Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Alleyne v. United States: Supreme Court Reaffirms Jury’s Central Role in Determining Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Alleyne v. United States: Supreme Court Reaffirms Jury’s Central Role in Determining Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Date: Jun 18, 2013
Alleyne v. United States: Supreme Court Reaffirms Jury’s Central Role in Determining Mandatory Minimum Sentences Introduction Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Preemption of State Voter Registration Requirements under the National Voter Registration Act: Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona

Preemption of State Voter Registration Requirements under the National Voter Registration Act: Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona

Date: Jun 18, 2013
Preemption of State Voter Registration Requirements under the National Voter Registration Act: Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona Introduction Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc....
Salinas v. Texas: Requirement of Explicit Fifth Amendment Invocation in Noncustodial Police Interrogations

Salinas v. Texas: Requirement of Explicit Fifth Amendment Invocation in Noncustodial Police Interrogations

Date: Jun 18, 2013
Salinas v. Texas: Requirement of Explicit Fifth Amendment Invocation in Noncustodial Police Interrogations Introduction Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. 178 (2013), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
FTC v. Actavis: Establishing Antitrust Scrutiny for Reverse Payment Patent Settlements

FTC v. Actavis: Establishing Antitrust Scrutiny for Reverse Payment Patent Settlements

Date: Jun 18, 2013
FTC v. Actavis: Establishing Antitrust Scrutiny for Reverse Payment Patent Settlements Introduction FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 136 (2013), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
FTC v. Actavis: Supreme Court Applies Rule of Reason to Reverse Payment Patent Settlements

FTC v. Actavis: Supreme Court Applies Rule of Reason to Reverse Payment Patent Settlements

Date: Jun 18, 2013
FTC v. Actavis: Supreme Court Applies Rule of Reason to Reverse Payment Patent Settlements Introduction Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., 133 S.Ct. 2223 (2013), is a landmark decision by the...
Federal Preemption of Arizona's Voter Registration Citizenship Requirement under NVRA

Federal Preemption of Arizona's Voter Registration Citizenship Requirement under NVRA

Date: Jun 18, 2013
Federal Preemption of Arizona's Voter Registration Citizenship Requirement under NVRA Introduction The case of Arizona, et al. v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., et al. (133 S.Ct. 2247,...
United States v. Davila: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Vacating Guilty Pleas under Federal Rule 11(c)(1)

United States v. Davila: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Vacating Guilty Pleas under Federal Rule 11(c)(1)

Date: Jun 14, 2013
United States v. Davila: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Vacating Guilty Pleas under Federal Rule 11(c)(1) Introduction United States v. Anthony Davila, 133 S.Ct. 2139 (2013), is a pivotal...
Red River Compact Does Not Preempt State Water Regulations: A Comprehensive Analysis

Red River Compact Does Not Preempt State Water Regulations: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jun 14, 2013
Red River Compact Does Not Preempt State Water Regulations: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Tarrant Regional Water District v. Rudolf John Herrmann et al. (133 S.Ct. 2120, 2013) is a...
Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology: Defining the Boundaries of Gene Patentability

Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology: Defining the Boundaries of Gene Patentability

Date: Jun 14, 2013
Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology: Defining the Boundaries of Gene Patentability Introduction In the landmark case Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics,...
Rule 11(c)(1) and Plea Validity: Insights from United States v. Davila

Rule 11(c)(1) and Plea Validity: Insights from United States v. Davila

Date: Jun 14, 2013
Rule 11(c)(1) and Plea Validity: Insights from United States v. Davila Introduction United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that redefines the consequences...
Supremacy of Federal Law in Motor Carrier Regulation: ATA v. City of Los Angeles

Supremacy of Federal Law in Motor Carrier Regulation: ATA v. City of Los Angeles

Date: Jun 14, 2013
Supremacy of Federal Law in Motor Carrier Regulation: ATA v. City of Los Angeles Introduction The landmark case American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 569 U.S. 641 (2013),...
Preemption of Local Concession Agreements under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act: Insights from American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Preemption of Local Concession Agreements under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act: Insights from American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Date: Jun 14, 2013
Preemption of Local Concession Agreements under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act Introduction The case of American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, California...
Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology: Defining Patent Eligibility of Genetic Material

Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology: Defining Patent Eligibility of Genetic Material

Date: Jun 14, 2013
Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology: Defining Patent Eligibility of Genetic Material Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v....
Red River Compact Does Not Grant Cross-Border Water Diversion Rights

Red River Compact Does Not Grant Cross-Border Water Diversion Rights

Date: Jun 14, 2013
Red River Compact Does Not Grant Cross-Border Water Diversion Rights Introduction In the landmark case Tarrant Regional Water District v. Rudolf John Herrmann et al., the U.S. Supreme Court addressed...
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority in Class Arbitration: Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority in Class Arbitration: Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I

Date: Jun 11, 2013
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority in Class Arbitration: Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I Introduction Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I., 133 S.Ct. 2064 (2013), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Mar v. Peugh: Upholding the Ex Post Facto Clause in Sentencing Guidelines

Mar v. Peugh: Upholding the Ex Post Facto Clause in Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Jun 11, 2013
Mar v. Peugh: Upholding the Ex Post Facto Clause in Sentencing Guidelines Introduction In the landmark case Mar v. Peugh, 569 U.S. 530 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Takings Claims for Agricultural Handlers under the AMAA

Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Takings Claims for Agricultural Handlers under the AMAA

Date: Jun 11, 2013
Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Takings Claims for Agricultural Handlers under the AMAA Introduction In Mar v. N. D. Horne, et al., Petitioners (569 U.S. 513), the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Affirms Federal Jurisdiction Over Takings Claims of Agricultural Handlers Under the AMAA

Supreme Court Affirms Federal Jurisdiction Over Takings Claims of Agricultural Handlers Under the AMAA

Date: Jun 11, 2013
Supreme Court Affirms Federal Jurisdiction Over Takings Claims of Agricultural Handlers Under the AMAA Introduction The case of Marvin D. Horne et al. v. Department of Agriculture, decided on June...
Ex Post Facto Implications of Updated Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of Mar v. Peugh

Ex Post Facto Implications of Updated Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of Mar v. Peugh

Date: Jun 11, 2013
Ex Post Facto Implications of Updated Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of Mar v. Peugh Introduction In Mar v. Peugh, 133 S.Ct. 2072 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed a significant...
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I: Affirming Arbitrator Authority in Class Arbitration Under the FAA

Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I: Affirming Arbitrator Authority in Class Arbitration Under the FAA

Date: Jun 11, 2013
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I: Affirming Arbitrator Authority in Class Arbitration Under the FAA Introduction Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I, 569 U.S. 564 (2013), is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert