Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Abuse of Discretion Standard Applied to Enforcement of EEOC Subpoenas – McLane v. EEOC

Abuse of Discretion Standard Applied to Enforcement of EEOC Subpoenas – McLane v. EEOC

Date: Apr 4, 2017
Abuse of Discretion Standard Applied to Enforcement of EEOC Subpoenas – McLane v. EEOC Introduction The case of McLane Company, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 137 S. Ct. 1159...
Supreme Court Remands §518 Surcharge Ban for First Amendment Analysis

Supreme Court Remands §518 Surcharge Ban for First Amendment Analysis

Date: Mar 30, 2017
Supreme Court Remands §518 Surcharge Ban for First Amendment Analysis Introduction In Expressions Hair Design, et al. v. Schneiderman, 137 S. Ct. 1144 (2017), the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Medical Standards for Intellectual Disability in Capital Sentencing

Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Medical Standards for Intellectual Disability in Capital Sentencing

Date: Mar 29, 2017
Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Medical Standards for Intellectual Disability in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of Bobby James Moore v. Texas (137 S. Ct. 1039, 2017), the...
Establishing the Separability Test for Copyrightability of Applied Art: Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands

Establishing the Separability Test for Copyrightability of Applied Art: Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands

Date: Mar 23, 2017
Establishing the Separability Test for Copyrightability of Applied Art: Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands Introduction The Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. case, decided by the U.S....
Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp.: Upholding the Absolute Priority Rule in Structured Dismissals

Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp.: Upholding the Absolute Priority Rule in Structured Dismissals

Date: Mar 23, 2017
Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp.: Upholding the Absolute Priority Rule in Structured Dismissals Introduction Casimir Czyzewski, et al. v. Jevic Holding Corp., et al. (137 S. Ct. 973, 2017) is a...
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District: Establishing the "Progress Appropriate" Standard under IDEA

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District: Establishing the "Progress Appropriate" Standard under IDEA

Date: Mar 23, 2017
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District: Establishing the "Progress Appropriate" Standard under IDEA Introduction Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District Re-1, 137 S. Ct. 988 (2017), is a...
National Labor Relations Board v. SW General: Broad Applicability of Section 3345(b)(1) of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act

National Labor Relations Board v. SW General: Broad Applicability of Section 3345(b)(1) of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act

Date: Mar 22, 2017
National Labor Relations Board v. SW General: Broad Applicability of Section 3345(b)(1) of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act Introduction National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) v. SW General, Inc. is a...
Elijah Manuel v. City of Joliet: Extending Fourth Amendment Protections to Post-Legal Process Pretrial Detention

Elijah Manuel v. City of Joliet: Extending Fourth Amendment Protections to Post-Legal Process Pretrial Detention

Date: Mar 22, 2017
Elijah Manuel v. City of Joliet: Extending Fourth Amendment Protections to Post-Legal Process Pretrial Detention Introduction In Elijah Manuel v. City of Joliet, Illinois, et al., the United States...
Supreme Court Rules Laches Cannot Bar Damages Claims within Patent Act's Six-Year Limitations

Supreme Court Rules Laches Cannot Bar Damages Claims within Patent Act's Six-Year Limitations

Date: Mar 22, 2017
Laches Defense Not Applicable within the Six-Year Limitations Period under 35 U.S.C. §286: Analysis of SCA Hygiene Products AKTIEBOLAG v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC Introduction The case of SCA...
Limited Scope of the Foreign Commerce Clause: Analyzing Baston v. United States

Limited Scope of the Foreign Commerce Clause: Analyzing Baston v. United States

Date: Mar 7, 2017
Limited Scope of the Foreign Commerce Clause: Analyzing Baston v. United States Introduction Baston v. United States (137 S. Ct. 850, 2017) presents a pivotal discussion regarding the extent of...
Modern Civil Forfeiture and Due Process: Insights from Leonard v. Texas

Modern Civil Forfeiture and Due Process: Insights from Leonard v. Texas

Date: Mar 7, 2017
Modern Civil Forfeiture and Due Process: Insights from Leonard v. Texas Introduction Leonard v. Texas, 137 S. Ct. 847 (2017) presents a pivotal examination of modern civil forfeiture statutes in...
Overriding the No-Impeachment Rule in Cases of Racial Bias: Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado

Overriding the No-Impeachment Rule in Cases of Racial Bias: Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado

Date: Mar 7, 2017
Overriding the No-Impeachment Rule in Cases of Racial Bias: Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado Introduction In "Miguel Angel Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado," the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine: Insights from Beckles v. United States

Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine: Insights from Beckles v. United States

Date: Mar 7, 2017
Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine: Insights from Beckles v. United States Introduction Travis Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886 (2017), marks a pivotal moment...
Golden Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections: Reaffirming and Refining the Standard for Racial Gerrymandering

Golden Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections: Reaffirming and Refining the Standard for Racial Gerrymandering

Date: Mar 2, 2017
Golden Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections: Reaffirming and Refining the Standard for Racial Gerrymandering Introduction Golden Bethune-Hill, et al., Appellants v. Virginia State Board...
Buck v. Davis: Strengthening Sixth Amendment Rights and Prohibiting Racial Bias in Death Sentences

Buck v. Davis: Strengthening Sixth Amendment Rights and Prohibiting Racial Bias in Death Sentences

Date: Feb 23, 2017
Buck v. Davis: Strengthening Sixth Amendment Rights and Prohibiting Racial Bias in Death Sentences Introduction Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759 (2017), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that...
Supreme Court Clarifies §271(f)(1): Single Components Do Not Trigger Infringement Liability

Supreme Court Clarifies §271(f)(1): Single Components Do Not Trigger Infringement Liability

Date: Feb 23, 2017
Supreme Court Clarifies §271(f)(1): Single Components Do Not Trigger Infringement Liability Introduction In the landmark case Life Technologies Corporation, et al. v. Promega Corporation, the United...
Clarifying §1415(l): Exhaustion of IDEA Procedures Required Only for FAPE Denials

Clarifying §1415(l): Exhaustion of IDEA Procedures Required Only for FAPE Denials

Date: Feb 23, 2017
Clarifying §1415(l): Exhaustion of IDEA Procedures Required Only for FAPE Denials Introduction Stacy Fry, Et Vir, as Next Friends of Minor E. F. v. Napoleon Community Schools, Et Al., 137 S. Ct. 743...
Reaffirming the 'Known and Available' Standard in Eighth Amendment Challenges: A Commentary on Arthur v. Dunn

Reaffirming the 'Known and Available' Standard in Eighth Amendment Challenges: A Commentary on Arthur v. Dunn

Date: Feb 22, 2017
Reaffirming the 'Known and Available' Standard in Eighth Amendment Challenges: A Commentary on Arthur v. Dunn Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Thomas D. Arthur v. Jefferson S. Dunn,...
Limits on Federal Jurisdiction Under Fannie Mae's Sue-and-Be-Sued Clause

Limits on Federal Jurisdiction Under Fannie Mae's Sue-and-Be-Sued Clause

Date: Jan 19, 2017
Limits on Federal Jurisdiction Under Fannie Mae's Sue-and-Be-Sued Clause Introduction Case: Crystal Monique Lightfoot, et al., Petitioners v. Cendant Mortgage Corporation, DBA PHH Mortgage et al....
Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force: Ray White v. Pauly

Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force: Ray White v. Pauly

Date: Jan 10, 2017
Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force: Ray White v. Pauly Introduction Ray White, et al. v. Daniel T. Pauly, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Samuel Pauly, Deceased et al. (137 S. Ct....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert