Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Monsanto v. Geertson: Defining the Boundaries of Injunctive Relief under NEPA

Monsanto v. Geertson: Defining the Boundaries of Injunctive Relief under NEPA

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Monsanto v. Geertson: Defining the Boundaries of Injunctive Relief under NEPA Introduction Monsanto Co. et al., v. Geertson Seed Farms et al., 561 U.S. 139 (2010), is a landmark case in environmental...
Carmack Amendment and Forum Selection: Insights from Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corporation et al.

Carmack Amendment and Forum Selection: Insights from Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corporation et al.

Date: Jun 22, 2010
Carmack Amendment and Forum Selection: Insights from Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corporation et al. Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v....
Resolving Circuit Conflicts on MPPAA Withdrawal Liability: ICP v. Central States Pension Fund

Resolving Circuit Conflicts on MPPAA Withdrawal Liability: ICP v. Central States Pension Fund

Date: Jun 19, 2010
Resolving Circuit Conflicts on MPPAA Withdrawal Liability: ICP v. Central States Pension Fund Introduction The case of International Comfort Products, LLC (ICP) v. Central States, Southeast and...
Dillon v. United States: Affirming the Binding Nature of §3582(c)(2) Proceedings Post-Booker

Dillon v. United States: Affirming the Binding Nature of §3582(c)(2) Proceedings Post-Booker

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Dillon v. United States: Affirming the Binding Nature of §3582(c)(2) Proceedings Post-Booker Introduction Percy Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817 (2010), addressed the applicability of the...
Quon v. City of Ontario: Establishing Reasonable Employee Privacy Expectations in Workplace Communications

Quon v. City of Ontario: Establishing Reasonable Employee Privacy Expectations in Workplace Communications

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Quon v. City of Ontario: Establishing Reasonable Employee Privacy Expectations in Workplace Communications Introduction The case of City of Ontario, California, et al. v. Jeff Quon et al. presented a...
Schwab v. Reilly: Clarifying Trustee Obligations on Bankruptcy Exemptions

Schwab v. Reilly: Clarifying Trustee Obligations on Bankruptcy Exemptions

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Schwab v. Reilly: Clarifying Trustee Obligations on Bankruptcy Exemptions Introduction In Schwab v. Reilly, 560 U.S. 770 (2010), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue in...
Supreme Court Upholds Three-Member Quorum Requirement for Delegated NLRB Authority in New Process Steel v. NLRB

Supreme Court Upholds Three-Member Quorum Requirement for Delegated NLRB Authority in New Process Steel v. NLRB

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Supreme Court Upholds Three-Member Quorum Requirement for Delegated NLRB Authority in New Process Steel v. NLRB Introduction New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board (560 U.S. 674,...
Judicial Determinations and Property Takings: Comprehensive Analysis of STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, Inc. v. Florida DEP

Judicial Determinations and Property Takings: Comprehensive Analysis of STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, Inc. v. Florida DEP

Date: Jun 18, 2010
Judicial Determinations and Property Takings: Comprehensive Analysis of STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Introduction STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT,...
Inherent Authority and Due Process in Sanctioning Litigation: Insights from Jackson v. Rohm Haas Company

Inherent Authority and Due Process in Sanctioning Litigation: Insights from Jackson v. Rohm Haas Company

Date: Jun 17, 2010
Inherent Authority and Due Process in Sanctioning Litigation: Insights from Jackson v. Rohm Haas Company Introduction Case: Mark Jackson et al. v. Rohm Haas Company et al. Court: United States...
Equitable Tolling under AEDPA: A Comprehensive Analysis of HOLLAND v. FLORIDA

Equitable Tolling under AEDPA: A Comprehensive Analysis of HOLLAND v. FLORIDA

Date: Jun 15, 2010
Equitable Tolling under AEDPA: A Comprehensive Analysis of HOLLAND v. FLORIDA Introduction Albert HOLLAND v. FLORIDA, 560 U.S. 631 (2010), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Sentencing Court’s Authority to Impose Restitution After Statutory Deadline Confirmed in Dolan v. United States

Sentencing Court’s Authority to Impose Restitution After Statutory Deadline Confirmed in Dolan v. United States

Date: Jun 15, 2010
Sentencing Court’s Authority to Impose Restitution After Statutory Deadline Confirmed in Dolan v. United States Introduction In Dolan v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
EAJA Fees Awarded to Litigants Subject to Government Offset: Astrue v. Ratliff

EAJA Fees Awarded to Litigants Subject to Government Offset: Astrue v. Ratliff

Date: Jun 15, 2010
EAJA Fees Awarded to Litigants Subject to Government Offset: Astrue v. Ratliff Introduction In Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Petitioner, v. Catherine G. Ratliff (560 U.S. 586,...
Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of Aggravated Felony in Immigration Context

Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of Aggravated Felony in Immigration Context

Date: Jun 15, 2010
Supreme Court Clarifies Definition of Aggravated Felony in Immigration Context Introduction In Jose Angel Carachuri–Rosendo v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, 560 U.S. 563 (2010), the United...
Supreme Court Upholds First Amendment Protections in Kelly Conard v. Pennsylvania State Police

Supreme Court Upholds First Amendment Protections in Kelly Conard v. Pennsylvania State Police

Date: Jun 12, 2010
Supreme Court Upholds First Amendment Protections in Kelly Conard v. Pennsylvania State Police Introduction The case of Kelly Conard v. Pennsylvania State Police addresses significant issues...
Relating Back Under Rule 15(c)(1)(C)(ii): Insights from Krupski v. Costa Crociere S.P.A.

Relating Back Under Rule 15(c)(1)(C)(ii): Insights from Krupski v. Costa Crociere S.P.A.

Date: Jun 8, 2010
Relating Back Under Rule 15(c)(1)(C)(ii): Insights from Krupski v. Costa Crociere S.P.A. Introduction Krupski v. Costa Crociere S. p. A. is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that...
Term of Imprisonment Interpreted as Time Served: Supreme Court Ruling in Barber v. Thomas

Term of Imprisonment Interpreted as Time Served: Supreme Court Ruling in Barber v. Thomas

Date: Jun 8, 2010
Term of Imprisonment Interpreted as Time Served: Supreme Court Ruling in Barber v. Thomas Introduction In Michael Gary Barber, et al., Petitioners, v. J. E. Thomas, Warden (560 U.S. 474, 2010), the...
Federal Preemption of State Labeling Requirements for Generic Drugs Established by Actavis Inc. v. Demahy

Federal Preemption of State Labeling Requirements for Generic Drugs Established by Actavis Inc. v. Demahy

Date: Jun 8, 2010
Federal Preemption of State Labeling Requirements for Generic Drugs Established by Actavis Inc. v. Demahy Introduction Actavis, Inc. v. Demahy is a pivotal case in the realm of pharmaceutical law,...
Forward-Looking Approach Affirmed for Projected Disposable Income in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Forward-Looking Approach Affirmed for Projected Disposable Income in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Date: Jun 8, 2010
Forward-Looking Approach Affirmed for Projected Disposable Income in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Introduction The Supreme Court case Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee, Petitioner, v. Stephanie Kay Lanning,...
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Does Not Provide Immunity to Individual Foreign Officials: Samantar v. Yusuf

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Does Not Provide Immunity to Individual Foreign Officials: Samantar v. Yusuf

Date: Jun 2, 2010
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Does Not Provide Immunity to Individual Foreign Officials: Samantar v. Yusuf Introduction In Mohamed Ali Samantar v. Bashe Abdi Yusuf et al., the United States...
Comity Doctrine Affirmed in Tax Discrimination Case: Levin v. Commerce Energy

Comity Doctrine Affirmed in Tax Discrimination Case: Levin v. Commerce Energy

Date: Jun 2, 2010
Comity Doctrine Affirmed in Tax Discrimination Case: Levin v. Commerce Energy Introduction In Levin v. Commerce Energy, Inc., 560 U.S. 413 (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the interplay...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert