Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Stay of Executive Order No. 13780 Limited to Individuals with U.S. Ties

Stay of Executive Order No. 13780 Limited to Individuals with U.S. Ties

Date: Jun 27, 2017
Stay of Executive Order No. 13780 Limited to Individuals with U.S. Ties Introduction The case Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. International Refugee Assistance Project, et...
Proper Jurisdiction for Judicial Review of Mixed Cases in MSPB Dismissals: Perry v. MSPB Commentary

Proper Jurisdiction for Judicial Review of Mixed Cases in MSPB Dismissals: Perry v. MSPB Commentary

Date: Jun 24, 2017
Proper Jurisdiction for Judicial Review of Mixed Cases in MSPB Dismissals: Perry v. MSPB Commentary Introduction The case of Anthony W. Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board (137 S. Ct. 1975, 2017)...
Murr v. Wisconsin: Defining Property Units in Regulatory Takings

Murr v. Wisconsin: Defining Property Units in Regulatory Takings

Date: Jun 24, 2017
Murr v. Wisconsin: Defining Property Units in Regulatory Takings Introduction Case: Joseph P. Murr, et al. v. Wisconsin, et al. Court: Supreme Court of the United States Date: June 23, 2017 In the...
Expanding the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Jae Lee v. United States

Expanding the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Jae Lee v. United States

Date: Jun 24, 2017
Expanding the Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Jae Lee v. United States Introduction Jae Lee v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1958 (2017), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Weaver v. Massachusetts: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims for Structural Errors

Weaver v. Massachusetts: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims for Structural Errors

Date: Jun 23, 2017
Weaver v. Massachusetts: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance Claims for Structural Errors Introduction Weaver v. Massachusetts, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 22, 2017,...
Materiality of Withheld Evidence under Brady: Turner et al. v. United States

Materiality of Withheld Evidence under Brady: Turner et al. v. United States

Date: Jun 23, 2017
Materiality of Withheld Evidence under Brady: Turner et al. v. United States Introduction Turner et al. v. United States is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court on June...
Causation Requirement in Naturalization Procurements under 18 U.S.C. §1425(a): Insights from Maslenjak v. United States

Causation Requirement in Naturalization Procurements under 18 U.S.C. §1425(a): Insights from Maslenjak v. United States

Date: Jun 23, 2017
Causation Requirement in Naturalization Procurements under 18 U.S.C. §1425(a): Insights from Maslenjak v. United States Introduction In Divna Maslenjak v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1918 (2017), the...
Limiting the Scope of Bivens Actions: Ziglars v. Ashcroft

Limiting the Scope of Bivens Actions: Ziglars v. Ashcroft

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Limiting the Scope of Bivens Actions: Ziglars v. Ashcroft Introduction In the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States Federal Government implemented stringent measures to...
Matal v. Tam: Disparagement Clause's Violation of the First Amendment

Matal v. Tam: Disparagement Clause's Violation of the First Amendment

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Matal v. Tam: Disparagement Clause's Violation of the First Amendment Introduction Matal v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that significantly impacted trademark law...
Enhancing Mental Health Protections for Indigent Defendants: McWilliams v. Dunn

Enhancing Mental Health Protections for Indigent Defendants: McWilliams v. Dunn

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Enhancing Mental Health Protections for Indigent Defendants: McWilliams v. Dunn Introduction McWilliams v. Dunn, 137 S. Ct. 1790 (2017), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Packingham v. North Carolina: Upholding First Amendment Protections in the Digital Age

Packingham v. North Carolina: Upholding First Amendment Protections in the Digital Age

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Packingham v. North Carolina: Upholding First Amendment Protections in the Digital Age Introduction Packingham v. North Carolina addresses a critical intersection between criminal justice and digital...
Limits on Specific Jurisdiction: Insights from Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court

Limits on Specific Jurisdiction: Insights from Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Limits on Specific Jurisdiction: Insights from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Superior Court of California Introduction The case of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Superior Court of California,...
Finality in Class Action Appeals: Insights from Microsoft Corp. v. Baker

Finality in Class Action Appeals: Insights from Microsoft Corp. v. Baker

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Finality in Class Action Appeals: Insights from Microsoft Corp. v. Baker Introduction The landmark case Microsoft Corporation v. Seth Baker, et al. addressed a critical issue in the realm of...
Gender-Based Equal Protection in Citizenship Transmission: Sessions v. Morales-Santana

Gender-Based Equal Protection in Citizenship Transmission: Sessions v. Morales-Santana

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Gender-Based Equal Protection in Citizenship Transmission: Sessions v. Morales-Santana Introduction Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 137 S. Ct. 1678 (2017), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case...
Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.: Enforcing BPCIA Disclosure Requirements and Notice Timing

Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.: Enforcing BPCIA Disclosure Requirements and Notice Timing

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.: Enforcing BPCIA Disclosure Requirements and Notice Timing Introduction Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 12,...
Virginia v. Dennis LeBlanc: Upholding the Geriatric Release Program under AEDPA

Virginia v. Dennis LeBlanc: Upholding the Geriatric Release Program under AEDPA

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Virginia v. Dennis LeBlanc: Upholding the Geriatric Release Program under AEDPA Introduction The Supreme Court case Virginia, et al. v. Dennis LeBlanc addresses the complexities surrounding the...
Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Henson: Redefining 'Debt Collector' under the FDCPA

Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Henson: Redefining 'Debt Collector' under the FDCPA

Date: Jun 13, 2017
Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Henson: Redefining 'Debt Collector' under the FDCPA Introduction In Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Henson, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a pivotal question regarding...
ERISA Church Plan Qualification Expanded to Principal-Purpose Organizations

ERISA Church Plan Qualification Expanded to Principal-Purpose Organizations

Date: Jun 6, 2017
ERISA Church Plan Qualification Expanded to Principal-Purpose Organizations Introduction The case of Advocate Health Care Network, et al. v. Maria Stapleton, et al. addressed a pivotal issue...
SEC Disgorgement as a Penalty Under 28 U.S.C. §2462: Insights from Kokesh v. SEC

SEC Disgorgement as a Penalty Under 28 U.S.C. §2462: Insights from Kokesh v. SEC

Date: Jun 6, 2017
SEC Disgorgement as a Penalty Under 28 U.S.C. §2462: Insights from Kokesh v. SEC Introduction Charles R. Kokesh v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017), is a landmark Supreme...
Limitations on Forfeiture Liability Under 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1): Honeycutt v. United States

Limitations on Forfeiture Liability Under 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1): Honeycutt v. United States

Date: Jun 6, 2017
Limitations on Forfeiture Liability Under 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1): Honeycutt v. United States Introduction Honeycutt v. United States is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that clarifies the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.