Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Comprehensive Commentary on the Supreme Court of Washington's Decision in Robert C. WOO v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COmpany

Comprehensive Commentary on the Supreme Court of Washington's Decision in Robert C. WOO v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COmpany

Date: Jul 27, 2007
Establishing the Scope of Duty to Defend: Insights from WOO v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COmpany, 161 Wn.2d 43 (2007) Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington's decision in Robert C. Woo et al. v....
The Importance of Judicial Impartiality in Search Warrant Proceedings: Insights from State v. Chamberlin

The Importance of Judicial Impartiality in Search Warrant Proceedings: Insights from State v. Chamberlin

Date: Jul 20, 2007
The Importance of Judicial Impartiality in Search Warrant Proceedings: Insights from State v. Chamberlin Introduction State of Washington v. Scott Chamberlin is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Valid Traffic Stop and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claim in State v. Nichols

Affirmation of Valid Traffic Stop and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claim in State v. Nichols

Date: Jul 20, 2007
Affirmation of Valid Traffic Stop and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claim in State v. Nichols Introduction In State of Washington v. Caleb George Nichols, the Supreme Court of Washington...
Forfeiture by Wrongdoing and the Confrontation Clause: Insights from STATE v. MASON

Forfeiture by Wrongdoing and the Confrontation Clause: Insights from STATE v. MASON

Date: Jul 20, 2007
Forfeiture by Wrongdoing and the Confrontation Clause: Insights from STATE v. MASON Introduction State of Washington v. Kim Heichel Mason is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming the Standards for Informal Appearance in Default Judgments: Sherri Morin et al. v. Bonnie Burris et al. et al.

Reaffirming the Standards for Informal Appearance in Default Judgments: Sherri Morin et al. v. Bonnie Burris et al. et al.

Date: Jun 29, 2007
Reaffirming the Standards for Informal Appearance in Default Judgments: Sherri Morin et al. v. Bonnie Burris et al. et al. (160 Wn.2d 745) Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the...
Reaffirmation of Default Judgment in Absence of Prima Facie Defense and Insurer Intervention – Little v. King et al.

Reaffirmation of Default Judgment in Absence of Prima Facie Defense and Insurer Intervention – Little v. King et al.

Date: Jun 22, 2007
Reaffirmation of Default Judgment in Absence of Prima Facie Defense and Insurer Intervention – Little v. King et al. Introduction The case of Lisa Little v. Annie King et al., decided by the Supreme...
STATE v. WOMAC: Double Jeopardy Protection Against Multiple Convictions for a Single Offense

STATE v. WOMAC: Double Jeopardy Protection Against Multiple Convictions for a Single Offense

Date: Jun 15, 2007
STATE v. WOMAC: Double Jeopardy Protection Against Multiple Convictions for a Single Offense Introduction State of Washington v. Brian Zane Womac is a pivotal case adjudged by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying Judicial Estoppel Application to Bankruptcy Trustees: Arkison v. Ethan Allen Establishes Distinct Roles

Clarifying Judicial Estoppel Application to Bankruptcy Trustees: Arkison v. Ethan Allen Establishes Distinct Roles

Date: Jun 1, 2007
Clarifying Judicial Estoppel Application to Bankruptcy Trustees: Arkison v. Ethan Allen Establishes Distinct Roles Introduction In Peter H. Arkison, as Bankruptcy Trustee, Appellant, v. Ethan Allen,...
Recklessness Standard Affirmed for Search Warrant Validity in Washington State

Recklessness Standard Affirmed for Search Warrant Validity in Washington State

Date: May 25, 2007
Recklessness Standard Affirmed for Search Warrant Validity in Washington State Introduction In the landmark case The State of Washington v. Randal Lee Chenoweth et al. (160 Wn. 2d 454, 2007), the...
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standard in Prior Conviction Comparability: Thiefault v. State

Washington Supreme Court Establishes Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standard in Prior Conviction Comparability: Thiefault v. State

Date: May 18, 2007
Washington Supreme Court Establishes Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standard in Prior Conviction Comparability: Thiefault v. State Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v....
Police Impersonation of Attorneys in DNA Collection: Supreme Court of Washington Affirms Admissibility and Upholds Conviction

Police Impersonation of Attorneys in DNA Collection: Supreme Court of Washington Affirms Admissibility and Upholds Conviction

Date: May 11, 2007
Police Impersonation of Attorneys in DNA Collection: Supreme Court of Washington Affirms Admissibility and Upholds Conviction Introduction The case of THE STATE OF WASHINGTON v. JOHN NICHOLAS ATHAN...
Affirmation of Trial Court Authority to Impose Maximum Term No-Contact Orders under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act

Affirmation of Trial Court Authority to Impose Maximum Term No-Contact Orders under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act

Date: Apr 20, 2007
Affirmation of Trial Court Authority to Impose Maximum Term No-Contact Orders under Washington's Sentencing Reform Act Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Ismael Armendariz (160 Wn....
Affirmation of Jury's Exclusive Role in Assessing Credibility: STATE v. KIRKMAN and Candia

Affirmation of Jury's Exclusive Role in Assessing Credibility: STATE v. KIRKMAN and Candia

Date: Apr 6, 2007
Affirmation of Jury's Exclusive Role in Assessing Credibility: STATE v. KIRKMAN and Candia Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington addressed critical issues of judicial procedures and...
Reinterpreting Securities Transactions: Insights from KINNEY v. COOK

Reinterpreting Securities Transactions: Insights from KINNEY v. COOK

Date: Mar 23, 2007
Reinterpreting Securities Transactions: Insights from KINNEY v. COOK Introduction KINNEY v. COOK, 159 Wn. 2d 837 (2007), adjudicated by The Supreme Court of Washington, addresses the intricate...
Alternative Means Doctrine Clarified in STATE OF WASHINGTON v. SARAH JANE SMITH

Alternative Means Doctrine Clarified in STATE OF WASHINGTON v. SARAH JANE SMITH

Date: Mar 16, 2007
Alternative Means Doctrine Clarified in State of Washington v. Sarah Jane Smith Introduction State of Washington v. Sarah Jane Smith, 159 Wn. 2d 778 (2007), presents a pivotal examination of the...
Comprehensive Commentary on BOSTAIN v. FOOD EXPRESS, INC. (159 Wn. 2d 700)

Comprehensive Commentary on BOSTAIN v. FOOD EXPRESS, INC. (159 Wn. 2d 700)

Date: Mar 2, 2007
Overtime Compensation for Interstate Truck Drivers Under Washington's Minimum Wage Act: Insights from BOSTAIN v. FOOD EXPRESS, INC. Introduction In the landmark case of BOSTAIN v. FOOD EXPRESS, INC.,...
Washington Supreme Court Reaffirms Economic Loss Rule Bar on Negligent Misrepresentation in Residential Property Sales

Washington Supreme Court Reaffirms Economic Loss Rule Bar on Negligent Misrepresentation in Residential Property Sales

Date: Mar 2, 2007
Washington Supreme Court Reaffirms Economic Loss Rule Bar on Negligent Misrepresentation in Residential Property Sales Introduction In the landmark case of Arturo Alejandre et al. v. Mary M. Bull,...
Refining Attorney Fee Calculations and Tax Offset Limitations in Employment Discrimination under WLAD: Pham v. Seattle City Light

Refining Attorney Fee Calculations and Tax Offset Limitations in Employment Discrimination under WLAD: Pham v. Seattle City Light

Date: Feb 2, 2007
Refining Attorney Fee Calculations and Tax Offset Limitations in Employment Discrimination under WLAD: Pham v. Seattle City Light Introduction The case of Chuong Van Pham et al. v. Seattle City Light...
Limiting Mechanical Extrapolation in Child Support Determinations: Insights from McCausland v. McCausland

Limiting Mechanical Extrapolation in Child Support Determinations: Insights from McCausland v. McCausland

Date: Feb 2, 2007
Limiting Mechanical Extrapolation in Child Support Determinations: Insights from McCausland v. McCausland Introduction In the landmark case In the Matter of the Marriage of Angela Karon McCausland...
Empaneling Sentencing Juries Post-Blakely: Insights from Washington's Laws of 2005, Chapter 68

Empaneling Sentencing Juries Post-Blakely: Insights from Washington's Laws of 2005, Chapter 68

Date: Jan 26, 2007
Empaneling Sentencing Juries Post-Blakely: Insights from Washington's Laws of 2005, Chapter 68 Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Pillatos, the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert