Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Carcieri v. Salazar: Defining Federal Jurisdiction Over Indian Tribes Under the Indian Reorganization Act

Carcieri v. Salazar: Defining Federal Jurisdiction Over Indian Tribes Under the Indian Reorganization Act

Date: Feb 25, 2009
Carcieri v. Salazar: Defining Federal Jurisdiction Over Indian Tribes Under the Indian Reorganization Act Introduction Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Hayes v. United States: Clarifying Predicate Offenses for Firearm Possession Prohibitions Under §922(g)(9)

Hayes v. United States: Clarifying Predicate Offenses for Firearm Possession Prohibitions Under §922(g)(9)

Date: Feb 25, 2009
Hayes v. United States: Clarifying Predicate Offenses for Firearm Possession Prohibitions Under §922(g)(9) Introduction Hayes v. United States, 555 U.S. 415 (2009), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Expansion and Controversy of the "Honest Services" Doctrine under 18 U.S.C. §1346

Expansion and Controversy of the "Honest Services" Doctrine under 18 U.S.C. §1346

Date: Feb 24, 2009
Expansion and Controversy of the "Honest Services" Doctrine under 18 U.S.C. §1346 Introduction The case of Robert Sorich, Timothy McCarthy, and Patrick Slattery v. United States, decided on February...
Enhanced Protections Under Title VII: Broad Interpretation of the Anti-Retaliation Clause in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Enhanced Protections Under Title VII: Broad Interpretation of the Anti-Retaliation Clause in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville

Date: Jan 27, 2009
Enhanced Protections Under Title VII: Broad Interpretation of the Anti-Retaliation Clause in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville Introduction Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of...
ERISA's Anti-Alienation Provision Clarified in Kennedy v. DuPont

ERISA's Anti-Alienation Provision Clarified in Kennedy v. DuPont

Date: Jan 27, 2009
ERISA's Anti-Alienation Provision Clarified in Kennedy v. DuPont Introduction In Kari E. KENNEDY v. PLAN ADMINistrator for DuPont Savings and Investment Plan et al. (555 U.S. 285, 2009), the United...
United States v. Eurodif S.A.: Defining Antidumping Duties on Low Enriched Uranium Under SWU Contracts

United States v. Eurodif S.A.: Defining Antidumping Duties on Low Enriched Uranium Under SWU Contracts

Date: Jan 27, 2009
United States v. Eurodif S.A.: Defining Antidumping Duties on Low Enriched Uranium Under SWU Contracts Introduction In United States v. Eurodif S.A., 555 U.S. 305 (2009), the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds Antidumping Duties on Low Enriched Uranium: Redefining Sale of Goods under the Tariff Act

Supreme Court Upholds Antidumping Duties on Low Enriched Uranium: Redefining Sale of Goods under the Tariff Act

Date: Jan 27, 2009
Supreme Court Upholds Antidumping Duties on Low Enriched Uranium: Redefining Sale of Goods under the Tariff Act Introduction In United States v. Eurodif S.A. et al., 555 U.S. 305 (2009), the United...
United States v. Eurodif S.A. ET AL.: Defining Antidumping Applications in Uranium Enrichment Contracts

United States v. Eurodif S.A. ET AL.: Defining Antidumping Applications in Uranium Enrichment Contracts

Date: Jan 27, 2009
United States v. Eurodif S.A. ET AL.: Defining Antidumping Applications in Uranium Enrichment Contracts Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Eurodif S.A. et al., USEC Inc., et al....
Expansion of Prosecutorial Absolute Immunity to Supervisory and Administrative Functions: Van de Kamp v. Goldstein

Expansion of Prosecutorial Absolute Immunity to Supervisory and Administrative Functions: Van de Kamp v. Goldstein

Date: Jan 27, 2009
Expansion of Prosecutorial Absolute Immunity to Supervisory and Administrative Functions: Van de Kamp v. Goldstein Introduction In Van de Kamp v. Goldstein, the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Arizona v. Lemon Montrea Johnson: Upholding "Stop and Frisk" Protocols During Traffic Stops

Arizona v. Lemon Montrea Johnson: Upholding "Stop and Frisk" Protocols During Traffic Stops

Date: Jan 27, 2009
Arizona v. Lemon Montrea Johnson: Upholding "Stop and Frisk" Protocols During Traffic Stops Introduction Arizona v. Lemon Montrea Johnson is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds Precise Application of Accomplice Liability under Washington Law in Waddington v. Sarausad

Supreme Court Upholds Precise Application of Accomplice Liability under Washington Law in Waddington v. Sarausad

Date: Jan 22, 2009
Supreme Court Upholds Precise Application of Accomplice Liability under Washington Law in Waddington v. Sarausad Introduction The landmark case of Waddington v. Sarausad (555 U.S. 179) addresses the...
Title IX Does Not Preclude § 1983 Claims for Unconstitutional Gender Discrimination in Schools

Title IX Does Not Preclude § 1983 Claims for Unconstitutional Gender Discrimination in Schools

Date: Jan 22, 2009
Title IX Does Not Preclude § 1983 Claims for Unconstitutional Gender Discrimination in Schools Introduction The Supreme Court case LISA FITZGERALD, ET VIR, PETITIONERS v. BARN-STABLE SCHOOL COMMITTEE...
Title IX Does Not Preclude §1983 Actions: Insights from FITZGERALD v. BARNSTABLE School Committee

Title IX Does Not Preclude §1983 Actions: Insights from FITZGERALD v. BARNSTABLE School Committee

Date: Jan 22, 2009
Title IX Does Not Preclude §1983 Actions: Insights from FITZGERALD v. BARNSTABLE School Committee Introduction FITZGERALD v. BARNSTABLE School Committee is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on...
District Courts' Authority to Vary Crack-Powder Cocaine Ratios Affirmed in Spears v. United States

District Courts' Authority to Vary Crack-Powder Cocaine Ratios Affirmed in Spears v. United States

Date: Jan 22, 2009
District Courts' Authority to Vary Crack-Powder Cocaine Ratios Affirmed in Spears v. United States Introduction Spears v. United States, 555 U.S. 261 (2009), represents a pivotal moment in the...
Chargeability of National Litigation Expenses in Union Service Fees: LOCKE v. KARASS Commentary

Chargeability of National Litigation Expenses in Union Service Fees: LOCKE v. KARASS Commentary

Date: Jan 22, 2009
Chargeability of National Litigation Expenses in Union Service Fees: LOCKE v. KARASS Introduction LOCKE v. KARASS is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that addresses the constitutionality...
Supreme Court Abandons Mandatory Saucier Procedure in Qualified Immunity Cases

Supreme Court Abandons Mandatory Saucier Procedure in Qualified Immunity Cases

Date: Jan 22, 2009
Supreme Court Abandons Mandatory Saucier Procedure in Qualified Immunity Cases Introduction Correll Pearson, et al., Petitioners v. Afton Callahan is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limited Applicability of the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Isolated Police Negligence

Limited Applicability of the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Isolated Police Negligence

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Limited Applicability of the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Isolated Police Negligence Introduction In the landmark case Bennie Dean HERRING v. UNITED STATES, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on...
Oregon v. Ice: Upholding Judicial Discretion for Consecutive Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment

Oregon v. Ice: Upholding Judicial Discretion for Consecutive Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Oregon v. Ice: Upholding Judicial Discretion for Consecutive Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment Introduction Oregon v. Thomas Eugene Ice is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Isolated Negligence and the Exclusionary Rule: Analyzing Bennie Dean Herring v. United States

Isolated Negligence and the Exclusionary Rule: Analyzing Bennie Dean Herring v. United States

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Isolated Negligence and the Exclusionary Rule: Analyzing Bennie Dean Herring v. United States Introduction Bennie Dean Herring v. United States (555 U.S. 135) is a landmark 2009 decision by the...
Finality of Judgment Under AEDPA: Supreme Court's Ruling in Jimenez v. Quarterman

Finality of Judgment Under AEDPA: Supreme Court's Ruling in Jimenez v. Quarterman

Date: Jan 14, 2009
Finality of Judgment Under AEDPA: Supreme Court's Ruling in Jimenez v. Quarterman Introduction The case of Carlos Jimenez v. Nathaniel Quarterman, decided by the United States Supreme Court on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert