Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Carcieri v. Salazar: Defining Federal Jurisdiction Over Indian Tribes Under the Indian Reorganization Act Introduction Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Hayes v. United States: Clarifying Predicate Offenses for Firearm Possession Prohibitions Under §922(g)(9) Introduction Hayes v. United States, 555 U.S. 415 (2009), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Expansion and Controversy of the "Honest Services" Doctrine under 18 U.S.C. §1346 Introduction The case of Robert Sorich, Timothy McCarthy, and Patrick Slattery v. United States, decided on February...
Enhanced Protections Under Title VII: Broad Interpretation of the Anti-Retaliation Clause in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville Introduction Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of...
ERISA's Anti-Alienation Provision Clarified in Kennedy v. DuPont Introduction In Kari E. KENNEDY v. PLAN ADMINistrator for DuPont Savings and Investment Plan et al. (555 U.S. 285, 2009), the United...
United States v. Eurodif S.A.: Defining Antidumping Duties on Low Enriched Uranium Under SWU Contracts Introduction In United States v. Eurodif S.A., 555 U.S. 305 (2009), the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds Antidumping Duties on Low Enriched Uranium: Redefining Sale of Goods under the Tariff Act Introduction In United States v. Eurodif S.A. et al., 555 U.S. 305 (2009), the United...
United States v. Eurodif S.A. ET AL.: Defining Antidumping Applications in Uranium Enrichment Contracts Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Eurodif S.A. et al., USEC Inc., et al....
Expansion of Prosecutorial Absolute Immunity to Supervisory and Administrative Functions: Van de Kamp v. Goldstein Introduction In Van de Kamp v. Goldstein, the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Arizona v. Lemon Montrea Johnson: Upholding "Stop and Frisk" Protocols During Traffic Stops Introduction Arizona v. Lemon Montrea Johnson is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds Precise Application of Accomplice Liability under Washington Law in Waddington v. Sarausad Introduction The landmark case of Waddington v. Sarausad (555 U.S. 179) addresses the...
Title IX Does Not Preclude § 1983 Claims for Unconstitutional Gender Discrimination in Schools Introduction The Supreme Court case LISA FITZGERALD, ET VIR, PETITIONERS v. BARN-STABLE SCHOOL COMMITTEE...
Title IX Does Not Preclude §1983 Actions: Insights from FITZGERALD v. BARNSTABLE School Committee Introduction FITZGERALD v. BARNSTABLE School Committee is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on...
District Courts' Authority to Vary Crack-Powder Cocaine Ratios Affirmed in Spears v. United States Introduction Spears v. United States, 555 U.S. 261 (2009), represents a pivotal moment in the...
Chargeability of National Litigation Expenses in Union Service Fees: LOCKE v. KARASS Introduction LOCKE v. KARASS is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that addresses the constitutionality...
Supreme Court Abandons Mandatory Saucier Procedure in Qualified Immunity Cases Introduction Correll Pearson, et al., Petitioners v. Afton Callahan is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limited Applicability of the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Isolated Police Negligence Introduction In the landmark case Bennie Dean HERRING v. UNITED STATES, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on...
Oregon v. Ice: Upholding Judicial Discretion for Consecutive Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment Introduction Oregon v. Thomas Eugene Ice is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Isolated Negligence and the Exclusionary Rule: Analyzing Bennie Dean Herring v. United States Introduction Bennie Dean Herring v. United States (555 U.S. 135) is a landmark 2009 decision by the...
Finality of Judgment Under AEDPA: Supreme Court's Ruling in Jimenez v. Quarterman Introduction The case of Carlos Jimenez v. Nathaniel Quarterman, decided by the United States Supreme Court on...