Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Williams v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Good-Time Credit Allocation

Williams v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Good-Time Credit Allocation

Date: Jun 11, 1993
Williams v. Department of Corrections: Clarifying Good-Time Credit Allocation Introduction In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Kent Glen Williams (121 Wn. 2d 655) is a pivotal 1993 decision by...
Establishing Probable Cause and the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Hanson v. The City of Snohomish

Establishing Probable Cause and the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Hanson v. The City of Snohomish

Date: May 28, 1993
Establishing Probable Cause and the Application of Collateral Estoppel in Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Hanson v. The City of Snohomish Introduction The case of Gerald L. Hanson v. The City of...
State v. Kalakosky: Affirming DNA Evidence Admissibility and Protecting Rape Crisis Center Confidentiality

State v. Kalakosky: Affirming DNA Evidence Admissibility and Protecting Rape Crisis Center Confidentiality

Date: May 28, 1993
State v. Kalakosky: Affirming DNA Evidence Admissibility and Protecting Rape Crisis Center Confidentiality Introduction State of Washington v. Paul H. Kalakosky, 121 Wn.2d 525 (1993), presented...
Mandatory Jurisdictional Timeframes for Administrative Appeals under WISHA

Mandatory Jurisdictional Timeframes for Administrative Appeals under WISHA

Date: May 21, 1993
Mandatory Jurisdictional Timeframes for Administrative Appeals under WISHA Introduction In the case of The Erection Company v. The Department of Labor and Industries (121 Wn. 2d 513), the Supreme...
Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeliness under Washington's RAP Rules Established in Schaefco v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeliness under Washington's RAP Rules Established in Schaefco v. Columbia River Gorge Commission

Date: Apr 30, 1993
Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeliness under Washington's RAP Rules Established in Schaefco v. Columbia River Gorge Commission Introduction Schaefco, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission is a...
STATE v. JOY (1993): Contractor Liability for Embezzlement Under Revised Theft Statutes

STATE v. JOY (1993): Contractor Liability for Embezzlement Under Revised Theft Statutes

Date: Apr 30, 1993
STATE v. JOY (1993): Contractor Liability for Embezzlement Under Revised Theft Statutes Introduction In State of Washington v. Kenneth Ralph Joy (121 Wn. 2d 333, 1993), the Supreme Court of...
Mandatory Written Rejection of Underinsured Motorist Coverage: CLEMENTS v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Co.

Mandatory Written Rejection of Underinsured Motorist Coverage: CLEMENTS v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Co.

Date: Apr 16, 1993
Mandatory Written Rejection of Underinsured Motorist Coverage: CLEMENTS v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Co. Introduction CLEMENTS v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Company, 121 Wn. 2d 243 (1993), is a landmark decision...
Battered Child Syndrome Admissibility in Self-Defense: State of Washington v. Janes

Battered Child Syndrome Admissibility in Self-Defense: State of Washington v. Janes

Date: Apr 9, 1993
Battered Child Syndrome Admissibility in Self-Defense: State of Washington v. Janes Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Andrew G. Janes (121 Wn. 2d 220) represents a pivotal moment in...
Mandatory Nondisclosure of Child Sexual Assault Victims Contravenes Open Access to Justice: Allied Daily Newspapers v. Eikenberry

Mandatory Nondisclosure of Child Sexual Assault Victims Contravenes Open Access to Justice: Allied Daily Newspapers v. Eikenberry

Date: Apr 2, 1993
Mandatory Nondisclosure of Child Sexual Assault Victims Contravenes Open Access to Justice: Allied Daily Newspapers v. Eikenberry Introduction In the landmark case of Allied Daily Newspapers of...
Protective Frisk Justified Under Reasonable Safety Concern: STATE v. COLLINS

Protective Frisk Justified Under Reasonable Safety Concern: STATE v. COLLINS

Date: Mar 26, 1993
Protective Frisk Justified Under Reasonable Safety Concern: STATE v. COLLINS Introduction State of Washington v. Michael Floyd Collins is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Balancing Free Speech and Child Welfare: The Limits of Restraining Orders in Divorce Proceedings – Olson v. Olson

Balancing Free Speech and Child Welfare: The Limits of Restraining Orders in Divorce Proceedings – Olson v. Olson

Date: Mar 23, 1993
Balancing Free Speech and Child Welfare: The Limits of Restraining Orders in Divorce Proceedings – Olson v. Olson Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Marriage of SULA A. OLSON and NORMAN G....
Bowles v. Department of Retirement Systems: Restricting Pension Calculations to 2-Year AFC Leave Accrual

Bowles v. Department of Retirement Systems: Restricting Pension Calculations to 2-Year AFC Leave Accrual

Date: Mar 12, 1993
Bowles v. Department of Retirement Systems: Restricting Pension Calculations to 2-Year AFC Leave Accrual Introduction In the landmark case of John A. Bowles, et al. v. The Department of Retirement...
The Riley Decision: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Particularity in Computer Trespass Cases

The Riley Decision: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Particularity in Computer Trespass Cases

Date: Mar 5, 1993
The Riley Decision: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Particularity in Computer Trespass Cases Introduction The State of Washington v. Joseph N. Riley is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Standards for DNA Match Testimony: CAUTHRON v. State

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Standards for DNA Match Testimony: CAUTHRON v. State

Date: Feb 26, 1993
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Standards for DNA Match Testimony: CAUTHRON v. State Introduction In the landmark case of THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. RICHARD C. CAUTHRON, reported at 120 Wn. 2d...
State v. Blackwell: Defining Limits of Criminal Discovery and Prosecution Dismissal under Washington Law

State v. Blackwell: Defining Limits of Criminal Discovery and Prosecution Dismissal under Washington Law

Date: Feb 19, 1993
State v. Blackwell: Defining Limits of Criminal Discovery and Prosecution Dismissal under Washington Law Introduction State of Washington v. Hyson Blackwell, et al is a significant case adjudicated...
Refined Standards for Public Records Exemptions and Employee Privacy: Analysis of SETH R. DAWSON v. LAWRENCE DALY

Refined Standards for Public Records Exemptions and Employee Privacy: Analysis of SETH R. DAWSON v. LAWRENCE DALY

Date: Feb 19, 1993
Refined Standards for Public Records Exemptions and Employee Privacy: Analysis of SETH R. DAWSON v. LAWRENCE DALY Introduction SETH R. DAWSON v. LAWRENCE DALY, 120 Wn. 2d 782 (1993), is a landmark...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in State v. Gary Michael Benn: Proportionality and Procedural Adherence

Affirmation of Death Sentence in State v. Gary Michael Benn: Proportionality and Procedural Adherence

Date: Feb 12, 1993
Affirmation of Death Sentence in State v. Gary Michael Benn: Proportionality and Procedural Adherence Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Gary Michael Benn (120 Wn. 2d...
Striker Reaffirmed: Time for Trial Rules under CrR 3.3 in Washington State

Striker Reaffirmed: Time for Trial Rules under CrR 3.3 in Washington State

Date: Feb 5, 1993
Striker Reaffirmed: Time for Trial Rules under CrR 3.3 in Washington State Introduction In the landmark decision of THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. WALLACE J. GREENWOOD, ET AL, the Supreme Court of...
Washington Supreme Court Emphasizes Material Fact Consideration in Indemnity Agreement Interpretation under CERCLA

Washington Supreme Court Emphasizes Material Fact Consideration in Indemnity Agreement Interpretation under CERCLA

Date: Jan 29, 1993
Washington Supreme Court Emphasizes Material Fact Consideration in Indemnity Agreement Interpretation under CERCLA Introduction The case of Scott Galvanizing, Inc. v. Northwest EnviroServices, Inc....
Good Faith Belief Not a Defense in National Origin Discrimination: Xieng v. Peoples National Bank of Washington

Good Faith Belief Not a Defense in National Origin Discrimination: Xieng v. Peoples National Bank of Washington

Date: Jan 22, 1993
Good Faith Belief Not a Defense in National Origin Discrimination: Xieng v. Peoples National Bank of Washington Introduction In the case of Phanna K. Xieng, et al. v. Peoples National Bank of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert