Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity Extended to Private Contractors Retained by Government Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Qualified Immunity Extended to Private Contractors Retained by Government Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Apr 18, 2012
Qualified Immunity Extended to Private Contractors Retained by Government Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction The case of Steve A. Filarsky v. Nicholas B. Delia before the U.S. Supreme Court...
Generics Empowered to Challenge Overbroad Use Codes: Caraco v. Novo Nordisk

Generics Empowered to Challenge Overbroad Use Codes: Caraco v. Novo Nordisk

Date: Apr 18, 2012
Generics Empowered to Challenge Overbroad Use Codes: Caraco v. Novo Nordisk Introduction Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S (566 U.S. 399, 2012) is a landmark decision by...
Fourth Amendment and Suspicionless Strip Searches in Jails: An Analysis of Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County

Fourth Amendment and Suspicionless Strip Searches in Jails: An Analysis of Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County

Date: Apr 3, 2012
Fourth Amendment and Suspicionless Strip Searches in Jails: An Analysis of Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County Introduction The case of Albert W. Florence v. Board of Chosen...
Grand Jury Witnesses Granted Absolute Immunity under Section 1983: REHBERG v. PAULK

Grand Jury Witnesses Granted Absolute Immunity under Section 1983: REHBERG v. PAULK

Date: Apr 3, 2012
Grand Jury Witnesses Granted Absolute Immunity under Section 1983: REHBERG v. PAULK Introduction REHBERG v. PAULK, 132 S.Ct. 1497 (2012), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Suspicionless Strip Searches of Jail Arrestees for Security Purposes

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Suspicionless Strip Searches of Jail Arrestees for Security Purposes

Date: Apr 3, 2012
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Suspicionless Strip Searches of Jail Arrestees for Security Purposes Introduction In the landmark case of Albert W. Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of...
Grand Jury Witnesses Entitled to Absolute Immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: REHBERG v. PAULK

Grand Jury Witnesses Entitled to Absolute Immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: REHBERG v. PAULK

Date: Apr 3, 2012
Grand Jury Witnesses Entitled to Absolute Immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: REHBERG v. PAULK Introduction In Charles A. Rehberg v. James P. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356 (2012), the United States Supreme Court...
Actual Damages Under the Privacy Act Limited to Economic Loss

Actual Damages Under the Privacy Act Limited to Economic Loss

Date: Mar 29, 2012
Actual Damages Under the Privacy Act Limited to Economic Loss Introduction In Federal Aviation Administration, et al. v. Stanmore Cawthon Cooper, 132 S.Ct. 1441 (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court...
Non-Retroactive Applicability of IIRIRA for Lawful Permanent Residents: VARTELAS v. HOLDER

Non-Retroactive Applicability of IIRIRA for Lawful Permanent Residents: VARTELAS v. HOLDER

Date: Mar 29, 2012
Non-Retroactive Applicability of IIRIRA for Lawful Permanent Residents: VARTELAS v. HOLDER Introduction In the case of Panagis Vartelas v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., the United States Supreme Court...
Actual Damages Under the Privacy Act: Supreme Court Limits Recovery to Economic Loss in FAA v. Cooper

Actual Damages Under the Privacy Act: Supreme Court Limits Recovery to Economic Loss in FAA v. Cooper

Date: Mar 29, 2012
Actual Damages Under the Privacy Act: Supreme Court Limits Recovery to Economic Loss in FAA v. Cooper Introduction In the landmark case Federal Aviation Administration, et al. v. Stanmore Cawthon...
Federal Courts Retain Discretion to Order Sentences Concurrent or Consecutive to Anticipated State Sentences

Federal Courts Retain Discretion to Order Sentences Concurrent or Consecutive to Anticipated State Sentences

Date: Mar 29, 2012
Federal Courts Retain Discretion to Order Sentences Concurrent or Consecutive to Anticipated State Sentences Introduction In Monroe Ace Setser v. United States, 566 U.S. 231 (2012), the United States...
Retroactive Application of IIRIRA Provisions in Immigration Law: VARTELAS v. HOLDER

Retroactive Application of IIRIRA Provisions in Immigration Law: VARTELAS v. HOLDER

Date: Mar 29, 2012
Retroactive Application of IIRIRA Provisions in Immigration Law: VARTELAS v. HOLDER Introduction Panagis Vartelas v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on March...
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Judicial Reassertion Over Executive Foreign Affairs Policy

Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Judicial Reassertion Over Executive Foreign Affairs Policy

Date: Mar 27, 2012
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Judicial Reassertion Over Executive Foreign Affairs Policy Introduction The landmark case Zivotofsky v. Clinton, adjudicated by the U.S. Supreme Court on March 26, 2012,...
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES v. SIMMONDS: Redefining Tolling of §16(b) Limitations Period

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES v. SIMMONDS: Redefining Tolling of §16(b) Limitations Period

Date: Mar 27, 2012
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES v. SIMMONDS: Redefining Tolling of §16(b) Limitations Period Introduction The Supreme Court case CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, et al. v. Vanessa SIMMONDS addresses...
Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations under §16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act

Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations under §16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act

Date: Mar 27, 2012
Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds: Clarifying the Statute of Limitations under §16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al....
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Redefining Congressional Authority in Foreign Affairs

Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Redefining Congressional Authority in Foreign Affairs

Date: Mar 27, 2012
Zivotofsky v. Clinton: Redefining Congressional Authority in Foreign Affairs Introduction In the landmark case Zivotofsky v. Clinton, adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court on March 26, 2012,...
Missouri v. Frye: Defining the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Assistance During Plea Negotiations

Missouri v. Frye: Defining the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Assistance During Plea Negotiations

Date: Mar 22, 2012
Missouri v. Frye: Defining the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Assistance During Plea Negotiations Introduction Missouri v. Galin E. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012), is a landmark decision by the...
COOPER v. LAFLER: Expanding Sixth Amendment Protections in Plea Bargaining

COOPER v. LAFLER: Expanding Sixth Amendment Protections in Plea Bargaining

Date: Mar 22, 2012
COOPER v. LAFLER: Expanding Sixth Amendment Protections in Plea Bargaining Introduction COOPER v. LAFLER is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision rendered on March 21, 2012. The case...
Sackett v. EPA: Expanding Judicial Scrutiny of Environmental Compliance Orders

Sackett v. EPA: Expanding Judicial Scrutiny of Environmental Compliance Orders

Date: Mar 22, 2012
Sackett v. EPA: Expanding Judicial Scrutiny of Environmental Compliance Orders Introduction Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Missouri v. Frye: Establishing the Duty of Defense Counsel to Communicate Plea Offers

Missouri v. Frye: Establishing the Duty of Defense Counsel to Communicate Plea Offers

Date: Mar 22, 2012
Missouri v. Frye: Establishing the Duty of Defense Counsel to Communicate Plea Offers Introduction Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that...
Lafler v. Cooper: Establishing Strickland Prejudice in Rejected Plea Offers

Lafler v. Cooper: Establishing Strickland Prejudice in Rejected Plea Offers

Date: Mar 22, 2012
Lafler v. Cooper: Establishing Strickland Prejudice in Rejected Plea Offers Introduction Blaine Lafler, the petitioner, challenged his conviction in the case Blaine Lafler v. Anthony Cooper, 566 U.S....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert