Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Reinforces FFDCA Hearing Requirements in National Corn Growers Association v. EPA

Supreme Court Reinforces FFDCA Hearing Requirements in National Corn Growers Association v. EPA

Date: Feb 17, 2011
Supreme Court Reinforces FFDCA Hearing Requirements in National Corn Growers Association v. EPA Introduction In the landmark case of National Corn Growers Association, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S....
Supreme Court Affirms Chase's Right to Increase Interest Rates Without Prior Notice Under Regulation Z

Supreme Court Affirms Chase's Right to Increase Interest Rates Without Prior Notice Under Regulation Z

Date: Jan 25, 2011
Supreme Court Affirms Chase's Right to Increase Interest Rates Without Prior Notice Under Regulation Z Introduction The case of CHASE BANK USA, N.A. v. JAMES A. McCOY addressed a critical issue...
Supreme Court Establishes Limitation on Federal Habeas Review of State Parole Procedures

Supreme Court Establishes Limitation on Federal Habeas Review of State Parole Procedures

Date: Jan 25, 2011
Limiting Federal Habeas Review: The Supreme Court's Ruling in Swarthout v. Cooke Introduction In the landmark decision of Swarthout v. Cooke, Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of...
Supreme Court Restricts Appeals on Qualified Immunity Denials Post-Trial: ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al.

Supreme Court Restricts Appeals on Qualified Immunity Denials Post-Trial: ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al.

Date: Jan 25, 2011
Supreme Court Restricts Appeals on Qualified Immunity Denials Post-Trial: ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al. Introduction ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al. (562 U.S. 180) is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Expanding Scope of Third-Party Retaliation under Title VII: THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS

Expanding Scope of Third-Party Retaliation under Title VII: THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS

Date: Jan 25, 2011
Expanding Scope of Third-Party Retaliation under Title VII: THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS Introduction Eric L. THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS, LP. is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Clarifying the Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Harrington v. Richter

Clarifying the Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Harrington v. Richter

Date: Jan 20, 2011
Clarifying the Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Harrington v. Richter Introduction In the landmark case of KELLY HARRINGTON, WARDEN, PETITIONER v....
Reaffirming the Strickland Standard in Plea Bargain Contexts

Reaffirming the Strickland Standard in Plea Bargain Contexts

Date: Jan 20, 2011
Reaffirming the Strickland Standard in Plea Bargain Contexts Introduction Jeff Premeo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Petitioner v. Randy Joseph Moore (562 U.S. 115, 2011) is a United...
Informational Privacy in Government Employment Background Checks: Analysis of NASA v. Nelson

Informational Privacy in Government Employment Background Checks: Analysis of NASA v. Nelson

Date: Jan 20, 2011
Informational Privacy in Government Employment Background Checks: Analysis of NASA v. Nelson Introduction National Aeronautics and Space Administration et al. v. Nelson et al., 562 U.S. 134 (2011),...
Mayo Foundation v. United States: Defining the 'Student' Exception Under FICA

Mayo Foundation v. United States: Defining the 'Student' Exception Under FICA

Date: Jan 12, 2011
Mayo Foundation v. United States: Defining the 'Student' Exception Under FICA Introduction Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 562 U.S. 44...
Ransom v. FIA: 'Ownership Costs' Deduction in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Requires Active Loan or Lease Payments

Ransom v. FIA: 'Ownership Costs' Deduction in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Requires Active Loan or Lease Payments

Date: Jan 12, 2011
Ransom v. FIA: 'Ownership Costs' Deduction in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Requires Active Loan or Lease Payments Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: January 11, 2011 Introduction Ransom v. FIA Card Services,...
Alderman v. United States: Challenging the Boundaries of the Commerce Clause

Alderman v. United States: Challenging the Boundaries of the Commerce Clause

Date: Jan 11, 2011
Alderman v. United States: Challenging the Boundaries of the Commerce Clause Introduction Alderman v. United States is a pivotal case that highlights the ongoing tension within the U.S. judiciary...
Preserving Fair Trial Rights: Reversal of Barrios's Conviction Due to Prosecutorial Misconduct

Preserving Fair Trial Rights: Reversal of Barrios's Conviction Due to Prosecutorial Misconduct

Date: Dec 24, 2010
Preserving Fair Trial Rights: Reversal of Barrios's Conviction Due to Prosecutorial Misconduct Introduction The case of Edson Barrios v. State of Florida presents a pivotal examination of...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analyzing RICHARD F. ALLEN v. JAMES CHARLES LAWHORN

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analyzing RICHARD F. ALLEN v. JAMES CHARLES LAWHORN

Date: Dec 14, 2010
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analyzing RICHARD F. ALLEN v. JAMES CHARLES LAWHORN Introduction The case of RICHARD F. ALLEN, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF...
Supreme Court to Resolve Circuit Conflicts on First Amendment Protections vs. Privacy in Prescriber Data Marketing

Supreme Court to Resolve Circuit Conflicts on First Amendment Protections vs. Privacy in Prescriber Data Marketing

Date: Dec 14, 2010
Supreme Court to Resolve Circuit Conflicts on First Amendment Protections vs. Privacy in Prescriber Data Marketing Introduction The case of William H. Sorrell, et al. v. IMS Health Inc., et al....
Williams v. Hobbs: Redefining Procedural Safeguards in Federal Habeas Corpus Evidentiary Hearings

Williams v. Hobbs: Redefining Procedural Safeguards in Federal Habeas Corpus Evidentiary Hearings

Date: Dec 7, 2010
Williams v. Hobbs: Redefining Procedural Safeguards in Federal Habeas Corpus Evidentiary Hearings 1. Introduction Williams v. Hobbs, 131 S. Ct. 558 (2010), is a pivotal case addressing the procedural...
Exclusion Payments in Pharmaceutical Antitrust Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Bayer AG

Exclusion Payments in Pharmaceutical Antitrust Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Bayer AG

Date: Dec 7, 2010
Exclusion Payments in Pharmaceutical Antitrust Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Bayer AG Introduction The case of Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., CVS...
Monell's Policy or Custom Requirement Applied to Prospective Relief: Insights from Los Angeles County v. Humphries

Monell's Policy or Custom Requirement Applied to Prospective Relief: Insights from Los Angeles County v. Humphries

Date: Dec 1, 2010
Monell's Policy or Custom Requirement Applied to Prospective Relief: Insights from Los Angeles County v. Humphries Introduction Los Angeles County v. Humphries, 562 U.S. 29 (2010), marks a...
McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. v. Valdes: Federal Preemption and State Failure-to-Warn in OTC Drug Labeling

McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. v. Valdes: Federal Preemption and State Failure-to-Warn in OTC Drug Labeling

Date: Dec 1, 2010
McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. v. Valdes: Federal Preemption and State Failure-to-Warn in OTC Drug Labeling Introduction In the landmark case McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. v. Valdes, the United States Supreme Court was...
Ke v. Abbott: Supreme Court's Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)'s 'Except' Clause

Ke v. Abbott: Supreme Court's Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)'s 'Except' Clause

Date: Nov 16, 2010
Ke v. Abbott: Supreme Court's Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)'s 'Except' Clause Introduction In the landmark case Ke v. Abbott, decided on November 15, 2010, the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Clarifies Application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 'Except' Clause

Supreme Court Clarifies Application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 'Except' Clause

Date: Nov 16, 2010
Supreme Court Clarifies Application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 'Except' Clause Introduction In the 2010 decision of Kevin Abbott, Petitioner v. United States and Carlos Rashad Gould, Petitioner v. United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert