Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Scope of SLUSA: Supreme Court Upholds State-Law Class Actions in Tangential Securities Fraud Cases

Clarifying the Scope of SLUSA: Supreme Court Upholds State-Law Class Actions in Tangential Securities Fraud Cases

Date: Feb 27, 2014
Clarifying the Scope of SLUSA: Supreme Court Upholds State-Law Class Actions in Tangential Securities Fraud Cases Introduction In the landmark case Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. Samuel Troice et al.,...
Warrantless Consent Searches in Joint Occupancy: The Fernandez v. California Decision

Warrantless Consent Searches in Joint Occupancy: The Fernandez v. California Decision

Date: Feb 26, 2014
Warrantless Consent Searches in Joint Occupancy: The Fernandez v. California Decision Introduction The Supreme Court case Fernandez v. California, 571 U.S. 292 (2014), addresses the complexities...
Reaffirming Personal Jurisdiction Principles: Walden v. Fiore

Reaffirming Personal Jurisdiction Principles: Walden v. Fiore

Date: Feb 26, 2014
Reaffirming Personal Jurisdiction Principles: Walden v. Fiore Introduction Walden v. Fiore et al. (571 U.S. 277) is a landmark 2014 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the...
Grand Jury Probable Cause Findings Final and Non-Reviewable in Pre-Trial Asset Seizure

Grand Jury Probable Cause Findings Final and Non-Reviewable in Pre-Trial Asset Seizure

Date: Feb 26, 2014
Grand Jury Probable Cause Findings Final and Non-Reviewable in Pre-Trial Asset Seizure Introduction In the landmark case Kerri L. Kaley, et vir v. United States, 571 U.S. 320 (2014), the United...
Hinton v. Alabama: Affirming Expanded Interpretation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland

Hinton v. Alabama: Affirming Expanded Interpretation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland

Date: Feb 25, 2014
Hinton v. Alabama: Affirming Expanded Interpretation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland Introduction Hinton v. Alabama, 571 U.S. 263 (2014), is a landmark decision by the United...
But-For Causation Required for Mandatory Minimum Penalties under §841(b)(1)(C): Burrage v. United States

But-For Causation Required for Mandatory Minimum Penalties under §841(b)(1)(C): Burrage v. United States

Date: Jan 28, 2014
But-For Causation Required for Mandatory Minimum Penalties under §841(b)(1)(C): Burrage v. United States Introduction Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014), is a landmark decision by the...
Interpreting "Changing Clothes" under FLSA §203(o): Sandifer v. U.S. Steel

Interpreting "Changing Clothes" under FLSA §203(o): Sandifer v. U.S. Steel

Date: Jan 28, 2014
Interpreting "Changing Clothes" under FLSA §203(o): Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Introduction In Sandifer v. United States Steel Corporation, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue concerning the...
Supreme Court Upholds ATSA Immunity for Materially True Statements: Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper

Supreme Court Upholds ATSA Immunity for Materially True Statements: Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper

Date: Jan 28, 2014
Supreme Court Upholds ATSA Immunity for Materially True Statements: Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper Introduction Air Wisconsin Airlines Corporation v. William L. Hoeper is a significant...
Preserving the Patentee’s Burden of Proof in Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Medtronic v. Mirowski Family Ventures

Preserving the Patentee’s Burden of Proof in Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Medtronic v. Mirowski Family Ventures

Date: Jan 23, 2014
Preserving the Patentee’s Burden of Proof in Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Medtronic v. Mirowski Family Ventures Introduction Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC is a...
Finality of Court Decisions with Unresolved Contractual Attorney's Fees under 28 U.S.C. §1291

Finality of Court Decisions with Unresolved Contractual Attorney's Fees under 28 U.S.C. §1291

Date: Jan 16, 2014
Finality of Court Decisions with Unresolved Contractual Attorney's Fees under 28 U.S.C. §1291 Introduction The case of Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. v. Central Pension Fund of the International...
Mass Action Definition under CAFA: Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation

Mass Action Definition under CAFA: Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation

Date: Jan 15, 2014
Mass Action Definition under CAFA: Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation Introduction The case of Mississippi ex rel. Jim Hood, Attorney General, Petitioner v. AU Optronics Corporation et al. (571...
Daimler AG v. Bauman: Clarifying Limits on General Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations

Daimler AG v. Bauman: Clarifying Limits on General Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations

Date: Jan 15, 2014
Daimler AG v. Bauman: Clarifying Limits on General Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations Introduction Daimler AG v. Barbara Bauman et al. is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Enforceability of Contractual Limitations Periods in ERISA Plans: Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life

Enforceability of Contractual Limitations Periods in ERISA Plans: Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life

Date: Dec 17, 2013
Enforceability of Contractual Limitations Periods in ERISA Plans: Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life Introduction The Supreme Court case Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. (571 U.S. 99)...
Reaffirmation of Rebuttal Evidence in Mental Status Defenses: Kansas v. Cheever

Reaffirmation of Rebuttal Evidence in Mental Status Defenses: Kansas v. Cheever

Date: Dec 12, 2013
Reaffirmation of Rebuttal Evidence in Mental Status Defenses: Kansas v. Cheever Introduction Kansas v. Scott D. Cheever (571 U.S. 87, 2013) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that...
Younger Abstention Limits Affirmed in Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs

Younger Abstention Limits Affirmed in Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs

Date: Dec 11, 2013
Younger Abstention Limits Affirmed in Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs Introduction In Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Elizabeth S. Jacobs et al., 571 U.S. 69 (2013), the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Clarifies Enforcement of Forum-Selection Clauses Under §1404(a)

Supreme Court Clarifies Enforcement of Forum-Selection Clauses Under §1404(a)

Date: Dec 4, 2013
Supreme Court Clarifies Enforcement of Forum-Selection Clauses Under §1404(a) Introduction In Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Western District of...
Valuation Misstatement Penalty Applicability in Sham Partnerships: United States v. Gary Woods

Valuation Misstatement Penalty Applicability in Sham Partnerships: United States v. Gary Woods

Date: Dec 4, 2013
Valuation Misstatement Penalty Applicability in Sham Partnerships: United States v. Gary Woods Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Gary Woods, 571 U.S. 31 (2013), the U.S. Supreme...
Vacating Stay in Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas v. Abbott: Upholding Judicial Standards in Abortion Legislation

Vacating Stay in Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas v. Abbott: Upholding Judicial Standards in Abortion Legislation

Date: Nov 20, 2013
Vacating Stay in Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas v. Abbott: Upholding Judicial Standards in Abortion Legislation Introduction The case of Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health...
Judicial Scrutiny of Class Counsel Diversity Requirements

Judicial Scrutiny of Class Counsel Diversity Requirements

Date: Nov 19, 2013
Judicial Scrutiny of Class Counsel Diversity Requirements Introduction In the landmark case Nicolas MARTIN, v. Carl BLESSING, et al., the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a contentious practice employed...
Judicial Overrides in Alabama Capital Sentencing: Insights from Woodward v. Alabama

Judicial Overrides in Alabama Capital Sentencing: Insights from Woodward v. Alabama

Date: Nov 19, 2013
Judicial Overrides in Alabama Capital Sentencing: Insights from Woodward v. Alabama Introduction Mario Dion Woodward v. Alabama (2013) presents a critical examination of Alabama's capital sentencing...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert