Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Packingham v. North Carolina: Upholding First Amendment Protections in the Digital Age

Packingham v. North Carolina: Upholding First Amendment Protections in the Digital Age

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Packingham v. North Carolina: Upholding First Amendment Protections in the Digital Age Introduction Packingham v. North Carolina addresses a critical intersection between criminal justice and digital...
Limits on Specific Jurisdiction: Insights from Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court

Limits on Specific Jurisdiction: Insights from Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Limits on Specific Jurisdiction: Insights from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Superior Court of California Introduction The case of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Superior Court of California,...
Finality in Class Action Appeals: Insights from Microsoft Corp. v. Baker

Finality in Class Action Appeals: Insights from Microsoft Corp. v. Baker

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Finality in Class Action Appeals: Insights from Microsoft Corp. v. Baker Introduction The landmark case Microsoft Corporation v. Seth Baker, et al. addressed a critical issue in the realm of...
Gender-Based Equal Protection in Citizenship Transmission: Sessions v. Morales-Santana

Gender-Based Equal Protection in Citizenship Transmission: Sessions v. Morales-Santana

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Gender-Based Equal Protection in Citizenship Transmission: Sessions v. Morales-Santana Introduction Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 137 S. Ct. 1678 (2017), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case...
Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.: Enforcing BPCIA Disclosure Requirements and Notice Timing

Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.: Enforcing BPCIA Disclosure Requirements and Notice Timing

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.: Enforcing BPCIA Disclosure Requirements and Notice Timing Introduction Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 12,...
Virginia v. Dennis LeBlanc: Upholding the Geriatric Release Program under AEDPA

Virginia v. Dennis LeBlanc: Upholding the Geriatric Release Program under AEDPA

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Virginia v. Dennis LeBlanc: Upholding the Geriatric Release Program under AEDPA Introduction The Supreme Court case Virginia, et al. v. Dennis LeBlanc addresses the complexities surrounding the...
Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Henson: Redefining 'Debt Collector' under the FDCPA

Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Henson: Redefining 'Debt Collector' under the FDCPA

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Henson: Redefining 'Debt Collector' under the FDCPA Introduction In Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Henson, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a pivotal question regarding...
ERISA Church Plan Qualification Expanded to Principal-Purpose Organizations

ERISA Church Plan Qualification Expanded to Principal-Purpose Organizations

Date: Jun 6, 2017
ERISA Church Plan Qualification Expanded to Principal-Purpose Organizations Introduction The case of Advocate Health Care Network, et al. v. Maria Stapleton, et al. addressed a pivotal issue...
SEC Disgorgement as a Penalty Under 28 U.S.C. §2462: Insights from Kokesh v. SEC

SEC Disgorgement as a Penalty Under 28 U.S.C. §2462: Insights from Kokesh v. SEC

Date: Jun 6, 2017
SEC Disgorgement as a Penalty Under 28 U.S.C. §2462: Insights from Kokesh v. SEC Introduction Charles R. Kokesh v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017), is a landmark Supreme...
Limitations on Forfeiture Liability Under 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1): Honeycutt v. United States

Limitations on Forfeiture Liability Under 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1): Honeycutt v. United States

Date: Jun 6, 2017
Limitations on Forfeiture Liability Under 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1): Honeycutt v. United States Introduction Honeycutt v. United States is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that clarifies the...
Article III Standing Requirements for Intervenors of Right Affirmed in TOWN OF CHESTER v. LAROE ESTATES

Article III Standing Requirements for Intervenors of Right Affirmed in TOWN OF CHESTER v. LAROE ESTATES

Date: Jun 6, 2017
Article III Standing Requirements for Intervenors of Right Affirmed in TOWN OF CHESTER v. LAROE ESTATES Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in TOWN OF CHESTER, NEW YORK,...
Provocation Rule Rejected: Implications of COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES v. Mendez

Provocation Rule Rejected: Implications of COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES v. Mendez

Date: May 31, 2017
Provocation Rule Rejected: Implications of County of Los Angeles v. Mendez Introduction In County of Los Angeles, California, et al. v. Angel Mendez, et al., 137 S. Ct. 1539 (2017), the United States...
Interpretation of "Sexual Abuse of a Minor" Under INA Requires Victim to be Under 16 in Statutory Rape Offenses

Interpretation of "Sexual Abuse of a Minor" Under INA Requires Victim to be Under 16 in Statutory Rape Offenses

Date: May 31, 2017
"Sexual Abuse of a Minor" Requires Victim to be Under 16 Under the INA: A Comprehensive Commentary on Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions Introduction Juan Esquivel-Quintana vs. Jefferson B. Sessions III,...
Impression Products v. Lexmark: Expanding the Scope of Patent Exhaustion

Impression Products v. Lexmark: Expanding the Scope of Patent Exhaustion

Date: May 31, 2017
Impression Products v. Lexmark: Expanding the Scope of Patent Exhaustion Introduction Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1523 (2017), is a landmark decision by the...
Supreme Court Limits State General Personal Jurisdiction Over Railroads in FELA Litigation

Supreme Court Limits State General Personal Jurisdiction Over Railroads in FELA Litigation

Date: May 31, 2017
Supreme Court Limits State General Personal Jurisdiction Over Railroads in FELA Litigation Introduction In the landmark case BNSF Railway Co. v. Kelli Tyrrell, decided on May 30, 2017, the United...
Hague Service Convention Permits Service of Process by Mail: Comprehensive Commentary on Water Splash, Inc. v. Tara Menon

Hague Service Convention Permits Service of Process by Mail: Comprehensive Commentary on Water Splash, Inc. v. Tara Menon

Date: May 23, 2017
Hague Service Convention Permits Service of Process by Mail: Comprehensive Commentary on Water Splash, Inc. v. Tara Menon Introduction The case of Water Splash, Inc. v. Tara Menon addressed a pivotal...
TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC: Redefining Patent Venue for Domestic Corporations

TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC: Redefining Patent Venue for Domestic Corporations

Date: May 23, 2017
TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC: Redefining Patent Venue for Domestic Corporations Introduction In the landmark case TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, the United...
Predominant Racial Consideration in North Carolina's Redistricting: Cooper v. Harris

Predominant Racial Consideration in North Carolina's Redistricting: Cooper v. Harris

Date: May 23, 2017
Predominant Racial Consideration in North Carolina's Redistricting: Cooper v. Harris Introduction Cooper v. Harris, 137 S. Ct. 1455 (2017), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that...
Filing Time-Barred Claims in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Does Not Violate FDCPA: Analysis of Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson

Filing Time-Barred Claims in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Does Not Violate FDCPA: Analysis of Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson

Date: May 16, 2017
Filing Time-Barred Claims in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Does Not Violate FDCPA: Analysis of Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson Introduction The Supreme Court case Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson (137 S. Ct....
Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Clear-Statement Rules in Powers of Attorney: Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark

Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Clear-Statement Rules in Powers of Attorney: Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark

Date: May 16, 2017
Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Clear-Statement Rules in Powers of Attorney: Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark Introduction In Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. Janis E. Clark et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert