Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES v. SIMMONDS: Redefining Tolling of §16(b) Limitations Period Introduction The Supreme Court case CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, et al. v. Vanessa SIMMONDS addresses...
Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations under §16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al....
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Redefining Congressional Authority in Foreign Affairs Introduction In the landmark case Zivotofsky v. Clinton, adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court on March 26, 2012,...
Missouri v. Frye: Defining the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Assistance During Plea Negotiations Introduction Missouri v. Galin E. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012), is a landmark decision by the...
COOPER v. LAFLER: Expanding Sixth Amendment Protections in Plea Bargaining Introduction COOPER v. LAFLER is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision rendered on March 21, 2012. The case...
Sackett v. EPA: Expanding Judicial Scrutiny of Environmental Compliance Orders Introduction Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Missouri v. Frye: Establishing the Duty of Defense Counsel to Communicate Plea Offers Introduction Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that...
Lafler v. Cooper: Establishing Strickland Prejudice in Rejected Plea Offers Introduction Blaine Lafler, the petitioner, challenged his conviction in the case Blaine Lafler v. Anthony Cooper, 566 U.S....
Harmonizing "Newly Awarded Compensation" under the LHWCA: Insights from Dana Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Dana Roberts v. Sea–Land Services, Inc., the...
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories: Clarifying the 'Laws of Nature' Exception to Patent Eligibility Introduction The Supreme Court case of Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo...
Affirming State Sovereign Immunity: FMLA's Self-Care Provision Does Not Allow Suits for Damages Introduction In Daniel Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, 566 U.S. 30 (2012), the U.S. Supreme...
Martinez v. Ryan: Establishing an Exception to Procedural Default for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Initial-Review Collateral Proceedings Introduction Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), is...
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories: Redefining Patent Eligibility of Diagnostic Methods Introduction Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. 66...
Establishing an Exception for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Initial-Review Collateral Proceedings: Martinez v. Ryan Introduction In Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), the United States...
Roberts v. Sea-Land Services: Defining "Newly Awarded Compensation" Under the LHWCA Introduction The case of Dana Roberts v. Sea–Land Services, Inc. before the U.S. Supreme Court addresses a pivotal...
Interests of Justice Standard for Substitution of Counsel in Capital Habeas Proceedings Introduction In Michael Martel, Warden, Petitioner v. Kenneth Clair, 132 S.Ct. 1276 (2012), the United States...
Martel v. Clair: Establishing the 'Interests of Justice' Standard for Counsel Substitution in Capital Habeas Proceedings Introduction Martel v. Clair, 565 U.S. 648 (2012), is a significant Supreme...
Supreme Court Establishes Field Preemption of State Torts under the Locomotive Inspection Act Introduction In KURNS v. Railroad Friction Products Corporation et al., 132 S. Ct. 1261 (2012), the...
Preemption of State Design-Defect and Failure-to-Warn Claims under the Locomotive Inspection Act: Analysis of Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. Introduction Kurns v. Railroad Friction...
Tobey Douglas v. Independent Living Center: Supremacy Clause and Medicaid Law Introduction The case of Toby Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living...