Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Barriers to Successive Habeas Petitions: Analyzing the Eleventh Circuit's Procedural Hurdles

Barriers to Successive Habeas Petitions: Analyzing the Eleventh Circuit's Procedural Hurdles

Date: Jun 9, 2020
Barriers to Successive Habeas Petitions: Analyzing the Eleventh Circuit's Procedural Hurdles Introduction Michael St. Hubert v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1727 (2020), addresses significant procedural...
Judicial Review of CAT Orders in Criminal Removal Cases: Nasrallah v. Barr

Judicial Review of CAT Orders in Criminal Removal Cases: Nasrallah v. Barr

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Judicial Review of CAT Orders in Criminal Removal Cases: Nasrallah v. Barr Introduction Nasrallah v. Barr, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (2020), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements by Nonsignatories Under the New York Convention

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements by Nonsignatories Under the New York Convention

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements by Nonsignatories Under the New York Convention Introduction In GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC, 140...
Article III Standing in ERISA Cases: Insights from Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A.

Article III Standing in ERISA Cases: Insights from Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A.

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Article III Standing in ERISA Cases: Insights from Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A. Introduction Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A., 140 S. Ct. 1615 (2020), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico: Appointments Clause and Local Officer Status

Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico: Appointments Clause and Local Officer Status

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico: Appointments Clause and Local Officer Status Introduction The case Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurélus...
Supreme Court Upholds President's Appointment of Territorial Board Members Without Senate Confirmation

Supreme Court Upholds President's Appointment of Territorial Board Members Without Senate Confirmation

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds President's Appointment of Territorial Board Members Without Senate Confirmation Introduction In the case of Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius...
Banister v. Da: Clarifying the Role of Rule 59(e) in Federal Habeas Proceedings

Banister v. Da: Clarifying the Role of Rule 59(e) in Federal Habeas Proceedings

Date: Jun 2, 2020
Banister v. Da: Clarifying the Role of Rule 59(e) in Federal Habeas Proceedings Introduction Banister v. Da (140 S. Ct. 1698, 2020) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Opati v. Republic of Sudan: Affirming Punitive Damages Under FSIA §1605A(c)

Opati v. Republic of Sudan: Affirming Punitive Damages Under FSIA §1605A(c)

Date: May 19, 2020
Opati v. Republic of Sudan: Affirming Punitive Damages Under FSIA §1605A(c) Introduction Opati v. Republic of Sudan (140 S. Ct. 1601) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Deliberate Indifference in COVID-19 Prison Management: Valentine v. Collier

Deliberate Indifference in COVID-19 Prison Management: Valentine v. Collier

Date: May 15, 2020
Deliberate Indifference in COVID-19 Prison Management: Valentine v. Collier Introduction Valentine v. Collier, 140 S. Ct. 1598 (2020), addresses the critical issue of prison management during the...
Supreme Court Rejects "Defense Preclusion" in Res Judicata: Lucky Brand v. Marcel Fashions

Supreme Court Rejects "Defense Preclusion" in Res Judicata: Lucky Brand v. Marcel Fashions

Date: May 15, 2020
Supreme Court Rejects "Defense Preclusion" in Res Judicata: Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court case Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions...
Limiting Federal Fraud Jurisdiction: Insights from Kelly v. United States

Limiting Federal Fraud Jurisdiction: Insights from Kelly v. United States

Date: May 8, 2020
Limiting Federal Fraud Jurisdiction: Insights from Kelly v. United States Introduction Kelly v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1565 (2020), represents a pivotal moment in the interpretation of federal...
Reaffirming the Party Presentation Principle: Insights from United States v. Sineneng-Smith

Reaffirming the Party Presentation Principle: Insights from United States v. Sineneng-Smith

Date: May 8, 2020
Reaffirming the Party Presentation Principle: Insights from United States v. Sineneng-Smith Introduction United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (2020), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Mootness and Second Amendment Rights: Analyzing New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. City of New York

Mootness and Second Amendment Rights: Analyzing New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. City of New York

Date: Apr 28, 2020
Mootness and Second Amendment Rights: Analyzing New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City of New York Introduction New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City of New York (140 S. Ct....
Supreme Court Affirms Enforceable Money-Mandating Obligation under ACA’s Risk Corridors Program

Supreme Court Affirms Enforceable Money-Mandating Obligation under ACA’s Risk Corridors Program

Date: Apr 28, 2020
Supreme Court Affirms Enforceable Money-Mandating Obligation under ACA’s Risk Corridors Program Introduction In the landmark case Maine Community Health Options v. United States (140 S. Ct. 1308),...
Government Edicts Doctrine Precludes Copyright on Legislative Annotations: Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.

Government Edicts Doctrine Precludes Copyright on Legislative Annotations: Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.

Date: Apr 28, 2020
Government Edicts Doctrine Precludes Copyright on Legislative Annotations: Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. Introduction In Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (2020), the...
Romag Fasteners v. Fossil: Willfulness Not a Prerequisite for Profit Awards in Trademark Infringement

Romag Fasteners v. Fossil: Willfulness Not a Prerequisite for Profit Awards in Trademark Infringement

Date: Apr 24, 2020
Romag Fasteners v. Fossil: Willfulness Not a Prerequisite for Profit Awards in Trademark Infringement Introduction The Supreme Court case Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., decided on April 23,...
Cancellation of Removal Eligibility in Barton v. Barr: A New Precedent

Cancellation of Removal Eligibility in Barton v. Barr: A New Precedent

Date: Apr 24, 2020
Cancellation of Removal Eligibility in Barton v. Barr: A New Precedent 1. Introduction Barton v. Barr (140 S. Ct. 1442, 2020) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarifies...
County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund: Defining 'Functional Equivalent' Discharges Under the Clean Water Act

County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund: Defining 'Functional Equivalent' Discharges Under the Clean Water Act

Date: Apr 24, 2020
County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund: Defining 'Functional Equivalent' Discharges Under the Clean Water Act Introduction In County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (2020), the...
Finality of Inter Partes Review Institution Decisions in Patent Law: Thryv v. Click-to-Call Technologies

Finality of Inter Partes Review Institution Decisions in Patent Law: Thryv v. Click-to-Call Technologies

Date: Apr 21, 2020
Finality of Inter Partes Review Institution Decisions in Patent Law: Thryv v. Click-to-Call Technologies Introduction The Supreme Court case Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP (140 S. Ct....
State Courts Maintain Jurisdiction Over State Law Environmental Claims in Superfund Cleanup Efforts

State Courts Maintain Jurisdiction Over State Law Environmental Claims in Superfund Cleanup Efforts

Date: Apr 21, 2020
State Courts Maintain Jurisdiction Over State Law Environmental Claims in Superfund Cleanup Efforts Introduction In the landmark case Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian (140 S. Ct. 1335, 2020), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert