Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Qualified Immunity and Case Review: Insights from Camreta v. Greene Introduction Bob Camreta v. Sarah Greene is a pivotal case decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 26, 2011. The case...
Automatic Exclusion of Pretrial Motions under the Speedy Trial Act: Analysis of United States v. Tinklenberg Introduction United States v. Tinklenberg, 563 U.S. 647 (2011), addresses a pivotal issue...
Qualified Immunity and Supreme Court Review: Analyzing Camreta v. Greene Introduction Camreta v. Greene (131 S.Ct. 2020), decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 26, 2011, addresses...
Fowler v. United States: Establishing the Reasonable Likelihood Standard in Federal Witness Tampering Supreme Court of the United States Decided: May 26, 2011 563 U.S. 668 Introduction The case of...
Remedies When State Secrets Render Defense Claims Nonjusticiable in Government Contract Disputes Introduction General Dynamics Corporation v. United States is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
State Secrets Privilege and Government Contract Remedies: Analysis of General Dynamics Corp. v. United States Introduction General Dynamics Corp., Petitioner, v. United States, The Boeing Co.,...
Plata v. Brown: Establishing Constitutional Limits on Prison Overcrowding Introduction Plata v. Brown, 563 U.S. 493 (2011), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court addressing the...
Expansion of the FCA Public Disclosure Bar to Include FOIA Responses: Schindler Elevator Corp. v. United States ex rel. Daniel Kirk Introduction Schindler Elevator Corporation v. United States ex...
CIGNA v. Amara: Defining 'Appropriate Equitable Relief' under ERISA §502(a)(3) Introduction The case of CIGNA Corporation, et al. v. Janice C. Amara, et al., 563 U.S. 421 (2011), addressed pivotal...
Exigent Circumstances and Police-Created Exigencies: A Commentary on Kentucky v. Hollis King Introduction Kentucky v. Hollis King (563 U.S. 452, 2011) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota: Upholding Appropriation Doctrine in Yellowstone River Compact Introduction In the landmark case of State of Montana v. State of Wyoming and State of North Dakota...
Supreme Court Upholds Wyoming's Right to Enhance Irrigation Efficiency under the Yellowstone River Compact Introduction The State of Montana v. State of Wyoming and State of North Dakota case,...
FAA Preempts California’s Discover Bank Rule: Upholding Individual Arbitration Agreements Introduction In ATT Mobility LLC v. Concepcion et ux., 563 U.S. 333 (2011), the United States Supreme Court...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 1500: Jurisdictional Bar in Parallel Suits – United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation Introduction United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation (563 U.S. 307, 2011) addresses...
Intent to Deceive Not Required for Breach of ERISA's Duty of Loyalty: Supreme Court Commentary Introduction The case of Stephen Lingis, et al., Petitioners v. Rick Dorazil, et al., Respondents...
Sossamon v. Texas: States Do Not Waive Sovereign Immunity to Monetary Damages Under RLUIPA Introduction Sossamon v. Texas is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case decided on April 20, 2011, that...
Extending EX PARTE YOUNG: Federal Courts Can Hear Lawsuits Between State Agencies Introduction Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. James W. Stewart III, 563 U.S. 247 (2011), is a landmark...
The Narrowing of Taxpayer Standing under the Establishment Clause Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn (2011) Introduction The Supreme Court case Arizona Christian School Tuition...
Taxpayer Standing and the Establishment Clause: Insights from Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn Introduction In Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, the United...
Federal Habeas Review Restricted to State Court Record under AEDPA: Cullen v. Pinholster Introduction Cullen, Acting Warden v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011), represents a pivotal Supreme Court...