Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago: Clarifying Jurisdictional Appeal Deadlines

Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago: Clarifying Jurisdictional Appeal Deadlines

Date: Nov 9, 2017
Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago: Clarifying Jurisdictional Appeal Deadlines Introduction In the landmark case Charmaine Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, et al....
Distinguishing Jurisdictional Time Limits: Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago

Distinguishing Jurisdictional Time Limits: Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago

Date: Nov 9, 2017
Distinguishing Jurisdictional Time Limits: Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago Introduction Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, et al., 138 S. Ct. 13 (2017), is a pivotal...
Supreme Court Reaffirms Discretion in Plea Amendment Cases: Kernan v. Cuero

Supreme Court Reaffirms Discretion in Plea Amendment Cases: Kernan v. Cuero

Date: Nov 7, 2017
Supreme Court Reaffirms Discretion in Plea Amendment Cases: Kernan v. Cuero Introduction In Kernan v. Cuero, the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical issue concerning federal habeas...
Execution Competence and Memory: Jefferson Dunn v. Vernon Madison - A New Precedent

Execution Competence and Memory: Jefferson Dunn v. Vernon Madison - A New Precedent

Date: Nov 7, 2017
Execution Competence and Memory: Jefferson Dunn v. Vernon Madison - A New Precedent Introduction The Supreme Court case Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections v. Vernon...
Supreme Court Vacates Fifth Circuit’s Decision on Bivens Claims in Cross-Border Border Patrol Shooting

Supreme Court Vacates Fifth Circuit’s Decision on Bivens Claims in Cross-Border Border Patrol Shooting

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Supreme Court Vacates Fifth Circuit’s Decision on Bivens Claims in Cross-Border Border Patrol Shooting Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States addressed a critical case involving the...
Limiting Federal Habeas Review: Davila v. Davis Confirms No Expansion of Martinez Exception to Appellate Counsel Ineffectiveness

Limiting Federal Habeas Review: Davila v. Davis Confirms No Expansion of Martinez Exception to Appellate Counsel Ineffectiveness

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Limiting Federal Habeas Review: Davila v. Davis Confirms No Expansion of Martinez Exception to Appellate Counsel Ineffectiveness Introduction In the landmark case Erick Daniel Davila v. Lorie Davis,...
CalPERS v. ANZ Securities: Statute of Repose Bar Undisturbed by Class Action Tolling

CalPERS v. ANZ Securities: Statute of Repose Bar Undisturbed by Class Action Tolling

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Statute of Repose in Securities Act Cannot Be Equitably Tolled: CalPERS v. ANZ Securities Introduction California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest public pension fund in the...
Expanding the Second Amendment: Right to Public Carry – Peruta v. California

Expanding the Second Amendment: Right to Public Carry – Peruta v. California

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Expanding the Second Amendment: Right to Public Carry – Peruta v. California Introduction Edward Peruta v. California, et al. is a pivotal case that delves into the interpretation of the Second...
Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer: Upholding Free Exercise Rights in Public Benefit Allocation

Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer: Upholding Free Exercise Rights in Public Benefit Allocation

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer: Upholding Free Exercise Rights in Public Benefit Allocation Introduction In the landmark case Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Carol S. Comer (2017), the...
Stay of Executive Order No. 13780 Limited to Individuals with U.S. Ties

Stay of Executive Order No. 13780 Limited to Individuals with U.S. Ties

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Stay of Executive Order No. 13780 Limited to Individuals with U.S. Ties Introduction The case Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. International Refugee Assistance Project, et...
Equal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages in Birth Certificates: Pavan v. Smith

Equal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages in Birth Certificates: Pavan v. Smith

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Equal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages in Birth Certificates: Pavan v. Smith Introduction Pavan v. Smith, 137 S. Ct. 2075 (2017), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Proper Jurisdiction for Judicial Review of Mixed Cases in MSPB Dismissals: Perry v. MSPB Commentary

Proper Jurisdiction for Judicial Review of Mixed Cases in MSPB Dismissals: Perry v. MSPB Commentary

Date: Jun 24, 2017
Proper Jurisdiction for Judicial Review of Mixed Cases in MSPB Dismissals: Perry v. MSPB Commentary Introduction The case of Anthony W. Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board (137 S. Ct. 1975, 2017)...
Murr v. Wisconsin: Defining Property Units in Regulatory Takings

Murr v. Wisconsin: Defining Property Units in Regulatory Takings

Date: Jun 24, 2017
Murr v. Wisconsin: Defining Property Units in Regulatory Takings Introduction Case: Joseph P. Murr, et al. v. Wisconsin, et al. Court: Supreme Court of the United States Date: June 23, 2017 In the...
Expanding the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Jae Lee v. United States

Expanding the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Jae Lee v. United States

Date: Jun 24, 2017
Expanding the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Jae Lee v. United States Introduction Jae Lee v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1958 (2017), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Weaver v. Massachusetts: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims for Structural Errors

Weaver v. Massachusetts: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims for Structural Errors

Date: Jun 23, 2017
Weaver v. Massachusetts: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims for Structural Errors Introduction Weaver v. Massachusetts, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 22, 2017,...
Materiality of Withheld Evidence under Brady: Turner et al. v. United States

Materiality of Withheld Evidence under Brady: Turner et al. v. United States

Date: Jun 23, 2017
Materiality of Withheld Evidence under Brady: Turner et al. v. United States Introduction Turner et al. v. United States is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court on June...
Causation Requirement in Naturalization Procurements under 18 U.S.C. §1425(a): Insights from Maslenjak v. United States

Causation Requirement in Naturalization Procurements under 18 U.S.C. §1425(a): Insights from Maslenjak v. United States

Date: Jun 23, 2017
Causation Requirement in Naturalization Procurements under 18 U.S.C. §1425(a): Insights from Maslenjak v. United States Introduction In Divna Maslenjak v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1918 (2017), the...
Limiting the Scope of Bivens Actions: Ziglars v. Ashcroft

Limiting the Scope of Bivens Actions: Ziglars v. Ashcroft

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Limiting the Scope of Bivens Actions: Ziglars v. Ashcroft Introduction In the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States Federal Government implemented stringent measures to...
Matal v. Tam: Disparagement Clause's Violation of the First Amendment

Matal v. Tam: Disparagement Clause's Violation of the First Amendment

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Matal v. Tam: Disparagement Clause's Violation of the First Amendment Introduction Matal v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that significantly impacted trademark law...
Enhancing Mental Health Protections for Indigent Defendants: McWilliams v. Dunn

Enhancing Mental Health Protections for Indigent Defendants: McWilliams v. Dunn

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Enhancing Mental Health Protections for Indigent Defendants: McWilliams v. Dunn Introduction McWilliams v. Dunn, 137 S. Ct. 1790 (2017), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert