Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Defining FOIA Exemption 2: The Milner v. Department of the Navy Decision

Defining FOIA Exemption 2: The Milner v. Department of the Navy Decision

Date: Mar 8, 2011
Defining FOIA Exemption 2: The Milner v. Department of the Navy Decision Introduction Milner v. Department of the Navy, 562 U.S. 562 (2011), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarified...
Collateral Review Under AEDPA: U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Wall II v. Kholi

Collateral Review Under AEDPA: U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Wall II v. Kholi

Date: Mar 8, 2011
Collateral Review Under AEDPA: U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Wall II v. Kholi Introduction In Ashbel T. Wall II, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Petitioner v. Khalil Kholi, 562...
Expansion of §1983 Jurisdiction to Include Postconviction DNA Testing Claims

Expansion of §1983 Jurisdiction to Include Postconviction DNA Testing Claims

Date: Mar 8, 2011
Expansion of §1983 Jurisdiction to Include Postconviction DNA Testing Claims Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case SKINNER v. SWITZER addressed a pivotal issue in criminal justice: whether a...
Resentencing and Postsentencing Rehabilitation: New Precedent in Pepper v. United States

Resentencing and Postsentencing Rehabilitation: New Precedent in Pepper v. United States

Date: Mar 3, 2011
Resentencing and Postsentencing Rehabilitation: New Precedent in Pepper v. United States Introduction Jason Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476 (2011), marks a significant development in federal...
First Amendment Protection of Picketing: SNYDER v. PHELPS and Its Legal Implications

First Amendment Protection of Picketing: SNYDER v. PHELPS and Its Legal Implications

Date: Mar 3, 2011
First Amendment Protection of Picketing: SNYDER v. PHELPS and Its Legal Implications Introduction Albert Snyder v. Fred W. Phelps, Sr., et al. is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision...
HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI: Filing Deadlines in Veterans Court Appeals Are Non-Jurisdictional

HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI: Filing Deadlines in Veterans Court Appeals Are Non-Jurisdictional

Date: Mar 2, 2011
HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI: Filing Deadlines in Veterans Court Appeals Are Non-Jurisdictional Introduction In HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI, 562 U.S. 428 (2011), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
FOIA Exemption 7(C) Limited to Individuals: Supreme Court Clarifies Corporate Privacy Rights

FOIA Exemption 7(C) Limited to Individuals: Supreme Court Clarifies Corporate Privacy Rights

Date: Mar 2, 2011
FOIA Exemption 7(C) Limited to Individuals: Supreme Court Clarifies Corporate Privacy Rights Introduction The landmark case of Federal Communications Commission et al. v. AT&T Inc. et al. (562 U.S....
Proctor Hospital v. Staub: Establishing 'Cat's Paw' Liability Under USERRA

Proctor Hospital v. Staub: Establishing 'Cat's Paw' Liability Under USERRA

Date: Mar 2, 2011
Proctor Hospital v. Staub: Establishing 'Cat's Paw' Liability Under USERRA Introduction Proctor Hospital v. Vincent E. Staub is a landmark Supreme Court decision that reshaped the application of the...
Refining the 'Ongoing Emergency' Standard: Comprehensive Analysis of Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011)

Refining the 'Ongoing Emergency' Standard: Comprehensive Analysis of Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011)

Date: Mar 1, 2011
Refining the 'Ongoing Emergency' Standard: Comprehensive Analysis of Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011) Introduction In Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011), the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Upholds California's 'Reasonableness' Standard as Adequate Procedural Bar in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Supreme Court Upholds California's 'Reasonableness' Standard as Adequate Procedural Bar in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Feb 24, 2011
Supreme Court Upholds California's 'Reasonableness' Standard as Adequate Procedural Bar in Habeas Corpus Petitions 1. Introduction The case of James Walker, Warden, et al. v. Charles W. Martin (562...
Preemption of State Tort Suits under FMVSS 208: Insights from WILLIAMSON v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMErica

Preemption of State Tort Suits under FMVSS 208: Insights from WILLIAMSON v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMErica

Date: Feb 24, 2011
Preemption of State Tort Suits under FMVSS 208: Insights from WILLIAMSON v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMErica Introduction The case of Delbert Williamson, et al. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., et al. (562...
Expansion of §11501(b)(4): Allowing Railroads to Challenge Differential Taxation

Expansion of §11501(b)(4): Allowing Railroads to Challenge Differential Taxation

Date: Feb 23, 2011
Expansion of §11501(b)(4): Allowing Railroads to Challenge Differential Taxation Introduction In CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue ET AL. (562 U.S. 277, 2011), the United...
Preemption of Design-Defect Claims in Vaccine Injury Cases: An Analysis of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC

Preemption of Design-Defect Claims in Vaccine Injury Cases: An Analysis of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC

Date: Feb 23, 2011
Preemption of Design-Defect Claims in Vaccine Injury Cases: An Analysis of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC Introduction The case of Russell Bruesewitz, et al. v. Wyeth LLC, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Reinforces FFDCA Hearing Requirements in National Corn Growers Association v. EPA

Supreme Court Reinforces FFDCA Hearing Requirements in National Corn Growers Association v. EPA

Date: Feb 17, 2011
Supreme Court Reinforces FFDCA Hearing Requirements in National Corn Growers Association v. EPA Introduction In the landmark case of National Corn Growers Association, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S....
Supreme Court Establishes Limitation on Federal Habeas Review of State Parole Procedures

Supreme Court Establishes Limitation on Federal Habeas Review of State Parole Procedures

Date: Jan 25, 2011
Limiting Federal Habeas Review: The Supreme Court's Ruling in Swarthout v. Cooke Introduction In the landmark decision of Swarthout v. Cooke, Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of...
Supreme Court Affirms Chase's Right to Increase Interest Rates Without Prior Notice Under Regulation Z

Supreme Court Affirms Chase's Right to Increase Interest Rates Without Prior Notice Under Regulation Z

Date: Jan 25, 2011
Supreme Court Affirms Chase's Right to Increase Interest Rates Without Prior Notice Under Regulation Z Introduction The case of CHASE BANK USA, N.A. v. JAMES A. McCOY addressed a critical issue...
Supreme Court Restricts Appeals on Qualified Immunity Denials Post-Trial: ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al.

Supreme Court Restricts Appeals on Qualified Immunity Denials Post-Trial: ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al.

Date: Jan 25, 2011
Supreme Court Restricts Appeals on Qualified Immunity Denials Post-Trial: ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al. Introduction ORTIZ v. JORDAN et al. (562 U.S. 180) is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Expanding Scope of Third-Party Retaliation under Title VII: THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS

Expanding Scope of Third-Party Retaliation under Title VII: THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS

Date: Jan 25, 2011
Expanding Scope of Third-Party Retaliation under Title VII: THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS Introduction Eric L. THOMPSON v. NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS, LP. is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Clarifying the Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Harrington v. Richter

Clarifying the Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Harrington v. Richter

Date: Jan 20, 2011
Clarifying the Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Harrington v. Richter Introduction In the landmark case of KELLY HARRINGTON, WARDEN, PETITIONER v....
Reaffirming the Strickland Standard in Plea Bargain Contexts

Reaffirming the Strickland Standard in Plea Bargain Contexts

Date: Jan 20, 2011
Reaffirming the Strickland Standard in Plea Bargain Contexts Introduction Jeff Premeo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Petitioner v. Randy Joseph Moore (562 U.S. 115, 2011) is a United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.