mildred L. Arndt, 87 Wn. 2d 374 (1976), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Criteria for Acceptance of Equivocal Guilty Pleas

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Criteria for Acceptance of Equivocal Guilty Pleas

Date: Jul 30, 1976
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Comprehensive Criteria for Acceptance of Equivocal Guilty Pleas Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Edwin Donald Newton, the Supreme...
STATE v. RALPH WILLIAMS' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. (1976): Affirmation of Discretion in Consumer Protection Enforcement

STATE v. RALPH WILLIAMS' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. (1976): Affirmation of Discretion in Consumer Protection Enforcement

Date: Jul 23, 1976
STATE v. RALPH WILLIAMS' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. (1976): Affirmation of Discretion in Consumer Protection Enforcement Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Ralph Williams'...
Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Counsel and Compulsory Process: Limiting the Use of Special Inquiry Proceedings in Criminal Cases

Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Counsel and Compulsory Process: Limiting the Use of Special Inquiry Proceedings in Criminal Cases

Date: May 28, 1976
Affirmation of Defendant's Right to Counsel and Compulsory Process: Limiting the Use of Special Inquiry Proceedings in Criminal Cases Introduction The State of Washington v. Adolph Burri is a...
Interpretation of "Automobile" in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Analysis of Farmers Insurance Co. v. Miller

Interpretation of "Automobile" in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Analysis of Farmers Insurance Co. v. Miller

Date: Apr 30, 1976
Interpretation of "Automobile" in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Analysis of Farmers Insurance Co. v. Miller Introduction The case of Farmers Insurance Company of Washington v. Lane D. Miller, et al....
Establishing the 10-Year Limitation Period for Inverse Condemnation Claims in Public Property Interference

Establishing the 10-Year Limitation Period for Inverse Condemnation Claims in Public Property Interference

Date: Apr 16, 1976
Establishing the 10-Year Limitation Period for Inverse Condemnation Claims in Public Property Interference Introduction Highline School District No. 401 et al. v. The Port of Seattle et al. is a...
Governmental Liability in Issuance of Building Permits: Insights from Haslund v. City of Seattle

Governmental Liability in Issuance of Building Permits: Insights from Haslund v. City of Seattle

Date: Mar 26, 1976
Governmental Liability in Issuance of Building Permits: Insights from Haslund v. City of Seattle Introduction Haslund, Jr., et al. v. The City of Seattle is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reinterpreting Severance in Insurance Policies: Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Reinterpreting Severance in Insurance Policies: Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Date: Feb 6, 1976
Reinterpreting Severance in Insurance Policies: Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Company of America Introduction Case: Gerald P. Morgan v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America Court: The Supreme...
Establishing Common-Law Duties of State Agents to Warn in the Absence of Explicit Statutory Authority

Establishing Common-Law Duties of State Agents to Warn in the Absence of Explicit Statutory Authority

Date: Jan 1, 1976
Establishing Common-Law Duties of State Agents to Warn in the Absence of Explicit Statutory Authority Introduction The case of John F. Brown, Jr., et al. v. MacPherson's, Inc., et al., State of...
SCHROEDER v. FAGEOL MOTORS: Enhancing Unconscionability Standards for Exclusionary Clauses under RCW 62A.2-719 (3)

SCHROEDER v. FAGEOL MOTORS: Enhancing Unconscionability Standards for Exclusionary Clauses under RCW 62A.2-719 (3)

Date: Dec 19, 1975
SCHROEDER v. FAGEOL MOTORS: Enhancing Unconscionability Standards for Exclusionary Clauses under RCW 62A.2-719 (3) Introduction SCHROEDER v. FAGEOL MOTORS, Inc., et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Strict Liability Extends to Importers and Design Defects: Seattle-First National Bank v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. (1975)

Strict Liability Extends to Importers and Design Defects: Seattle-First National Bank v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. (1975)

Date: Nov 27, 1975
Strict Liability Extends to Importers and Design Defects: Seattle-First National Bank v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. (1975) Introduction The landmark case of Seattle-First National Bank v. Volkswagen...
Defining 'Private Conversations' in Audio Evidence: Insights from Washington v. Smith (1975)

Defining 'Private Conversations' in Audio Evidence: Insights from Washington v. Smith (1975)

Date: Sep 26, 1975
Defining 'Private Conversations' in Audio Evidence: Insights from Washington v. David T. Smith (1975) Introduction Washington v. David T. Smith (85 Wn.2d 840, 1975) is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Admissibility of Inconsistent Identification and Rejection of Multiple-Hypothesis Instructions: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Admissibility of Inconsistent Identification and Rejection of Multiple-Hypothesis Instructions: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Aug 29, 1975
Admissibility of Inconsistent Identification and Rejection of Multiple-Hypothesis Instructions: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case The State of Washington...
Proximate Cause and State Sovereign Immunity: Upholding Liability Standards under RCW 4.92.090

Proximate Cause and State Sovereign Immunity: Upholding Liability Standards under RCW 4.92.090

Date: Jan 31, 1975
Proximate Cause and State Sovereign Immunity: Upholding Liability Standards under RCW 4.92.090 Introduction Barbara LaPlante et al. v. The State of Washington, 85 Wn. 2d 154 (1975), addresses the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert