Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

ERISA Preemption Limited: Supreme Court Upholds Arkansas' Act 900 Regulating Pharmacy Benefit Managers

ERISA Preemption Limited: Supreme Court Upholds Arkansas' Act 900 Regulating Pharmacy Benefit Managers

Date: Dec 11, 2020
ERISA Preemption Limited: Supreme Court Upholds Arkansas' Act 900 Regulating Pharmacy Benefit Managers Introduction In Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas v. Pharmaceutical Care Management...
Expansion of RFRA Remedies: Allowing Monetary Damages Against Federal Officials

Expansion of RFRA Remedies: Allowing Monetary Damages Against Federal Officials

Date: Dec 11, 2020
Expansion of RFRA Remedies: Allowing Monetary Damages Against Federal Officials Introduction The Supreme Court case FNU TANZIN, ET AL. v. MUHAMMAD TANVIR, ET AL. (141 S. Ct. 486, 2020) addresses...
Affirming Article III Standing Requirements in Judicial Eligibility Cases: Carney v. Adams

Affirming Article III Standing Requirements in Judicial Eligibility Cases: Carney v. Adams

Date: Dec 11, 2020
Affirming Article III Standing Requirements in Judicial Eligibility Cases: Carney v. Adams Introduction Carney v. Adams, 141 S. Ct. 493 (2020), is a significant Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Reassessing Successive Habeas Standards for Brady and Napue Claims: Insights from Brandon Bernard v. United States

Reassessing Successive Habeas Standards for Brady and Napue Claims: Insights from Brandon Bernard v. United States

Date: Dec 11, 2020
Reassessing Successive Habeas Standards for Brady and Napue Claims: Insights from Brandon Bernard v. United States Introduction Brandon Bernard v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 504 (2020), represents a...
Timeliness of Military Rape Prosecutions Under the UCMJ: United States v. Briggs et al.

Timeliness of Military Rape Prosecutions Under the UCMJ: United States v. Briggs et al.

Date: Dec 11, 2020
Timeliness of Military Rape Prosecutions Under the UCMJ: United States v. Briggs et al. Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Briggs, Collins, Daniels, III addresses a critical issue...
Supreme Court Protects Religious Freedom: Enjoining New York's COVID-19 Restrictions on Worship Gatherings

Supreme Court Protects Religious Freedom: Enjoining New York's COVID-19 Restrictions on Worship Gatherings

Date: Nov 26, 2020
Supreme Court Protects Religious Freedom: Enjoining New York's COVID-19 Restrictions on Worship Gatherings Introduction In the landmark case Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. Andrew M....
Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Valentine v. Collier

Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Valentine v. Collier

Date: Nov 17, 2020
Strengthening Eighth Amendment Protections: Insights from Valentine v. Collier Introduction The case of Laddy Curtis Valentine, et al. v. Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of...
Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Procedural Protocols in Negligent Protest Liability: DERAY MCKESSON v. JOHN DOE

Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Procedural Protocols in Negligent Protest Liability: DERAY MCKESSON v. JOHN DOE

Date: Nov 3, 2020
Supreme Court Reinforces Federal Procedural Protocols in Negligent Protest Liability: DERAY MCKESSON v. JOHN DOE Introduction In the landmark case DERAY MCKESSON v. JOHN DOE (141 S. Ct. 48), the...
Affirming Eighth Amendment Protections: Taylor v. Riojas Establishes Clear Standards for Prisoner Conditions

Affirming Eighth Amendment Protections: Taylor v. Riojas Establishes Clear Standards for Prisoner Conditions

Date: Nov 3, 2020
Affirming Eighth Amendment Protections: Taylor v. Riojas Establishes Clear Standards for Prisoner Conditions Introduction Taylor v. Riojas (141 S. Ct. 52, 2020) marks a significant Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Reaffirms State Legislative Primacy in Election Law Amidst Pandemic

Supreme Court Reaffirms State Legislative Primacy in Election Law Amidst Pandemic

Date: Oct 27, 2020
Supreme Court Reaffirms State Legislative Primacy in Election Law Amidst Pandemic Introduction In the landmark case Democratic National Committee, et al. v. Wisconsin State Legislature, et al. (141...
Reevaluating Section 230 Immunity: Insights from Malwarebytes v. Enigma Software Group

Reevaluating Section 230 Immunity: Insights from Malwarebytes v. Enigma Software Group

Date: Oct 14, 2020
Reevaluating Section 230 Immunity: Insights from Malwarebytes v. Enigma Software Group Introduction The case of Malwarebytes, Inc. v. Enigma Software Group USA, LLC (No. 19-1284) presented before the...
Ensuring Census Accuracy Over Government Deadlines: Supreme Court's Stance in WILBUR ROSS v. NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE

Ensuring Census Accuracy Over Government Deadlines: Supreme Court's Stance in WILBUR ROSS v. NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE

Date: Oct 14, 2020
Ensuring Census Accuracy Over Government Deadlines: Supreme Court's Stance in WILBUR ROSS, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, ET AL. Introduction The case of Wilbur Ross,...
Supreme Court Upholds Injunction on FDA’s In-Person Dispensation Requirements for Mifepristone Amid COVID-19

Supreme Court Upholds Injunction on FDA’s In-Person Dispensation Requirements for Mifepristone Amid COVID-19

Date: Oct 9, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds Injunction on FDA’s In-Person Dispensation Requirements for Mifepristone Amid COVID-19 Introduction The case of Food and Drug Administration, et al. v. American College of...
Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege in Retrials: Insights from Raminder Kaur v. Maryland

Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege in Retrials: Insights from Raminder Kaur v. Maryland

Date: Oct 6, 2020
Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege in Retrials: Insights from Raminder Kaur v. Maryland Introduction Raminder Kaur v. Maryland, 141 S. Ct. 5 (2020), presents a critical examination of the...
Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Oversight in Correctional Health Measures During Pandemic

Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Oversight in Correctional Health Measures During Pandemic

Date: Aug 6, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Oversight in Correctional Health Measures During Pandemic Introduction In the landmark case of Don Barnes, Sheriff, Orange County, California, et al. v. Melissa Ahlman,...
Maintaining Ballot Integrity: Supreme Court Grants Stay in BRADLEY LITTLE v. RECLAIM IDAHO

Maintaining Ballot Integrity: Supreme Court Grants Stay in BRADLEY LITTLE v. RECLAIM IDAHO

Date: Jul 31, 2020
Maintaining Ballot Integrity: Supreme Court Grants Stay in Bradley Little v. Reclaim Idaho Introduction The case of Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al. v. Reclaim Idaho, et al. (No. 20A18)...
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief for Religious Services under Nevada's COVID-19 Directive

Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief for Religious Services under Nevada's COVID-19 Directive

Date: Jul 25, 2020
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief for Religious Services under Nevada's COVID-19 Directive Introduction In the landmark case Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Steve Sisolak, Governor of Nevada, et...
Protecting Voting Rights: Challenging Florida's Pay-to-Vote Scheme

Protecting Voting Rights: Challenging Florida's Pay-to-Vote Scheme

Date: Jul 17, 2020
Protecting Voting Rights: Challenging Florida's Pay-to-Vote Scheme Introduction The case of Bonnie Raysor, et al. v. Ron DeSantis, Governor of Florida, et al. (140 S. Ct. 2600) presents a significant...
Barr v. Lee: Supreme Court Upholds Use of Pentobarbital in Federal Executions

Barr v. Lee: Supreme Court Upholds Use of Pentobarbital in Federal Executions

Date: Jul 15, 2020
Barr v. Lee: Supreme Court Upholds Use of Pentobarbital in Federal Executions Introduction Barr v. Lee (140 S. Ct. 2590), decided on July 14, 2020, is a pivotal Supreme Court case addressing the...
Presidential Immunity from State Criminal Subpoenas: Analysis of Trump v. Vance

Presidential Immunity from State Criminal Subpoenas: Analysis of Trump v. Vance

Date: Jul 10, 2020
Presidential Immunity from State Criminal Subpoenas: Analysis of Trump v. Vance Introduction Trump v. Vance (140 S. Ct. 2412, 2020) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert