Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Judicial Review of Reopening Decisions Under the Railroad Retirement Act: Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board

Judicial Review of Reopening Decisions Under the Railroad Retirement Act: Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board

Date: Feb 4, 2021
Judicial Review of Reopening Decisions Under the Railroad Retirement Act: Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board Introduction The case of Manfredo M. Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board...
Supreme Court Affirms Narrow Interpretation of FSIA's Expropriation Exception: Sovereign Immunity Preserved for Domestic Property Seizures

Supreme Court Affirms Narrow Interpretation of FSIA's Expropriation Exception: Sovereign Immunity Preserved for Domestic Property Seizures

Date: Feb 4, 2021
Supreme Court Affirms Narrow Interpretation of FSIA's Expropriation Exception: Sovereign Immunity Preserved for Domestic Property Seizures Introduction In the landmark case of Federal Republic of...
Protecting the Mentally Ill: Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Removal Proceedings

Protecting the Mentally Ill: Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Removal Proceedings

Date: Jan 23, 2021
Protecting the Mentally Ill: Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Removal Proceedings Introduction The case of Alex Francois v. Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General presents a critical...
Federal Death Penalty Execution Procedures: Insights from United States v. Dustin John Higgs

Federal Death Penalty Execution Procedures: Insights from United States v. Dustin John Higgs

Date: Jan 16, 2021
Federal Death Penalty Execution Procedures: Insights from United States v. Dustin John Higgs Introduction United States v. Dustin John Higgs (141 S. Ct. 645, 2021) is a pivotal case examined by the...
Retention of Estate Property Post-Bankruptcy Filing Permitted Under §362(a)(3): City of Chicago v. Fulton

Retention of Estate Property Post-Bankruptcy Filing Permitted Under §362(a)(3): City of Chicago v. Fulton

Date: Jan 15, 2021
Retention of Estate Property Post-Bankruptcy Filing Permitted Under §362(a)(3): City of Chicago v. Fulton Introduction In City of Chicago, Illinois v. Robbin L. Fulton et al., 141 S. Ct. 585 (2021),...
Supreme Court Upholds FDA's In-Person Mifepristone Dispensing Requirements Amid COVID-19

Supreme Court Upholds FDA's In-Person Mifepristone Dispensing Requirements Amid COVID-19

Date: Jan 13, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds FDA's In-Person Mifepristone Dispensing Requirements Amid COVID-19 Introduction In the case of Food and Drug Administration, et al. v. American College of Obstetricians and...
Judicial Bar on Premature Challenges to Census Apportionment: Trump v. New York

Judicial Bar on Premature Challenges to Census Apportionment: Trump v. New York

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Judicial Bar on Premature Challenges to Census Apportionment: Trump v. New York Introduction The case of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Appellants versus New York, et al....
Danville Christian Academy v. Beshear: Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Neutral Laws to Religious Institutions

Danville Christian Academy v. Beshear: Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Neutral Laws to Religious Institutions

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Danville Christian Academy v. Beshear: Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Neutral Laws to Religious Institutions Introduction In the landmark case Danville Christian Academy, Inc., et al v. Andy...
Delivery Credit for Evaporated Water Under the Pecos River Compact: TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO

Delivery Credit for Evaporated Water Under the Pecos River Compact: TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO

Date: Dec 15, 2020
Delivery Credit for Evaporated Water Under the Pecos River Compact: TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO Introduction TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO, 141 S. Ct. 509 (2020), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of the United States...
Kayer v. Arizona Department of Corrections: Supreme Court Upholds AEDPA Deference

Kayer v. Arizona Department of Corrections: Supreme Court Upholds AEDPA Deference

Date: Dec 15, 2020
Kayer v. Arizona Department of Corrections: Supreme Court Upholds AEDPA Deference Introduction The Supreme Court case David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. George Russell Kayer...
ERISA Preemption Limited: Supreme Court Upholds Arkansas' Act 900 Regulating Pharmacy Benefit Managers

ERISA Preemption Limited: Supreme Court Upholds Arkansas' Act 900 Regulating Pharmacy Benefit Managers

Date: Dec 11, 2020
ERISA Preemption Limited: Supreme Court Upholds Arkansas' Act 900 Regulating Pharmacy Benefit Managers Introduction In Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas v. Pharmaceutical Care Management...
Expansion of RFRA Remedies: Allowing Monetary Damages Against Federal Officials

Expansion of RFRA Remedies: Allowing Monetary Damages Against Federal Officials

Date: Dec 11, 2020
Expansion of RFRA Remedies: Allowing Monetary Damages Against Federal Officials Introduction The Supreme Court case FNU TANZIN, ET AL. v. MUHAMMAD TANVIR, ET AL. (141 S. Ct. 486, 2020) addresses...
Affirming Article III Standing Requirements in Judicial Eligibility Cases: Carney v. Adams

Affirming Article III Standing Requirements in Judicial Eligibility Cases: Carney v. Adams

Date: Dec 11, 2020
Affirming Article III Standing Requirements in Judicial Eligibility Cases: Carney v. Adams Introduction Carney v. Adams, 141 S. Ct. 493 (2020), is a significant Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Reassessing Successive Habeas Standards for Brady and Napue Claims: Insights from Brandon Bernard v. United States

Reassessing Successive Habeas Standards for Brady and Napue Claims: Insights from Brandon Bernard v. United States

Date: Dec 11, 2020
Reassessing Successive Habeas Standards for Brady and Napue Claims: Insights from Brandon Bernard v. United States Introduction Brandon Bernard v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 504 (2020), represents a...
Timeliness of Military Rape Prosecutions Under the UCMJ: United States v. Briggs et al.

Timeliness of Military Rape Prosecutions Under the UCMJ: United States v. Briggs et al.

Date: Dec 11, 2020
Timeliness of Military Rape Prosecutions Under the UCMJ: United States v. Briggs et al. Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Briggs, Collins, Daniels, III addresses a critical issue...
Supreme Court Protects Religious Freedom: Enjoining New York's COVID-19 Restrictions on Worship Gatherings

Supreme Court Protects Religious Freedom: Enjoining New York's COVID-19 Restrictions on Worship Gatherings

Date: Nov 26, 2020
Supreme Court Protects Religious Freedom: Enjoining New York's COVID-19 Restrictions on Worship Gatherings Introduction In the landmark case Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. Andrew M....
Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Valentine v. Collier

Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Valentine v. Collier

Date: Nov 17, 2020
Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Valentine v. Collier Introduction The case of Laddy Curtis Valentine, et al. v. Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of...
Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Procedural Protocols in Negligent Protest Liability: DERAY MCKESSON v. JOHN DOE

Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Procedural Protocols in Negligent Protest Liability: DERAY MCKESSON v. JOHN DOE

Date: Nov 3, 2020
Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Procedural Protocols in Negligent Protest Liability: DERAY MCKESSON v. JOHN DOE Introduction In the landmark case DERAY MCKESSON v. JOHN DOE (141 S. Ct. 48), the...
Affirming Eighth Amendment Protections: Taylor v. Riojas Establishes Clear Standards for Prisoner Conditions

Affirming Eighth Amendment Protections: Taylor v. Riojas Establishes Clear Standards for Prisoner Conditions

Date: Nov 3, 2020
Affirming Eighth Amendment Protections: Taylor v. Riojas Establishes Clear Standards for Prisoner Conditions Introduction Taylor v. Riojas (141 S. Ct. 52, 2020) marks a significant Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Reaffirms State Legislative Primacy in Election Law Amidst Pandemic

Supreme Court Reaffirms State Legislative Primacy in Election Law Amidst Pandemic

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Supreme Court Reaffirms State Legislative Primacy in Election Law Amidst Pandemic Introduction In the landmark case Democratic National Committee, et al. v. Wisconsin State Legislature, et al. (141...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert