Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES v. SIMMONDS: Redefining Tolling of §16(b) Limitations Period

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES v. SIMMONDS: Redefining Tolling of §16(b) Limitations Period

Date: Mar 27, 2012
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES v. SIMMONDS: Redefining Tolling of §16(b) Limitations Period Introduction The Supreme Court case CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, et al. v. Vanessa SIMMONDS addresses...
Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations under §16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act

Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations under §16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act

Date: Mar 27, 2012
Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations under §16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al....
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Redefining Congressional Authority in Foreign Affairs

Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Redefining Congressional Authority in Foreign Affairs

Date: Mar 27, 2012
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Redefining Congressional Authority in Foreign Affairs Introduction In the landmark case Zivotofsky v. Clinton, adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court on March 26, 2012,...
Missouri v. Frye: Defining the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Assistance During Plea Negotiations

Missouri v. Frye: Defining the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Assistance During Plea Negotiations

Date: Mar 22, 2012
Missouri v. Frye: Defining the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Assistance During Plea Negotiations Introduction Missouri v. Galin E. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012), is a landmark decision by the...
COOPER v. LAFLER: Expanding Sixth Amendment Protections in Plea Bargaining

COOPER v. LAFLER: Expanding Sixth Amendment Protections in Plea Bargaining

Date: Mar 22, 2012
COOPER v. LAFLER: Expanding Sixth Amendment Protections in Plea Bargaining Introduction COOPER v. LAFLER is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision rendered on March 21, 2012. The case...
Sackett v. EPA: Expanding Judicial Scrutiny of Environmental Compliance Orders

Sackett v. EPA: Expanding Judicial Scrutiny of Environmental Compliance Orders

Date: Mar 22, 2012
Sackett v. EPA: Expanding Judicial Scrutiny of Environmental Compliance Orders Introduction Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Missouri v. Frye: Establishing the Duty of Defense Counsel to Communicate Plea Offers

Missouri v. Frye: Establishing the Duty of Defense Counsel to Communicate Plea Offers

Date: Mar 22, 2012
Missouri v. Frye: Establishing the Duty of Defense Counsel to Communicate Plea Offers Introduction Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that...
Lafler v. Cooper: Establishing Strickland Prejudice in Rejected Plea Offers

Lafler v. Cooper: Establishing Strickland Prejudice in Rejected Plea Offers

Date: Mar 22, 2012
Lafler v. Cooper: Establishing Strickland Prejudice in Rejected Plea Offers Introduction Blaine Lafler, the petitioner, challenged his conviction in the case Blaine Lafler v. Anthony Cooper, 566 U.S....
Harmonizing "Newly Awarded Compensation" under the LHWCA: Insights from Dana Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.

Harmonizing "Newly Awarded Compensation" under the LHWCA: Insights from Dana Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.

Date: Mar 21, 2012
Harmonizing "Newly Awarded Compensation" under the LHWCA: Insights from Dana Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Dana Roberts v. Sea–Land Services, Inc., the...
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories: Clarifying the 'Laws of Nature' Exception to Patent Eligibility

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories: Clarifying the 'Laws of Nature' Exception to Patent Eligibility

Date: Mar 21, 2012
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories: Clarifying the 'Laws of Nature' Exception to Patent Eligibility Introduction The Supreme Court case of Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo...
Affirming State Sovereign Immunity: FMLA's Self-Care Provision Does Not Allow Suits for Damages

Affirming State Sovereign Immunity: FMLA's Self-Care Provision Does Not Allow Suits for Damages

Date: Mar 21, 2012
Affirming State Sovereign Immunity: FMLA's Self-Care Provision Does Not Allow Suits for Damages Introduction In Daniel Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, 566 U.S. 30 (2012), the U.S. Supreme...
Martinez v. Ryan: Establishing an Exception to Procedural Default for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Initial-Review Collateral Proceedings

Martinez v. Ryan: Establishing an Exception to Procedural Default for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Initial-Review Collateral Proceedings

Date: Mar 21, 2012
Martinez v. Ryan: Establishing an Exception to Procedural Default for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Initial-Review Collateral Proceedings Introduction Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), is...
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories: Redefining Patent Eligibility of Diagnostic Methods

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories: Redefining Patent Eligibility of Diagnostic Methods

Date: Mar 21, 2012
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories: Redefining Patent Eligibility of Diagnostic Methods Introduction Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. 66...
Establishing an Exception for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Initial-Review Collateral Proceedings: Martinez v. Ryan

Establishing an Exception for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Initial-Review Collateral Proceedings: Martinez v. Ryan

Date: Mar 21, 2012
Establishing an Exception for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Initial-Review Collateral Proceedings: Martinez v. Ryan Introduction In Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), the United States...
Roberts v. Sea-Land Services: Defining "Newly Awarded Compensation" Under the LHWCA

Roberts v. Sea-Land Services: Defining "Newly Awarded Compensation" Under the LHWCA

Date: Mar 21, 2012
Roberts v. Sea-Land Services: Defining "Newly Awarded Compensation" Under the LHWCA Introduction The case of Dana Roberts v. Sea–Land Services, Inc. before the U.S. Supreme Court addresses a pivotal...
Interests of Justice Standard for Substitution of Counsel in Capital Habeas Proceedings

Interests of Justice Standard for Substitution of Counsel in Capital Habeas Proceedings

Date: Mar 6, 2012
Interests of Justice Standard for Substitution of Counsel in Capital Habeas Proceedings Introduction In Michael Martel, Warden, Petitioner v. Kenneth Clair, 132 S.Ct. 1276 (2012), the United States...
Martel v. Clair: Establishing the 'Interests of Justice' Standard for Counsel Substitution in Capital Habeas Proceedings

Martel v. Clair: Establishing the 'Interests of Justice' Standard for Counsel Substitution in Capital Habeas Proceedings

Date: Mar 6, 2012
Martel v. Clair: Establishing the 'Interests of Justice' Standard for Counsel Substitution in Capital Habeas Proceedings Introduction Martel v. Clair, 565 U.S. 648 (2012), is a significant Supreme...
Supreme Court Establishes Field Preemption of State Torts under the Locomotive Inspection Act

Supreme Court Establishes Field Preemption of State Torts under the Locomotive Inspection Act

Date: Mar 1, 2012
Supreme Court Establishes Field Preemption of State Torts under the Locomotive Inspection Act Introduction In KURNS v. Railroad Friction Products Corporation et al., 132 S. Ct. 1261 (2012), the...
Preemption of State Design-Defect and Failure-to-Warn Claims under the Locomotive Inspection Act: Analysis of Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp.

Preemption of State Design-Defect and Failure-to-Warn Claims under the Locomotive Inspection Act: Analysis of Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp.

Date: Mar 1, 2012
Preemption of State Design-Defect and Failure-to-Warn Claims under the Locomotive Inspection Act: Analysis of Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp. Introduction Kurns v. Railroad Friction...
Tobey Douglas v. Independent Living Center: Supremacy Clause and Medicaid Law

Tobey Douglas v. Independent Living Center: Supremacy Clause and Medicaid Law

Date: Feb 23, 2012
Tobey Douglas v. Independent Living Center: Supremacy Clause and Medicaid Law Introduction The case of Toby Douglas, Director, California Department of Health Care Services v. Independent Living...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert