Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Expansion of the FCA Public Disclosure Bar to Include FOIA Responses: Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Daniel Kirk

Expansion of the FCA Public Disclosure Bar to Include FOIA Responses: Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Daniel Kirk

Date: May 17, 2011
Expansion of the FCA Public Disclosure Bar to Include FOIA Responses: Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Daniel Kirk Introduction Schindler Elevator Corporation v. United States ex...
CIGNA v. Amara: Defining 'Appropriate Equitable Relief' under ERISA §502(a)(3)

CIGNA v. Amara: Defining 'Appropriate Equitable Relief' under ERISA §502(a)(3)

Date: May 17, 2011
CIGNA v. Amara: Defining 'Appropriate Equitable Relief' under ERISA §502(a)(3) Introduction The case of CIGNA Corporation, et al. v. Janice C. Amara, et al., 563 U.S. 421 (2011), addressed pivotal...
Exigent Circumstances and Police-Created Exigencies: A Commentary on Kentucky v. Hollis King

Exigent Circumstances and Police-Created Exigencies: A Commentary on Kentucky v. Hollis King

Date: May 17, 2011
Exigent Circumstances and Police-Created Exigencies: A Commentary on Kentucky v. Hollis King Introduction Kentucky v. Hollis King (563 U.S. 452, 2011) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota: Upholding Appropriation Doctrine in Yellowstone River Compact

Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota: Upholding Appropriation Doctrine in Yellowstone River Compact

Date: May 3, 2011
Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota: Upholding Appropriation Doctrine in Yellowstone River Compact Introduction In the landmark case of State of Montana v. State of Wyoming and State of North Dakota...
Supreme Court Upholds Wyoming's Right to Enhance Irrigation Efficiency under the Yellowstone River Compact

Supreme Court Upholds Wyoming's Right to Enhance Irrigation Efficiency under the Yellowstone River Compact

Date: May 3, 2011
Supreme Court Upholds Wyoming's Right to Enhance Irrigation Efficiency under the Yellowstone River Compact Introduction The State of Montana v. State of Wyoming and State of North Dakota case,...
FAA Preempts California’s Discover Bank Rule: Upholding Individual Arbitration Agreements

FAA Preempts California’s Discover Bank Rule: Upholding Individual Arbitration Agreements

Date: Apr 28, 2011
FAA Preempts California’s Discover Bank Rule: Upholding Individual Arbitration Agreements Introduction In ATT Mobility LLC v. Concepcion et ux., 563 U.S. 333 (2011), the United States Supreme Court...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 1500: Jurisdictional Bar in Parallel Suits – United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation

Clarifying the Scope of Section 1500: Jurisdictional Bar in Parallel Suits – United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation

Date: Apr 27, 2011
Clarifying the Scope of Section 1500: Jurisdictional Bar in Parallel Suits – United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation Introduction United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation (563 U.S. 307, 2011) addresses...
Intent to Deceive Not Required for Breach of ERISA's Duty of Loyalty: Supreme Court Commentary

Intent to Deceive Not Required for Breach of ERISA's Duty of Loyalty: Supreme Court Commentary

Date: Apr 22, 2011
Intent to Deceive Not Required for Breach of ERISA's Duty of Loyalty: Supreme Court Commentary Introduction The case of Stephen Lingis, et al., Petitioners v. Rick Dorazil, et al., Respondents...
Sossamon v. Texas: States Do Not Waive Sovereign Immunity to Monetary Damages Under RLUIPA

Sossamon v. Texas: States Do Not Waive Sovereign Immunity to Monetary Damages Under RLUIPA

Date: Apr 21, 2011
Sossamon v. Texas: States Do Not Waive Sovereign Immunity to Monetary Damages Under RLUIPA Introduction Sossamon v. Texas is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case decided on April 20, 2011, that...
Extending EX PARTE YOUNG: Federal Courts Can Hear Lawsuits Between State Agencies

Extending EX PARTE YOUNG: Federal Courts Can Hear Lawsuits Between State Agencies

Date: Apr 20, 2011
Extending EX PARTE YOUNG: Federal Courts Can Hear Lawsuits Between State Agencies Introduction Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. James W. Stewart III, 563 U.S. 247 (2011), is a landmark...
Taxpayer Standing and the Establishment Clause: Insights from Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn

Taxpayer Standing and the Establishment Clause: Insights from Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn

Date: Apr 5, 2011
Taxpayer Standing and the Establishment Clause: Insights from Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn Introduction In Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, the United...
Federal Habeas Review Restricted to State Court Record under AEDPA: Cullen v. Pinholster

Federal Habeas Review Restricted to State Court Record under AEDPA: Cullen v. Pinholster

Date: Apr 5, 2011
Federal Habeas Review Restricted to State Court Record under AEDPA: Cullen v. Pinholster Introduction Cullen, Acting Warden v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011), represents a pivotal Supreme Court...
The Narrowing of Taxpayer Standing under the Establishment Clause: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn (2011)

The Narrowing of Taxpayer Standing under the Establishment Clause: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn (2011)

Date: Apr 5, 2011
The Narrowing of Taxpayer Standing under the Establishment Clause Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn (2011) Introduction The Supreme Court case Arizona Christian School Tuition...
Enforcement Limitations of the 340B Program: Suits by Covered Entities Incompatible with Statutory Regime

Enforcement Limitations of the 340B Program: Suits by Covered Entities Incompatible with Statutory Regime

Date: Mar 30, 2011
Enforcement Limitations of the 340B Program: Suits by Covered Entities Incompatible with Statutory Regime Introduction The landmark case of Astra USA, Inc., et al. v. Santa Clara County, California...
Connick v. Thompson: Establishing the Limits of Municipal Liability for Single Brady Violations

Connick v. Thompson: Establishing the Limits of Municipal Liability for Single Brady Violations

Date: Mar 30, 2011
Connick v. Thompson: Establishing the Limits of Municipal Liability for Single Brady Violations Introduction Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (2011), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Enforcement Limits on Third-Party Beneficiaries in 340B Drug Pricing Agreements

Enforcement Limits on Third-Party Beneficiaries in 340B Drug Pricing Agreements

Date: Mar 30, 2011
Enforcement Limits on Third-Party Beneficiaries in 340B Drug Pricing Agreements Introduction The Supreme Court case Astra USA, Inc., et al. v. Santa Clara County, California (563 U.S. 110) addresses...
RICO Causation Standards for Third-Party Payors in Pharmaceutical Fraud: Analysis of Sergeants Benevolent Association v. Eli Lilly

RICO Causation Standards for Third-Party Payors in Pharmaceutical Fraud: Analysis of Sergeants Benevolent Association v. Eli Lilly

Date: Mar 26, 2011
RICO Causation Standards for Third-Party Payors in Pharmaceutical Fraud: Analysis of Sergeants Benevolent Association Health and Welfare Fund v. Eli Lilly & Co. Introduction The Supreme Court case...
FLSA Antiretaliation Protection Expanded to Include Oral Complaints: Kasten v. Saint-Gobain

FLSA Antiretaliation Protection Expanded to Include Oral Complaints: Kasten v. Saint-Gobain

Date: Mar 23, 2011
FLSA Antiretaliation Protection Expanded to Include Oral Complaints: Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Introduction In KASTEN v. SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS Corporation, 563 U.S. 1 (2011), the United...
Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano: Reevaluating Materiality Beyond Statistical Significance in Securities Fraud Claims

Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano: Reevaluating Materiality Beyond Statistical Significance in Securities Fraud Claims

Date: Mar 23, 2011
Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano: Reevaluating Materiality Beyond Statistical Significance in Securities Fraud Claims Introduction Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Establishes §1983 Jurisdiction for Postconviction DNA Testing Claims in SKINNER v. SWITZER

Supreme Court Establishes §1983 Jurisdiction for Postconviction DNA Testing Claims in SKINNER v. SWITZER

Date: Mar 8, 2011
Supreme Court Establishes §1983 Jurisdiction for Postconviction DNA Testing Claims in SKINNER v. SWITZER Introduction SKINNER v. SWITZER (562 U.S. 521, 2011) represents a significant development in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert