Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Wayfair Decision Overturns Quill and Bellas Hess: A New Era for State Sales Tax Collection

Wayfair Decision Overturns Quill and Bellas Hess: A New Era for State Sales Tax Collection

Date: Jun 22, 2018
Wayfair Decision Overturns Quill and Bellas Hess: A New Era for State Sales Tax Collection Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. (138 S. Ct. 2080, 2018)...
SEC's Administrative Law Judges Classified as 'Officers of the United States' under the Appointments Clause

SEC's Administrative Law Judges Classified as 'Officers of the United States' under the Appointments Clause

Date: Jun 22, 2018
SEC's Administrative Law Judges Classified as 'Officers of the United States' under the Appointments Clause Introduction In the landmark case Raymond J. Lucia, et al., Petitioners v. Securities and...
Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case

Date: Jun 19, 2018
Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case Introduction The United States Supreme Court issued a per curiam decision on June 18, 2018, in the case of O....
Lozman v. Riviera Beach: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections Against Retaliatory Arrests

Lozman v. Riviera Beach: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections Against Retaliatory Arrests

Date: Jun 19, 2018
Lozman v. Riviera Beach: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections Against Retaliatory Arrests Introduction Lozman v. Riviera Beach, 138 S. Ct. 1945 (2018), is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Be v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

Be v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

Date: Jun 19, 2018
Be v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases Introduction Be v. Gill, decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 18, 2018, addresses the...
Correction of Sentencing Errors: Rosales-Mireles v. United States Establishes Expanded Relief under Rule 52(b)

Correction of Sentencing Errors: Rosales-Mireles v. United States Establishes Expanded Relief under Rule 52(b)

Date: Jun 18, 2018
Correction of Sentencing Errors: Rosales-Mireles v. United States Establishes Expanded Relief under Rule 52(b) Introduction Florencio Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1897 (2018), is a...
Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case

Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case

Date: Jun 18, 2018
Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case Introduction The case O. John Benisek, et al. v. Linda H. Lamone, Administrator, Maryland State Board of...
Balancing Judicial Discretion and Explanation Requirements in Sentencing Modifications: Analysis of ADAUCTO CHAVEZ-MEZA v. United States

Balancing Judicial Discretion and Explanation Requirements in Sentencing Modifications: Analysis of ADAUCTO CHAVEZ-MEZA v. United States

Date: Jun 18, 2018
Balancing Judicial Discretion and Explanation Requirements in Sentencing Modifications: Analysis of ADAUCTO CHAVEZ-MEZA v. UNITED STATES Introduction ADAUCTO CHAVEZ-MEZA v. UNITED STATES is a pivotal...
Whitford v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Article III Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

Whitford v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Article III Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

Date: Jun 18, 2018
Whitford v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Article III Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases Introduction Whitford v. Gill is a landmark Supreme Court case adjudicated on June 17,...
Supreme Court Strikes Down Minnesota's Political Apparel Ban in Polling Places

Supreme Court Strikes Down Minnesota's Political Apparel Ban in Polling Places

Date: Jun 15, 2018
Supreme Court Strikes Down Minnesota's Political Apparel Ban in Polling Places Introduction In Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al. v. Joe Mansky, et al. (138 S. Ct. 1876, 2018), the United States...
Supreme Court Rules Federal Courts Not Bound to Foreign Governments' Official Statements on Domestic Law: Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical

Supreme Court Rules Federal Courts Not Bound to Foreign Governments' Official Statements on Domestic Law: Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical

Date: Jun 15, 2018
Supreme Court Rules Federal Courts Not Bound to Foreign Governments' Official Statements on Domestic Law: Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Introduction In the landmark case of...
Supreme Court Strikes Down Ambiguous Political Apparel Ban at Polling Places, Reinforcing Free Speech Protections

Supreme Court Strikes Down Ambiguous Political Apparel Ban at Polling Places, Reinforcing Free Speech Protections

Date: Jun 15, 2018
Supreme Court Strikes Down Ambiguous Political Apparel Ban at Polling Places, Reinforcing Free Speech Protections Introduction In the landmark case of MINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE, ET AL. v. JOE MANSKY,...
Balancing Respectful Consideration and Judicial Independence in Determining Foreign Law: Animal Science Products v. HeBei Welcome

Balancing Respectful Consideration and Judicial Independence in Determining Foreign Law: Animal Science Products v. HeBei Welcome

Date: Jun 14, 2018
Balancing Respectful Consideration and Judicial Independence in Determining Foreign Law: Animal Science Products v. HeBei Welcome 1. Introduction The Supreme Court case Animal Science Products, Inc....
Contracts Clause Applicability to Retroactive Beneficiary Revocation in Life Insurance Policies

Contracts Clause Applicability to Retroactive Beneficiary Revocation in Life Insurance Policies

Date: Jun 12, 2018
Contracts Clause Applicability to Retroactive Beneficiary Revocation in Life Insurance Policies Introduction ASHLEY SVEEN, ET AL. v. KAYE MELIN is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Ohio's Supplemental Voter Purge Process Upheld Under NVRA

Ohio's Supplemental Voter Purge Process Upheld Under NVRA

Date: Jun 12, 2018
Ohio's Supplemental Voter Purge Process Upheld Under NVRA Introduction The case of Jon Husted, Ohio Secretary of State, Petitioner v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, et al. addressed the...
Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Voter Roll Maintenance Procedures Under NVRA and HAVA

Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Voter Roll Maintenance Procedures Under NVRA and HAVA

Date: Jun 12, 2018
Supreme Court Upholds Ohio's Voter Roll Maintenance Procedures Under NVRA and HAVA Introduction In the landmark case of Jon Husted, Ohio Secretary of State, Petitioner v. A. Philip Randolph...
Supreme Court Limits American Pipe Tolling in Successive Class Actions

Supreme Court Limits American Pipe Tolling in Successive Class Actions

Date: Jun 12, 2018
Supreme Court Limits American Pipe Tolling in Successive Class Actions Introduction In China Agritech, Inc. v. Michael H. Resh, et al., 138 S. Ct. 1800 (2018), the United States Supreme Court...
Limits on Successive Class Actions Under American Pipe: China Agritech v. Resh

Limits on Successive Class Actions Under American Pipe: China Agritech v. Resh

Date: Jun 12, 2018
Limits on Successive Class Actions Under American Pipe: China Agritech v. Resh Introduction In China Agritech, Inc. v. Michael H. Resh, 857 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2017), the United States Supreme Court...
Hughes v. United States: Clarifying Eligibility for Sentence Reduction under § 3582(c)(2)

Hughes v. United States: Clarifying Eligibility for Sentence Reduction under § 3582(c)(2)

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Hughes v. United States: Clarifying Eligibility for Sentence Reduction under § 3582(c)(2) Introduction Hughes v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1765 (2018), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Supreme Court Upholds Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Laws: Masterpiece Cakeshop Case

Supreme Court Upholds Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Laws: Masterpiece Cakeshop Case

Date: Jun 5, 2018
Supreme Court Upholds Religious Neutrality in Anti-Discrimination Laws: Masterpiece Cakeshop Case Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert