Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Maples v. Thomas: Establishing Abandonment as Cause to Excuse Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus Relief

Maples v. Thomas: Establishing Abandonment as Cause to Excuse Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus Relief

Date: Jan 19, 2012
Maples v. Thomas: Establishing Abandonment as Cause to Excuse Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction Maples v. Thomas is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
GOLAN v. HOLDER: Upholding Restoration of Copyright to Foreign Works in the Public Domain

GOLAN v. HOLDER: Upholding Restoration of Copyright to Foreign Works in the Public Domain

Date: Jan 19, 2012
GOLAN v. HOLDER: Upholding Restoration of Copyright to Foreign Works in the Public Domain Introduction In Lawrence Golan, et al. v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al., 565 U.S. 302 (2012),...
Supreme Court Establishes Federal and State Concurrent Jurisdiction for Private TCPA Claims

Supreme Court Establishes Federal and State Concurrent Jurisdiction for Private TCPA Claims

Date: Jan 19, 2012
Supreme Court Establishes Federal and State Concurrent Jurisdiction for Private TCPA Claims Introduction In the landmark case Marcus D. MIMS v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, the United States...
Maples v. Thomas: Establishing Abandonment as a Cause to Excuse Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus

Maples v. Thomas: Establishing Abandonment as a Cause to Excuse Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus

Date: Jan 19, 2012
Maples v. Thomas: Establishing Abandonment as a Cause to Excuse Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus Introduction Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266 (2012), is a landmark decision by the United...
GOLAN v. HOLDER: Upholding § 514 URAA and its Implications on Public Domain Restoration

GOLAN v. HOLDER: Upholding § 514 URAA and its Implications on Public Domain Restoration

Date: Jan 19, 2012
GOLAN v. HOLDER: Upholding § 514 URAA and its Implications on Public Domain Restoration Introduction In GOLAN v. HOLDER, the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue concerning the...
Ministerial Exception Reinforced: Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC

Ministerial Exception Reinforced: Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC

Date: Jan 12, 2012
Ministerial Exception Reinforced: Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC Introduction In Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,...
Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC: Establishing the Ministerial Exception Under the First Amendment

Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC: Establishing the Ministerial Exception Under the First Amendment

Date: Jan 12, 2012
Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC: Establishing the Ministerial Exception Under the First Amendment Introduction Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal...
Perry v. New Hampshire: Balancing Due Process and Judicial Efficiency in Eyewitness Identification

Perry v. New Hampshire: Balancing Due Process and Judicial Efficiency in Eyewitness Identification

Date: Jan 12, 2012
Perry v. New Hampshire: Balancing Due Process and Judicial Efficiency in Eyewitness Identification Introduction Perry v. New Hampshire, 565 U.S. 228 (2012), marks a significant milestone in the...
Limited Due Process Screening for Eyewitness Identification Without Police-Orchestrated Suggestive Circumstances: PERRY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE

Limited Due Process Screening for Eyewitness Identification Without Police-Orchestrated Suggestive Circumstances: PERRY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date: Jan 12, 2012
Limited Due Process Screening for Eyewitness Identification Without Police-Orchestrated Suggestive Circumstances: PERRY v. NEW HAMPSHIRE Introduction Barion Perry v. New Hampshire is a pivotal...
Substantial Nexus Test Established for OCSLA Workers' Compensation Coverage

Substantial Nexus Test Established for OCSLA Workers' Compensation Coverage

Date: Jan 12, 2012
Substantial Nexus Test Established for OCSLA Workers' Compensation Coverage Introduction In the landmark case Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP, et al. v. Luisa L. Valladolid, et al., the United States...
Substantial Nexus Test Established for OCSLA Workers' Compensation Claims

Substantial Nexus Test Established for OCSLA Workers' Compensation Claims

Date: Jan 12, 2012
Substantial Nexus Test Established for OCSLA Workers' Compensation Claims Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. Luisa L. Valladolid, 132 S.Ct....
Brady Materiality in Eyewitness Testimony: Smith v. Cain

Brady Materiality in Eyewitness Testimony: Smith v. Cain

Date: Jan 11, 2012
Brady Materiality in Eyewitness Testimony: Smith v. Cain Introduction Juan Smith v. Burl Cain is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court case decided on January 10, 2012. The case revolves around whether...
Federal Arbitration Act Prevails Over Credit Repair Organizations Act: Comprehensive Commentary on CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood

Federal Arbitration Act Prevails Over Credit Repair Organizations Act: Comprehensive Commentary on CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood

Date: Jan 11, 2012
Federal Arbitration Act Prevails Over Credit Repair Organizations Act: Comprehensive Commentary on CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood Introduction CompuCredit Corporation, et al. v. Wanda Greenwood et...
Limitation of Bivens Remedies for Eighth Amendment Claims Against Privately Operated Federal Prisons

Limitation of Bivens Remedies for Eighth Amendment Claims Against Privately Operated Federal Prisons

Date: Jan 11, 2012
Limitation of Bivens Remedies for Eighth Amendment Claims Against Privately Operated Federal Prisons Introduction In the landmark case Margaret MINNECI, et al., Petitioners, v. Richard Lee POLLARD,...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Insights from CompuCredit v. Greenwood

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Insights from CompuCredit v. Greenwood

Date: Jan 11, 2012
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Insights from CompuCredit v. Greenwood Introduction CompuCredit Corporation, et al. v. Wanda Greenwood et al. (132 S.Ct....
GONZALEZ v. THALER: Nonjurisdictional Nature of Certificate of Appealability’s Indication Requirement

GONZALEZ v. THALER: Nonjurisdictional Nature of Certificate of Appealability’s Indication Requirement

Date: Jan 11, 2012
GONZALEZ v. THALER: Nonjurisdictional Nature of Certificate of Appealability’s Indication Requirement Introduction GONZALEZ v. THALER, 132 S.Ct. 641 (2012), is a landmark decision by the United...
GONZALEZ v. THALER: Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Certificate of Appealability Indications Clarified

GONZALEZ v. THALER: Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Certificate of Appealability Indications Clarified

Date: Jan 11, 2012
GONZALEZ v. THALER: Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Certificate of Appealability Indications Clarified Introduction In Rafael Arriaza GONZALEZ v. Rick THALER, the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Rejection of Bivens Remedy for Eighth Amendment Claims Against Private Prison Operators

Rejection of Bivens Remedy for Eighth Amendment Claims Against Private Prison Operators

Date: Jan 11, 2012
Rejection of Bivens Remedy for Eighth Amendment Claims Against Private Prison Operators Introduction In the landmark case Margaret MINNECI, et al., Petitioners, v. Richard Lee POLLARD, et al. (565...
Brady Materiality in Eyewitness Testimony: Insights from Smith v. Cain

Brady Materiality in Eyewitness Testimony: Insights from Smith v. Cain

Date: Jan 11, 2012
Brady Materiality in Eyewitness Testimony: Insights from Smith v. Cain Introduction The Supreme Court case Juan Smith v. Burl Cain, 565 U.S. 73 (2012), presents a pivotal examination of the BRADY v....
MAXWELL v. ROE: Federal Habeas Deference to State Factual Findings Under AEDPA

MAXWELL v. ROE: Federal Habeas Deference to State Factual Findings Under AEDPA

Date: Jan 10, 2012
MAXWELL v. ROE: Federal Habeas Deference to State Factual Findings Under AEDPA Introduction In the landmark case of Brenda CASH, acting warden v. Bobby Joe Maxwell (132 S.Ct. 611), the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert