Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Enforcement of Individualized Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis

Enforcement of Individualized Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis

Date: May 22, 2018
Enforcement of Individualized Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Epic Systems Corporation v. Lewis,...
Supreme Court Clarifies Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Property Disputes

Supreme Court Clarifies Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Property Disputes

Date: May 22, 2018
Supreme Court Clarifies Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Property Disputes Introduction In the landmark case Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sharline Lundgren et al., the United States Supreme Court...
Mootness and Class-like Claims in Criminal Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Sanchez-Gomez

Mootness and Class-like Claims in Criminal Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Sanchez-Gomez

Date: May 15, 2018
Mootness and Class-like Claims in Criminal Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Sanchez-Gomez Introduction United States v. Rene Sanchez-Gomez, et al., 859 F.3d 649 (9th Cir. 2017), presents...
Christie v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA's Anti-Authorization and Licensing Provisions under the Anticommandeering Principle

Christie v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA's Anti-Authorization and Licensing Provisions under the Anticommandeering Principle

Date: May 15, 2018
Christie v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA's Anti-Authorization and Licensing Provisions under the Anticommandeering Principle Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Christie v....
Byrd v. United States: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Unauthorized Rental Car Drivers

Byrd v. United States: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Unauthorized Rental Car Drivers

Date: May 15, 2018
Byrd v. United States: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Unauthorized Rental Car Drivers Introduction In the landmark case of Terrence Byrd v. United States, the United States Supreme Court...
Clarifying 'Insufficient on Its Face' in Wiretap Orders: Los Ro v. DAHDA

Clarifying 'Insufficient on Its Face' in Wiretap Orders: Los Ro v. DAHDA

Date: May 15, 2018
Clarifying 'Insufficient on Its Face' in Wiretap Orders: Los Ro v. DAHDA Introduction In Los Ro v. DAHDA, Petitioner, 138 S. Ct. 1491 (2018), the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of...
Murphy v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA’s Anti-Authorization Provisions

Murphy v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA’s Anti-Authorization Provisions

Date: May 15, 2018
Murphy v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA’s Anti-Authorization Provisions Introduction Murphy v. NCAA, 138 S. Ct. 1461 (2018), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Supreme Court Rules on Mootness Doctrine: Limits of Functional Class Actions in Criminal Cases

Supreme Court Rules on Mootness Doctrine: Limits of Functional Class Actions in Criminal Cases

Date: May 15, 2018
Supreme Court Rules on Mootness Doctrine: Limits of Functional Class Actions in Criminal Cases Introduction In United States v. Rene Sanchez–Gomez et al., the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Sixth Amendment Upholds Defendant’s Right to Control Defense Strategy: McCoy v. Louisiana

Sixth Amendment Upholds Defendant’s Right to Control Defense Strategy: McCoy v. Louisiana

Date: May 15, 2018
Sixth Amendment Upholds Defendant’s Right to Control Defense Strategy: McCoy v. Louisiana Introduction McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that profoundly...
SCOTUS Upholds Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review Process in Patent Law

SCOTUS Upholds Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review Process in Patent Law

Date: Apr 25, 2018
SCOTUS Upholds Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review Process in Patent Law Introduction In the landmark case of Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC, the United States...
Inter Partes Review Constitutionally Permitted: Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene's Energy Group LLC

Inter Partes Review Constitutionally Permitted: Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene's Energy Group LLC

Date: Apr 25, 2018
Inter Partes Review Constitutionally Permitted: Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene's Energy Group LLC Introduction Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC et al. is a...
Mandatory Resolution of All Challenged Claims in Inter Partes Review - SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu

Mandatory Resolution of All Challenged Claims in Inter Partes Review - SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu

Date: Apr 25, 2018
Mandatory Resolution of All Challenged Claims in Inter Partes Review Introduction The Supreme Court case SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu, as Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et...
Limitation of the Alien Tort Statute: Excluding Foreign Corporations as Defendants

Limitation of the Alien Tort Statute: Excluding Foreign Corporations as Defendants

Date: Apr 25, 2018
Limitation of the Alien Tort Statute: Excluding Foreign Corporations as Defendants Introduction The landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Joseph Jesner, et al., Petitioners v. Arab Bank, PLC (138 S. Ct....
SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu: Mandating Comprehensive Claim Resolution in Inter Partes Review

SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu: Mandating Comprehensive Claim Resolution in Inter Partes Review

Date: Apr 25, 2018
SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu: Mandating Comprehensive Claim Resolution in Inter Partes Review Introduction In SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu, the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Establishing the 'Look Through' Presumption in Federal Habeas Review of State Supreme Court Summary Orders

Establishing the 'Look Through' Presumption in Federal Habeas Review of State Supreme Court Summary Orders

Date: Apr 18, 2018
Establishing the 'Look Through' Presumption in Federal Habeas Review of State Supreme Court Summary Orders Introduction In the landmark case of Marion Wilson v. Eric Sellers, Warden (138 S. Ct....
Supreme Court Invalidates §16(b) Under Due Process: Establishing Clear Standards for "Crime of Violence"

Supreme Court Invalidates §16(b) Under Due Process: Establishing Clear Standards for "Crime of Violence"

Date: Apr 18, 2018
Supreme Court Invalidates §16(b) Under Due Process: Establishing Clear Standards for "Crime of Violence" Introduction In Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, Petitioner v. James Garcia...
Service Advisors Exempt from FLSA's Overtime-Pay Requirement: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro

Service Advisors Exempt from FLSA's Overtime-Pay Requirement: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro

Date: Apr 3, 2018
Service Advisors Exempt from FLSA's Overtime-Pay Requirement: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro Introduction In the landmark case Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro et al., decided on...
Guardado v. Jones: Eighth Amendment Implications on Florida's Death Penalty Procedures

Guardado v. Jones: Eighth Amendment Implications on Florida's Death Penalty Procedures

Date: Apr 3, 2018
Guardado v. Jones: Eighth Amendment Implications on Florida's Death Penalty Procedures Introduction In Guardado v. Jones, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed significant concerns...
Caldwell v. Florida: Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing

Caldwell v. Florida: Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing

Date: Apr 3, 2018
Caldwell v. Florida: Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing Introduction Jesse Guardado and Steven Anthony Cozzie are two capital defendants challenging their death...
Service Advisors Exempted Under FLSA Overtime Pay Requirements

Service Advisors Exempted Under FLSA Overtime Pay Requirements

Date: Apr 3, 2018
Service Advisors Exempted Under FLSA Overtime Pay Requirements Introduction In the landmark case Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Hector Navarro (138 S. Ct. 1134, 2018), the United States Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert