Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Sintra v. City of Seattle (1992): Supreme Court of Washington Enhances 42 U.S.C §1983 Civil Rights Protections in Regulatory Takings

Sintra v. City of Seattle (1992): Supreme Court of Washington Enhances 42 U.S.C §1983 Civil Rights Protections in Regulatory Takings

Date: May 15, 1992
Sintra v. City of Seattle (1992): Supreme Court of Washington Enhances 42 U.S.C §1983 Civil Rights Protections in Regulatory Takings Introduction Sintra, Inc., et al. v. The City of Seattle, et al....
Abrogation of Governmental Immunity for Arbitrary Land Use Denials: Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County

Abrogation of Governmental Immunity for Arbitrary Land Use Denials: Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County

Date: May 15, 1992
Abrogation of Governmental Immunity for Arbitrary Land Use Denials: Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County Introduction Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County (119 Wn. 2d 91, 1992) is a landmark...
Robinson v. City of Seattle: Reinforcing Substantive Due Process Protections Against Invalid Ordinance Enforcement

Robinson v. City of Seattle: Reinforcing Substantive Due Process Protections Against Invalid Ordinance Enforcement

Date: May 15, 1992
Robinson v. City of Seattle: Reinforcing Substantive Due Process Protections Against Invalid Ordinance Enforcement Introduction In the landmark case of Roy W. Robinson, et al v. The City of Seattle,...
Disclosure of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Disclosure of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: May 8, 1992
Disclosure of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of David Lewis Rice,...
Clarifying Standing and Development Definition under Washington's Shoreline Management Act: Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley

Clarifying Standing and Development Definition under Washington's Shoreline Management Act: Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley

Date: Apr 17, 1992
Clarifying Standing and Development Definition under Washington's Shoreline Management Act: Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley Introduction The case of Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, et al. v. Bruce...
Affirmation of Municipal Ordinance Against Drug Loitering: City of Tacoma v. John Luvene

Affirmation of Municipal Ordinance Against Drug Loitering: City of Tacoma v. John Luvene

Date: Apr 17, 1992
Affirmation of Municipal Ordinance Against Drug Loitering: City of Tacoma v. John Luvene Introduction In the landmark case The City of Tacoma v. John Luvene, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed...
Affirming Distinct Offenses: 'Same Criminal Conduct' Standard in Washington Sentencing - STATE v. LESSLEY

Affirming Distinct Offenses: 'Same Criminal Conduct' Standard in Washington Sentencing - STATE v. LESSLEY

Date: Apr 10, 1992
Affirming Distinct Offenses: 'Same Criminal Conduct' Standard in Washington Sentencing - STATE v. LESSLEY Introduction In State of Washington v. Dallas L. Lessley, 118 Wn.2d 773 (1992), the Supreme...
In the Matter of the Estates of Robert G. Hibbard et al.: Clarifying the Scope of the Discovery Rule in Negligence Actions Against the State

In the Matter of the Estates of Robert G. Hibbard et al.: Clarifying the Scope of the Discovery Rule in Negligence Actions Against the State

Date: Mar 27, 1992
In the Matter of the Estates of Robert G. Hibbard et al.: Clarifying the Scope of the Discovery Rule in Negligence Actions Against the State Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Estates of...
Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death: Understanding Due Diligence through Beverly ALLEN v. STATE of Washington

Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death: Understanding Due Diligence through Beverly ALLEN v. STATE of Washington

Date: Mar 27, 1992
Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death: Understanding Due Diligence through Beverly ALLEN v. STATE of Washington Introduction Beverly Allen, as Personal Representative, v. The State of Washington,...
Narrowing the Excited Utterance Exception: State v. Chapin

Narrowing the Excited Utterance Exception: State v. Chapin

Date: Mar 20, 1992
Narrowing the Excited Utterance Exception: State of Washington v. Richard Chapin Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc Date: March 19, 1992 Introduction The case of State of...
Miranda Rights and Psychologist-Client Privilege in Sentencing: Analysis of STATE v. POST

Miranda Rights and Psychologist-Client Privilege in Sentencing: Analysis of STATE v. POST

Date: Mar 13, 1992
Miranda Rights and Psychologist-Client Privilege in Sentencing: Analysis of State of Washington v. Post Introduction State of Washington v. Charles William Post, 118 Wn. 2d 596 (1992), addressed...
Effectiveness of Employee Handbook Disclaimers in At-Will Employment: Insights from Swanson v. Liquid Air Corp.

Effectiveness of Employee Handbook Disclaimers in At-Will Employment: Insights from Swanson v. Liquid Air Corp.

Date: Mar 6, 1992
Effectiveness of Employee Handbook Disclaimers in At-Will Employment: Insights from Swanson v. Liquid Air Corp. Introduction The landmark case of H. SWANSON v. LIQUID AIR CORPORATION (118 Wn. 2d 512)...
Affirming Routine Booking Statements Exception to Miranda Rights: The State v. Walton Decision

Affirming Routine Booking Statements Exception to Miranda Rights: The State v. Walton Decision

Date: Feb 26, 1992
Affirming Routine Booking Statements Exception to Miranda Rights: The State v. Walton Decision Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Bobby Gene Walton (64 Wn. App. 410, 1992) addresses...
Strict Enforcement of Conflict of Interest Rules: Disgorgement of Attorney Fees in Eriks v. Denver

Strict Enforcement of Conflict of Interest Rules: Disgorgement of Attorney Fees in Eriks v. Denver

Date: Feb 21, 1992
Strict Enforcement of Conflict of Interest Rules: Disgorgement of Attorney Fees in Eriks v. Denver Introduction Eriks et al. v. Denver et al. (118 Wn.2d 451), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Social Host Liability for Wrongful Death Due to Furnishing Alcohol to Minors: Analysis of HANSEN v. FRIEND

Establishing Social Host Liability for Wrongful Death Due to Furnishing Alcohol to Minors: Analysis of HANSEN v. FRIEND

Date: Feb 21, 1992
Establishing Social Host Liability for Wrongful Death Due to Furnishing Alcohol to Minors: Analysis of HANSEN v. FRIEND Introduction The case of Judith Hansen, Individually and as Personal...
Indecent Liberties Not Recognized as a Lesser Included Offense of Statutory Rape: An Analysis of State v. Frank L. Markle

Indecent Liberties Not Recognized as a Lesser Included Offense of Statutory Rape: An Analysis of State v. Frank L. Markle

Date: Feb 14, 1992
Indecent Liberties Not Recognized as a Lesser Included Offense of Statutory Rape: An Analysis of State v. Frank L. Markle Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Frank L. Markle,...
Safeco v. Butler: Establishing Harm in Bad Faith Insurance Claims

Safeco v. Butler: Establishing Harm in Bad Faith Insurance Claims

Date: Feb 7, 1992
Safeco v. Butler: Establishing Harm in Bad Faith Insurance Claims Introduction Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Hap M. Butler, et al. is a landmark case decided by The Supreme Court of...
Retroactive Application of New Legal Rules in Collateral Review: Analysis of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Christopher L. St. Pierre

Retroactive Application of New Legal Rules in Collateral Review: Analysis of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Christopher L. St. Pierre

Date: Jan 31, 1992
Retroactive Application of New Legal Rules in Collateral Review: Analysis of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Christopher L. St. Pierre (118 Wn. 2d 321) Introduction The case of Christopher...
Washington Supreme Court Affirms Parole Boards' Absolute Immunity and Establishes Qualified Immunity for Parole Officers in Negligent Supervision Claims

Washington Supreme Court Affirms Parole Boards' Absolute Immunity and Establishes Qualified Immunity for Parole Officers in Negligent Supervision Claims

Date: Jan 10, 1992
Washington Supreme Court Affirms Parole Boards' Absolute Immunity and Establishes Qualified Immunity for Parole Officers in Negligent Supervision Claims Introduction On January 9, 1992, the Supreme...
Broad Interpretation of Charging Documents Affirmed in STATE v. HOPPER

Broad Interpretation of Charging Documents Affirmed in STATE v. HOPPER

Date: Jan 3, 1992
Broad Interpretation of Charging Documents Affirmed in STATE v. HOPPER Introduction State of Washington v. Steven Mizell Hopper, 118 Wn. 2d 151 (1992), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert