Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Deference to State Court Judgments in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Deference to State Court Judgments in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Mar 30, 2021
Supreme Court Reaffirms Strict Deference to State Court Judgments in Federal Habeas Corpus Review Introduction In the case of Tony Mays, Warden v. Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines, the Supreme Court of...
Roxanne Torres v. Janice Madrid: Defining Seizure Under the Fourth Amendment

Roxanne Torres v. Janice Madrid: Defining Seizure Under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Mar 26, 2021
Roxanne Torres v. Janice Madrid: Defining Seizure Under the Fourth Amendment Introduction In Roxanne Torres v. Janice Madrid, et al., 141 S. Ct. 989 (2021), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Ford Motor Co. v. Montana and Minnesota: Expanding the Boundaries of Specific Jurisdiction

Ford Motor Co. v. Montana and Minnesota: Expanding the Boundaries of Specific Jurisdiction

Date: Mar 26, 2021
Ford Motor Co. v. Montana and Minnesota: Expanding the Boundaries of Specific Jurisdiction Introduction In Ford Motor Company v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, et al., the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming the Public Trial Right: A Commentary on Byron David Smith v. Jeff Titus

Reaffirming the Public Trial Right: A Commentary on Byron David Smith v. Jeff Titus

Date: Mar 23, 2021
Reaffirming the Public Trial Right: A Commentary on Byron David Smith v. Jeff Titus Introduction Byron David Smith v. Jeff Titus, Warden (No. 20-633) is a pivotal case that underscores the enduring...
Nominal Damages and Article III Standing: Insights from Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

Nominal Damages and Article III Standing: Insights from Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

Date: Mar 9, 2021
Nominal Damages and Article III Standing: Insights from Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski Introduction Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, 141 S. Ct. 792 (2021), marks a significant development in the interpretation of...
Pereida v. Wilkinson: Burden of Proof in Cancellation of Removal

Pereida v. Wilkinson: Burden of Proof in Cancellation of Removal

Date: Mar 5, 2021
Pereida v. Wilkinson: Burden of Proof in Cancellation of Removal Introduction Clemente Avelino Pereida v. Robert M. Wilkinson, 141 S. Ct. 754 (2021), is a significant Supreme Court case that...
Deliberative Process Privilege Upholds Protection of Predecisional Draft Biological Opinions under FOIA

Deliberative Process Privilege Upholds Protection of Predecisional Draft Biological Opinions under FOIA

Date: Mar 5, 2021
Deliberative Process Privilege Upholds Protection of Predecisional Draft Biological Opinions under FOIA Introduction In the landmark case of United States Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club,...
Supreme Court Establishes Judgment Bar Application in FTCA Dismissals

Supreme Court Establishes Judgment Bar Application in FTCA Dismissals

Date: Feb 26, 2021
Supreme Court Establishes Judgment Bar Application in FTCA Dismissals Introduction In the landmark case of Douglas Brownback, et al. v. James King, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed...
State Legislature's Sole Authority in Election Rulemaking: Analysis of Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid

State Legislature's Sole Authority in Election Rulemaking: Analysis of Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid

Date: Feb 23, 2021
State Legislature's Sole Authority in Election Rulemaking: Analysis of Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Degraffenreid Introduction Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Veronica Degraffenreid, et...
Supreme Court Upholds California's COVID-19 Restrictions on Indoor Worship with Limited Injunction

Supreme Court Upholds California's COVID-19 Restrictions on Indoor Worship with Limited Injunction

Date: Feb 6, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds California's COVID-19 Restrictions on Indoor Worship with Limited Injunction Introduction The case of South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al. v. Gavin Newsom, Governor of...
Judicial Review of Reopening Decisions Under the Railroad Retirement Act: Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board

Judicial Review of Reopening Decisions Under the Railroad Retirement Act: Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board

Date: Feb 4, 2021
Judicial Review of Reopening Decisions Under the Railroad Retirement Act: Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board Introduction The case of Manfredo M. Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board...
Supreme Court Affirms Narrow Interpretation of FSIA's Expropriation Exception: Sovereign Immunity Preserved for Domestic Property Seizures

Supreme Court Affirms Narrow Interpretation of FSIA's Expropriation Exception: Sovereign Immunity Preserved for Domestic Property Seizures

Date: Feb 4, 2021
Supreme Court Affirms Narrow Interpretation of FSIA's Expropriation Exception: Sovereign Immunity Preserved for Domestic Property Seizures Introduction In the landmark case of Federal Republic of...
Protecting the Mentally Ill: Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Removal Proceedings

Protecting the Mentally Ill: Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Removal Proceedings

Date: Jan 23, 2021
Protecting the Mentally Ill: Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Removal Proceedings Introduction The case of Alex Francois v. Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General presents a critical...
Federal Death Penalty Execution Procedures: Insights from United States v. Dustin John Higgs

Federal Death Penalty Execution Procedures: Insights from United States v. Dustin John Higgs

Date: Jan 16, 2021
Federal Death Penalty Execution Procedures: Insights from United States v. Dustin John Higgs Introduction United States v. Dustin John Higgs (141 S. Ct. 645, 2021) is a pivotal case examined by the...
Retention of Estate Property Post-Bankruptcy Filing Permitted Under §362(a)(3): City of Chicago v. Fulton

Retention of Estate Property Post-Bankruptcy Filing Permitted Under §362(a)(3): City of Chicago v. Fulton

Date: Jan 15, 2021
Retention of Estate Property Post-Bankruptcy Filing Permitted Under §362(a)(3): City of Chicago v. Fulton Introduction In City of Chicago, Illinois v. Robbin L. Fulton et al., 141 S. Ct. 585 (2021),...
Supreme Court Upholds FDA's In-Person Mifepristone Dispensing Requirements Amid COVID-19

Supreme Court Upholds FDA's In-Person Mifepristone Dispensing Requirements Amid COVID-19

Date: Jan 13, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds FDA's In-Person Mifepristone Dispensing Requirements Amid COVID-19 Introduction In the case of Food and Drug Administration, et al. v. American College of Obstetricians and...
Judicial Bar on Premature Challenges to Census Apportionment: Trump v. New York

Judicial Bar on Premature Challenges to Census Apportionment: Trump v. New York

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Judicial Bar on Premature Challenges to Census Apportionment: Trump v. New York Introduction The case of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Appellants versus New York, et al....
Danville Christian Academy v. Beshear: Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Neutral Laws to Religious Institutions

Danville Christian Academy v. Beshear: Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Neutral Laws to Religious Institutions

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Danville Christian Academy v. Beshear: Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Neutral Laws to Religious Institutions Introduction In the landmark case Danville Christian Academy, Inc., et al v. Andy...
Delivery Credit for Evaporated Water Under the Pecos River Compact: TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO

Delivery Credit for Evaporated Water Under the Pecos River Compact: TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO

Date: Dec 15, 2020
Delivery Credit for Evaporated Water Under the Pecos River Compact: TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO Introduction TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO, 141 S. Ct. 509 (2020), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of the United States...
Kayer v. Arizona Department of Corrections: Supreme Court Upholds AEDPA Deference

Kayer v. Arizona Department of Corrections: Supreme Court Upholds AEDPA Deference

Date: Dec 15, 2020
Kayer v. Arizona Department of Corrections: Supreme Court Upholds AEDPA Deference Introduction The Supreme Court case David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. George Russell Kayer...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert