Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC: Establishing the Ministerial Exception Under the First Amendment Introduction Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal...
Limited Due Process Screening for Eyewitness Identification Without Police-Orchestrated Suggestive Circumstances: PERRY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE Introduction Barion Perry v. New Hampshire is a pivotal...
Substantial Nexus Test Established for OCSLA Workers' Compensation Coverage Introduction In the landmark case Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP, et al. v. Luisa L. Valladolid, et al., the United States...
Substantial Nexus Test Established for OCSLA Workers' Compensation Claims Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. Luisa L. Valladolid, 132 S.Ct....
Brady Materiality in Eyewitness Testimony: Smith v. Cain Introduction Juan Smith v. Burl Cain is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court case decided on January 10, 2012. The case revolves around whether...
Limitation of Bivens Remedies for Eighth Amendment Claims Against Privately Operated Federal Prisons Introduction In the landmark case Margaret MINNECI, et al., Petitioners, v. Richard Lee POLLARD,...
Federal Arbitration Act Prevails Over Credit Repair Organizations Act: Comprehensive Commentary on CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood Introduction CompuCredit Corporation, et al. v. Wanda Greenwood et...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Insights from CompuCredit v. Greenwood Introduction CompuCredit Corporation, et al. v. Wanda Greenwood et al. (132 S.Ct....
GONZALEZ v. THALER: Nonjurisdictional Nature of Certificate of Appealability’s Indication Requirement Introduction GONZALEZ v. THALER, 132 S.Ct. 641 (2012), is a landmark decision by the United...
GONZALEZ v. THALER: Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Certificate of Appealability Indications Clarified Introduction In Rafael Arriaza GONZALEZ v. Rick THALER, the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Rejection of Bivens Remedy for Eighth Amendment Claims Against Private Prison Operators Introduction In the landmark case Margaret MINNECI, et al., Petitioners, v. Richard Lee POLLARD, et al. (565...
Brady Materiality in Eyewitness Testimony: Insights from Smith v. Cain Introduction The Supreme Court case Juan Smith v. Burl Cain, 565 U.S. 73 (2012), presents a pivotal examination of the BRADY v....
MAXWELL v. ROE: Federal Habeas Deference to State Factual Findings Under AEDPA Introduction In the landmark case of Brenda CASH, acting warden v. Bobby Joe Maxwell (132 S.Ct. 611), the United States...
Reaffirming AEDPA’s Deference to State Courts in Habeas Proceedings Introduction Brenda Cash, Acting Warden v. Bobby Joe Maxwell, 132 S. Ct. 611 (2012), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Supreme Court Strikes Down BIA's Comparable-Grounds Rule in §212(c) Deportation Relief Introduction In the landmark case Joel Judulang v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, the United States...
AEDPA Deference Upholds State Court's Ruling on Witness Unavailability in Hardy v. Cross Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in the case of Marcus Hardy, Warden v. Irving L. Cross, 565 U.S....
AEDPA Deference in Confrontation Clause Decisions Upheld in Hardy v. Cross Introduction Marcus Hardy, Warden v. Irving L. Cross, 132 S.Ct. 490 (2011), addresses a critical intersection between the...
Application of AEDPA’s 'Clearly Established Federal Law' Post-Gray: Insights from Greene v. Fisher Introduction Greene v. Fisher (2011) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that delves...
Clarifying 'Clearly Established Federal Law' under AEDPA: Supreme Court in Greene v. Fisher Introduction Greene v. Fisher, 565 U.S. 34 (2011), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limits on AEDPA's Standard for Habeas Corpus: Insights from Bobby v. Dixon 1. Introduction David Bobby, Warden v. Archie Dixon is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court on...