Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Bank Fraud Statute Encompasses Schemes Targeting Depositor Accounts

Bank Fraud Statute Encompasses Schemes Targeting Depositor Accounts

Date: Dec 13, 2016
Bank Fraud Statute Encompasses Schemes Targeting Depositor Accounts Introduction In the landmark case of Lawrence Eugene Shaw v. United States, the United States Supreme Court addressed the scope of...
Enhancing Tippee Liability: Insights from Salman v. United States on Fiduciary Breaches in Insider Trading

Enhancing Tippee Liability: Insights from Salman v. United States on Fiduciary Breaches in Insider Trading

Date: Dec 7, 2016
Enhancing Tippee Liability: Insights from Salman v. United States on Fiduciary Breaches in Insider Trading Introduction The case of Salman v. United States represents a pivotal moment in the realm of...
Seal Violation Under the False Claims Act Does Not Mandate Dismissal: Analysis of State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby

Seal Violation Under the False Claims Act Does Not Mandate Dismissal: Analysis of State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby

Date: Dec 7, 2016
Seal Violation Under the False Claims Act Does Not Mandate Dismissal: Analysis of State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in State...
Broad Interpretation of "Article of Manufacture" in Patent Damages: Samsung v. Apple

Broad Interpretation of "Article of Manufacture" in Patent Damages: Samsung v. Apple

Date: Dec 7, 2016
Broad Interpretation of "Article of Manufacture" in Patent Damages: Samsung v. Apple Introduction The landmark case of SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ET AL., PETITIONERS v. APPLE INC., decided by the...
Double Jeopardy and Issue-Preclusion: Insights from Bravo-Fernandez v. United States

Double Jeopardy and Issue-Preclusion: Insights from Bravo-Fernandez v. United States

Date: Nov 30, 2016
Double Jeopardy and Issue-Preclusion: Insights from Bravo-Fernandez v. United States Introduction Bravo-Fernandez v. United States (137 S. Ct. 352, 2016) is a seminal Supreme Court decision that...
Supreme Court Remands Arizona Juvenile Life Without Parole Cases in Light of Montgomery v. Louisiana

Supreme Court Remands Arizona Juvenile Life Without Parole Cases in Light of Montgomery v. Louisiana

Date: Nov 1, 2016
Supreme Court Remands Arizona Juvenile Life Without Parole Cases in Light of Montgomery v. Louisiana Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bobby Jerry Tatum v. Arizona (137 S. Ct. 11)...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Elmore v. Holbrook

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Elmore v. Holbrook

Date: Oct 18, 2016
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Elmore v. Holbrook Introduction Clark Elmore v. Donald R. Holbrook, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary is a pivotal...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Stormans, Inc. v. Wiesman: Upholding Washington's Pharmacy Regulations and Its Impact on Religious Objections

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Stormans, Inc. v. Wiesman: Upholding Washington's Pharmacy Regulations and Its Impact on Religious Objections

Date: Jun 29, 2016
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Stormans, Inc. v. Wiesman: Upholding Washington's Pharmacy Regulations and Its Impact on Religious Objections Introduction The case of Stormans, Inc., dba Ralph's...
Balancing Transparency and First Amendment Rights: Insights from Delaware Strong Families v. Denn

Balancing Transparency and First Amendment Rights: Insights from Delaware Strong Families v. Denn

Date: Jun 29, 2016
Balancing Transparency and First Amendment Rights: Insights from Delaware Strong Families v. Denn Introduction Delaware Strong Families v. Denn is a pivotal case that delves into the tension between...
McDonnell v. United States: Narrow Interpretation of "Official Act" in Federal Bribery Statute

McDonnell v. United States: Narrow Interpretation of "Official Act" in Federal Bribery Statute

Date: Jun 28, 2016
McDonnell v. United States: Narrow Interpretation of "Official Act" in Federal Bribery Statute Introduction Robert F. McDonnell v. United States is a landmark case decided by the United States...
Reckless Assaults as Misdemeanor Crimes of Domestic Violence Under §922(g)(9): Voisine v. United States

Reckless Assaults as Misdemeanor Crimes of Domestic Violence Under §922(g)(9): Voisine v. United States

Date: Jun 28, 2016
Reckless Assaults as Misdemeanor Crimes of Domestic Violence Under §922(g)(9): Voisine v. United States Introduction In Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III, Petitioners v. United States,...
Reaffirming the Undue Burden Standard: Comprehensive Analysis of Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

Reaffirming the Undue Burden Standard: Comprehensive Analysis of Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

Date: Jun 28, 2016
Reaffirming the Undue Burden Standard: Comprehensive Analysis of Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt Introduction Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, 136 S. Ct. 2292 (2016), is a landmark decision...
Fourth Amendment Implications of Implied Consent Laws in DUI Cases

Fourth Amendment Implications of Implied Consent Laws in DUI Cases

Date: Jun 24, 2016
Fourth Amendment Implications of Implied Consent Laws in DUI Cases Introduction The Supreme Court case Danny Birchfield, Petitioner v. North Dakota, along with related petitions William Robert...
Reaffirming the Elements-Only Categorical Approach in ACCA: Insights from Mathis v. United States

Reaffirming the Elements-Only Categorical Approach in ACCA: Insights from Mathis v. United States

Date: Jun 24, 2016
Reaffirming the Elements-Only Categorical Approach in ACCA: Insights from Mathis v. United States Introduction Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), is a landmark decision by the U.S....
Strict Scrutiny and Race-Conscious Admissions: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

Strict Scrutiny and Race-Conscious Admissions: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

Date: Jun 24, 2016
Strict Scrutiny and Race-Conscious Admissions: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Introduction Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme...
Attenuation Doctrine Refined: Admissibility of Evidence Following Unlawful Stops in Utah v. Strieff (2016)

Attenuation Doctrine Refined: Admissibility of Evidence Following Unlawful Stops in Utah v. Strieff (2016)

Date: Jun 21, 2016
Attenuation Doctrine Refined: Admissibility of Evidence Following Unlawful Stops in Utah v. Strieff (2016) Introduction Utah v. Strieff, 136 S. Ct. 2056 (2016), is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Cuozzo v. Lee: Finality of Inter Partes Review Institution and Broadest Reasonable Construction Affirmed

Cuozzo v. Lee: Finality of Inter Partes Review Institution and Broadest Reasonable Construction Affirmed

Date: Jun 21, 2016
Cuozzo v. Lee: Finality of Inter Partes Review Institution and Broadest Reasonable Construction Affirmed Introduction In Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Michelle K. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 2131 (2016), the...
Encino Motorcars v. Navarro: Limits on Chevron Deference in FLSA Exemption Interpretation

Encino Motorcars v. Navarro: Limits on Chevron Deference in FLSA Exemption Interpretation

Date: Jun 21, 2016
Encino Motorcars v. Navarro: Limits on Chevron Deference in FLSA Exemption Interpretation Introduction Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro, 136 S. Ct. 2117 (2016), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Affirming the Commerce Element in Hobbs Act Robberies Targeting Drug Dealers

Affirming the Commerce Element in Hobbs Act Robberies Targeting Drug Dealers

Date: Jun 21, 2016
Affirming the Commerce Element in Hobbs Act Robberies Targeting Drug Dealers Introduction In David Anthony Taylor v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2074 (2016), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
RICO's Private Right of Action and Extraterritoriality: Insights from RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community

RICO's Private Right of Action and Extraterritoriality: Insights from RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community

Date: Jun 21, 2016
RICO's Private Right of Action and Extraterritoriality: Insights from RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community Introduction RJR Nabisco, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. European Community, et al., 136 S....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert