Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Separation of Powers Reinforced: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Congressional Subpoenas of Presidential Records in Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP

Separation of Powers Reinforced: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Congressional Subpoenas of Presidential Records in Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP

Date: Jul 10, 2020
Separation of Powers Reinforced: Supreme Court Sets New Standards for Congressional Subpoenas of Presidential Records in Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Trump v....
Expanding the Ministerial Exception: Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru

Expanding the Ministerial Exception: Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru

Date: Jul 9, 2020
Expanding the Ministerial Exception: Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru Introduction In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, 140 S. Ct. 2049 (2020), the United States Supreme...
Government Exemptions from ACA's Contraceptive Mandate Upheld

Government Exemptions from ACA's Contraceptive Mandate Upheld

Date: Jul 9, 2020
Government Exemptions from ACA's Contraceptive Mandate Upheld Introduction The Supreme Court case Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania (140 S. Ct. 2367) addressed the...
First Amendment Principles in Robocall Legislation: Severance of Unconstitutional Debt-Collection Exception – Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants

First Amendment Principles in Robocall Legislation: Severance of Unconstitutional Debt-Collection Exception – Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants

Date: Jul 7, 2020
First Amendment Principles in Robocall Legislation: Severance of Unconstitutional Debt-Collection Exception – Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Introduction In Barr v. American...
Chiafalo v. Washington: Upholding State-Enforced Pledge Laws for Electoral College Electors

Chiafalo v. Washington: Upholding State-Enforced Pledge Laws for Electoral College Electors

Date: Jul 7, 2020
Chiafalo v. Washington: Upholding State-Enforced Pledge Laws for Electoral College Electors Introduction Chiafalo v. Washington (140 S. Ct. 2316, 2020) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue: Affirming Free Exercise Rights in State-Sponsored Scholarship Programs

Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue: Affirming Free Exercise Rights in State-Sponsored Scholarship Programs

Date: Jul 1, 2020
Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue: Affirming Free Exercise Rights in State-Sponsored Scholarship Programs Introduction In Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (2020), the...
Booking.com Trademark Eligibility After PTO v. Booking.com

Booking.com Trademark Eligibility After PTO v. Booking.com

Date: Jul 1, 2020
Booking.com Trademark Eligibility After PTO v. Booking.com Introduction The landmark case Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V. (2020) addressed the eligibility of "Booking.com" for...
Comprehensive Commentary on June Medical Services LLC v. Hellerstedt (140 S. Ct. 2103): Establishing the Undue Burden Standard for Abortion Regulations

Comprehensive Commentary on June Medical Services LLC v. Hellerstedt (140 S. Ct. 2103): Establishing the Undue Burden Standard for Abortion Regulations

Date: Jun 30, 2020
Comprehensive Commentary on June Medical Services LLC v. Hellerstedt (140 S. Ct. 2103): Establishing the Undue Burden Standard for Abortion Regulations Introduction June Medical Services LLC v....
Seila Law LLC v. CFPB: Redefining Executive Power in Regulatory Agencies

Seila Law LLC v. CFPB: Redefining Executive Power in Regulatory Agencies

Date: Jun 30, 2020
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Redefining Executive Power in Regulatory Agencies Introduction In the landmark case Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau...
Agency for Int’l Development v. Alliance for Open Society International: Limiting First Amendment Protections for Foreign Affiliates

Agency for Int’l Development v. Alliance for Open Society International: Limiting First Amendment Protections for Foreign Affiliates

Date: Jun 30, 2020
Agency for Int’l Development v. Alliance for Open Society International: Limiting First Amendment Protections for Foreign Affiliates Introduction In Agency for International Development v. Alliance...
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Habeas Corpus in Expedited Removal: Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Habeas Corpus in Expedited Removal: Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam

Date: Jun 26, 2020
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Restrictions on Habeas Corpus in Expedited Removal: Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam Introduction Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam (140 S....
Reckless Threats and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Kansas v. Boettger and Johnson

Reckless Threats and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Kansas v. Boettger and Johnson

Date: Jun 23, 2020
Reckless Threats and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Kansas v. Boettger and Johnson Introduction Kansas v. Timothy C. Boettger and Kansas v. Ryan Robert Johnson present significant questions...
Liu v. SEC: Establishing Disgorgement as Equitable Relief Under §78u(d)(5)

Liu v. SEC: Establishing Disgorgement as Equitable Relief Under §78u(d)(5)

Date: Jun 23, 2020
Liu v. SEC: Establishing Disgorgement as Equitable Relief Under §78u(d)(5) Introduction Liu v. SEC, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (2020), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarified...
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California: Setting New Standards for Agency Rescission of Deferred Action Programs

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California: Setting New Standards for Agency Rescission of Deferred Action Programs

Date: Jun 19, 2020
Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California: Setting New Standards for Agency Rescission of Deferred Action Programs Introduction The case of Department of Homeland...
Bostock v. Clayton County: Expanding Title VII to Include Sexual Orientation and Transgender Status as Sex Discrimination

Bostock v. Clayton County: Expanding Title VII to Include Sexual Orientation and Transgender Status as Sex Discrimination

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Bostock v. Clayton County: Expanding Title VII to Include Sexual Orientation and Transgender Status as Sex Discrimination Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Bostock v. Clayton County (140...
United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Affirming Pipeline Rights-of-Way Through National Forests

United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Affirming Pipeline Rights-of-Way Through National Forests

Date: Jun 16, 2020
United States Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Affirming Pipeline Rights-of-Way Through National Forests Introduction Case Citation: United States Forest Service v....
Reevaluating Qualified Immunity: Insights from Justice Thomas's Dissent in Baxter v. Bracey

Reevaluating Qualified Immunity: Insights from Justice Thomas's Dissent in Baxter v. Bracey

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Reevaluating Qualified Immunity: Insights from Justice Thomas's Dissent in Baxter v. Bracey Introduction In the landmark case ALEXANDER L. BAXTER v. BRAD BRACEY, ET AL. (140 S. Ct. 1862, 2020), the...
Clarifying Strickland Prejudice: Comprehensive Analysis of Andrus v. Texas

Clarifying Strickland Prejudice: Comprehensive Analysis of Andrus v. Texas

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Clarifying Strickland Prejudice: Comprehensive Analysis of Andrus v. Texas Introduction Andrus v. Texas, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (2020), is a pivotal Supreme Court case addressing the adequacy of legal...
Reaffirming Public Carry Rights: Comprehensive Commentary on Rogers v. Grewal

Reaffirming Public Carry Rights: Comprehensive Commentary on Rogers v. Grewal

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Reaffirming Public Carry Rights: Comprehensive Commentary on Rogers v. Grewal Introduction Rogers v. Grewal, decided on June 15, 2020, by the Supreme Court of the United States, marks a pivotal...
Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez: Clarifying the Three-Strikes Rule under the PLRA

Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez: Clarifying the Three-Strikes Rule under the PLRA

Date: Jun 9, 2020
Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez: Clarifying the Three-Strikes Rule under the PLRA Introduction Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez, 140 S. Ct. 1721 (2020), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert