Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Machine-or-Transformation Test Not Sole Criterion for Patent Eligibility Established in Bilski v. Kappos

Machine-or-Transformation Test Not Sole Criterion for Patent Eligibility Established in Bilski v. Kappos

Date: Jun 29, 2010
Machine-or-Transformation Test Not Sole Criterion for Patent Eligibility Established in Bilski v. Kappos Introduction Bilski v. Kappos is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision released on...
Implications of Otis McDonald v. City of Chicago: Incorporation of the Second Amendment into State Law

Implications of Otis McDonald v. City of Chicago: Incorporation of the Second Amendment into State Law

Date: Jun 29, 2010
Implications of Otis McDonald v. City of Chicago: Incorporation of the Second Amendment into State Law Introduction The landmark case Otis McDonald, et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.,...
Christian Legal Society v. Martinez: Upholding Viewpoint-Neutral Access Policies in University Student Organizations

Christian Legal Society v. Martinez: Upholding Viewpoint-Neutral Access Policies in University Student Organizations

Date: Jun 29, 2010
Christian Legal Society v. Martinez: Upholding Viewpoint-Neutral Access Policies in University Student Organizations Introduction Christian Legal Society, Chapter of the University of California,...
Defining "Second or Successive" Habeas Applications: Insights from Magwood v. Patterson

Defining "Second or Successive" Habeas Applications: Insights from Magwood v. Patterson

Date: Jun 25, 2010
Defining "Second or Successive" Habeas Applications: Insights from Magwood v. Patterson Introduction Billy Joe Magwood v. Tony Patterson, 561 U.S. 320 (2010), is a significant Supreme Court case that...
Skilling v. United States: Defining the Scope of Honest-Services Fraud

Skilling v. United States: Defining the Scope of Honest-Services Fraud

Date: Jun 25, 2010
Skilling v. United States: Defining the Scope of Honest-Services Fraud Introduction Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addressed significant...
Defendant Rights to Object to Honest Services Fraud Instructions Without Special Verdicts: Black v. United States

Defendant Rights to Object to Honest Services Fraud Instructions Without Special Verdicts: Black v. United States

Date: Jun 25, 2010
Defendant Rights to Object to Honest Services Fraud Instructions Without Special Verdicts: Black v. United States Introduction Conrad M. Black, John A. Boultbee, and Mark S. Kipnis v. United States...
Disclosure of Referendum Petitions and First Amendment Rights: Analysis of DOE v. REED

Disclosure of Referendum Petitions and First Amendment Rights: Analysis of DOE v. REED

Date: Jun 25, 2010
Disclosure of Referendum Petitions and First Amendment Rights: Analysis of DOE v. REED Introduction John Doe #1, et al. v. Sam Reed, Washington Secretary of State, et al. (561 U.S. 186) is a landmark...
Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Authority in CBA Ratification Disputes and Limits §301(a) Tort Claims in Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Authority in CBA Ratification Disputes and Limits §301(a) Tort Claims in Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Date: Jun 25, 2010
Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Authority in CBA Ratification Disputes and Limits §301(a) Tort Claims in Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Introduction In Granite Rock Company...
Supreme Court Sets Clear Limitations on §10(b)'s Extraterritorial Reach in National Australia Bank v. Morrison

Supreme Court Sets Clear Limitations on §10(b)'s Extraterritorial Reach in National Australia Bank v. Morrison

Date: Jun 25, 2010
Supreme Court Sets Clear Limitations on §10(b)'s Extraterritorial Reach in National Australia Bank v. Morrison Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Robert Morrison, et al., Petitioners v....
Supreme Court Upholds Criminalization of Material Support to Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations

Supreme Court Upholds Criminalization of Material Support to Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Supreme Court Upholds Criminalization of Material Support to Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations Introduction In the landmark case of Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al. v....
Supreme Court Rules Carmack Amendment Does Not Apply to International Through Bills of Lading

Supreme Court Rules Carmack Amendment Does Not Apply to International Through Bills of Lading

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Supreme Court Rules Carmack Amendment Does Not Apply to International Through Bills of Lading Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States addressed a pivotal issue in Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha...
Upholding the Material Support Prohibition for Foreign Terrorist Organizations: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

Upholding the Material Support Prohibition for Foreign Terrorist Organizations: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Upholding the Material Support Prohibition for Foreign Terrorist Organizations: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project Introduction In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (561 U.S. 1, 2010), the United...
Delegation of Arbitration Agreement Validity to Arbitrators Affirmed: Rent-A-Center v. Jackson

Delegation of Arbitration Agreement Validity to Arbitrators Affirmed: Rent-A-Center v. Jackson

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Delegation of Arbitration Agreement Validity to Arbitrators Affirmed: Rent–A–Center v. Jackson Introduction Rent–A–Center, West, Inc. v. Antonio Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010), is a landmark decision by...
Monsanto v. Geertson: Defining the Boundaries of Injunctive Relief under NEPA

Monsanto v. Geertson: Defining the Boundaries of Injunctive Relief under NEPA

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Monsanto v. Geertson: Defining the Boundaries of Injunctive Relief under NEPA Introduction Monsanto Co. et al., v. Geertson Seed Farms et al., 561 U.S. 139 (2010), is a landmark case in environmental...
Carmack Amendment and Forum Selection: Insights from Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corporation et al.

Carmack Amendment and Forum Selection: Insights from Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corporation et al.

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Carmack Amendment and Forum Selection: Insights from Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corporation et al. Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v....
Resolving Circuit Conflicts on MPPAA Withdrawal Liability: ICP v. Central States Pension Fund

Resolving Circuit Conflicts on MPPAA Withdrawal Liability: ICP v. Central States Pension Fund

Date: Jun 19, 2010
Resolving Circuit Conflicts on MPPAA Withdrawal Liability: ICP v. Central States Pension Fund Introduction The case of International Comfort Products, LLC (ICP) v. Central States, Southeast and...
Dillon v. United States: Affirming the Binding Nature of §3582(c)(2) Proceedings Post-Booker

Dillon v. United States: Affirming the Binding Nature of §3582(c)(2) Proceedings Post-Booker

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Dillon v. United States: Affirming the Binding Nature of §3582(c)(2) Proceedings Post-Booker Introduction Percy Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817 (2010), addressed the applicability of the...
Quon v. City of Ontario: Establishing Reasonable Employee Privacy Expectations in Workplace Communications

Quon v. City of Ontario: Establishing Reasonable Employee Privacy Expectations in Workplace Communications

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Quon v. City of Ontario: Establishing Reasonable Employee Privacy Expectations in Workplace Communications Introduction The case of City of Ontario, California, et al. v. Jeff Quon et al. presented a...
Schwab v. Reilly: Clarifying Trustee Obligations on Bankruptcy Exemptions

Schwab v. Reilly: Clarifying Trustee Obligations on Bankruptcy Exemptions

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Schwab v. Reilly: Clarifying Trustee Obligations on Bankruptcy Exemptions Introduction In Schwab v. Reilly, 560 U.S. 770 (2010), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue in...
Supreme Court Upholds Three-Member Quorum Requirement for Delegated NLRB Authority in New Process Steel v. NLRB

Supreme Court Upholds Three-Member Quorum Requirement for Delegated NLRB Authority in New Process Steel v. NLRB

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Supreme Court Upholds Three-Member Quorum Requirement for Delegated NLRB Authority in New Process Steel v. NLRB Introduction New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board (560 U.S. 674,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert