Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

STATE v. HALSTIEN: Upholding the Juvenile Sexual Motivation Statute Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenges

STATE v. HALSTIEN: Upholding the Juvenile Sexual Motivation Statute Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenges

Date: Aug 20, 1993
STATE v. HALSTIEN: Upholding the Juvenile Sexual Motivation Statute Against Vagueness and Overbreadth Challenges Introduction In State of Washington v. Steve Halstien (122 Wn. 2d 109, 1993), the...
Constitutional Validation of Mandatory DNA Testing for Convicted Offenders: Insights from State v. Olivas et al.

Constitutional Validation of Mandatory DNA Testing for Convicted Offenders: Insights from State v. Olivas et al.

Date: Aug 13, 1993
Constitutional Validation of Mandatory DNA Testing for Convicted Offenders: Insights from State v. Olivas et al. Introduction State of Washington v. Joseph M. Olivas, et al., 122 Wn.2d 73 (1993),...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Key Standards for Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators under RCW 71.09

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Key Standards for Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators under RCW 71.09

Date: Aug 10, 1993
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Key Standards for Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators under RCW 71.09 Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the landmark case involving the...
Enforcement of Single Family Residential Covenants: Mains Farm HOA v. Worthington

Enforcement of Single Family Residential Covenants: Mains Farm HOA v. Worthington

Date: Jul 16, 1993
Enforcement of Single Family Residential Covenants: Mains Farm HOA v. Worthington Introduction In the seminal case of Mains Farm Homeowners Association, et al. v. Salima Worthington, et al., heard by...
Admissibility of Officer's Opinion Testimony in DWI Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of The City of Seattle v. Robert C. Heatley

Admissibility of Officer's Opinion Testimony in DWI Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of The City of Seattle v. Robert C. Heatley

Date: Jul 13, 1993
Admissibility of Officer's Opinion Testimony in DWI Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of The City of Seattle v. Robert C. Heatley Introduction The City of Seattle v. Robert C. Heatley is a pivotal case...
Ambiguity in Pollution Exclusions Interpreted in Favor of Insureds: American Star Insurance Co. v. Grice

Ambiguity in Pollution Exclusions Interpreted in Favor of Insureds: American Star Insurance Co. v. Grice

Date: Jul 9, 1993
Ambiguity in Pollution Exclusions Interpreted in Favor of Insureds: American Star Insurance Co. v. Grice Introduction The case of American Star Insurance Company v. Earnest L. Grice, et al, decided...
Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Non-Presumptive Standard for Primary Residential Placement in Child Custody Cases

Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Non-Presumptive Standard for Primary Residential Placement in Child Custody Cases

Date: Jul 9, 1993
Supreme Court of Washington Establishes Non-Presumptive Standard for Primary Residential Placement in Child Custody Cases Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Marriage of Marcia Jean Kovacs...
Washington Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Appeal Waivers and Specific Performance in Real Estate Option Contracts

Washington Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Appeal Waivers and Specific Performance in Real Estate Option Contracts

Date: Jun 25, 1993
Washington Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Appeal Waivers and Specific Performance in Real Estate Option Contracts Introduction The case Michael Kruse, et al v. Fred Hemp, et al (121 Wn. 2d 715)...
Affirmation of Non-Appealability of Standard Range Sentences under RCW 9.94A.210(1) in STATE v. MAIL

Affirmation of Non-Appealability of Standard Range Sentences under RCW 9.94A.210(1) in STATE v. MAIL

Date: Jun 18, 1993
Affirmation of Non-Appealability of Standard Range Sentences under RCW 9.94A.210(1) in State of Washington v. Mail Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. James Craig Mail, 121...
Williams v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Good-Time Credit Allocation

Williams v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Good-Time Credit Allocation

Date: Jun 11, 1993
Williams v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Good-Time Credit Allocation Introduction In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Kent Glen Williams (121 Wn. 2d 655) is a pivotal 1993 decision by...
Establishing Probable Cause and the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Hanson v. The City of Snohomish

Establishing Probable Cause and the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Hanson v. The City of Snohomish

Date: May 28, 1993
Establishing Probable Cause and the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Hanson v. The City of Snohomish Introduction The case of Gerald L. Hanson v. The City of...
State v. Kalakosky: Affirming DNA Evidence Admissibility and Protecting Rape Crisis Center Confidentiality

State v. Kalakosky: Affirming DNA Evidence Admissibility and Protecting Rape Crisis Center Confidentiality

Date: May 28, 1993
State v. Kalakosky: Affirming DNA Evidence Admissibility and Protecting Rape Crisis Center Confidentiality Introduction State of Washington v. Paul H. Kalakosky, 121 Wn.2d 525 (1993), presented...
Mandatory Jurisdictional Timeframes for Administrative Appeals under WISHA

Mandatory Jurisdictional Timeframes for Administrative Appeals under WISHA

Date: May 21, 1993
Mandatory Jurisdictional Timeframes for Administrative Appeals under WISHA Introduction In the case of The Erection Company v. The Department of Labor and Industries (121 Wn. 2d 513), the Supreme...
Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeliness under Washington's RAP Rules Established in Schaefco v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeliness under Washington's RAP Rules Established in Schaefco v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

Date: Apr 30, 1993
Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeliness under Washington's RAP Rules Established in Schaefco v. Columbia River Gorge Commission Introduction Schaefco, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission is a...
STATE v. JOY (1993): Contractor Liability for Embezzlement Under Revised Theft Statutes

STATE v. JOY (1993): Contractor Liability for Embezzlement Under Revised Theft Statutes

Date: Apr 30, 1993
STATE v. JOY (1993): Contractor Liability for Embezzlement Under Revised Theft Statutes Introduction In State of Washington v. Kenneth Ralph Joy (121 Wn. 2d 333, 1993), the Supreme Court of...
Mandatory Written Rejection of Underinsured Motorist Coverage: CLEMENTS v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Co.

Mandatory Written Rejection of Underinsured Motorist Coverage: CLEMENTS v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Co.

Date: Apr 16, 1993
Mandatory Written Rejection of Underinsured Motorist Coverage: CLEMENTS v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Co. Introduction CLEMENTS v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Company, 121 Wn. 2d 243 (1993), is a landmark decision...
Battered Child Syndrome Admissibility in Self-Defense: State of Washington v. Janes

Battered Child Syndrome Admissibility in Self-Defense: State of Washington v. Janes

Date: Apr 9, 1993
Battered Child Syndrome Admissibility in Self-Defense: State of Washington v. Janes Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Andrew G. Janes (121 Wn. 2d 220) represents a pivotal moment in...
Mandatory Nondisclosure of Child Sexual Assault Victims Contravenes Open Access to Justice: Allied Daily Newspapers v. Eikenberry

Mandatory Nondisclosure of Child Sexual Assault Victims Contravenes Open Access to Justice: Allied Daily Newspapers v. Eikenberry

Date: Apr 2, 1993
Mandatory Nondisclosure of Child Sexual Assault Victims Contravenes Open Access to Justice: Allied Daily Newspapers v. Eikenberry Introduction In the landmark case of Allied Daily Newspapers of...
Protective Frisk Justified Under Reasonable Safety Concern: STATE v. COLLINS

Protective Frisk Justified Under Reasonable Safety Concern: STATE v. COLLINS

Date: Mar 26, 1993
Protective Frisk Justified Under Reasonable Safety Concern: STATE v. COLLINS Introduction State of Washington v. Michael Floyd Collins is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Balancing Free Speech and Child Welfare: The Limits of Restraining Orders in Divorce Proceedings – Olson v. Olson

Balancing Free Speech and Child Welfare: The Limits of Restraining Orders in Divorce Proceedings – Olson v. Olson

Date: Mar 23, 1993
Balancing Free Speech and Child Welfare: The Limits of Restraining Orders in Divorce Proceedings – Olson v. Olson Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Marriage of SULA A. OLSON and NORMAN G....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert