Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Uniform Application of Expert Witness Attendance Fees in Original Jurisdiction Cases: KANSAS v. COLORADO

Uniform Application of Expert Witness Attendance Fees in Original Jurisdiction Cases: KANSAS v. COLORADO

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Uniform Application of Expert Witness Attendance Fees in Original Jurisdiction Cases: KANSAS v. COLORADO Introduction State of Kansas v. State of Colorado, 556 U.S. 98 (2009), is a significant...
Federal Jurisdiction and Arbitration under FAA §4: The Vaden v. Discover Bank Decision

Federal Jurisdiction and Arbitration under FAA §4: The Vaden v. Discover Bank Decision

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Federal Jurisdiction and Arbitration under FAA §4: The Vaden v. Discover Bank Decision Introduction Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009), is a landmark case in the realm of arbitration...
Vaden v. Discover Bank: Clarifying Federal Court Jurisdiction in Arbitration Petitions

Vaden v. Discover Bank: Clarifying Federal Court Jurisdiction in Arbitration Petitions

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Vaden v. Discover Bank: Clarifying Federal Court Jurisdiction in Arbitration Petitions Introduction In Vaden v. Discover Bank et al., 556 U.S. 49 (2009), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed critical...
Supreme Court Upholds Federal Limit on Expert Witness Fees in Original Jurisdiction Cases

Supreme Court Upholds Federal Limit on Expert Witness Fees in Original Jurisdiction Cases

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Supreme Court Upholds Federal Limit on Expert Witness Fees in Original Jurisdiction Cases Introduction In the landmark case State of Kansas v. State of Colorado (556 U.S. 98, 2009), the United States...
Extended Delays in Death Penalty Cases and Eighth Amendment Concerns: Insights from Thompson v. McNeil Denial of Certiorari

Extended Delays in Death Penalty Cases and Eighth Amendment Concerns: Insights from Thompson v. McNeil Denial of Certiorari

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Extended Delays in Death Penalty Cases and Eighth Amendment Concerns: Insights from Thompson v. McNeil Denial of Certiorari Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States recently denied the...
Assigned Counsel Delays Charged to Defendant: Insights from Vermont v. Brillon

Assigned Counsel Delays Charged to Defendant: Insights from Vermont v. Brillon

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Assigned Counsel Delays Charged to Defendant: Insights from Vermont v. Brillon Introduction Vermont v. Michael Brillon is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the...
Limiting Voting Rights Act Section 2 to Majority-Minority Districts: Supreme Court Upholds 50% Threshold

Limiting Voting Rights Act Section 2 to Majority-Minority Districts: Supreme Court Upholds 50% Threshold

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Limiting Voting Rights Act Section 2 to Majority-Minority Districts: Supreme Court Upholds 50% Threshold Introduction The Supreme Court case Gary Bartlett, Executive Director of North Carolina State...
Uniform Expert Witness Fees in Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction Cases

Uniform Expert Witness Fees in Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction Cases

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Uniform Expert Witness Fees in Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction Cases Introduction The case of State of Kansas v. State of Colorado (556 U.S. 98) is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court...
Defining Minority Opportunity Districts: Supreme Court Upholds Majority-Minority Requirement under Voting Rights Act § 2 in Bartlett v. Director of N.C. State Board of Elections

Defining Minority Opportunity Districts: Supreme Court Upholds Majority-Minority Requirement under Voting Rights Act § 2 in Bartlett v. Director of N.C. State Board of Elections

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Defining Minority Opportunity Districts: Supreme Court Upholds Majority-Minority Requirement under Voting Rights Act § 2 in Bartlett v. Director of N.C. State Board of Elections Introduction In Gary...
Attribution of Trial Delays in Speedy Trial Claims: Vermont v. Brillon

Attribution of Trial Delays in Speedy Trial Claims: Vermont v. Brillon

Date: Mar 10, 2009
Attribution of Trial Delays in Speedy Trial Claims: Vermont v. Brillon Introduction Vermont v. Brillon, 556 U.S. 81 (2009), represents a significant development in the jurisprudence surrounding the...
Federal Preemption of State Failure-to-Warn Claims in Drug Labeling: Analysis of WYETH v. Levine

Federal Preemption of State Failure-to-Warn Claims in Drug Labeling: Analysis of WYETH v. Levine

Date: Mar 5, 2009
Federal Preemption of State Failure-to-Warn Claims in Drug Labeling: Analysis of WYETH v. Levine Introduction WYETH v. Levine is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the complex interplay...
Caperton v. Massey Coal: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Judicial Recusal in the Context of Campaign Contributions

Caperton v. Massey Coal: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Judicial Recusal in the Context of Campaign Contributions

Date: Mar 4, 2009
Caperton v. Massey Coal: Establishing Constitutional Standards for Judicial Recusal in the Context of Campaign Contributions Introduction The landmark case Caperton v. Massey Coal, decided by the...
Persecutor Bar Clarified: Supreme Court Reinterprets Asylum Eligibility Criteria

Persecutor Bar Clarified: Supreme Court Reinterprets Asylum Eligibility Criteria

Date: Mar 4, 2009
Persecutor Bar Clarified: Supreme Court Reinterprets Asylum Eligibility Criteria Introduction In the landmark case Daniel Girmai Negusie v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General (555 U.S. 511, 2009),...
Standing to Challenge Regulatory Exemptions: The Summers v. Earth Island Institute Decision

Standing to Challenge Regulatory Exemptions: The Summers v. Earth Island Institute Decision

Date: Mar 4, 2009
Standing to Challenge Regulatory Exemptions: The Summers v. Earth Island Institute Decision Introduction The case of Priscilla Summers, et al. v. Earth Island Institute et al., 555 U.S. 488 (2009),...
Reaffirming Article III Standing: Supreme Court's Decision in Summers v. Earth Island Institute

Reaffirming Article III Standing: Supreme Court's Decision in Summers v. Earth Island Institute

Date: Mar 4, 2009
Reaffirming Article III Standing: Supreme Court's Decision in Summers v. Earth Island Institute Introduction The Supreme Court case Priscilla Summers, et al. v. Earth Island Institute et al., 555...
Supreme Court Rules Out Price-Squeeze Claims Under Sherman Act in AT&T v. LinkLine Communications

Supreme Court Rules Out Price-Squeeze Claims Under Sherman Act in AT&T v. LinkLine Communications

Date: Feb 26, 2009
Supreme Court Rules Out Price-Squeeze Claims Under Sherman Act in AT&T v. LinkLine Communications Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California, et...
Government Speech Doctrine in Public Monument Display: An Analysis of Pleasant Grove City v. Summum

Government Speech Doctrine in Public Monument Display: An Analysis of Pleasant Grove City v. Summum

Date: Feb 26, 2009
Government Speech Doctrine in Public Monument Display: An Analysis of Pleasant Grove City v. Summum Introduction Pleasant Grove City, Utah, et al. v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460 (2009), is a pivotal case...
Price-Squeeze Claims Under Sherman Act Require Duty-to-Deal: ATT v. LinkLine Communications

Price-Squeeze Claims Under Sherman Act Require Duty-to-Deal: ATT v. LinkLine Communications

Date: Feb 26, 2009
Price-Squeeze Claims Under Sherman Act Require Duty-to-Deal: ATT v. LinkLine Communications Introduction The Supreme Court case PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, DBA ATT, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.,...
Idaho's Ban on Political Payroll Deductions Upheld: A First Amendment Analysis

Idaho's Ban on Political Payroll Deductions Upheld: A First Amendment Analysis

Date: Feb 25, 2009
Idaho's Ban on Political Payroll Deductions Upheld: A First Amendment Analysis Introduction The case of Ben Ysursa, Idaho Secretary of State, et al. v. Pocatello Education Association et al. reached...
Carcieri v. Salazar: Defining Federal Jurisdiction in Tribal Land Trusts

Carcieri v. Salazar: Defining Federal Jurisdiction in Tribal Land Trusts

Date: Feb 25, 2009
Carcieri v. Salazar: Defining Federal Jurisdiction in Tribal Land Trusts Introduction Carcieri v. Salazar, 555 U.S. 379 (2009), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that clarifies the scope of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert