Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Double Jeopardy Protection Confirmed: Jeopardy Attaches Upon Jury Swearing

Double Jeopardy Protection Confirmed: Jeopardy Attaches Upon Jury Swearing

Date: May 28, 2014
Double Jeopardy Protection Confirmed: Jeopardy Attaches Upon Jury Swearing Introduction Esteban Martinez v. Illinois, 572 U.S. 833 (2014), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that clarifies the...
Defining Intellectual Disability in Capital Cases: Insights from Hall v. Florida

Defining Intellectual Disability in Capital Cases: Insights from Hall v. Florida

Date: May 28, 2014
Defining Intellectual Disability in Capital Cases: Insights from Hall v. Florida Introduction Freddie Lee Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. 701 (2014), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Qualified Immunity Confirmed for Secret Service in First Amendment Viewpoint Discrimination Case

Qualified Immunity Confirmed for Secret Service in First Amendment Viewpoint Discrimination Case

Date: May 28, 2014
Qualified Immunity Confirmed for Secret Service in First Amendment Viewpoint Discrimination Case Introduction In Tim Wood and Rob Sa v. GE, 134 S. Ct. 2056 (2014), the United States Supreme Court...
Qualified Immunity and the Use of Deadly Force in High-Speed Chases: Insights from Plumhoff v. Rickard

Qualified Immunity and the Use of Deadly Force in High-Speed Chases: Insights from Plumhoff v. Rickard

Date: May 28, 2014
Qualified Immunity and the Use of Deadly Force in High-Speed Chases: Insights from Plumhoff v. Rickard Introduction Officer Vance PLUMHOFF, et al., Petitioners v. Whitne RICKARD, a Minor Child, Indi...
Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer: Limiting the Laches Defense in Copyright Infringement Cases

Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer: Limiting the Laches Defense in Copyright Infringement Cases

Date: May 20, 2014
Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer: Limiting the Laches Defense in Copyright Infringement Cases Introduction Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), Inc., et al., 572 U.S. 663 (2014), is a landmark case...
Reaffirming Summary Judgment Standards in Qualified Immunity: Tolan v. Cotton

Reaffirming Summary Judgment Standards in Qualified Immunity: Tolan v. Cotton

Date: May 6, 2014
Reaffirming Summary Judgment Standards in Qualified Immunity: Tolan v. Cotton Introduction Tolan v. Cotton is a significant United States Supreme Court decision that addresses the application of...
Affirming Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece Upholds Traditional Practices under the Establishment Clause

Affirming Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece Upholds Traditional Practices under the Establishment Clause

Date: May 6, 2014
Affirming Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece Upholds Traditional Practices under the Establishment Clause Introduction The Supreme Court case, Town of Greece, New York, Petitioner v. Susan Galloway...
Interpreting "Returned Property" under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act: Robers v. United States

Interpreting "Returned Property" under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act: Robers v. United States

Date: May 6, 2014
Interpreting "Returned Property" under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act: Robers v. United States Introduction Benjamin Robers, the petitioner, was convicted of submitting fraudulent mortgage...
Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System: Establishing Abuse of Discretion for §285 Exceptional-Case Determinations

Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System: Establishing Abuse of Discretion for §285 Exceptional-Case Determinations

Date: Apr 30, 2014
Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System: Establishing Abuse of Discretion for §285 Exceptional-Case Determinations Introduction In Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.,...
EPA v. EME Homer City Generation: Upholding Cost-Effective Emission Allocation under the Clean Air Act

EPA v. EME Homer City Generation: Upholding Cost-Effective Emission Allocation under the Clean Air Act

Date: Apr 30, 2014
EPA v. EME Homer City Generation: Upholding Cost-Effective Emission Allocation under the Clean Air Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Environmental Protection Agency et al. v. EME Homer City...
Supreme Court Affirms EPA's Cost-Based Emission Allocation under the Good Neighbor Provision

Supreme Court Affirms EPA's Cost-Based Emission Allocation under the Good Neighbor Provision

Date: Apr 30, 2014
Supreme Court Affirms EPA's Cost-Based Emission Allocation under the Good Neighbor Provision Introduction In the landmark case Environmental Protection Agency et al. v. EME Homer City Generation,...
EPA's Transport Rule Upheld: Cost-Effective Allocation of Emission Reductions Established

EPA's Transport Rule Upheld: Cost-Effective Allocation of Emission Reductions Established

Date: Apr 30, 2014
EPA's Transport Rule Upheld: Cost-Effective Allocation of Emission Reductions Established Introduction In Environmental Protection Agency et al. v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., et al.; and...
Supreme Court Upholds EPA's Transport Rule Under the Clean Air Act's Good Neighbor Provision

Supreme Court Upholds EPA's Transport Rule Under the Clean Air Act's Good Neighbor Provision

Date: Apr 30, 2014
Supreme Court Upholds EPA's Transport Rule Under the Clean Air Act's Good Neighbor Provision Introduction On April 29, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered a pivotal decision in...
Octane Fitness v. Icon Health & Fitness: Redefining "Exceptional Cases" Under 35 U.S.C. § 285

Octane Fitness v. Icon Health & Fitness: Redefining "Exceptional Cases" Under 35 U.S.C. § 285

Date: Apr 30, 2014
Octane Fitness v. Icon Health & Fitness: Redefining "Exceptional Cases" Under 35 U.S.C. § 285 Introduction The Supreme Court case Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545...
Woodall v. White: Supreme Court Refines Fifth Amendment Protections in Penalty Phase

Woodall v. White: Supreme Court Refines Fifth Amendment Protections in Penalty Phase

Date: Apr 24, 2014
Woodall v. White: Supreme Court Refines Fifth Amendment Protections in Penalty Phase Introduction Woodall v. White (572 U.S. 415, 2014) is a significant Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Paroline v. United States: Proximate Causation in §2259 Restitution

Paroline v. United States: Proximate Causation in §2259 Restitution

Date: Apr 24, 2014
Paroline v. United States: Proximate Causation in §2259 Restitution Introduction Doyle Randall Paroline v. United States et al. (572 U.S. 434, 2014) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case...
Schuette v. BAMN: Upholding Voter-Controlled Race Preferences in University Admissions

Schuette v. BAMN: Upholding Voter-Controlled Race Preferences in University Admissions

Date: Apr 23, 2014
Schuette v. BAMN: Upholding Voter-Controlled Race Preferences in University Admissions Introduction Schuette v. BAMN, 572 U.S. 291 (2014), presents a pivotal Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Reliability of Anonymous 911 Tips in Fourth Amendment Traffic Stops

Reliability of Anonymous 911 Tips in Fourth Amendment Traffic Stops

Date: Apr 23, 2014
Reliability of Anonymous 911 Tips in Fourth Amendment Traffic Stops Introduction In the landmark case Lorenzo Prado Navarette and José Prado Navarette v. California (572 U.S. 393, 2014), the United...
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission: Redefining Campaign Finance Limits under the First Amendment

McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission: Redefining Campaign Finance Limits under the First Amendment

Date: Apr 3, 2014
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission: Redefining Campaign Finance Limits under the First Amendment Introduction McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 572 U.S. 185 (2014), represents a...
ADA Preemption of Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Airline Contracts

ADA Preemption of Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Airline Contracts

Date: Apr 3, 2014
ADA Preemption of Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Airline Contracts Introduction Northwest, Inc., et al. v. Rabbi S. Binyomin Ginsberg, 572 U.S. 273 (2014), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert