Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Inter Partes Review Constitutionally Permitted: Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene's Energy Group LLC Introduction Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC et al. is a...
Mandatory Resolution of All Challenged Claims in Inter Partes Review Introduction The Supreme Court case SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu, as Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et...
Limitation of the Alien Tort Statute: Excluding Foreign Corporations as Defendants Introduction The landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Joseph Jesner, et al., Petitioners v. Arab Bank, PLC (138 S. Ct....
SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu: Mandating Comprehensive Claim Resolution in Inter Partes Review Introduction In SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu, the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Establishing the 'Look Through' Presumption in Federal Habeas Review of State Supreme Court Summary Orders Introduction In the landmark case of Marion Wilson v. Eric Sellers, Warden (138 S. Ct....
Supreme Court Invalidates §16(b) Under Due Process: Establishing Clear Standards for "Crime of Violence" Introduction In Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, Petitioner v. James Garcia...
Service Advisors Exempt from FLSA's Overtime-Pay Requirement: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro Introduction In the landmark case Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro et al., decided on...
Guardado v. Jones: Eighth Amendment Implications on Florida's Death Penalty Procedures Introduction In Guardado v. Jones, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed significant concerns...
Caldwell v. Florida: Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing Introduction Jesse Guardado and Steven Anthony Cozzie are two capital defendants challenging their death...
Ensuring Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Guardado v. Jones Introduction The Supreme Court case Jesse Guardado v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida...
Service Advisors Exempted Under FLSA Overtime Pay Requirements Introduction In the landmark case Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro (138 S. Ct. 1134, 2018), the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Reinforces Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force Cases: Kisela v. Hughes Introduction Kisela v. Hughes (138 S. Ct. 1148, 2018) is a landmark Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Holistic Appellate Rights in Consolidated Cases: Analyzing Hall v. Hall Introduction Elsa Hall v. Samuel Hall, et al. is a significant ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court dated March 27, 2018. The case...
Immediate Appealability of Resolved Cases in Rule 42(a) Consolidated Litigation Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Elsa Hall, as personal representative v. Estate of Ethlyn Louise Hall and...
Ayestas v. Davis: Supreme Court Clarifies §3599(f) Funding Standards Introduction In Ayestas v. Davis, the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical issue concerning the standards for awarding...
Marinello v. United States: Scope of 26 U.S.C. §7212(a) Limited to Obstruction of Specific IRS Proceedings Introduction Marinello v. United States (138 S. Ct. 1101, 2018) is a landmark decision by...
State Courts Retain Jurisdiction over 1933 Securities Act Class Actions under SLUSA Introduction Cyan, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al. is a pivotal...
State Court Jurisdiction Over 1933 Act Class Actions Affirmed in CYAN, INC. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund Introduction The landmark decision in Cyan, Inc., et al. v. Beaver County...
Narrowing the Classes of Death Eligibility: Insights from ABEL DANIEL HIDALGO v. ARIZONA Introduction In the landmark case Abel Daniel Hidalgo v. Arizona (No. 17-251, 2018), the petitioner challenged...
Standard of Review for Non-Statutory Insider Determinations in Bankruptcy Cramdown Plans Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee, by and through CWCAPITAL...