Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Supreme Court Reinforces Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force Cases: Kisela v. Hughes Introduction Kisela v. Hughes (138 S. Ct. 1148, 2018) is a landmark Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Ensuring Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Guardado v. Jones Introduction The Supreme Court case Jesse Guardado v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida...
Holistic Appellate Rights in Consolidated Cases: Analyzing Hall v. Hall Introduction Elsa Hall v. Samuel Hall, et al. is a significant ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court dated March 27, 2018. The case...
Immediate Appealability of Resolved Cases in Rule 42(a) Consolidated Litigation Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Elsa Hall, as personal representative v. Estate of Ethlyn Louise Hall and...
Ayestas v. Davis: Supreme Court Clarifies §3599(f) Funding Standards Introduction In Ayestas v. Davis, the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical issue concerning the standards for awarding...
Marinello v. United States: Scope of 26 U.S.C. §7212(a) Limited to Obstruction of Specific IRS Proceedings Introduction Marinello v. United States (138 S. Ct. 1101, 2018) is a landmark decision by...
State Courts Retain Jurisdiction over 1933 Securities Act Class Actions under SLUSA Introduction Cyan, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al. is a pivotal...
State Court Jurisdiction Over 1933 Act Class Actions Affirmed in CYAN, INC. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund Introduction The landmark decision in Cyan, Inc., et al. v. Beaver County...
Narrowing the Classes of Death Eligibility: Insights from ABEL DANIEL HIDALGO v. ARIZONA Introduction In the landmark case Abel Daniel Hidalgo v. Arizona (No. 17-251, 2018), the petitioner challenged...
Standard of Review for Non-Statutory Insider Determinations in Bankruptcy Cramdown Plans Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee, by and through CWCAPITAL...
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Participation in Interstate Water Compact Enforcement Introduction The case of State of Texas v. State of New Mexico and State of Colorado (138 S. Ct. 954)...
Clear-Error Standard for Appellate Review of Non-Statutory Insider Determinations Under Bankruptcy Law Introduction The Supreme Court case U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee, by and through...
Clarifying the Scope of §546(e) Securities Safe Harbor: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting, Inc. Introduction Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. is a landmark decision by the...
Jurisdiction Stripping and Its Boundaries: Supreme Court Upholds Gun Lake Act in Patchak v. Zinke Introduction In David Patchak v. Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, et al., the United States...
Affirming Congressional Jurisdiction-Stripping: The Supreme Court Upholds Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act in Patchak v. Band of Pottawatomi Indians Introduction Patchak v. Band of Pottawatomi...
Congress's Authority to Strip Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Patchak v. Zinke Introduction The United States Supreme Court case David Patchak v. Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, et al....
Supreme Court Rules Against Periodic Bond Hearings for Detained Aliens Under Immigration Statutes Introduction In David Jennings, et al. v. Alejandro Rodriguez, et al., decided on February 27, 2018,...
Clarifying the Scope of § 546(e) Securities Safe Harbor: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting Introduction Case Overview: Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 883...
Supreme Court Affirms Mandatory Apportionment of Attorney's Fees in Prisoner Civil Rights Suits Under §1997e(d)(2) Introduction In the landmark case of Charles Murphy v. Robert Smith, et al., the...
Limited Scope of §1610(g) in FSIA: Affirming Property Immunity for Foreign States Introduction Jenny Rubin, et al., Petitioners v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al. (138 S. Ct. 816) is a landmark...