Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

District Courts' Authority to Vary Crack-Powder Cocaine Ratios Affirmed in Spears v. United States

District Courts' Authority to Vary Crack-Powder Cocaine Ratios Affirmed in Spears v. United States

Date: Jan 22, 2009
District Courts' Authority to Vary Crack-Powder Cocaine Ratios Affirmed in Spears v. United States Introduction Spears v. United States, 555 U.S. 261 (2009), represents a pivotal moment in the...
Supreme Court Abandons Mandatory Saucier Procedure in Qualified Immunity Cases

Supreme Court Abandons Mandatory Saucier Procedure in Qualified Immunity Cases

Date: Jan 22, 2009
Supreme Court Abandons Mandatory Saucier Procedure in Qualified Immunity Cases Introduction Correll Pearson, et al., Petitioners v. Afton Callahan is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limited Applicability of the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Isolated Police Negligence

Limited Applicability of the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Isolated Police Negligence

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Limited Applicability of the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Isolated Police Negligence Introduction In the landmark case Bennie Dean HERRING v. UNITED STATES, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on...
Oregon v. Ice: Upholding Judicial Discretion for Consecutive Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment

Oregon v. Ice: Upholding Judicial Discretion for Consecutive Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Oregon v. Ice: Upholding Judicial Discretion for Consecutive Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment Introduction Oregon v. Thomas Eugene Ice is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Isolated Negligence and the Exclusionary Rule: Analyzing Bennie Dean Herring v. United States

Isolated Negligence and the Exclusionary Rule: Analyzing Bennie Dean Herring v. United States

Date: Jan 15, 2009
Isolated Negligence and the Exclusionary Rule: Analyzing Bennie Dean Herring v. United States Introduction Bennie Dean Herring v. United States (555 U.S. 135) is a landmark 2009 decision by the...
Finality of Judgment Under AEDPA: Supreme Court's Ruling in Jimenez v. Quarterman

Finality of Judgment Under AEDPA: Supreme Court's Ruling in Jimenez v. Quarterman

Date: Jan 14, 2009
Finality of Judgment Under AEDPA: Supreme Court's Ruling in Jimenez v. Quarterman Introduction The case of Carlos Jimenez v. Nathaniel Quarterman, decided by the United States Supreme Court on...
Reopening Direct Appeals and AEDPA's Timeliness: Jimenez v. Quarterman

Reopening Direct Appeals and AEDPA's Timeliness: Jimenez v. Quarterman

Date: Jan 14, 2009
Reopening Direct Appeals and AEDPA's Timeliness: Jimenez v. Quarterman Introduction Carlos Jimenez, the petitioner, faced a significant legal question regarding the timing of his federal habeas...
Deondery Chambers v. United States: Failure to Report Not Considered a Violent Felony under ACCA

Deondery Chambers v. United States: Failure to Report Not Considered a Violent Felony under ACCA

Date: Jan 14, 2009
Deondery Chambers v. United States: Failure to Report Not Considered a Violent Felony under ACCA Introduction Deondery Chambers v. United States (555 U.S. 122, 2009) is a pivotal Supreme Court case...
Non-Preemption of State Fraud Claims by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act

Non-Preemption of State Fraud Claims by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act

Date: Dec 16, 2008
Non-Preemption of State Fraud Claims by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act Introduction The case of Altria Group, Inc., et al. v. Stephanie Good et al., 555 U.S. 70 (2008), represents...
Reclassifying Jury Instruction Errors: Insights from Hedgpeth v. Pulido

Reclassifying Jury Instruction Errors: Insights from Hedgpeth v. Pulido

Date: Dec 3, 2008
Reclassifying Jury Instruction Errors: Insights from Hedgpeth v. Pulido Introduction Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57 (2008), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Reaffirming Harmless Error Analysis in Jury Instructions: Pulido v. Hedgpeth

Reaffirming Harmless Error Analysis in Jury Instructions: Pulido v. Hedgpeth

Date: Dec 3, 2008
Reaffirming Harmless Error Analysis in Jury Instructions: Pulido v. Hedgpeth Introduction Anthony Hedgpeth, Warden, Petitioner, v. Michael Robert Pulido is a landmark decision by the United States...
Supreme Court Sets Rigorous Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Military Environmental Cases: Winter v. NRDC

Supreme Court Sets Rigorous Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Military Environmental Cases: Winter v. NRDC

Date: Nov 13, 2008
Supreme Court Sets Rigorous Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Military Environmental Cases: Winter v. NRDC Introduction In Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008),...
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council: Refining the Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Environmental Law

Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council: Refining the Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Environmental Law

Date: Nov 13, 2008
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council: Refining the Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Environmental Law Introduction In Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008),...
Admissibility of Multimedia Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Kelly v. California

Admissibility of Multimedia Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Kelly v. California

Date: Nov 11, 2008
Admissibility of Multimedia Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Kelly v. California Introduction The cases of Douglas Kelly and Samuel Zamudio represent significant...
Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Trials: Revisiting Admissibility Standards Post-Kelly v. California

Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Trials: Revisiting Admissibility Standards Post-Kelly v. California

Date: Nov 11, 2008
Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Trials: Revisiting Admissibility Standards Post-Kelly v. California Introduction The admissibility of victim impact evidence in capital trials has long been a...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Walker v. Georgia: Implications for Eighth Amendment Capital Sentencing

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Walker v. Georgia: Implications for Eighth Amendment Capital Sentencing

Date: Oct 21, 2008
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Walker v. Georgia: Implications for Eighth Amendment Capital Sentencing Introduction Artimus Rick Walker v. Georgia (555 U.S. 979) is a significant case addressing...
AmeriSource v. United States: Fifth Amendment Protections for Innocent Third-Party Property Seized as Evidence

AmeriSource v. United States: Fifth Amendment Protections for Innocent Third-Party Property Seized as Evidence

Date: Oct 16, 2008
AmeriSource v. United States: Fifth Amendment Protections for Innocent Third-Party Property Seized as Evidence Introduction AmeriSource Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the publicly traded...
Death Penalty for Child Rape Ruled Unconstitutional Under the Eighth Amendment

Death Penalty for Child Rape Ruled Unconstitutional Under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Oct 2, 2008
Death Penalty for Child Rape Ruled Unconstitutional Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction In the landmark case of Patrick Kennedy v. Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court addressed a profound...
Enforcement of International Court Decisions Requires Congressional Action: Insights from Medellín v. Texas

Enforcement of International Court Decisions Requires Congressional Action: Insights from Medellín v. Texas

Date: Aug 6, 2008
Enforcement of International Court Decisions Requires Congressional Action: Insights from Medellín v. Texas Introduction Medellín v. Texas is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme...
Enforceability of International Court Decisions in U.S. Domestic Law: Insights from Medellín v. Texas

Enforceability of International Court Decisions in U.S. Domestic Law: Insights from Medellín v. Texas

Date: Aug 6, 2008
Enforceability of International Court Decisions in U.S. Domestic Law: Insights from Medellín v. Texas Introduction In re Jose Ernesto Medellín, v. Texas (554 U.S. 759) is a pivotal United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert