Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supremacy Clause Enforcement of Federal Medicaid Requirements: Insights from Douglas v. Independent Living Center

Supremacy Clause Enforcement of Federal Medicaid Requirements: Insights from Douglas v. Independent Living Center

Date: Feb 23, 2012
Supremacy Clause Enforcement of Federal Medicaid Requirements: Insights from Douglas v. Independent Living Center Introduction Toby DOUGLAS, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v....
Supremacy Clause Enforcement of Medicaid Reimbursement Rates

Supremacy Clause Enforcement of Medicaid Reimbursement Rates

Date: Feb 23, 2012
Supremacy Clause Enforcement of Medicaid Reimbursement Rates Introduction Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.,...
PPL Montana LLC v. Montana: Reinforcing the Segment-by-Segment Navigability Standard for Riverbed Title Under the Equal-Footing Doctrine

PPL Montana LLC v. Montana: Reinforcing the Segment-by-Segment Navigability Standard for Riverbed Title Under the Equal-Footing Doctrine

Date: Feb 23, 2012
PPL Montana LLC v. Montana: Reinforcing the Segment-by-Segment Navigability Standard for Riverbed Title Under the Equal-Footing Doctrine Introduction PPL Montana, LLC v. Montana, 132 S.Ct. 1215...
Equal-Footing Doctrine Reinforced in PPL Montana v. Montana

Equal-Footing Doctrine Reinforced in PPL Montana v. Montana

Date: Feb 23, 2012
Equal-Footing Doctrine Reinforced in PPL Montana, LLC v. Montana Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case PPL Montana, LLC v. Montana, decided on February 22, 2012, deals with the intricate...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Police Officers in Search Warrant Validity Dispute

Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Police Officers in Search Warrant Validity Dispute

Date: Feb 23, 2012
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Police Officers in Search Warrant Validity Dispute Introduction In the landmark case of Messerschmidt v. Millender, the United States Supreme Court addressed the...
Qualified Immunity Upheld for Officers in Broad Firearm and Gang-Related Search Warrants

Qualified Immunity Upheld for Officers in Broad Firearm and Gang-Related Search Warrants

Date: Feb 23, 2012
Qualified Immunity Upheld for Officers in Broad Firearm and Gang-Related Search Warrants Introduction In the landmark case of Curt Messerschmidt, et al. v. Brenda Millender, as executor of the Estate...
Wetzel v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Clarifying Brady Obligations on Exculpatory Evidence Disclosure

Wetzel v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Clarifying Brady Obligations on Exculpatory Evidence Disclosure

Date: Feb 22, 2012
Wetzel v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Clarifying Brady Obligations on Exculpatory Evidence Disclosure Introduction Wetzel v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (565 U.S. 520) is a...
Supreme Court Rules Tax Fraud under §7206 as Aggravated Felony Triggering Deportation

Supreme Court Rules Tax Fraud under §7206 as Aggravated Felony Triggering Deportation

Date: Feb 22, 2012
Supreme Court Rules Tax Fraud under §7206 as Aggravated Felony Triggering Deportation Introduction In the landmark case of Akio Kawashima, et ux., Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney...
False Tax Returns as Aggravated Felonies under Immigration Law

False Tax Returns as Aggravated Felonies under Immigration Law

Date: Feb 22, 2012
False Tax Returns as Aggravated Felonies under Immigration Law Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Akio Kawashima, et ux., Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General,...
Supremacy of the Federal Arbitration Act in Enforcing Predispute Arbitration Agreements for Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Claims

Supremacy of the Federal Arbitration Act in Enforcing Predispute Arbitration Agreements for Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Claims

Date: Feb 22, 2012
Supremacy of the Federal Arbitration Act in Enforcing Predispute Arbitration Agreements for Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Claims Introduction The case Marmet Health Care Center, Inc., et al. v....
Miranda Custody Clarified in Howes v. Fields: A New Precedent

Miranda Custody Clarified in Howes v. Fields: A New Precedent

Date: Feb 22, 2012
Miranda Custody Clarified in Howes v. Fields: A New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Carol Howes, Warden, Petitioner v. Randall Lee Fields, the United States Supreme Court addressed the...
Reevaluating Miranda Custody in Prison Interrogations: Howes v. Fields

Reevaluating Miranda Custody in Prison Interrogations: Howes v. Fields

Date: Feb 22, 2012
Reevaluating Miranda Custody in Prison Interrogations: Howes v. Fields Introduction Howes v. Fields, 132 S.Ct. 1181 (2012), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Reinforcing Objective Reasonableness in Warrantless Home Entries: Insights from Darin Ryburn et al. v. George R. Huff

Reinforcing Objective Reasonableness in Warrantless Home Entries: Insights from Darin Ryburn et al. v. George R. Huff

Date: Jan 24, 2012
Reinforcing Objective Reasonableness in Warrantless Home Entries: Insights from Darin Ryburn et al. v. George R. Huff Introduction The case of Darin Ryburn, et al. v. George R. Huff, et al. (565 U.S....
United States v. Jones: Supreme Court Establishes GPS Monitoring as a Fourth Amendment Search

United States v. Jones: Supreme Court Establishes GPS Monitoring as a Fourth Amendment Search

Date: Jan 24, 2012
United States v. Jones: Supreme Court Establishes GPS Monitoring as a Fourth Amendment Search Introduction United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Supreme Court Affirms FMIA Preempts California's Nonambulatory Pig Regulations

Supreme Court Affirms FMIA Preempts California's Nonambulatory Pig Regulations

Date: Jan 24, 2012
Supreme Court Affirms FMIA Preempts California's Nonambulatory Pig Regulations Introduction In National Meat Association v. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, et al. (565 U.S. 452,...
Reynolds v. United States: Clarifying Applicability of SORNA to Pre-Act Offenders

Reynolds v. United States: Clarifying Applicability of SORNA to Pre-Act Offenders

Date: Jan 24, 2012
Reynolds v. United States: Clarifying Applicability of SORNA to Pre-Act Offenders Introduction Billy Joe Reynolds v. United States, 565 U.S. 432 (2012), is a landmark Supreme Court case addressing...
Federal Meat Inspection Act Preempts California's Slaughterhouse Regulations on Nonambulatory Pigs

Federal Meat Inspection Act Preempts California's Slaughterhouse Regulations on Nonambulatory Pigs

Date: Jan 24, 2012
Federal Meat Inspection Act Preempts California's Slaughterhouse Regulations on Nonambulatory Pigs National Meat Association v. Kamala D. Harris, 132 S.Ct. 965 (2012) Introduction The case of...
GPS Tracking as a Fourth Amendment Search: Analysis of United States v. Antoine Jones

GPS Tracking as a Fourth Amendment Search: Analysis of United States v. Antoine Jones

Date: Jan 24, 2012
GPS Tracking as a Fourth Amendment Search: Analysis of United States v. Antoine Jones Introduction United States v. Antoine Jones (565 U.S. 400) is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Judicial Interim Redistricting under Voting Rights Act Section 5

Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Judicial Interim Redistricting under Voting Rights Act Section 5

Date: Jan 21, 2012
Supreme Court Establishes Standards for Judicial Interim Redistricting under Voting Rights Act Section 5 Introduction The Supreme Court case Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al. v. Shannon Perez, et...
Supreme Court Clarifies Interim Redistricting Procedures under Voting Rights Act §5 in Perry v. Perez

Supreme Court Clarifies Interim Redistricting Procedures under Voting Rights Act §5 in Perry v. Perez

Date: Jan 21, 2012
Supreme Court Clarifies Interim Redistricting Procedures under Voting Rights Act §5 in Perry v. Perez Introduction In the landmark case of Rick Perry, Governor of Texas, et al. v. Shannon Perez et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert