Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Affirms American Express's Antisteering Provisions as Consistent with Antitrust Law in Two-Sided Market Context

Supreme Court Affirms American Express's Antisteering Provisions as Consistent with Antitrust Law in Two-Sided Market Context

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Supreme Court Affirms American Express's Antisteering Provisions as Consistent with Antitrust Law in Two-Sided Market Context Introduction The case of Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. American Express...
Amex v. Ohio: Affirming the Rule of Reason in Two-Sided Transaction Platforms under Antitrust Law

Amex v. Ohio: Affirming the Rule of Reason in Two-Sided Transaction Platforms under Antitrust Law

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Amex v. Ohio: Affirming the Rule of Reason in Two-Sided Transaction Platforms under Antitrust Law Introduction OHIO, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, ET AL. is a landmark decision by...
Abbott v. Perez: Upholding the Burden of Proof in Voting Rights Redistricting

Abbott v. Perez: Upholding the Burden of Proof in Voting Rights Redistricting

Date: Jun 26, 2018
Abbott v. Perez: Upholding the Burden of Proof in Voting Rights Redistricting Introduction Abbott v. Perez, decided on June 25, 2018, addressed critical issues surrounding the redistricting process...
Westerngeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp.: Extending Patent Damages to Foreign Profits Under §271(f)(2)

Westerngeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp.: Extending Patent Damages to Foreign Profits Under §271(f)(2)

Date: Jun 23, 2018
Westerngeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp.: Extending Patent Damages to Foreign Profits Under §271(f)(2) Introduction In the landmark case of WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corporation, the United...
Supreme Court Affirms Appellate Jurisdiction Over Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and Validates Dual Judicial Roles

Supreme Court Affirms Appellate Jurisdiction Over Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and Validates Dual Judicial Roles

Date: Jun 23, 2018
Supreme Court Affirms Appellate Jurisdiction Over Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and Validates Dual Judicial Roles Introduction In the landmark case Keanu D. W. Ortiz v. United States (138 S....
Carpenter v. United States: Expanding Fourth Amendment Protections to Historical Cell-Site Records

Carpenter v. United States: Expanding Fourth Amendment Protections to Historical Cell-Site Records

Date: Jun 23, 2018
Carpenter v. United States: Expanding Fourth Amendment Protections to Historical Cell-Site Records Introduction Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark decision by the...
Consent to Severance and Double Jeopardy: Currier v. Virginia

Consent to Severance and Double Jeopardy: Currier v. Virginia

Date: Jun 23, 2018
Consent to Severance and Double Jeopardy: Currier v. Virginia Introduction In Michael Nelson Currier v. Virginia (138 S. Ct. 2144, 2018), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a complex Double Jeopardy...
Defining 'Money Remuneration': Supreme Court Sets Clear Distinction in Railroad Retirement Tax Act

Defining 'Money Remuneration': Supreme Court Sets Clear Distinction in Railroad Retirement Tax Act

Date: Jun 22, 2018
Defining "Money Remuneration": Supreme Court Sets Clear Distinction in Railroad Retirement Tax Act Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in the case of Wisconsin Central Ltd., et al.,...
Pereira v. Sessions: Clarifying Notice to Appear and the Stop-Time Rule

Pereira v. Sessions: Clarifying Notice to Appear and the Stop-Time Rule

Date: Jun 22, 2018
Pereira v. Sessions: Clarifying Notice to Appear and the Stop-Time Rule Introduction Wescley Fonseca Pereira v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), is a landmark...
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.: Establishing Economic Nexus and Overruling Quill and Bellas Hess

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.: Establishing Economic Nexus and Overruling Quill and Bellas Hess

Date: Jun 22, 2018
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.: Establishing Economic Nexus and Overruling Quill and Bellas Hess Introduction South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court,...
Wayfair Decision Overturns Quill and Bellas Hess: A New Era for State Sales Tax Collection

Wayfair Decision Overturns Quill and Bellas Hess: A New Era for State Sales Tax Collection

Date: Jun 22, 2018
Wayfair Decision Overturns Quill and Bellas Hess: A New Era for State Sales Tax Collection Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. (138 S. Ct. 2080, 2018)...
SEC's Administrative Law Judges Classified as 'Officers of the United States' under the Appointments Clause

SEC's Administrative Law Judges Classified as 'Officers of the United States' under the Appointments Clause

Date: Jun 22, 2018
SEC's Administrative Law Judges Classified as 'Officers of the United States' under the Appointments Clause Introduction In the landmark case Raymond J. Lucia, et al., Petitioners v. Securities and...
Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case

Date: Jun 19, 2018
Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case Introduction The United States Supreme Court issued a per curiam decision on June 18, 2018, in the case of O....
Lozman v. Riviera Beach: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections Against Retaliatory Arrests

Lozman v. Riviera Beach: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections Against Retaliatory Arrests

Date: Jun 19, 2018
Lozman v. Riviera Beach: Reinforcing First Amendment Protections Against Retaliatory Arrests Introduction Lozman v. Riviera Beach, 138 S. Ct. 1945 (2018), is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Be v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

Be v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

Date: Jun 19, 2018
Be v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases Introduction Be v. Gill, decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 18, 2018, addresses the...
Correction of Sentencing Errors: Rosales-Mireles v. United States Establishes Expanded Relief under Rule 52(b)

Correction of Sentencing Errors: Rosales-Mireles v. United States Establishes Expanded Relief under Rule 52(b)

Date: Jun 18, 2018
Correction of Sentencing Errors: Rosales-Mireles v. United States Establishes Expanded Relief under Rule 52(b) Introduction Florencio Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1897 (2018), is a...
Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case

Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case

Date: Jun 18, 2018
Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Partisan Gerrymandering Case Introduction The case O. John Benisek, et al. v. Linda H. Lamone, Administrator, Maryland State Board of...
Balancing Judicial Discretion and Explanation Requirements in Sentencing Modifications: Analysis of ADAUCTO CHAVEZ-MEZA v. United States

Balancing Judicial Discretion and Explanation Requirements in Sentencing Modifications: Analysis of ADAUCTO CHAVEZ-MEZA v. United States

Date: Jun 18, 2018
Balancing Judicial Discretion and Explanation Requirements in Sentencing Modifications: Analysis of ADAUCTO CHAVEZ-MEZA v. UNITED STATES Introduction ADAUCTO CHAVEZ-MEZA v. UNITED STATES is a pivotal...
Whitford v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Article III Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

Whitford v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Article III Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

Date: Jun 18, 2018
Whitford v. Gill: Supreme Court Clarifies Article III Standing Requirements in Partisan Gerrymandering Cases Introduction Whitford v. Gill is a landmark Supreme Court case adjudicated on June 17,...
Supreme Court Strikes Down Minnesota's Political Apparel Ban in Polling Places

Supreme Court Strikes Down Minnesota's Political Apparel Ban in Polling Places

Date: Jun 15, 2018
Supreme Court Strikes Down Minnesota's Political Apparel Ban in Polling Places Introduction In Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al. v. Joe Mansky, et al. (138 S. Ct. 1876, 2018), the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert