Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Reinforces Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force Cases: Kisela v. Hughes

Supreme Court Reinforces Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force Cases: Kisela v. Hughes

Date: Apr 3, 2018
Supreme Court Reinforces Qualified Immunity in Use of Deadly Force Cases: Kisela v. Hughes Introduction Kisela v. Hughes (138 S. Ct. 1148, 2018) is a landmark Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Ensuring Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Guardado v. Jones

Ensuring Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Guardado v. Jones

Date: Apr 3, 2018
Ensuring Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing: A Comprehensive Analysis of Guardado v. Jones Introduction The Supreme Court case Jesse Guardado v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida...
Holistic Appellate Rights in Consolidated Cases: Analyzing Hall v. Hall

Holistic Appellate Rights in Consolidated Cases: Analyzing Hall v. Hall

Date: Mar 28, 2018
Holistic Appellate Rights in Consolidated Cases: Analyzing Hall v. Hall Introduction Elsa Hall v. Samuel Hall, et al. is a significant ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court dated March 27, 2018. The case...
Immediate Appealability of Resolved Cases in Rule 42(a) Consolidated Litigation

Immediate Appealability of Resolved Cases in Rule 42(a) Consolidated Litigation

Date: Mar 28, 2018
Immediate Appealability of Resolved Cases in Rule 42(a) Consolidated Litigation Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Elsa Hall, as personal representative v. Estate of Ethlyn Louise Hall and...
Ayestas v. Davis: Supreme Court Clarifies §3599(f) Funding Standards

Ayestas v. Davis: Supreme Court Clarifies §3599(f) Funding Standards

Date: Mar 22, 2018
Ayestas v. Davis: Supreme Court Clarifies §3599(f) Funding Standards Introduction In Ayestas v. Davis, the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical issue concerning the standards for awarding...
Marinello v. United States: Narrow Interpretation of the Omnibus Clause Requiring Nexus with Specific IRS Proceedings

Marinello v. United States: Narrow Interpretation of the Omnibus Clause Requiring Nexus with Specific IRS Proceedings

Date: Mar 22, 2018
Marinello v. United States: Scope of 26 U.S.C. §7212(a) Limited to Obstruction of Specific IRS Proceedings Introduction Marinello v. United States (138 S. Ct. 1101, 2018) is a landmark decision by...
State Courts Retain Jurisdiction over 1933 Securities Act Class Actions under SLUSA

State Courts Retain Jurisdiction over 1933 Securities Act Class Actions under SLUSA

Date: Mar 21, 2018
State Courts Retain Jurisdiction over 1933 Securities Act Class Actions under SLUSA Introduction Cyan, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al. is a pivotal...
State Court Jurisdiction Over 1933 Act Class Actions Affirmed in CYAN, INC. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund

State Court Jurisdiction Over 1933 Act Class Actions Affirmed in CYAN, INC. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund

Date: Mar 21, 2018
State Court Jurisdiction Over 1933 Act Class Actions Affirmed in CYAN, INC. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund Introduction The landmark decision in Cyan, Inc., et al. v. Beaver County...
Narrowing the Classes of Death Eligibility: Insights from ABEL DANIEL HIDALGO v. ARIZONA

Narrowing the Classes of Death Eligibility: Insights from ABEL DANIEL HIDALGO v. ARIZONA

Date: Mar 20, 2018
Narrowing the Classes of Death Eligibility: Insights from ABEL DANIEL HIDALGO v. ARIZONA Introduction In the landmark case Abel Daniel Hidalgo v. Arizona (No. 17-251, 2018), the petitioner challenged...
Standard of Review for Non-Statutory Insider Determinations in Bankruptcy Cramdown Plans

Standard of Review for Non-Statutory Insider Determinations in Bankruptcy Cramdown Plans

Date: Mar 6, 2018
Standard of Review for Non-Statutory Insider Determinations in Bankruptcy Cramdown Plans Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee, by and through CWCAPITAL...
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Participation in Interstate Water Compact Enforcement

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Participation in Interstate Water Compact Enforcement

Date: Mar 6, 2018
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Participation in Interstate Water Compact Enforcement Introduction The case of State of Texas v. State of New Mexico and State of Colorado (138 S. Ct. 954)...
Clear-Error Standard for Appellate Review of Non-Statutory Insider Determinations Under Bankruptcy Law

Clear-Error Standard for Appellate Review of Non-Statutory Insider Determinations Under Bankruptcy Law

Date: Mar 6, 2018
Clear-Error Standard for Appellate Review of Non-Statutory Insider Determinations Under Bankruptcy Law Introduction The Supreme Court case U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee, by and through...
Clarifying the Scope of §546(e) Securities Safe Harbor: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting, Inc.

Clarifying the Scope of §546(e) Securities Safe Harbor: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting, Inc.

Date: Feb 28, 2018
Clarifying the Scope of §546(e) Securities Safe Harbor: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting, Inc. Introduction Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. is a landmark decision by the...
Jurisdiction Stripping and Its Boundaries: Supreme Court Upholds Gun Lake Act in Patchak v. Zinke

Jurisdiction Stripping and Its Boundaries: Supreme Court Upholds Gun Lake Act in Patchak v. Zinke

Date: Feb 28, 2018
Jurisdiction Stripping and Its Boundaries: Supreme Court Upholds Gun Lake Act in Patchak v. Zinke Introduction In David Patchak v. Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, et al., the United States...
Affirming Congressional Jurisdiction-Stripping: The Supreme Court Upholds Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act in Patchak v. Band of Pottawatomi Indians

Affirming Congressional Jurisdiction-Stripping: The Supreme Court Upholds Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act in Patchak v. Band of Pottawatomi Indians

Date: Feb 28, 2018
Affirming Congressional Jurisdiction-Stripping: The Supreme Court Upholds Gun Lake Trust Land Reaffirmation Act in Patchak v. Band of Pottawatomi Indians Introduction Patchak v. Band of Pottawatomi...
Congress's Authority to Strip Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Patchak v. Zinke

Congress's Authority to Strip Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Patchak v. Zinke

Date: Feb 28, 2018
Congress's Authority to Strip Federal Jurisdiction: Insights from Patchak v. Zinke Introduction The United States Supreme Court case David Patchak v. Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, et al....
Supreme Court Rules Against Periodic Bond Hearings for Detained Aliens Under Immigration Statutes

Supreme Court Rules Against Periodic Bond Hearings for Detained Aliens Under Immigration Statutes

Date: Feb 28, 2018
Supreme Court Rules Against Periodic Bond Hearings for Detained Aliens Under Immigration Statutes Introduction In David Jennings, et al. v. Alejandro Rodriguez, et al., decided on February 27, 2018,...
Clarifying the Scope of § 546(e) Securities Safe Harbor: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting

Clarifying the Scope of § 546(e) Securities Safe Harbor: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting

Date: Feb 28, 2018
Clarifying the Scope of § 546(e) Securities Safe Harbor: Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting Introduction Case Overview: Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 883...
Supreme Court Affirms Mandatory Apportionment of Attorney's Fees in Prisoner Civil Rights Suits Under §1997e(d)(2)

Supreme Court Affirms Mandatory Apportionment of Attorney's Fees in Prisoner Civil Rights Suits Under §1997e(d)(2)

Date: Feb 22, 2018
Supreme Court Affirms Mandatory Apportionment of Attorney's Fees in Prisoner Civil Rights Suits Under §1997e(d)(2) Introduction In the landmark case of Charles Murphy v. Robert Smith, et al., the...
Limited Scope of §1610(g) in FSIA: Affirming Property Immunity for Foreign States

Limited Scope of §1610(g) in FSIA: Affirming Property Immunity for Foreign States

Date: Feb 22, 2018
Limited Scope of §1610(g) in FSIA: Affirming Property Immunity for Foreign States Introduction Jenny Rubin, et al., Petitioners v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al. (138 S. Ct. 816) is a landmark...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert