Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Habeas Corpus in Expedited Removal: Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Habeas Corpus in Expedited Removal: Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam

Date: Jun 26, 2020
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Habeas Corpus in Expedited Removal: Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam Introduction Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam (140 S....
Reckless Threats and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Kansas v. Boettger and Johnson

Reckless Threats and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Kansas v. Boettger and Johnson

Date: Jun 23, 2020
Reckless Threats and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Kansas v. Boettger and Johnson Introduction Kansas v. Timothy C. Boettger and Kansas v. Ryan Robert Johnson present significant questions...
Liu v. SEC: Establishing Disgorgement as Equitable Relief Under §78u(d)(5)

Liu v. SEC: Establishing Disgorgement as Equitable Relief Under §78u(d)(5)

Date: Jun 23, 2020
Liu v. SEC: Establishing Disgorgement as Equitable Relief Under §78u(d)(5) Introduction Liu v. SEC, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (2020), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarified...
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California: Setting New Standards for Agency Rescission of Deferred Action Programs

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California: Setting New Standards for Agency Rescission of Deferred Action Programs

Date: Jun 19, 2020
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California: Setting New Standards for Agency Rescission of Deferred Action Programs Introduction The case of Department of Homeland...
Bostock v. Clayton County: Expanding Title VII to Include Sexual Orientation and Transgender Status as Sex Discrimination

Bostock v. Clayton County: Expanding Title VII to Include Sexual Orientation and Transgender Status as Sex Discrimination

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Bostock v. Clayton County: Expanding Title VII to Include Sexual Orientation and Transgender Status as Sex Discrimination Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Bostock v. Clayton County (140...
United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Affirming Pipeline Rights-of-Way Through National Forests

United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Affirming Pipeline Rights-of-Way Through National Forests

Date: Jun 16, 2020
United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Affirming Pipeline Rights-of-Way Through National Forests Introduction Case Citation: United States Forest Service v....
Reevaluating Qualified Immunity: Insights from Justice Thomas's Dissent in Baxter v. Bracey

Reevaluating Qualified Immunity: Insights from Justice Thomas's Dissent in Baxter v. Bracey

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Reevaluating Qualified Immunity: Insights from Justice Thomas's Dissent in Baxter v. Bracey Introduction In the landmark case ALEXANDER L. BAXTER v. BRAD BRACEY, ET AL. (140 S. Ct. 1862, 2020), the...
Clarifying Strickland Prejudice: Comprehensive Analysis of Andrus v. Texas

Clarifying Strickland Prejudice: Comprehensive Analysis of Andrus v. Texas

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Clarifying Strickland Prejudice: Comprehensive Analysis of Andrus v. Texas Introduction Andrus v. Texas, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (2020), is a pivotal Supreme Court case addressing the adequacy of legal...
Reaffirming Public Carry Rights: Comprehensive Commentary on Rogers v. Grewal

Reaffirming Public Carry Rights: Comprehensive Commentary on Rogers v. Grewal

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Reaffirming Public Carry Rights: Comprehensive Commentary on Rogers v. Grewal Introduction Rogers v. Grewal, decided on June 15, 2020, by the Supreme Court of the United States, marks a pivotal...
Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez: Clarifying the Three-Strikes Rule under the PLRA

Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez: Clarifying the Three-Strikes Rule under the PLRA

Date: Jun 9, 2020
Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez: Clarifying the Three-Strikes Rule under the PLRA Introduction Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez, 140 S. Ct. 1721 (2020), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Barriers to Successive Habeas Petitions: Analyzing the Eleventh Circuit's Procedural Hurdles

Barriers to Successive Habeas Petitions: Analyzing the Eleventh Circuit's Procedural Hurdles

Date: Jun 9, 2020
Barriers to Successive Habeas Petitions: Analyzing the Eleventh Circuit's Procedural Hurdles Introduction Michael St. Hubert v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1727 (2020), addresses significant procedural...
Judicial Review of CAT Orders in Criminal Removal Cases: Nasrallah v. Barr

Judicial Review of CAT Orders in Criminal Removal Cases: Nasrallah v. Barr

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Judicial Review of CAT Orders in Criminal Removal Cases: Nasrallah v. Barr Introduction Nasrallah v. Barr, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (2020), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements by Nonsignatories Under the New York Convention

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements by Nonsignatories Under the New York Convention

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements by Nonsignatories Under the New York Convention Introduction In GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC, 140...
Article III Standing in ERISA Cases: Insights from Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A.

Article III Standing in ERISA Cases: Insights from Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A.

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Article III Standing in ERISA Cases: Insights from Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A. Introduction Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A., 140 S. Ct. 1615 (2020), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico: Appointments Clause and Local Officer Status

Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico: Appointments Clause and Local Officer Status

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico: Appointments Clause and Local Officer Status Introduction The case Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurélus...
Supreme Court Upholds President's Appointment of Territorial Board Members Without Senate Confirmation

Supreme Court Upholds President's Appointment of Territorial Board Members Without Senate Confirmation

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds President's Appointment of Territorial Board Members Without Senate Confirmation Introduction In the case of Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius...
Banister v. Da: Clarifying the Role of Rule 59(e) in Federal Habeas Proceedings

Banister v. Da: Clarifying the Role of Rule 59(e) in Federal Habeas Proceedings

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Banister v. Da: Clarifying the Role of Rule 59(e) in Federal Habeas Proceedings Introduction Banister v. Da (140 S. Ct. 1698, 2020) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Opati v. Republic of Sudan: Affirming Punitive Damages Under FSIA §1605A(c)

Opati v. Republic of Sudan: Affirming Punitive Damages Under FSIA §1605A(c)

Date: May 19, 2020
Opati v. Republic of Sudan: Affirming Punitive Damages Under FSIA §1605A(c) Introduction Opati v. Republic of Sudan (140 S. Ct. 1601) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Deliberate Indifference in COVID-19 Prison Management: Valentine v. Collier

Deliberate Indifference in COVID-19 Prison Management: Valentine v. Collier

Date: May 15, 2020
Deliberate Indifference in COVID-19 Prison Management: Valentine v. Collier Introduction Valentine v. Collier, 140 S. Ct. 1598 (2020), addresses the critical issue of prison management during the...
Supreme Court Rejects "Defense Preclusion" in Res Judicata: Lucky Brand v. Marcel Fashions

Supreme Court Rejects "Defense Preclusion" in Res Judicata: Lucky Brand v. Marcel Fashions

Date: May 15, 2020
Supreme Court Rejects "Defense Preclusion" in Res Judicata: Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court case Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert