Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Machine-or-Transformation Test Not Sole Criterion for Patent Eligibility Established in Bilski v. Kappos Introduction Bilski v. Kappos is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision released on...
Implications of Otis McDonald v. City of Chicago: Incorporation of the Second Amendment into State Law Introduction The landmark case Otis McDonald, et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al.,...
Christian Legal Society v. Martinez: Upholding Viewpoint-Neutral Access Policies in University Student Organizations Introduction Christian Legal Society, Chapter of the University of California,...
Defining "Second or Successive" Habeas Applications: Insights from Magwood v. Patterson Introduction Billy Joe Magwood v. Tony Patterson, 561 U.S. 320 (2010), is a significant Supreme Court case that...
Skilling v. United States: Defining the Scope of Honest-Services Fraud Introduction Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addressed significant...
Defendant Rights to Object to Honest Services Fraud Instructions Without Special Verdicts: Black v. United States Introduction Conrad M. Black, John A. Boultbee, and Mark S. Kipnis v. United States...
Disclosure of Referendum Petitions and First Amendment Rights: Analysis of DOE v. REED Introduction John Doe #1, et al. v. Sam Reed, Washington Secretary of State, et al. (561 U.S. 186) is a landmark...
Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Authority in CBA Ratification Disputes and Limits §301(a) Tort Claims in Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Introduction In Granite Rock Company...
Supreme Court Sets Clear Limitations on §10(b)'s Extraterritorial Reach in National Australia Bank v. Morrison Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Robert Morrison, et al., Petitioners v....
Supreme Court Upholds Criminalization of Material Support to Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations Introduction In the landmark case of Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al. v....
Supreme Court Rules Carmack Amendment Does Not Apply to International Through Bills of Lading Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States addressed a pivotal issue in Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha...
Upholding the Material Support Prohibition for Foreign Terrorist Organizations: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project Introduction In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (561 U.S. 1, 2010), the United...
Delegation of Arbitration Agreement Validity to Arbitrators Affirmed: Rent–A–Center v. Jackson Introduction Rent–A–Center, West, Inc. v. Antonio Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010), is a landmark decision by...
Monsanto v. Geertson: Defining the Boundaries of Injunctive Relief under NEPA Introduction Monsanto Co. et al., v. Geertson Seed Farms et al., 561 U.S. 139 (2010), is a landmark case in environmental...
Carmack Amendment and Forum Selection: Insights from Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corporation et al. Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v....
Resolving Circuit Conflicts on MPPAA Withdrawal Liability: ICP v. Central States Pension Fund Introduction The case of International Comfort Products, LLC (ICP) v. Central States, Southeast and...
Dillon v. United States: Affirming the Binding Nature of §3582(c)(2) Proceedings Post-Booker Introduction Percy Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817 (2010), addressed the applicability of the...
Quon v. City of Ontario: Establishing Reasonable Employee Privacy Expectations in Workplace Communications Introduction The case of City of Ontario, California, et al. v. Jeff Quon et al. presented a...
Schwab v. Reilly: Clarifying Trustee Obligations on Bankruptcy Exemptions Introduction In Schwab v. Reilly, 560 U.S. 770 (2010), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue in...
Supreme Court Upholds Three-Member Quorum Requirement for Delegated NLRB Authority in New Process Steel v. NLRB Introduction New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board (560 U.S. 674,...