Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Discovery Rule Applied to Construction Contract Breach: Washington Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Discovery Rule Applied to Construction Contract Breach: Washington Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Discovery Rule Applied to Construction Contract Breach: Washington Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent Introduction The case of 1000 Virginia Limited Partnership v. Vertecs Corporation and Carl...
State Preemption Allows Municipal Conditions on Firearm Sales at Gun Shows: Supreme Court Upholds City of Sequim's Actions

State Preemption Allows Municipal Conditions on Firearm Sales at Gun Shows: Supreme Court Upholds City of Sequim's Actions

Date: Oct 13, 2006
State Preemption Allows Municipal Conditions on Firearm Sales at Gun Shows: Supreme Court Upholds City of Sequim's Actions Introduction In the case of Pacific Northwest Shooting Park Association et...
Voluntary Intoxication and Lesser Included Offenses in Second Degree Child Molestation: STATE v. STEVENS

Voluntary Intoxication and Lesser Included Offenses in Second Degree Child Molestation: STATE v. STEVENS

Date: Oct 6, 2006
Voluntary Intoxication and Lesser Included Offenses in Second Degree Child Molestation: STATE v. STEVENS Introduction State of Washington v. Randall Jerome Stevens (158 Wn. 2d 304) is a pivotal case...
License Suspension for Child Support Arrears Upheld: Washington Supreme Court’s Comprehensive Due Process Analysis in Amunrud v. Board of Appeals

License Suspension for Child Support Arrears Upheld: Washington Supreme Court’s Comprehensive Due Process Analysis in Amunrud v. Board of Appeals

Date: Sep 22, 2006
License Suspension for Child Support Arrears Upheld: Washington Supreme Court’s Comprehensive Due Process Analysis in Amunrud v. Board of Appeals Introduction In the landmark case of Greg Amunrud v....
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Exemption for Agricultural Truckers under MWA

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Exemption for Agricultural Truckers under MWA

Date: Sep 1, 2006
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Clear Exemption for Agricultural Truckers under MWA Introduction In the landmark case of Jesse Cerrillo et al. v. Cipriano Esparza et al., the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of Washington Restricts Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine: Preservation of Right to Appeal Post-Conviction Pre-Sentencing

Supreme Court of Washington Restricts Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine: Preservation of Right to Appeal Post-Conviction Pre-Sentencing

Date: Aug 18, 2006
Supreme Court of Washington Restricts Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine: Preservation of Right to Appeal Post-Conviction Pre-Sentencing Introduction THE STATE OF WASHINGTON vs. JAMES FRENCH (157 Wn....
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Due to Misinformation: Insights from State v. Mendoza

Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Due to Misinformation: Insights from State v. Mendoza

Date: Aug 18, 2006
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Due to Misinformation: Insights from State v. Mendoza Introduction State of Washington v. Hector L. Mendoza, 157 Wn.2d 582 (2006), addresses a critical aspect of criminal...
STATE v. KORUM: Clarifying Prosecutorial Vindictiveness in Pretrial and Plea Bargaining Contexts

STATE v. KORUM: Clarifying Prosecutorial Vindictiveness in Pretrial and Plea Bargaining Contexts

Date: Aug 18, 2006
STATE v. KORUM: Clarifying Prosecutorial Vindictiveness in Pretrial and Plea Bargaining Contexts Introduction The State of Washington v. Jacob Melvin Korum is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Consideration of Deportation Risks in SSOSA Sentencing: Insights from STATE v. OSMAN

Consideration of Deportation Risks in SSOSA Sentencing: Insights from STATE v. OSMAN

Date: Aug 4, 2006
Consideration of Deportation Risks in SSOSA Sentencing: Insights from STATE v. OSMAN Introduction State v. Semi Osman, 157 Wn.2d 474 (2006), is a pivotal case in Washington state law that addresses...
Washington Supreme Court Aligns WLAD 'Disability' Definition with ADA Standard

Washington Supreme Court Aligns WLAD 'Disability' Definition with ADA Standard

Date: Jul 7, 2006
Washington Supreme Court Aligns WLAD 'Disability' Definition with ADA Standard Introduction In the landmark case of Kenneth McCLARTY v. TOTEM ELECtric, 157 Wn.2d 214 (2006), the Supreme Court of...
Preservation of Public Trial Rights in Joint Proceedings: The State v. Easterling

Preservation of Public Trial Rights in Joint Proceedings: The State v. Easterling

Date: Jun 30, 2006
Preservation of Public Trial Rights in Joint Proceedings: The State v. Easterling Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Ricko Fernandez Easterling, the Supreme Court of...
Assessing Prejudicial Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Insights from STATE v. McKENZIE

Assessing Prejudicial Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Insights from STATE v. McKENZIE

Date: May 19, 2006
Assessing Prejudicial Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Insights from STATE v. McKENZIE Introduction State of Washington v. David Wyatt McKenzie, 157 Wn. 2d 44 (2006), presents a pivotal...
Establishing the Necessity of Actual Receipt in Communications with Minors for Immoral Purposes

Establishing the Necessity of Actual Receipt in Communications with Minors for Immoral Purposes

Date: May 12, 2006
Establishing the Necessity of Actual Receipt in Communications with Minors for Immoral Purposes Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Richard Leon Hosier, the Supreme Court...
Impact of Judicial Comments on Victim’s Age in Jury Instructions: STATE v. JACKMAN Decision

Impact of Judicial Comments on Victim’s Age in Jury Instructions: STATE v. JACKMAN Decision

Date: Apr 14, 2006
Impact of Judicial Comments on Victim’s Age in Jury Instructions: The STATE v. JACKMAN Decision 1. Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Ryan Alan Jackman (156 Wn.2d 736) addresses...
Presumption of Prejudice for Judicial Comments in Jury Instructions Established in State v. Percy A. Levy

Presumption of Prejudice for Judicial Comments in Jury Instructions Established in State v. Percy A. Levy

Date: Apr 14, 2006
Presumption of Prejudice for Judicial Comments in Jury Instructions Established in State v. Percy A. Levy Introduction State of Washington v. Percy A. Levy, 156 Wn. 2d 709 (2006), is a seminal case...
Defining Proper Discovery Sanctions and CPA Fee Awards: Insights from Mayer v. Sto Industries

Defining Proper Discovery Sanctions and CPA Fee Awards: Insights from Mayer v. Sto Industries

Date: Apr 7, 2006
Defining Proper Discovery Sanctions and CPA Fee Awards: Insights from Mayer v. Sto Industries Introduction Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington...
State v. Cross: Affirming Procedural Integrity and Proportionality in Washington's Death Penalty System

State v. Cross: Affirming Procedural Integrity and Proportionality in Washington's Death Penalty System

Date: Mar 31, 2006
State v. Cross: Affirming Procedural Integrity and Proportionality in Washington's Death Penalty System Introduction State of Washington v. Dayva Cross is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Exceptional Sentencing and Plea Agreement: Insights from STATE v. ERMELS

Exceptional Sentencing and Plea Agreement: Insights from STATE v. ERMELS

Date: Mar 17, 2006
Exceptional Sentencing and Plea Agreement: Insights from STATE v. ERMELS Introduction State of Washington v. Joshua James Ermels, 156 Wn. 2d 528 (2006), is a pivotal case addressed by the Supreme...
Washington Supreme Court Rules DSHS Not Liable Under Restatement (Second) of Torts §319 in Foster Care Assault Case

Washington Supreme Court Rules DSHS Not Liable Under Restatement (Second) of Torts §319 in Foster Care Assault Case

Date: Feb 17, 2006
Washington Supreme Court Rules DSHS Not Liable Under Restatement (Second) of Torts §319 in Foster Care Assault Case Introduction In the landmark case of Said Aba Sheikh v. Kevin S. Choe et al.,...
Constructive Discharge in Violation of Public Policy Requires Absence of Adequate Alternative Remedies

Constructive Discharge in Violation of Public Policy Requires Absence of Adequate Alternative Remedies

Date: Dec 23, 2005
Constructive Discharge in Violation of Public Policy Requires Absence of Adequate Alternative Remedies Introduction In the landmark case Steven M. Korslund et al. v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert