Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Enforcement Limitations of the 340B Program: Suits by Covered Entities Incompatible with Statutory Regime Introduction The landmark case of Astra USA, Inc., et al. v. Santa Clara County, California...
Connick v. Thompson: Establishing the Limits of Municipal Liability for Single Brady Violations Introduction Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (2011), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Enforcement Limits on Third-Party Beneficiaries in 340B Drug Pricing Agreements Introduction The Supreme Court case Astra USA, Inc., et al. v. Santa Clara County, California (563 U.S. 110) addresses...
RICO Causation Standards for Third-Party Payors in Pharmaceutical Fraud: Analysis of Sergeants Benevolent Association Health and Welfare Fund v. Eli Lilly & Co. Introduction The Supreme Court case...
FLSA Antiretaliation Protection Expanded to Include Oral Complaints: Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Introduction In KASTEN v. SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS Corporation, 563 U.S. 1 (2011), the United...
Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano: Reevaluating Materiality Beyond Statistical Significance in Securities Fraud Claims Introduction Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Establishes §1983 Jurisdiction for Postconviction DNA Testing Claims in SKINNER v. SWITZER Introduction SKINNER v. SWITZER (562 U.S. 521, 2011) represents a significant development in...
Defining FOIA Exemption 2: The Milner v. Department of the Navy Decision Introduction Milner v. Department of the Navy, 562 U.S. 562 (2011), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarified...
Collateral Review Under AEDPA: U.S. Supreme Court Decision in Wall II v. Kholi Introduction In Ashbel T. Wall II, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Petitioner v. Khalil Kholi, 562...
Expansion of §1983 Jurisdiction to Include Postconviction DNA Testing Claims Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case SKINNER v. SWITZER addressed a pivotal issue in criminal justice: whether a...
Resentencing and Postsentencing Rehabilitation: New Precedent in Pepper v. United States Introduction Jason Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476 (2011), marks a significant development in federal...
First Amendment Protection of Picketing: SNYDER v. PHELPS and Its Legal Implications Introduction Albert Snyder v. Fred W. Phelps, Sr., et al. is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision...
HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI: Filing Deadlines in Veterans Court Appeals Are Non-Jurisdictional Introduction In HENDERSON v. SHINSEKI, 562 U.S. 428 (2011), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
FOIA Exemption 7(C) Limited to Individuals: Supreme Court Clarifies Corporate Privacy Rights Introduction The landmark case of Federal Communications Commission et al. v. AT&T Inc. et al. (562 U.S....
Proctor Hospital v. Staub: Establishing 'Cat's Paw' Liability Under USERRA Introduction Proctor Hospital v. Vincent E. Staub is a landmark Supreme Court decision that reshaped the application of the...
Refining the 'Ongoing Emergency' Standard: Comprehensive Analysis of Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011) Introduction In Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011), the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Upholds California's 'Reasonableness' Standard as Adequate Procedural Bar in Habeas Corpus Petitions 1. Introduction The case of James Walker, Warden, et al. v. Charles W. Martin (562...
Preemption of State Tort Suits under FMVSS 208: Insights from WILLIAMSON v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMErica Introduction The case of Delbert Williamson, et al. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., et al. (562...
Expansion of §11501(b)(4): Allowing Railroads to Challenge Differential Taxation Introduction In CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue ET AL. (562 U.S. 277, 2011), the United...
Preemption of Design-Defect Claims in Vaccine Injury Cases: An Analysis of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC Introduction The case of Russell Bruesewitz, et al. v. Wyeth LLC, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court...