Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

STATE v. STRAUSS: Mandating Mental Health Evaluations for Future Dangerousness in Exceptional Sentencing

STATE v. STRAUSS: Mandating Mental Health Evaluations for Future Dangerousness in Exceptional Sentencing

Date: Jul 10, 1992
STATE v. STRAUSS: Mandating Mental Health Evaluations for Future Dangerousness in Exceptional Sentencing Introduction State of Washington v. Gordon Michael Strauss is a pivotal case decided by the...
Subrogation Waivers and Third-Party Beneficiary Warranties in Product Liability: Insights from TOUCHET VALLEY GRAIN GROWERS, INC. v. OPP SEIBOLD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Subrogation Waivers and Third-Party Beneficiary Warranties in Product Liability: Insights from TOUCHET VALLEY GRAIN GROWERS, INC. v. OPP SEIBOLD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Subrogation Waivers and Third-Party Beneficiary Warranties in Product Liability: Insights from TOUCHET VALLEY GRAIN GROWERS, INC. v. OPP SEIBOLD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC. Introduction The case of...
Clarifying Due Process Standards for Preservation of Exculpatory Evidence and Expert Testimony: State of Washington v. Mario Ortiz

Clarifying Due Process Standards for Preservation of Exculpatory Evidence and Expert Testimony: State of Washington v. Mario Ortiz

Date: Jun 12, 1992
Clarifying Due Process Standards for Preservation of Exculpatory Evidence and Expert Testimony: State of Washington v. Mario Ortiz Introduction In State of Washington v. Mario Ortiz, 119 Wn.2d 294...
Exclusion of Professional Conduct Codes in Legal Malpractice Actions: Hizey v. Carpenter

Exclusion of Professional Conduct Codes in Legal Malpractice Actions: Hizey v. Carpenter

Date: Jun 5, 1992
Exclusion of Professional Conduct Codes in Legal Malpractice Actions: Hizey v. Carpenter Introduction The case Gordon N. Hizey, et al., Appellants, v. Timothy W. Carpenter, et al., Respondents (119...
Clarifying Civil Rule 11 Sanctions: BRYANT v. JOSEPH TREE, INC.

Clarifying Civil Rule 11 Sanctions: BRYANT v. JOSEPH TREE, INC.

Date: May 29, 1992
Clarifying Civil Rule 11 Sanctions: BRYANT v. JOSEPH TREE, INC. Introduction Elaine J. Bryant, et al. v. Joseph Tree, Inc., et al. is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Expanding Jurisdictional Scope and Limiting Exemplary Damages in Electronic Interception: Analysis of Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department

Expanding Jurisdictional Scope and Limiting Exemplary Damages in Electronic Interception: Analysis of Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department

Date: May 22, 1992
Expanding Jurisdictional Scope and Limiting Exemplary Damages in Electronic Interception: Analysis of Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Department Introduction Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police...
Establishing Knowledge-Based Liability in Permitting Prostitution: STATE v. JOHNSON

Establishing Knowledge-Based Liability in Permitting Prostitution: STATE v. JOHNSON

Date: May 22, 1992
Establishing Knowledge-Based Liability in Permitting Prostitution: State of Washington v. Janice Ann Johnson Introduction State of Washington v. Janice Ann Johnson, 119 Wn.2d 167 (Supreme Court of...
Constitutional Validation of One-Party Consent Wiretapping in Drug Offenses: State v. Salinas

Constitutional Validation of One-Party Consent Wiretapping in Drug Offenses: State v. Salinas

Date: May 22, 1992
Constitutional Validation of One-Party Consent Wiretapping in Drug Offenses: State of Washington v. Ruben R. Salinas Introduction State of Washington v. Ruben R. Salinas is a landmark case decided by...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Discretion in Assessing Court Costs and Victim Penalties

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Discretion in Assessing Court Costs and Victim Penalties

Date: May 15, 1992
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Discretion in Assessing Court Costs and Victim Penalties Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Tony Anthony Curry, decided on May 14, 1992,...
Sintra v. City of Seattle (1992): Supreme Court of Washington Enhances 42 U.S.C §1983 Civil Rights Protections in Regulatory Takings

Sintra v. City of Seattle (1992): Supreme Court of Washington Enhances 42 U.S.C §1983 Civil Rights Protections in Regulatory Takings

Date: May 15, 1992
Sintra v. City of Seattle (1992): Supreme Court of Washington Enhances 42 U.S.C §1983 Civil Rights Protections in Regulatory Takings Introduction Sintra, Inc., et al. v. The City of Seattle, et al....
Abrogation of Governmental Immunity for Arbitrary Land Use Denials: Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County

Abrogation of Governmental Immunity for Arbitrary Land Use Denials: Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County

Date: May 15, 1992
Abrogation of Governmental Immunity for Arbitrary Land Use Denials: Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County Introduction Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish County (119 Wn. 2d 91, 1992) is a landmark...
Robinson v. City of Seattle: Reinforcing Substantive Due Process Protections Against Invalid Ordinance Enforcement

Robinson v. City of Seattle: Reinforcing Substantive Due Process Protections Against Invalid Ordinance Enforcement

Date: May 15, 1992
Robinson v. City of Seattle: Reinforcing Substantive Due Process Protections Against Invalid Ordinance Enforcement Introduction In the landmark case of Roy W. Robinson, et al v. The City of Seattle,...
Disclosure of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Disclosure of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: May 8, 1992
Disclosure of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases: Washington Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of David Lewis Rice,...
Clarifying Standing and Development Definition under Washington's Shoreline Management Act: Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley

Clarifying Standing and Development Definition under Washington's Shoreline Management Act: Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley

Date: Apr 17, 1992
Clarifying Standing and Development Definition under Washington's Shoreline Management Act: Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley Introduction The case of Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, et al. v. Bruce...
Affirmation of Municipal Ordinance Against Drug Loitering: City of Tacoma v. John Luvene

Affirmation of Municipal Ordinance Against Drug Loitering: City of Tacoma v. John Luvene

Date: Apr 17, 1992
Affirmation of Municipal Ordinance Against Drug Loitering: City of Tacoma v. John Luvene Introduction In the landmark case The City of Tacoma v. John Luvene, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed...
Affirming Distinct Offenses: 'Same Criminal Conduct' Standard in Washington Sentencing - STATE v. LESSLEY

Affirming Distinct Offenses: 'Same Criminal Conduct' Standard in Washington Sentencing - STATE v. LESSLEY

Date: Apr 10, 1992
Affirming Distinct Offenses: 'Same Criminal Conduct' Standard in Washington Sentencing - STATE v. LESSLEY Introduction In State of Washington v. Dallas L. Lessley, 118 Wn.2d 773 (1992), the Supreme...
In the Matter of the Estates of Robert G. Hibbard et al.: Clarifying the Scope of the Discovery Rule in Negligence Actions Against the State

In the Matter of the Estates of Robert G. Hibbard et al.: Clarifying the Scope of the Discovery Rule in Negligence Actions Against the State

Date: Mar 27, 1992
In the Matter of the Estates of Robert G. Hibbard et al.: Clarifying the Scope of the Discovery Rule in Negligence Actions Against the State Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Estates of...
Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death: Understanding Due Diligence through Beverly ALLEN v. STATE of Washington

Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death: Understanding Due Diligence through Beverly ALLEN v. STATE of Washington

Date: Mar 27, 1992
Statute of Limitations in Wrongful Death: Understanding Due Diligence through Beverly ALLEN v. STATE of Washington Introduction Beverly Allen, as Personal Representative, v. The State of Washington,...
Narrowing the Excited Utterance Exception: State v. Chapin

Narrowing the Excited Utterance Exception: State v. Chapin

Date: Mar 20, 1992
Narrowing the Excited Utterance Exception: State of Washington v. Richard Chapin Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc Date: March 19, 1992 Introduction The case of State of...
Miranda Rights and Psychologist-Client Privilege in Sentencing: Analysis of STATE v. POST

Miranda Rights and Psychologist-Client Privilege in Sentencing: Analysis of STATE v. POST

Date: Mar 13, 1992
Miranda Rights and Psychologist-Client Privilege in Sentencing: Analysis of State of Washington v. Post Introduction State of Washington v. Charles William Post, 118 Wn. 2d 596 (1992), addressed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert