Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Defalcation' under Bankruptcy Law: Culpable Mind Requirement Established

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Defalcation' under Bankruptcy Law: Culpable Mind Requirement Established

Date: May 14, 2013
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Defalcation' under Bankruptcy Law: Culpable Mind Requirement Established Introduction In the landmark case of Randy Curtis Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. (133 S.Ct. 1754),...
Patent Exhaustion and Reproduction Rights: The Bowman v. Monsanto Decision

Patent Exhaustion and Reproduction Rights: The Bowman v. Monsanto Decision

Date: May 14, 2013
Patent Exhaustion and Reproduction Rights: The Bowman v. Monsanto Decision Introduction Vernon Hugh Bowman v. Monsanto Company et al. was a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court on...
State Regulation of Vehicle Disposal Not Preempted by FAAAA: Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Robert Pelkey

State Regulation of Vehicle Disposal Not Preempted by FAAAA: Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Robert Pelkey

Date: May 14, 2013
State Regulation of Vehicle Disposal Not Preempted by FAAAA: Dan's City Used Cars, Inc. v. Robert Pelkey Introduction In Dan's City Used Cars, Inc., dba Dan's City Auto Body v. Robert Pelkey, the...
State Law Claims and Federal Preemption: Insights from Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey

State Law Claims and Federal Preemption: Insights from Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey

Date: May 14, 2013
State Law Claims and Federal Preemption: Insights from Dan's City Used Cars v. Pelkey Introduction Dan's City Used Cars, Inc., dba Dan's City Auto Body, Petitioner v. Robert Pelkey (569 U.S. 251) is...
Virginia FOIA's Citizens-Only Access Upheld Under Privileges and Immunities Clause

Virginia FOIA's Citizens-Only Access Upheld Under Privileges and Immunities Clause

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Virginia FOIA's Citizens-Only Access Upheld Under Privileges and Immunities Clause Introduction In the landmark case Mark J. McBurney, et al. v. Nathaniel L. Young, 569 U.S. 221 (2013), the United...
Impact of State Funding Failures on Speedy Trial Rights: Analysis of Boyer v. Louisiana

Impact of State Funding Failures on Speedy Trial Rights: Analysis of Boyer v. Louisiana

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Impact of State Funding Failures on Speedy Trial Rights: Analysis of Boyer v. Louisiana Introduction Jonathan Edward Boyer v. Louisiana, 569 U.S. 238 (2013), represents a pivotal case in the realm of...
Boyer v. Louisiana: State Responsibility in Funding Indigent Defense and Speedy Trial Protections

Boyer v. Louisiana: State Responsibility in Funding Indigent Defense and Speedy Trial Protections

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Boyer v. Louisiana: State Responsibility in Funding Indigent Defense and Speedy Trial Protections Introduction Boyer v. Louisiana is a pivotal case addressed by the United States Supreme Court in...
Privileges and Immunities Clause Permits Citizens-Only Freedom of Information Laws

Privileges and Immunities Clause Permits Citizens-Only Freedom of Information Laws

Date: Apr 30, 2013
Privileges and Immunities Clause Permits Citizens-Only Freedom of Information Laws Introduction In the landmark case Mark J. McBurney, et al. v. Nathaniel L. Young, Deputy Commissioner and Director,...
Redefining "Aggravated Felony" for Marijuana Offenses: Moncrieffe v. Holder

Redefining "Aggravated Felony" for Marijuana Offenses: Moncrieffe v. Holder

Date: Apr 24, 2013
Redefining "Aggravated Felony" for Marijuana Offenses: Moncrieffe v. Holder Introduction In the landmark case Moncrieffe v. Holder, the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical intersection...
Limits on 'Aggravated Felony' Classification for Minor Marijuana Offenses Under INA

Limits on 'Aggravated Felony' Classification for Minor Marijuana Offenses Under INA

Date: Apr 24, 2013
Limits on 'Aggravated Felony' Classification for Minor Marijuana Offenses Under INA Introduction The case of Adrian Moncrieffe v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General (569 U.S. 184) represents a...
Natural Dissipation of Blood Alcohol Does Not Per Se Justify Warrantless Blood Tests: Missouri v. Tyler McNeely

Natural Dissipation of Blood Alcohol Does Not Per Se Justify Warrantless Blood Tests: Missouri v. Tyler McNeely

Date: Apr 18, 2013
Natural Dissipation of Blood Alcohol Does Not Per Se Justify Warrantless Blood Tests: Missouri v. Tyler McNeely Introduction In Missouri v. Tyler G. McNeely (133 S.Ct. 1552, 2013), the United States...
Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Reinforced for Alien Tort Statute in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum

Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Reinforced for Alien Tort Statute in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum

Date: Apr 18, 2013
Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Reinforced for Alien Tort Statute in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Introduction KIOBEL v. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO. is a landmark decision by the United...
Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Applies to Alien Tort Statute Claims: KIOBEL v. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO.

Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Applies to Alien Tort Statute Claims: KIOBEL v. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO.

Date: Apr 18, 2013
Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Applies to Alien Tort Statute Claims: KIOBEL v. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO. Introduction KIOBEL v. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO. is a landmark 2013 decision by the...
Missouri v. McNeely: Fourth Amendment Protections in DWI Investigations

Missouri v. McNeely: Fourth Amendment Protections in DWI Investigations

Date: Apr 18, 2013
Missouri v. McNeely: Fourth Amendment Protections in DWI Investigations Introduction Missouri v. Tyler G. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Dismissal of FLSA Collective Actions Under Rule 68: Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk

Dismissal of FLSA Collective Actions Under Rule 68: Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk

Date: Apr 17, 2013
Dismissal of FLSA Collective Actions Under Rule 68: Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk Introduction In the landmark case of Genesis Healthcare Corporation, et al. v. Laura Symczyk, the United States...
ERISA §502(a)(3) Enforcement: Plan Provisions Override Equitable Doctrines with Default Rules Applied When Silent

ERISA §502(a)(3) Enforcement: Plan Provisions Override Equitable Doctrines with Default Rules Applied When Silent

Date: Apr 17, 2013
ERISA §502(a)(3) Enforcement: Plan Provisions Override Equitable Doctrines with Default Rules Applied When Silent Introduction In the landmark case of US Airways, Inc. v. James E. McCutchen, 569 U.S....
Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk: Mootness in FLSA Collective Actions and Rule 68 Offers

Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk: Mootness in FLSA Collective Actions and Rule 68 Offers

Date: Apr 17, 2013
Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk: Mootness in FLSA Collective Actions and Rule 68 Offers Introduction In Genesis Healthcare Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Laura Symczyk, 569 U.S. 66 (2013),...
ERISA Plan Terms Prevail Over Equitable Defenses: An In-Depth Analysis of US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen

ERISA Plan Terms Prevail Over Equitable Defenses: An In-Depth Analysis of US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen

Date: Apr 17, 2013
ERISA Plan Terms Prevail Over Equitable Defenses: An In-Depth Analysis of US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen Case Citation: US Airways, Inc., Petitioner v. James E. McCutchen et al. (133 S.Ct. 1537) |...
Right to Reappointment of Counsel in Post-Waiver Stages: Marshall v. Rodgers

Right to Reappointment of Counsel in Post-Waiver Stages: Marshall v. Rodgers

Date: Apr 2, 2013
Right to Reappointment of Counsel in Post-Waiver Stages: Marshall v. Rodgers Introduction John Marshall, Warden v. Otis Lee Rodgers (569 U.S. 58) is a significant Supreme Court case that addresses...
Broad Application of the FTCA's Law Enforcement Proviso Established in Millbrook v. United States

Broad Application of the FTCA's Law Enforcement Proviso Established in Millbrook v. United States

Date: Mar 28, 2013
Broad Application of the FTCA's Law Enforcement Proviso Established in Millbrook v. United States Introduction Millbrook v. United States (569 U.S. 50, 2013) is a landmark decision by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert