Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Assessing Prejudicial Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Insights from STATE v. McKENZIE

Assessing Prejudicial Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Insights from STATE v. McKENZIE

Date: May 19, 2006
Assessing Prejudicial Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: Insights from STATE v. McKENZIE Introduction State of Washington v. David Wyatt McKenzie, 157 Wn. 2d 44 (2006), presents a pivotal...
Establishing the Necessity of Actual Receipt in Communications with Minors for Immoral Purposes

Establishing the Necessity of Actual Receipt in Communications with Minors for Immoral Purposes

Date: May 12, 2006
Establishing the Necessity of Actual Receipt in Communications with Minors for Immoral Purposes Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Richard Leon Hosier, the Supreme Court...
Impact of Judicial Comments on Victim’s Age in Jury Instructions: STATE v. JACKMAN Decision

Impact of Judicial Comments on Victim’s Age in Jury Instructions: STATE v. JACKMAN Decision

Date: Apr 14, 2006
Impact of Judicial Comments on Victim’s Age in Jury Instructions: The STATE v. JACKMAN Decision 1. Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Ryan Alan Jackman (156 Wn.2d 736) addresses...
Presumption of Prejudice for Judicial Comments in Jury Instructions Established in State v. Percy A. Levy

Presumption of Prejudice for Judicial Comments in Jury Instructions Established in State v. Percy A. Levy

Date: Apr 14, 2006
Presumption of Prejudice for Judicial Comments in Jury Instructions Established in State v. Percy A. Levy Introduction State of Washington v. Percy A. Levy, 156 Wn. 2d 709 (2006), is a seminal case...
Defining Proper Discovery Sanctions and CPA Fee Awards: Insights from Mayer v. Sto Industries

Defining Proper Discovery Sanctions and CPA Fee Awards: Insights from Mayer v. Sto Industries

Date: Apr 7, 2006
Defining Proper Discovery Sanctions and CPA Fee Awards: Insights from Mayer v. Sto Industries Introduction Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington...
State v. Cross: Affirming Procedural Integrity and Proportionality in Washington's Death Penalty System

State v. Cross: Affirming Procedural Integrity and Proportionality in Washington's Death Penalty System

Date: Mar 31, 2006
State v. Cross: Affirming Procedural Integrity and Proportionality in Washington's Death Penalty System Introduction State of Washington v. Dayva Cross is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Exceptional Sentencing and Plea Agreement: Insights from STATE v. ERMELS

Exceptional Sentencing and Plea Agreement: Insights from STATE v. ERMELS

Date: Mar 17, 2006
Exceptional Sentencing and Plea Agreement: Insights from STATE v. ERMELS Introduction State of Washington v. Joshua James Ermels, 156 Wn. 2d 528 (2006), is a pivotal case addressed by the Supreme...
Washington Supreme Court Rules DSHS Not Liable Under Restatement (Second) of Torts §319 in Foster Care Assault Case

Washington Supreme Court Rules DSHS Not Liable Under Restatement (Second) of Torts §319 in Foster Care Assault Case

Date: Feb 17, 2006
Washington Supreme Court Rules DSHS Not Liable Under Restatement (Second) of Torts §319 in Foster Care Assault Case Introduction In the landmark case of Said Aba Sheikh v. Kevin S. Choe et al.,...
Constructive Discharge in Violation of Public Policy Requires Absence of Adequate Alternative Remedies

Constructive Discharge in Violation of Public Policy Requires Absence of Adequate Alternative Remedies

Date: Dec 23, 2005
Constructive Discharge in Violation of Public Policy Requires Absence of Adequate Alternative Remedies Introduction In the landmark case Steven M. Korslund et al. v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services,...
Limitation of Negligent Investigation Claims Under RCW 26.44: Insights from Roberson et al. v. Perez et al.

Limitation of Negligent Investigation Claims Under RCW 26.44: Insights from Roberson et al. v. Perez et al.

Date: Dec 2, 2005
Limitation of Negligent Investigation Claims Under RCW 26.44: Insights from Roberson et al. v. Perez et al., 156 Wn.2d 33 (2005) Introduction The case of Roberson et al. v. Perez et al., decided on...
Clarifying Common Authority and Presence in Consent-Based Warrantless Searches: STATE v. MORSE

Clarifying Common Authority and Presence in Consent-Based Warrantless Searches: STATE v. MORSE

Date: Dec 2, 2005
Clarifying Common Authority and Presence in Consent-Based Warrantless Searches: STATE v. MORSE Introduction In State of Washington v. Robert James Morse, 156 Wn.2d 1 (2005), the Supreme Court of...
Establishing De Facto Parentage: Washington Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in In re PARENTAGE OF L.B. Carvin v. Page Britain

Establishing De Facto Parentage: Washington Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in In re PARENTAGE OF L.B. Carvin v. Page Britain

Date: Nov 4, 2005
Establishing De Facto Parentage: Washington Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in In re PARENTAGE OF L.B. Carvin v. Page Britain Introduction The case of In re PARENTAGE OF L.B. Sue Ellen ("Mian")...
Exclusion of Resident Workers from Minimum Wage Protections under Washington's MWA: Analysis of BERROCAL v. FERNANDEZ

Exclusion of Resident Workers from Minimum Wage Protections under Washington's MWA: Analysis of BERROCAL v. FERNANDEZ

Date: Oct 14, 2005
Exclusion of Resident Workers from Minimum Wage Protections under Washington's MWA: Analysis of BERROCAL v. FERNANDEZ Introduction The case of Heriberto Berrocal et al. v. Max Fernandez et al.,...
Public Trial Rights Reinforced: Strict Compliance Required for Courtroom Closure During Jury Selection

Public Trial Rights Reinforced: Strict Compliance Required for Courtroom Closure During Jury Selection

Date: Oct 7, 2005
Public Trial Rights Reinforced: Strict Compliance Required for Courtroom Closure During Jury Selection Introduction In The State of Washington v. Nathan Dallas Brightman (155 Wn. 2d 506, 2005), the...
Establishing Habitual Offender Status in First-Degree Driving While License Suspended Cases

Establishing Habitual Offender Status in First-Degree Driving While License Suspended Cases

Date: Sep 30, 2005
Establishing Habitual Offender Status in First-Degree Driving While License Suspended Cases Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Calvin M. Smith, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Land Use Petition Act’s Strict Time Limits and Attorney Fees Provisions in Habitat Watch v. Skagit County

Affirmation of Land Use Petition Act’s Strict Time Limits and Attorney Fees Provisions in Habitat Watch v. Skagit County

Date: Sep 23, 2005
Affirmation of Land Use Petition Act’s Strict Time Limits and Attorney Fees Provisions in Habitat Watch v. Skagit County Introduction ‘Habitat Watch v. Skagit County’ (155 Wn. 2d 397) is a pivotal...
Limits of Apprendi and Blakely in Restitution: Washington Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. KINNEMAN

Limits of Apprendi and Blakely in Restitution: Washington Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. KINNEMAN

Date: Sep 9, 2005
Limits of Apprendi and Blakely in Restitution: Washington Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. KINNEMAN Introduction In State of Washington v. Zachary A. Kinneman, the Washington Supreme Court...
Enhancing Transparency: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Robust Enforcement Mechanisms under the Public Disclosure Act

Enhancing Transparency: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Robust Enforcement Mechanisms under the Public Disclosure Act

Date: Aug 12, 2005
Enhancing Transparency: Washington Supreme Court Establishes Robust Enforcement Mechanisms under the Public Disclosure Act Introduction The case of SPOKANE RESEARCH DEFENSE FUND, Plaintiff, TIM...
Independent Source Exception Upholds Evidence Admission under Article I, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution

Independent Source Exception Upholds Evidence Admission under Article I, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution

Date: Jul 29, 2005
Independent Source Exception Upholds Evidence Admission under Article I, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution Introduction In the case of The State of Washington v. Devennice Antoine Gaines et...
Appellate Review Standards for Remittitur: Bunch v. King County Dept. of Youth Services

Appellate Review Standards for Remittitur: Bunch v. King County Dept. of Youth Services

Date: Jul 22, 2005
Appellate Review Standards for Remittitur: Bunch v. King County Dept. of Youth Services Introduction Ralph Dwight Bunch filed a lawsuit against the King County Department of Youth Services alleging...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert