Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Supreme Court Reinforces FFDCA Hearing Requirements in National Corn Growers Association v. EPA Introduction In the landmark case of National Corn Growers Association, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S....
Supreme Court Affirms Chase's Right to Increase Interest Rates Without Prior Notice Under Regulation Z Introduction The case of CHASE BANK USA, N.A. v. JAMES A. McCOY addressed a critical issue...
Limiting Federal Habeas Review: The Supreme Court's Ruling in Swarthout v. Cooke Introduction In the landmark decision of Swarthout v. Cooke, Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of...
Supreme Court Restricts Appeals on Qualified Immunity Denials Post-Trial: ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al. Introduction ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al. (562 U.S. 180) is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Expanding Scope of Third-Party Retaliation under Title VII: THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS Introduction Eric L. THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS, LP. is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Clarifying the Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Harrington v. Richter Introduction In the landmark case of KELLY HARRINGTON, WARDEN, PETITIONER v....
Reaffirming the Strickland Standard in Plea Bargain Contexts Introduction Jeff Premeo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Petitioner v. Randy Joseph Moore (562 U.S. 115, 2011) is a United...
Informational Privacy in Government Employment Background Checks: Analysis of NASA v. Nelson Introduction National Aeronautics and Space Administration et al. v. Nelson et al., 562 U.S. 134 (2011),...
Mayo Foundation v. United States: Defining the 'Student' Exception Under FICA Introduction Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, et al., Petitioners v. United States, 562 U.S. 44...
Ransom v. FIA: 'Ownership Costs' Deduction in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Requires Active Loan or Lease Payments Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: January 11, 2011 Introduction Ransom v. FIA Card Services,...
Alderman v. United States: Challenging the Boundaries of the Commerce Clause Introduction Alderman v. United States is a pivotal case that highlights the ongoing tension within the U.S. judiciary...
Preserving Fair Trial Rights: Reversal of Barrios's Conviction Due to Prosecutorial Misconduct Introduction The case of Edson Barrios v. State of Florida presents a pivotal examination of...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analyzing RICHARD F. ALLEN v. JAMES CHARLES LAWHORN Introduction The case of RICHARD F. ALLEN, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF...
Supreme Court to Resolve Circuit Conflicts on First Amendment Protections vs. Privacy in Prescriber Data Marketing Introduction The case of William H. Sorrell, et al. v. IMS Health Inc., et al....
Williams v. Hobbs: Redefining Procedural Safeguards in Federal Habeas Corpus Evidentiary Hearings 1. Introduction Williams v. Hobbs, 131 S. Ct. 558 (2010), is a pivotal case addressing the procedural...
Exclusion Payments in Pharmaceutical Antitrust Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Bayer AG Introduction The case of Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., CVS...
Monell's Policy or Custom Requirement Applied to Prospective Relief: Insights from Los Angeles County v. Humphries Introduction Los Angeles County v. Humphries, 562 U.S. 29 (2010), marks a...
McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. v. Valdes: Federal Preemption and State Failure-to-Warn in OTC Drug Labeling Introduction In the landmark case McNeil-P.P.C., Inc. v. Valdes, the United States Supreme Court was...
Ke v. Abbott: Supreme Court's Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)'s 'Except' Clause Introduction In the landmark case Ke v. Abbott, decided on November 15, 2010, the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Clarifies Application of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) 'Except' Clause Introduction In the 2010 decision of Kevin Abbott, Petitioner v. United States and Carlos Rashad Gould, Petitioner v. United...