Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Affirming Attorney’s Fee Awards for Untimely NCVIA Petitions in Sebelius v. CES

Affirming Attorney’s Fee Awards for Untimely NCVIA Petitions in Sebelius v. CES

Date: May 21, 2013
Affirming Attorney’s Fee Awards for Untimely NCVIA Petitions in Sebelius v. CES Introduction Case: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. CES, Petitioner Court: United States...
Supreme Court Affirms Chevron Deference to FCC’s Interpretation of Agency Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Affirms Chevron Deference to FCC’s Interpretation of Agency Jurisdiction

Date: May 21, 2013
Supreme Court Affirms Chevron Deference to FCC’s Interpretation of Agency Jurisdiction Introduction In the landmark case of City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et...
NCVIA Petition Timeliness and Attorney’s Fees: Good Faith and Reasonable Basis Standard

NCVIA Petition Timeliness and Attorney’s Fees: Good Faith and Reasonable Basis Standard

Date: May 21, 2013
NCVIA Petition Timeliness and Attorney’s Fees: Good Faith and Reasonable Basis Standard Introduction In Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Cloer, 133 S.Ct. 1886 (2013), the...
Retroactive Application of State Supreme Court Decisions Affirmed: Metrish v. Lancaster

Retroactive Application of State Supreme Court Decisions Affirmed: Metrish v. Lancaster

Date: May 21, 2013
Retroactive Application of State Supreme Court Decisions Affirmed: Metrish v. Lancaster Introduction Metrish v. Lancaster, 133 S.Ct. 1781 (2013), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision...
Chevron Deference Applies to Agency Interpretations of Statutory Authority: City of Arlington v. FCC

Chevron Deference Applies to Agency Interpretations of Statutory Authority: City of Arlington v. FCC

Date: May 21, 2013
Chevron Deference Applies to Agency Interpretations of Statutory Authority: City of Arlington v. FCC Introduction City of Arlington, Texas, et al. v. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is a...
U.S. Supreme Court Determines U.K. Windfall Tax as Creditable Excess Profits Tax under IRC § 901

U.S. Supreme Court Determines U.K. Windfall Tax as Creditable Excess Profits Tax under IRC § 901

Date: May 21, 2013
U.S. Supreme Court Determines U.K. Windfall Tax as Creditable Excess Profits Tax under IRC § 901 Introduction The case of PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (133...
Defalcation in Bankruptcy Law: Understanding the Culpable Mindset in Bullock v. BankChampaign

Defalcation in Bankruptcy Law: Understanding the Culpable Mindset in Bullock v. BankChampaign

Date: May 14, 2013
Defalcation in Bankruptcy Law: Understanding the Culpable Mindset in Bullock v. BankChampaign Introduction Randy Curtis Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. (569 U.S. 267, 2013) is a landmark decision by...
Defining Patent Exhaustion in Self-Replicating Seed Technologies: Bowman v. Monsanto

Defining Patent Exhaustion in Self-Replicating Seed Technologies: Bowman v. Monsanto

Date: May 14, 2013
Defining Patent Exhaustion in Self-Replicating Seed Technologies: Bowman v. Monsanto Introduction Vernon Hugh Bowman v. Monsanto Company et al. (133 S.Ct. 1761, 2013) is a landmark decision by the...
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Defalcation' under Bankruptcy Law: Culpable Mind Requirement Established

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Defalcation' under Bankruptcy Law: Culpable Mind Requirement Established

Date: May 14, 2013
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Defalcation' under Bankruptcy Law: Culpable Mind Requirement Established Introduction In the landmark case of Randy Curtis Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. (133 S.Ct. 1754),...
State Regulation of Vehicle Disposal Not Preempted by FAAAA: Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Robert Pelkey

State Regulation of Vehicle Disposal Not Preempted by FAAAA: Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Robert Pelkey

Date: May 14, 2013
State Regulation of Vehicle Disposal Not Preempted by FAAAA: Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Robert Pelkey Introduction In Dan's City Used Cars, Inc., dba Dan's City Auto Body v. Robert Pelkey, the...
State Law Claims and Federal Preemption: Insights from Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey

State Law Claims and Federal Preemption: Insights from Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey

Date: May 14, 2013
State Law Claims and Federal Preemption: Insights from Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey Introduction Dan's City Used Cars, Inc., dba Dan's City Auto Body, Petitioner v. Robert Pelkey (569 U.S. 251) is...
Patent Exhaustion and Reproduction Rights: The Bowman v. Monsanto Decision

Patent Exhaustion and Reproduction Rights: The Bowman v. Monsanto Decision

Date: May 14, 2013
Patent Exhaustion and Reproduction Rights: The Bowman v. Monsanto Decision Introduction Vernon Hugh Bowman v. Monsanto Company et al. was a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court on...
Virginia FOIA's Citizens-Only Access Upheld Under Privileges and Immunities Clause

Virginia FOIA's Citizens-Only Access Upheld Under Privileges and Immunities Clause

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Virginia FOIA's Citizens-Only Access Upheld Under Privileges and Immunities Clause Introduction In the landmark case Mark J. McBurney, et al. v. Nathaniel L. Young, 569 U.S. 221 (2013), the United...
Impact of State Funding Failures on Speedy Trial Rights: Analysis of Boyer v. Louisiana

Impact of State Funding Failures on Speedy Trial Rights: Analysis of Boyer v. Louisiana

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Impact of State Funding Failures on Speedy Trial Rights: Analysis of Boyer v. Louisiana Introduction Jonathan Edward Boyer v. Louisiana, 569 U.S. 238 (2013), represents a pivotal case in the realm of...
Boyer v. Louisiana: State Responsibility in Funding Indigent Defense and Speedy Trial Protections

Boyer v. Louisiana: State Responsibility in Funding Indigent Defense and Speedy Trial Protections

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Boyer v. Louisiana: State Responsibility in Funding Indigent Defense and Speedy Trial Protections Introduction Boyer v. Louisiana is a pivotal case addressed by the United States Supreme Court in...
Privileges and Immunities Clause Permits Citizens-Only Freedom of Information Laws

Privileges and Immunities Clause Permits Citizens-Only Freedom of Information Laws

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Privileges and Immunities Clause Permits Citizens-Only Freedom of Information Laws Introduction In the landmark case Mark J. McBurney, et al. v. Nathaniel L. Young, Deputy Commissioner and Director,...
Redefining "Aggravated Felony" for Marijuana Offenses: Moncrieffe v. Holder

Redefining "Aggravated Felony" for Marijuana Offenses: Moncrieffe v. Holder

Date: Apr 24, 2013
Redefining "Aggravated Felony" for Marijuana Offenses: Moncrieffe v. Holder Introduction In the landmark case Moncrieffe v. Holder, the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical intersection...
Limits on 'Aggravated Felony' Classification for Minor Marijuana Offenses Under INA

Limits on 'Aggravated Felony' Classification for Minor Marijuana Offenses Under INA

Date: Apr 24, 2013
Limits on 'Aggravated Felony' Classification for Minor Marijuana Offenses Under INA Introduction The case of Adrian Moncrieffe v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General (569 U.S. 184) represents a...
Natural Dissipation of Blood Alcohol Does Not Per Se Justify Warrantless Blood Tests: Missouri v. Tyler McNeely

Natural Dissipation of Blood Alcohol Does Not Per Se Justify Warrantless Blood Tests: Missouri v. Tyler McNeely

Date: Apr 18, 2013
Natural Dissipation of Blood Alcohol Does Not Per Se Justify Warrantless Blood Tests: Missouri v. Tyler McNeely Introduction In Missouri v. Tyler G. McNeely (133 S.Ct. 1552, 2013), the United States...
Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Reinforced for Alien Tort Statute in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum

Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Reinforced for Alien Tort Statute in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum

Date: Apr 18, 2013
Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Reinforced for Alien Tort Statute in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Introduction KIOBEL v. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO. is a landmark decision by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert