Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Mandatory Full Reimbursement by DSHS for County Jail Inmate Medical Costs Under RCW 70.48.130

Mandatory Full Reimbursement by DSHS for County Jail Inmate Medical Costs Under RCW 70.48.130

Date: Jan 8, 1993
Mandatory Full Reimbursement by DSHS for County Jail Inmate Medical Costs Under RCW 70.48.130 Introduction The case of Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin County addresses the financial...
Collective Bargaining Agreements Cannot Waive Statutory Unemployment Benefits: Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security Department

Collective Bargaining Agreements Cannot Waive Statutory Unemployment Benefits: Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security Department

Date: Dec 25, 1992
Collective Bargaining Agreements Cannot Waive Statutory Unemployment Benefits: Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security Department Introduction In the landmark case of...
Beatt Equipment Company v. Washburn: Defining "Manufacturer" Under the Washington Statute of Repose

Beatt Equipment Company v. Washburn: Defining "Manufacturer" Under the Washington Statute of Repose

Date: Nov 26, 1992
Beatt Equipment Company v. Washburn: Defining "Manufacturer" Under the Washington Statute of Repose Introduction Beatt Equipment Company v. Washburn is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
RCW 69.50.435 Validated: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Drug Offense Enhancements Near School Bus Stops Against Vagueness and Equal Protection Claims

RCW 69.50.435 Validated: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Drug Offense Enhancements Near School Bus Stops Against Vagueness and Equal Protection Claims

Date: Nov 13, 1992
RCW 69.50.435 Validated: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Drug Offense Enhancements Near School Bus Stops Against Vagueness and Equal Protection Claims Introduction The case of The State of...
Clarifying Coverage Exclusions in Insurance Contracts: McDonald v. State Farm

Clarifying Coverage Exclusions in Insurance Contracts: McDonald v. State Farm

Date: Oct 2, 1992
Clarifying Coverage Exclusions in Insurance Contracts: McDonald v. State Farm Introduction McDonald v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Dependency Without Parental Unfitness: Insights from In the Matter of the Welfare of Kirsten Key

Establishing Dependency Without Parental Unfitness: Insights from In the Matter of the Welfare of Kirsten Key

Date: Sep 11, 1992
Establishing Dependency Without Parental Unfitness: Insights from In the Matter of the Welfare of Kirsten Key Introduction In the Matter of the Welfare of Kirsten Key (119 Wn. 2d 600) is a landmark...
Application of "Manifest Error" in Appellate Reviews and Rejection of Impossibility Defense in Controlled Substance Offenses: State v. Christopher Lynn

Application of "Manifest Error" in Appellate Reviews and Rejection of Impossibility Defense in Controlled Substance Offenses: State v. Christopher Lynn

Date: Sep 1, 1992
Application of "Manifest Error" in Appellate Reviews and Rejection of Impossibility Defense in Controlled Substance Offenses: State v. Christopher Lynn Introduction The State of Washington v....
Ensuring Fourth Amendment Particularity in Child Pornography Search Warrants: Analysis of STATE v. PERRONE

Ensuring Fourth Amendment Particularity in Child Pornography Search Warrants: Analysis of STATE v. PERRONE

Date: Aug 21, 1992
Ensuring Fourth Amendment Particularity in Child Pornography Search Warrants: Analysis of STATE v. PERRONE Introduction State of Washington v. Frank Perrone, 119 Wn.2d 538 (1992), is a landmark...
Mandatory Inclusion of Grievance Procedures in Collective Bargaining: The City of Pasco v. PERC

Mandatory Inclusion of Grievance Procedures in Collective Bargaining: The City of Pasco v. PERC

Date: Jul 31, 1992
Mandatory Inclusion of Grievance Procedures in Collective Bargaining: The City of Pasco v. PERC Introduction The landmark case, The City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC),...
Limitations on Parental Waivers and Assumption of Risk in Minor's Skiing Injury Claims: Scott v. Pacific West Mountain Resort

Limitations on Parental Waivers and Assumption of Risk in Minor's Skiing Injury Claims: Scott v. Pacific West Mountain Resort

Date: Jul 31, 1992
Limitations on Parental Waivers and Assumption of Risk in Minor's Skiing Injury Claims: Scott v. Pacific West Mountain Resort Introduction In the landmark case of Scott v. Pacific West Mountain...
Processor Liens for Dairy Products: A New Legal Framework Established by F.D. Processing, Inc. v. Washington Supreme Court

Processor Liens for Dairy Products: A New Legal Framework Established by F.D. Processing, Inc. v. Washington Supreme Court

Date: Jul 24, 1992
Processor Liens for Dairy Products: A New Legal Framework Established by F.D. Processing, Inc. v. Washington Supreme Court Introduction In the landmark case F.D. Processing, Inc., 119 Wn. 2d 452...
STATE v. STRAUSS: Mandating Mental Health Evaluations for Future Dangerousness in Exceptional Sentencing

STATE v. STRAUSS: Mandating Mental Health Evaluations for Future Dangerousness in Exceptional Sentencing

Date: Jul 10, 1992
STATE v. STRAUSS: Mandating Mental Health Evaluations for Future Dangerousness in Exceptional Sentencing Introduction State of Washington v. Gordon Michael Strauss is a pivotal case decided by the...
Subrogation Waivers and Third-Party Beneficiary Warranties in Product Liability: Insights from TOUCHET VALLEY GRAIN GROWERS, INC. v. OPP SEIBOLD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Subrogation Waivers and Third-Party Beneficiary Warranties in Product Liability: Insights from TOUCHET VALLEY GRAIN GROWERS, INC. v. OPP SEIBOLD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Subrogation Waivers and Third-Party Beneficiary Warranties in Product Liability: Insights from TOUCHET VALLEY GRAIN GROWERS, INC. v. OPP SEIBOLD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC. Introduction The case of...
Clarifying Due Process Standards for Preservation of Exculpatory Evidence and Expert Testimony: State of Washington v. Mario Ortiz

Clarifying Due Process Standards for Preservation of Exculpatory Evidence and Expert Testimony: State of Washington v. Mario Ortiz

Date: Jun 12, 1992
Clarifying Due Process Standards for Preservation of Exculpatory Evidence and Expert Testimony: State of Washington v. Mario Ortiz Introduction In State of Washington v. Mario Ortiz, 119 Wn.2d 294...
Exclusion of Professional Conduct Codes in Legal Malpractice Actions: Hizey v. Carpenter

Exclusion of Professional Conduct Codes in Legal Malpractice Actions: Hizey v. Carpenter

Date: Jun 5, 1992
Exclusion of Professional Conduct Codes in Legal Malpractice Actions: Hizey v. Carpenter Introduction The case Gordon N. Hizey, et al., Appellants, v. Timothy W. Carpenter, et al., Respondents (119...
Clarifying Civil Rule 11 Sanctions: BRYANT v. JOSEPH TREE, INC.

Clarifying Civil Rule 11 Sanctions: BRYANT v. JOSEPH TREE, INC.

Date: May 29, 1992
Clarifying Civil Rule 11 Sanctions: BRYANT v. JOSEPH TREE, INC. Introduction Elaine J. Bryant, et al. v. Joseph Tree, Inc., et al. is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Expanding Jurisdictional Scope and Limiting Exemplary Damages in Electronic Interception: Analysis of Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department

Expanding Jurisdictional Scope and Limiting Exemplary Damages in Electronic Interception: Analysis of Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department

Date: May 22, 1992
Expanding Jurisdictional Scope and Limiting Exemplary Damages in Electronic Interception: Analysis of Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department Introduction Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police...
Establishing Knowledge-Based Liability in Permitting Prostitution: STATE v. JOHNSON

Establishing Knowledge-Based Liability in Permitting Prostitution: STATE v. JOHNSON

Date: May 22, 1992
Establishing Knowledge-Based Liability in Permitting Prostitution: State of Washington v. Janice Ann Johnson Introduction State of Washington v. Janice Ann Johnson, 119 Wn.2d 167 (Supreme Court of...
Constitutional Validation of One-Party Consent Wiretapping in Drug Offenses: State v. Salinas

Constitutional Validation of One-Party Consent Wiretapping in Drug Offenses: State v. Salinas

Date: May 22, 1992
Constitutional Validation of One-Party Consent Wiretapping in Drug Offenses: State of Washington v. Ruben R. Salinas Introduction State of Washington v. Ruben R. Salinas is a landmark case decided by...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Discretion in Assessing Court Costs and Victim Penalties

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Discretion in Assessing Court Costs and Victim Penalties

Date: May 15, 1992
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Discretion in Assessing Court Costs and Victim Penalties Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Tony Anthony Curry, decided on May 14, 1992,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert