Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

ADA Preemption of Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Airline Contracts

ADA Preemption of Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Airline Contracts

Date: Apr 3, 2014
ADA Preemption of Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Airline Contracts Introduction Northwest, Inc., et al. v. Rabbi S. Binyomin Ginsberg, 572 U.S. 273 (2014), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Supreme Court's Expansive Interpretation of 'Physical Force' in § 922(g)(9): United States v. Castleman

Supreme Court's Expansive Interpretation of 'Physical Force' in § 922(g)(9): United States v. Castleman

Date: Mar 27, 2014
Supreme Court's Expansive Interpretation of "Physical Force" in § 922(g)(9): United States v. Castleman Introduction United States v. James Al Castleman, 572 U.S. 157 (2014), is a significant Supreme...
Severance Payments Recognized as Taxable Wages Under FICA: United States v. Quality Stores, Inc.

Severance Payments Recognized as Taxable Wages Under FICA: United States v. Quality Stores, Inc.

Date: Mar 26, 2014
Severance Payments Recognized as Taxable Wages Under FICA: United States v. Quality Stores, Inc. Introduction The landmark case of United States v. Quality Stores, Inc., decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Establishing Business Standing under the Lanham Act: Lexmark v. Static Control Components

Establishing Business Standing under the Lanham Act: Lexmark v. Static Control Components

Date: Mar 26, 2014
Establishing Business Standing under the Lanham Act: Lexmark v. Static Control Components Introduction The Supreme Court case Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc., 572 U.S....
Termination of Railroad Easements: Restoration of Full Land Ownership Upon Abandonment Under the General Railroad Right–of–Way Act of 1875

Termination of Railroad Easements: Restoration of Full Land Ownership Upon Abandonment Under the General Railroad Right–of–Way Act of 1875

Date: Mar 11, 2014
Termination of Railroad Easements: Restoration of Full Land Ownership Upon Abandonment Under the General Railroad Right–of–Way Act of 1875 Introduction The Supreme Court case Marvin M. Brandt...
BG Group v. Argentina: Reinforcing Arbitrator Primacy in Treaty Arbitration Clauses

BG Group v. Argentina: Reinforcing Arbitrator Primacy in Treaty Arbitration Clauses

Date: Mar 6, 2014
BG Group v. Argentina: Reinforcing Arbitrator Primacy in Treaty Arbitration Clauses Introduction In the landmark case of BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, the United States Supreme Court...
Advance Knowledge Standard for Aiding and Abetting Under 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Rosemond v. United States

Advance Knowledge Standard for Aiding and Abetting Under 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Rosemond v. United States

Date: Mar 6, 2014
Advance Knowledge Standard for Aiding and Abetting Under 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Rosemond v. United States Introduction In Justus C. ROSEMOND, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES, 572 U.S. 65 (2014), the United...
Article 12 of the Hague Convention Not Subject to Equitable Tolling: Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Article 12 of the Hague Convention Not Subject to Equitable Tolling: Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Date: Mar 6, 2014
Article 12 of the Hague Convention Not Subject to Equitable Tolling: Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court, in Manuel Jose Lozano v. Diana Lucia Montoya Alvarez,...
Broadening Whistleblower Protections: Supreme Court Rules 18 U.S.C. § 1514A Includes Contractor Employees

Broadening Whistleblower Protections: Supreme Court Rules 18 U.S.C. § 1514A Includes Contractor Employees

Date: Mar 5, 2014
Broadening Whistleblower Protections: Supreme Court Rules 18 U.S.C. § 1514A Includes Contractor Employees Introduction In the landmark case of Lawson v. FMR LLC, 571 U.S. 429 (2014), the United...
Limits on Bankruptcy Court Authority to Surcharge Homestead Exemptions for Administrative Expenses

Limits on Bankruptcy Court Authority to Surcharge Homestead Exemptions for Administrative Expenses

Date: Mar 5, 2014
Limits on Bankruptcy Court Authority to Surcharge Homestead Exemptions for Administrative Expenses Introduction In Stephen Law v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee, 571 U.S. 415 (2014), the United...
Defining Military Installations under 18 U.S.C. § 1382: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope in United States v. Apel

Defining Military Installations under 18 U.S.C. § 1382: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope in United States v. Apel

Date: Feb 27, 2014
Defining Military Installations under 18 U.S.C. § 1382: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope in United States v. Apel Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. John Dennis Apel (571 U.S. 359)...
Supreme Court Upholds SLUSA Non-Preemption in State-Law Class Actions Over Misrepresentations Tangential to Covered Securities

Supreme Court Upholds SLUSA Non-Preemption in State-Law Class Actions Over Misrepresentations Tangential to Covered Securities

Date: Feb 27, 2014
Supreme Court Upholds SLUSA Non-Preemption in State-Law Class Actions Over Misrepresentations Tangential to Covered Securities Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of...
Clarifying the Scope of SLUSA: Supreme Court Upholds State-Law Class Actions in Tangential Securities Fraud Cases

Clarifying the Scope of SLUSA: Supreme Court Upholds State-Law Class Actions in Tangential Securities Fraud Cases

Date: Feb 27, 2014
Clarifying the Scope of SLUSA: Supreme Court Upholds State-Law Class Actions in Tangential Securities Fraud Cases Introduction In the landmark case Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Samuel Troice et al.,...
Warrantless Consent Searches in Joint Occupancy: The Fernandez v. California Decision

Warrantless Consent Searches in Joint Occupancy: The Fernandez v. California Decision

Date: Feb 26, 2014
Warrantless Consent Searches in Joint Occupancy: The Fernandez v. California Decision Introduction The Supreme Court case Fernandez v. California, 571 U.S. 292 (2014), addresses the complexities...
Reaffirming Personal Jurisdiction Principles: Walden v. Fiore

Reaffirming Personal Jurisdiction Principles: Walden v. Fiore

Date: Feb 26, 2014
Reaffirming Personal Jurisdiction Principles: Walden v. Fiore Introduction Walden v. Fiore et al. (571 U.S. 277) is a landmark 2014 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the...
Grand Jury Probable Cause Findings Final and Non-Reviewable in Pre-Trial Asset Seizure

Grand Jury Probable Cause Findings Final and Non-Reviewable in Pre-Trial Asset Seizure

Date: Feb 26, 2014
Grand Jury Probable Cause Findings Final and Non-Reviewable in Pre-Trial Asset Seizure Introduction In the landmark case Kerri L. Kaley, et vir v. United States, 571 U.S. 320 (2014), the United...
Hinton v. Alabama: Affirming Expanded Interpretation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland

Hinton v. Alabama: Affirming Expanded Interpretation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland

Date: Feb 25, 2014
Hinton v. Alabama: Affirming Expanded Interpretation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland Introduction Hinton v. Alabama, 571 U.S. 263 (2014), is a landmark decision by the United...
But-For Causation Required for Mandatory Minimum Penalties under §841(b)(1)(C): Burrage v. United States

But-For Causation Required for Mandatory Minimum Penalties under §841(b)(1)(C): Burrage v. United States

Date: Jan 28, 2014
But-For Causation Required for Mandatory Minimum Penalties under §841(b)(1)(C): Burrage v. United States Introduction Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014), is a landmark decision by the...
Interpreting "Changing Clothes" under FLSA §203(o): Sandifer v. U.S. Steel

Interpreting "Changing Clothes" under FLSA §203(o): Sandifer v. U.S. Steel

Date: Jan 28, 2014
Interpreting "Changing Clothes" under FLSA §203(o): Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Introduction In Sandifer v. United States Steel Corporation, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue concerning the...
Supreme Court Upholds ATSA Immunity for Materially True Statements: Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper

Supreme Court Upholds ATSA Immunity for Materially True Statements: Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper

Date: Jan 28, 2014
Supreme Court Upholds ATSA Immunity for Materially True Statements: Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper Introduction Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation v. William L. Hoeper is a significant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert