Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

FCC v. Fox Television Stations: Upholding Stricter Indecency Standards Under the Administrative Procedure Act

FCC v. Fox Television Stations: Upholding Stricter Indecency Standards Under the Administrative Procedure Act

Date: Apr 29, 2009
FCC v. Fox Television Stations: Upholding Stricter Indecency Standards Under the Administrative Procedure Act Introduction Federal Communications Commission (FCC) v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. ,...
Traditional Stay Standards Affirmed Over §1252(f)(2) in Nken v. Holder

Traditional Stay Standards Affirmed Over §1252(f)(2) in Nken v. Holder

Date: Apr 23, 2009
Traditional Stay Standards Affirmed Over §1252(f)(2) in Nken v. Holder Introduction In the landmark case of Jean Marc NKEN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, 556 U.S. 418 (2009),...
Supreme Court Upholds Traditional Four-Factor Test for Staying Removal in Nken v. Holder

Supreme Court Upholds Traditional Four-Factor Test for Staying Removal in Nken v. Holder

Date: Apr 23, 2009
Supreme Court Upholds Traditional Four-Factor Test for Staying Removal in Nken v. Holder Introduction Jean Marc Nken v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, 556 U.S. 418 (2009), is a pivotal...
Elahi v. Ministry of Defense: Reinterpreting Asset Attachment in Terrorism-Related Judgments Under VPA and TRIA

Elahi v. Ministry of Defense: Reinterpreting Asset Attachment in Terrorism-Related Judgments Under VPA and TRIA

Date: Apr 22, 2009
Elahi v. Ministry of Defense: Reinterpreting Asset Attachment in Terrorism-Related Judgments Under VPA and TRIA Introduction The Supreme Court case Ministry of Defense and Support for the Armed...
Arizona v. Gant: Refining the Scope of Vehicle Searches Incident to Arrest

Arizona v. Gant: Refining the Scope of Vehicle Searches Incident to Arrest

Date: Apr 22, 2009
Arizona v. Gant: Refining the Scope of Vehicle Searches Incident to Arrest Introduction Arizona v. Rodney Joseph Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), represents a significant development in Fourth Amendment...
Shinseki v. Sanders: Redefining Harmless Error in Veterans Claims

Shinseki v. Sanders: Redefining Harmless Error in Veterans Claims

Date: Apr 22, 2009
Shinseki v. Sanders: Redefining Harmless Error in Veterans Claims Introduction In Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Petitioner, v. Woodrow F. Sanders (556 U.S. 396, 2009), the United...
Supreme Court Reinforces Sovereign Immunity: Navajo Nation's Breach-of-Trust Claim Dismissed Under the Indian Tucker Act

Supreme Court Reinforces Sovereign Immunity: Navajo Nation's Breach-of-Trust Claim Dismissed Under the Indian Tucker Act

Date: Apr 7, 2009
Supreme Court Reinforces Sovereign Immunity: Navajo Nation's Breach-of-Trust Claim Dismissed Under the Indian Tucker Act Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Navajo Nation, 556 U.S....
Corley v. United States: Affirming the McNabb-Mallory Rule under 18 U.S.C. § 3501

Corley v. United States: Affirming the McNabb-Mallory Rule under 18 U.S.C. § 3501

Date: Apr 7, 2009
Corley v. United States: Affirming the McNabb-Mallory Rule under 18 U.S.C. § 3501 Introduction Case: Johnnie Corley, Petitioner, v. United States. Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: April 6, 2009...
Johnnie Corley v. United States (2009): Reinforcing the McNabb-Mallory Exclusionary Rule under 18 U.S.C. § 3501

Johnnie Corley v. United States (2009): Reinforcing the McNabb-Mallory Exclusionary Rule under 18 U.S.C. § 3501

Date: Apr 7, 2009
Johnnie Corley v. United States (2009): Reinforcing the McNabb-Mallory Exclusionary Rule under 18 U.S.C. § 3501 Introduction Johnnie Corley v. United States (556 U.S. 303, 2009) is a significant...
EPA's Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis Under §316(b) of the Clean Water Act Affirmed

EPA's Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis Under §316(b) of the Clean Water Act Affirmed

Date: Apr 2, 2009
EPA's Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis Under §316(b) of the Clean Water Act Affirmed Introduction Entergy Corporation v. Riverkeeper, Inc., et al. (556 U.S. 208, 2009) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
EPA's Authorization to Utilize Cost-Benefit Analysis Under Clean Water Act §1326(b): A Comprehensive Commentary on Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

EPA's Authorization to Utilize Cost-Benefit Analysis Under Clean Water Act §1326(b): A Comprehensive Commentary on Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Date: Apr 2, 2009
EPA's Authorization to Utilize Cost-Benefit Analysis Under Clean Water Act §1326(b): A Comprehensive Commentary on Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc. Introduction Entergy Corporation v. Riverkeeper,...
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses for ADEA Claims in Collective-Bargaining Agreements

Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses for ADEA Claims in Collective-Bargaining Agreements

Date: Apr 2, 2009
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses for ADEA Claims in Collective-Bargaining Agreements Introduction In the landmark case 14 PENN PLAZA LLC, ET AL. v. STEVEN PYETT ET AL. (556 U.S. 247, 2009), the...
Expansion of 18 U.S.C. § 3599: Federally Appointed Counsel in State Clemency Proceedings

Expansion of 18 U.S.C. § 3599: Federally Appointed Counsel in State Clemency Proceedings

Date: Apr 2, 2009
Expansion of 18 U.S.C. § 3599: Federally Appointed Counsel in State Clemency Proceedings Introduction Edward Jerome Harbison v. Ricky Bell, Warden, 556 U.S. 180 (2009), presents a significant...
EPA's Authority to Employ Cost-Benefit Analysis Under the Clean Water Act: Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc. Analysis

EPA's Authority to Employ Cost-Benefit Analysis Under the Clean Water Act: Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc. Analysis

Date: Apr 2, 2009
EPA's Authority to Employ Cost-Benefit Analysis Under the Clean Water Act: Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc. Analysis Introduction Case Title: Entergy Corporation, Petitioner, v. Riverkeeper, Inc.,...
Supreme Court Clarifies Apology Resolution Does Not Restrict Hawaii's Sovereignty in Ceded Land Transfers

Supreme Court Clarifies Apology Resolution Does Not Restrict Hawaii's Sovereignty in Ceded Land Transfers

Date: Apr 1, 2009
Supreme Court Clarifies Apology Resolution Does Not Restrict Hawaii's Sovereignty in Ceded Land Transfers Introduction The case of Hawaii, et al. v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs et al., 556 U.S. 163...
Rivera v. Illinois: Denial of Peremptory Challenge Does Not Mandate Automatic Conviction Reversal Under Due Process

Rivera v. Illinois: Denial of Peremptory Challenge Does Not Mandate Automatic Conviction Reversal Under Due Process

Date: Apr 1, 2009
Rivera v. Illinois: Denial of Peremptory Challenge Does Not Mandate Automatic Conviction Reversal Under Due Process Introduction Parties Involved: Michael Rivera, the petitioner, appealed his...
Apology Resolution Does Not Impede State Authority to Alienate Ceded Lands: Comprehensive Analysis of Hawai'i et al. v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs

Apology Resolution Does Not Impede State Authority to Alienate Ceded Lands: Comprehensive Analysis of Hawai'i et al. v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs

Date: Apr 1, 2009
Apology Resolution Does Not Impede State Authority to Alienate Ceded Lands: Comprehensive Analysis of Hawai'i et al. v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs Introduction The case of Hawai'i et al. v. Office of...
Puckett v. United States: Affirming the Application of Plain-Error Review to Forfeited Plea-Breach Claims

Puckett v. United States: Affirming the Application of Plain-Error Review to Forfeited Plea-Breach Claims

Date: Mar 26, 2009
Puckett v. United States: Affirming the Application of Plain-Error Review to Forfeited Plea-Breach Claims Introduction James Benjamin Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129 (2009), is a landmark...
Limits on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Knowles v. Mirzayance

Limits on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Knowles v. Mirzayance

Date: Mar 25, 2009
Limits on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Knowles v. Mirzayance Introduction Knowles v. Mirzayance, 556 U.S. 111 (2009), is a significant Supreme Court case that addresses the standards for...
Legal Commentary: Reverse Payment Agreements in Pharmaceutical Antitrust Law

Legal Commentary: Reverse Payment Agreements in Pharmaceutical Antitrust Law

Date: Mar 24, 2009
Legal Commentary: Reverse Payment Agreements in Pharmaceutical Antitrust Law Introduction The case of Arkansas Carpenters Health and Welfare Fund, Paper, A.F. of L., et al., v. Bayer AG and Bayer...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.