Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

"Only Constituents May Recall": Washington Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Standing Rule for Local Recalls and Affirms Fee Sanctions for Bad-Faith Petitions

"Only Constituents May Recall": Washington Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Standing Rule for Local Recalls and Affirms Fee Sanctions for Bad-Faith Petitions

Date: Mar 28, 2025
"Only Constituents May Recall": Washington Supreme Court Establishes Constitutional Standing Rule for Local Recalls and Affirms Fee Sanctions for Bad-Faith Petitions Introduction In In re Recall of...
Beyond Procedure: RAP 2.3(b)(3) Authorizes Discretionary Review for Substantive Departures from the Accepted Course of Proceedings

Beyond Procedure: RAP 2.3(b)(3) Authorizes Discretionary Review for Substantive Departures from the Accepted Course of Proceedings

Date: Mar 28, 2025
Beyond Procedure: RAP 2.3(b)(3) Authorizes Discretionary Review for Substantive Departures from the Accepted Course of Proceedings Case: In re Dependency of C.J.J.I., C.V.I., and R.A.R., Jr. Court:...
Raab v. Nu Skin: CR 12(b)(3) Is Not the Vehicle to Enforce Out-of-State Forum-Selection Clauses in Washington; Voicelink Overruled

Raab v. Nu Skin: CR 12(b)(3) Is Not the Vehicle to Enforce Out-of-State Forum-Selection Clauses in Washington; Voicelink Overruled

Date: Mar 28, 2025
Raab v. Nu Skin: CR 12(b)(3) Is Not the Vehicle to Enforce Out-of-State Forum-Selection Clauses in Washington; Voicelink Overruled Introduction In a significant procedural ruling with statewide...
Only Actions Specifically Permitted by Nonenumerated Regulators Qualify for Washington’s CPA Safe Harbor: Hall v. Walgreens Boots Alliance

Only Actions Specifically Permitted by Nonenumerated Regulators Qualify for Washington’s CPA Safe Harbor: Hall v. Walgreens Boots Alliance

Date: Mar 21, 2025
Only Actions Specifically Permitted by Nonenumerated Regulators Qualify for Washington’s CPA Safe Harbor Hall v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., No. 102829-6 (Wash. Mar. 20, 2025) (en banc)...
Reaffirming the Reasonable Foreseeability Exception in Premises Liability: Implications for Falling Merchandise Cases

Reaffirming the Reasonable Foreseeability Exception in Premises Liability: Implications for Falling Merchandise Cases

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Reaffirming the Reasonable Foreseeability Exception in Premises Liability: Implications for Falling Merchandise Cases Introduction In the case of HWAYO JENNY GALASSI and MICHAEL GALASSI, wife and...
Redefining the Boundaries of Consent Searches: The Limited Reach of Ferrier Warnings

Redefining the Boundaries of Consent Searches: The Limited Reach of Ferrier Warnings

Date: Mar 11, 2025
Redefining the Boundaries of Consent Searches: The Limited Reach of Ferrier Warnings Introduction In State of Washington, Respondent, v. Mary Margaret Mercedes, Petitioner, the Supreme Court of...
Constitutional Endorsement of Signature Verification Coupled with Expansive Cure Provisions in Washington Elections

Constitutional Endorsement of Signature Verification Coupled with Expansive Cure Provisions in Washington Elections

Date: Mar 11, 2025
Constitutional Endorsement of Signature Verification Coupled with Expansive Cure Provisions in Washington Elections Introduction The case before the Supreme Court of Washington – Vet Voice...
New Precedent: 30-Day Eviction Notice under the CARES Act Applies Only to Nonpayment Evictions

New Precedent: 30-Day Eviction Notice under the CARES Act Applies Only to Nonpayment Evictions

Date: Feb 25, 2025
New Precedent: 30-Day Eviction Notice under the CARES Act Applies Only to Nonpayment Evictions Introduction This commentary examines the recent Supreme Court of Washington decision in THE HOUSING...
Public Employee Conduct in Public Events: Clarifying Privacy Limits and PRA Disclosure Standards

Public Employee Conduct in Public Events: Clarifying Privacy Limits and PRA Disclosure Standards

Date: Feb 19, 2025
Public Employee Conduct in Public Events: Clarifying Privacy Limits and PRA Disclosure Standards Introduction This Judgment, rendered by the Supreme Court of Washington on February 13, 2025,...
Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of RCW 4.24.595(1) in Child Abuse Investigations

Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of RCW 4.24.595(1) in Child Abuse Investigations

Date: Feb 11, 2025
Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of RCW 4.24.595(1) in Child Abuse Investigations Introduction The case of Ian Atkerson v. State of Washington, Department of Children, Youth, and Families...
Mandatory CVCA Restitution: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Non-Discretionary Restitution Orders in State v. Morgan

Mandatory CVCA Restitution: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Non-Discretionary Restitution Orders in State v. Morgan

Date: Jan 24, 2025
Mandatory CVCA Restitution: Washington Supreme Court Upholds Non-Discretionary Restitution Orders in State v. Morgan Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Montreal Leanthony...
Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies Limits on Noncompete Agreements for Low-Wage Workers under RCW 49.62.070

Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies Limits on Noncompete Agreements for Low-Wage Workers under RCW 49.62.070

Date: Jan 24, 2025
Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies Limits on Noncompete Agreements for Low-Wage Workers under RCW 49.62.070 Introduction The case of Jeremy David and Mark Springer v. Freedom Vans LLC addresses...
Ensuring Judicial Impartiality: State of Washington v. J.M.H.

Ensuring Judicial Impartiality: State of Washington v. J.M.H.

Date: Jan 23, 2025
Ensuring Judicial Impartiality: State of Washington v. J.M.H. Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington, Respondent, v. J.M.H., Petitioner, decided on January 16, 2025, the Supreme...
Broad Immunity Affirmed for Forestland Owners under RCW 76.09.330: Public Utility District No. 1 v. State of Washington

Broad Immunity Affirmed for Forestland Owners under RCW 76.09.330: Public Utility District No. 1 v. State of Washington

Date: Jan 23, 2025
Broad Immunity Affirmed for Forestland Owners under RCW 76.09.330: Public Utility District No. 1 v. State of Washington Introduction In the landmark case Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish...
Vasquez v. State: Expanding Judicial Discretion in Resentencing Proceedings

Vasquez v. State: Expanding Judicial Discretion in Resentencing Proceedings

Date: Dec 23, 2024
Vasquez v. State: Expanding Judicial Discretion in Resentencing Proceedings Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington in State of Washington v. Anthony Rene Vasquez addresses critical aspects of...
State v. Kelly: Upholding Time Bar on Collateral Resentencing and Mandating Consecutive Firearm Enhancements

State v. Kelly: Upholding Time Bar on Collateral Resentencing and Mandating Consecutive Firearm Enhancements

Date: Dec 23, 2024
State v. Kelly: Upholding Time Bar on Collateral Resentencing and Mandating Consecutive Firearm Enhancements Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Timothy Michael Kelly, the...
Envolve Pharmacy Solutions Exempted from B&O Tax Under RCW 82.04.320: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Envolve Pharmacy Solutions Exempted from B&O Tax Under RCW 82.04.320: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary

Date: Dec 18, 2024
Envolve Pharmacy Solutions Exempted from B&O Tax Under RCW 82.04.320: A Comprehensive Legal Commentary Introduction The case of Envolve Pharmacy Solutions, Inc. v. Department of Revenue adjudicated...
Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies Houston-Sconiers Application in Juvenile Plea Agreements

Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies Houston-Sconiers Application in Juvenile Plea Agreements

Date: Nov 28, 2024
Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies Houston-Sconiers Application in Juvenile Plea Agreements Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the landmark case State of Washington v. Darren S....
Supreme Court Upholds Lacey's RV Parking Ordinance, Affirming Municipal Police Powers Over Intrastate Travel Claims

Supreme Court Upholds Lacey's RV Parking Ordinance, Affirming Municipal Police Powers Over Intrastate Travel Claims

Date: Jul 4, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Lacey's RV Parking Ordinance, Affirming Municipal Police Powers Over Intrastate Travel Claims Introduction In the case of Jack Potter v. City of Lacey et al., the Supreme Court...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Determinate Sentences for Young Adult Murderers under Monschke Precedent

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Determinate Sentences for Young Adult Murderers under Monschke Precedent

Date: May 24, 2024
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Determinate Sentences for Young Adult Murderers under Monschke Precedent Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington has recently rendered a pivotal judgment in the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert