Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Alleyne v. United States: Supreme Court Reaffirms Jury’s Central Role in Determining Mandatory Minimum Sentences Introduction Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Preemption of State Voter Registration Requirements under the National Voter Registration Act: Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona Introduction Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc....
Salinas v. Texas: Requirement of Explicit Fifth Amendment Invocation in Noncustodial Police Interrogations Introduction Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. 178 (2013), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
FTC v. Actavis: Establishing Antitrust Scrutiny for Reverse Payment Patent Settlements Introduction FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 136 (2013), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
FTC v. Actavis: Supreme Court Applies Rule of Reason to Reverse Payment Patent Settlements Introduction Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., 133 S.Ct. 2223 (2013), is a landmark decision by the...
Federal Preemption of Arizona's Voter Registration Citizenship Requirement under NVRA Introduction The case of Arizona, et al. v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., et al. (133 S.Ct. 2247,...
United States v. Davila: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Vacating Guilty Pleas under Federal Rule 11(c)(1) Introduction United States v. Anthony Davila, 133 S.Ct. 2139 (2013), is a pivotal...
Red River Compact Does Not Preempt State Water Regulations: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Tarrant Regional Water District v. Rudolf John Herrmann et al. (133 S.Ct. 2120, 2013) is a...
Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology: Defining the Boundaries of Gene Patentability Introduction In the landmark case Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics,...
Rule 11(c)(1) and Plea Validity: Insights from United States v. Davila Introduction United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that redefines the consequences...
Supremacy of Federal Law in Motor Carrier Regulation: ATA v. City of Los Angeles Introduction The landmark case American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 569 U.S. 641 (2013),...
Preemption of Local Concession Agreements under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act Introduction The case of American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, California...
Myriad Genetics v. Association for Molecular Pathology: Defining Patent Eligibility of Genetic Material Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v....
Red River Compact Does Not Grant Cross-Border Water Diversion Rights Introduction In the landmark case Tarrant Regional Water District v. Rudolf John Herrmann et al., the U.S. Supreme Court addressed...
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority in Class Arbitration: Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I Introduction Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I., 133 S.Ct. 2064 (2013), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Mar v. Peugh: Upholding the Ex Post Facto Clause in Sentencing Guidelines Introduction In the landmark case Mar v. Peugh, 569 U.S. 530 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Takings Claims for Agricultural Handlers under the AMAA Introduction In Mar v. N. D. Horne, et al., Petitioners (569 U.S. 513), the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Affirms Federal Jurisdiction Over Takings Claims of Agricultural Handlers Under the AMAA Introduction The case of Marvin D. Horne et al. v. Department of Agriculture, decided on June...
Ex Post Facto Implications of Updated Sentencing Guidelines: Analysis of Mar v. Peugh Introduction In Mar v. Peugh, 133 S.Ct. 2072 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed a significant...
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I: Affirming Arbitrator Authority in Class Arbitration Under the FAA Introduction Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John I, 569 U.S. 564 (2013), is a pivotal case adjudicated...