Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Federal Supremacy in Life Insurance Beneficiary Designations: Hillman v. Maretta

Federal Supremacy in Life Insurance Beneficiary Designations: Hillman v. Maretta

Date: Jun 4, 2013
Federal Supremacy in Life Insurance Beneficiary Designations: Hillman v. Maretta Introduction Hillman v. Maretta, 133 S.Ct. 1943 (2013), addressed a critical intersection between federal and state...
Nevada v. Jackson: Upholding State Evidentiary Standards under AEDPA

Nevada v. Jackson: Upholding State Evidentiary Standards under AEDPA

Date: Jun 4, 2013
Nevada v. Jackson: Upholding State Evidentiary Standards under AEDPA Introduction Nevada, et al., Petitioners v. Calvin O'Neil Jackson (569 U.S. 505, 2013) addresses the critical issue of whether...
Maryland v. King: Upholding DNA Collection During Arrests as Constitutional Under the Fourth Amendment

Maryland v. King: Upholding DNA Collection During Arrests as Constitutional Under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Jun 4, 2013
Maryland v. King: Upholding DNA Collection During Arrests as Constitutional Under the Fourth Amendment Introduction In Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Supreme Court Affirms FEGLIA Preemption of State Law in Beneficiary Designations

Supreme Court Affirms FEGLIA Preemption of State Law in Beneficiary Designations

Date: Jun 4, 2013
Supreme Court Affirms FEGLIA Preemption of State Law in Beneficiary Designations Introduction Jacqueline Hillman v. Judy A. Maretta, 569 U.S. 483 (2013), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Maryland v. King: Establishing the Legality of DNA Collection During Arrests

Maryland v. King: Establishing the Legality of DNA Collection During Arrests

Date: Jun 4, 2013
Maryland v. King: Establishing the Legality of DNA Collection During Arrests Introduction The case of Maryland v. King (133 S.Ct. 1958) represents a pivotal decision by the U.S. Supreme Court...
Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Overcome AEDPA’s Statute of Limitations: Analysis of McQuiggin v. Perkins

Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Overcome AEDPA’s Statute of Limitations: Analysis of McQuiggin v. Perkins

Date: May 29, 2013
Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Overcome AEDPA’s Statute of Limitations: Analysis of McQuiggin v. Perkins Introduction Greg McQuiggin, Warden, Petitioner v. Floyd Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013), is a...
Martinez Exception Applied to Texas Procedural Framework in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Martinez Exception Applied to Texas Procedural Framework in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: May 29, 2013
Martinez Exception Applied to Texas Procedural Framework in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction Carlos Trevino v. Rick Thaler, 569 U.S. 413 (2013), is a seminal case adjudicated by the United...
Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Overcome AEDPA's Statute of Limitations

Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Overcome AEDPA's Statute of Limitations

Date: May 29, 2013
Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Overcome AEDPA's Statute of Limitations Introduction In Greg McQuiggin, Warden, Petitioner v. Floyd Perkins, 133 S.Ct. 1924 (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a...
Martinez v. Thaler: Extending Martinez Exception to Texas for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Martinez v. Thaler: Extending Martinez Exception to Texas for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: May 29, 2013
Martinez v. Thaler: Extending Martinez Exception to Texas for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction Martinez v. Thaler, 133 S.Ct. 1911 (2013), is a landmark decision by the United...
PPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Establishing Creditable Excess Profits Tax

PPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Establishing Creditable Excess Profits Tax

Date: May 21, 2013
PPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Establishing Creditable Excess Profits Tax Introduction PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (569 U.S. 329, 2013)...
Chevron Deference Applied to Agency Jurisdiction: Commentary on City of Arlington v. FCC

Chevron Deference Applied to Agency Jurisdiction: Commentary on City of Arlington v. FCC

Date: May 21, 2013
Chevron Deference Applied to Agency Jurisdiction: Commentary on City of Arlington v. FCC Introduction City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 569 U.S. 290...
Supreme Court Upholds Retroactive Rejection of Diminished Capacity Defense in Metrish v. Lancaster

Supreme Court Upholds Retroactive Rejection of Diminished Capacity Defense in Metrish v. Lancaster

Date: May 21, 2013
Supreme Court Upholds Retroactive Rejection of Diminished Capacity Defense in Metrish v. Lancaster Introduction In the landmark case of Metrish v. Lancaster, the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Affirming Attorney’s Fee Awards for Untimely NCVIA Petitions in Sebelius v. CES

Affirming Attorney’s Fee Awards for Untimely NCVIA Petitions in Sebelius v. CES

Date: May 21, 2013
Affirming Attorney’s Fee Awards for Untimely NCVIA Petitions in Sebelius v. CES Introduction Case: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. CES, Petitioner Court: United States...
Supreme Court Affirms Chevron Deference to FCC’s Interpretation of Agency Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Affirms Chevron Deference to FCC’s Interpretation of Agency Jurisdiction

Date: May 21, 2013
Supreme Court Affirms Chevron Deference to FCC’s Interpretation of Agency Jurisdiction Introduction In the landmark case of City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et...
NCVIA Petition Timeliness and Attorney’s Fees: Good Faith and Reasonable Basis Standard

NCVIA Petition Timeliness and Attorney’s Fees: Good Faith and Reasonable Basis Standard

Date: May 21, 2013
NCVIA Petition Timeliness and Attorney’s Fees: Good Faith and Reasonable Basis Standard Introduction In Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Cloer, 133 S.Ct. 1886 (2013), the...
U.S. Supreme Court Determines U.K. Windfall Tax as Creditable Excess Profits Tax under IRC § 901

U.S. Supreme Court Determines U.K. Windfall Tax as Creditable Excess Profits Tax under IRC § 901

Date: May 21, 2013
U.S. Supreme Court Determines U.K. Windfall Tax as Creditable Excess Profits Tax under IRC § 901 Introduction The case of PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (133...
Retroactive Application of State Supreme Court Decisions Affirmed: Metrish v. Lancaster

Retroactive Application of State Supreme Court Decisions Affirmed: Metrish v. Lancaster

Date: May 21, 2013
Retroactive Application of State Supreme Court Decisions Affirmed: Metrish v. Lancaster Introduction Metrish v. Lancaster, 133 S.Ct. 1781 (2013), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision...
Chevron Deference Applies to Agency Interpretations of Statutory Authority: City of Arlington v. FCC

Chevron Deference Applies to Agency Interpretations of Statutory Authority: City of Arlington v. FCC

Date: May 21, 2013
Chevron Deference Applies to Agency Interpretations of Statutory Authority: City of Arlington v. FCC Introduction City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is a...
Defalcation in Bankruptcy Law: Understanding the Culpable Mindset in Bullock v. BankChampaign

Defalcation in Bankruptcy Law: Understanding the Culpable Mindset in Bullock v. BankChampaign

Date: May 14, 2013
Defalcation in Bankruptcy Law: Understanding the Culpable Mindset in Bullock v. BankChampaign Introduction Randy Curtis Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. (569 U.S. 267, 2013) is a landmark decision by...
Defining Patent Exhaustion in Self-Replicating Seed Technologies: Bowman v. Monsanto

Defining Patent Exhaustion in Self-Replicating Seed Technologies: Bowman v. Monsanto

Date: May 14, 2013
Defining Patent Exhaustion in Self-Replicating Seed Technologies: Bowman v. Monsanto Introduction Vernon Hugh Bowman v. Monsanto Company et al. (133 S.Ct. 1761, 2013) is a landmark decision by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert