Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Upholds Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Laws: Masterpiece Cakeshop Case

Supreme Court Upholds Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Laws: Masterpiece Cakeshop Case

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Supreme Court Upholds Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Laws: Masterpiece Cakeshop Case Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights...
Supreme Court Establishes Vacatur Protocol for Moot Civil Cases: Azar v. Garza Commentary

Supreme Court Establishes Vacatur Protocol for Moot Civil Cases: Azar v. Garza Commentary

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Supreme Court Establishes Vacatur Protocol for Moot Civil Cases: Azar v. Garza Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of Azar v. Garza, 138 S. Ct. 1790 (2018), the United States Supreme Court...
Mandatory Minimums and Substantial Assistance: Limiting Scope of §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reductions

Mandatory Minimums and Substantial Assistance: Limiting Scope of §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reductions

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Mandatory Minimums and Substantial Assistance: Limiting Scope of §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reductions Introduction In the landmark case of Koons et al. v. United States, the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Establishes Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Enforcement: Masterpiece Cakeshop Decision

Supreme Court Establishes Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Enforcement: Masterpiece Cakeshop Decision

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Supreme Court Establishes Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Enforcement: Masterpiece Cakeshop Decision Introduction In the landmark case Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd., et al. v. Colorado Civil...
Expansive Interpretation of "Statement Respecting Financial Condition" in Bankruptcy Law: LAMAR v. APPLING

Expansive Interpretation of "Statement Respecting Financial Condition" in Bankruptcy Law: LAMAR v. APPLING

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Expansive Interpretation of "Statement Respecting Financial Condition" in Bankruptcy Law: LAMAR v. APPLING Introduction LAMAR, ARCHER & COFRIN, LLP v. R. Scott Appling is a landmark case adjudicated...
Comprehensive Review of Mitigating Evidence in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Insights from Trevino v. Davis

Comprehensive Review of Mitigating Evidence in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Insights from Trevino v. Davis

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Comprehensive Review of Mitigating Evidence in Ineffective Assistance Claims: Insights from Trevino v. Davis Introduction The case of Carlos Trevino v. Lorie Davis, adjudicated on June 4, 2018,...
Sentencing Based on Mandatory Minimums and Substantial Assistance Excludes Eligibility for § 3582(c)(2) Reductions

Sentencing Based on Mandatory Minimums and Substantial Assistance Excludes Eligibility for § 3582(c)(2) Reductions

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Sentencing Based on Mandatory Minimums and Substantial Assistance Excludes Eligibility for § 3582(c)(2) Reductions Introduction In the landmark case of Timothy D. Koons et al. v. United States, the...
Supreme Court Limits Mandatory Victims Restitution to Government Jurisdictions: Lagos v. United States

Supreme Court Limits Mandatory Victims Restitution to Government Jurisdictions: Lagos v. United States

Date: May 30, 2018
Supreme Court Limits Mandatory Victims Restitution to Government Jurisdictions: Lagos v. United States Introduction Case Citation: Sergio Fernando Lagos v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1684 (2018)...
Automobile Exception Constrained: No Warrantless Entry into Home Curtilage for Vehicle Searches

Automobile Exception Constrained: No Warrantless Entry into Home Curtilage for Vehicle Searches

Date: May 30, 2018
Automobile Exception Constrained: No Warrantless Entry into Home Curtilage for Vehicle Searches Introduction In the landmark case Ryan Austin Collins v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 1663 (2018), the United...
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Act's Enforcement of Individual Arbitration Agreements, Rejects NLRA Conflict

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Act's Enforcement of Individual Arbitration Agreements, Rejects NLRA Conflict

Date: May 22, 2018
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Act's Enforcement of Individual Arbitration Agreements, Rejects NLRA Conflict Introduction Epic Systems Corporation v. Jacob Lewis, alongside related cases involving...
Enforcement of Individualized Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis

Enforcement of Individualized Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis

Date: May 22, 2018
Enforcement of Individualized Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Epic Systems Corporation v. Lewis,...
Supreme Court Clarifies Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Property Disputes

Supreme Court Clarifies Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Property Disputes

Date: May 22, 2018
Supreme Court Clarifies Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Property Disputes Introduction In the landmark case Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sharline Lundgren et al., the United States Supreme Court...
Mootness and Class-like Claims in Criminal Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Sanchez-Gomez

Mootness and Class-like Claims in Criminal Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Sanchez-Gomez

Date: May 15, 2018
Mootness and Class-like Claims in Criminal Jurisdiction: Insights from United States v. Sanchez-Gomez Introduction United States v. Rene Sanchez-Gomez, et al., 859 F.3d 649 (9th Cir. 2017), presents...
Byrd v. United States: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Unauthorized Rental Car Drivers

Byrd v. United States: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Unauthorized Rental Car Drivers

Date: May 15, 2018
Byrd v. United States: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy for Unauthorized Rental Car Drivers Introduction In the landmark case of Terrence Byrd v. United States, the United States Supreme Court...
Christie v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA's Anti-Authorization and Licensing Provisions under the Anticommandeering Principle

Christie v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA's Anti-Authorization and Licensing Provisions under the Anticommandeering Principle

Date: May 15, 2018
Christie v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA's Anti-Authorization and Licensing Provisions under the Anticommandeering Principle Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Christie v....
Clarifying 'Insufficient on Its Face' in Wiretap Orders: Los Ro v. DAHDA

Clarifying 'Insufficient on Its Face' in Wiretap Orders: Los Ro v. DAHDA

Date: May 15, 2018
Clarifying 'Insufficient on Its Face' in Wiretap Orders: Los Ro v. DAHDA Introduction In Los Ro v. DAHDA, Petitioner, 138 S. Ct. 1491 (2018), the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of...
Murphy v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA’s Anti-Authorization Provisions

Murphy v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA’s Anti-Authorization Provisions

Date: May 15, 2018
Murphy v. NCAA: Supreme Court Strikes Down PASPA’s Anti-Authorization Provisions Introduction Murphy v. NCAA, 138 S. Ct. 1461 (2018), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Supreme Court Rules on Mootness Doctrine: Limits of Functional Class Actions in Criminal Cases

Supreme Court Rules on Mootness Doctrine: Limits of Functional Class Actions in Criminal Cases

Date: May 15, 2018
Supreme Court Rules on Mootness Doctrine: Limits of Functional Class Actions in Criminal Cases Introduction In United States v. Rene Sanchez–Gomez et al., the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Sixth Amendment Upholds Defendant’s Right to Control Defense Strategy: McCoy v. Louisiana

Sixth Amendment Upholds Defendant’s Right to Control Defense Strategy: McCoy v. Louisiana

Date: May 15, 2018
Sixth Amendment Upholds Defendant’s Right to Control Defense Strategy: McCoy v. Louisiana Introduction McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S. Ct. 1500 (2018), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that profoundly...
SCOTUS Upholds Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review Process in Patent Law

SCOTUS Upholds Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review Process in Patent Law

Date: Apr 25, 2018
SCOTUS Upholds Constitutionality of Inter Partes Review Process in Patent Law Introduction In the landmark case of Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC, the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert