Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Unanimous Verdicts Required in All State Criminal Trials: An Analysis of Ramos v. Louisiana

Unanimous Verdicts Required in All State Criminal Trials: An Analysis of Ramos v. Louisiana

Date: Apr 21, 2020
Unanimous Verdicts Required in All State Criminal Trials: An Analysis of Ramos v. Louisiana Introduction Ramos v. Louisiana, decided on April 20, 2020, represents a landmark decision by the United...
Absentee Ballot Deadlines and Election Integrity: An Analysis of Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee

Absentee Ballot Deadlines and Election Integrity: An Analysis of Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee

Date: Apr 7, 2020
Absentee Ballot Deadlines and Election Integrity: An Analysis of Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee Introduction Republican National Committee v. Democratic National...
Kansas v. Glo: Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Standards in License Revocation Cases

Kansas v. Glo: Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Standards in License Revocation Cases

Date: Apr 7, 2020
Kansas v. Glo: Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Standards in License Revocation Cases Introduction Kansas v. Glo, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (2020), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
EEOC’s Investigative Authority Post-Right to Sue: Analyzing VF Jeanswear LP v. EEOC

EEOC’s Investigative Authority Post-Right to Sue: Analyzing VF Jeanswear LP v. EEOC

Date: Apr 7, 2020
EEOC’s Investigative Authority Post-Right to Sue: Analyzing VF Jeanswear LP v. EEOC Introduction The case of VF Jeanswear LP v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), docket number 19-446,...
Expanding Age Discrimination Protections in Federal Employment: Insights from Babb v. Wilkie

Expanding Age Discrimination Protections in Federal Employment: Insights from Babb v. Wilkie

Date: Apr 7, 2020
Expanding Age Discrimination Protections in Federal Employment: Insights from Babb v. Wilkie Introduction Babb v. Wilkie (140 S. Ct. 1168) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.: Establishing a Warranty of Safety in Maritime Charter Parties

CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.: Establishing a Warranty of Safety in Maritime Charter Parties

Date: Mar 31, 2020
CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.: Establishing a Warranty of Safety in Maritime Charter Parties Introduction In CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., 140 S. Ct. 1081...
Allen v. Cooper: States' Sovereign Immunity in Copyright Infringement Suits

Allen v. Cooper: States' Sovereign Immunity in Copyright Infringement Suits

Date: Mar 24, 2020
Allen v. Cooper: States' Sovereign Immunity in Copyright Infringement Suits Introduction Allen v. Cooper, 140 S. Ct. 994 (2020), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Strict 'But-For' Causation Standard Affirmed for §1981 Claims in Comcast Corp. v. NAAMAom

Strict 'But-For' Causation Standard Affirmed for §1981 Claims in Comcast Corp. v. NAAMAom

Date: Mar 24, 2020
Strict 'But-For' Causation Standard Affirmed for §1981 Claims in Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African-American Owned Media Introduction Comcast Corp. v. National Association of...
Kahler v. Kansas: Upholding Cognitive-Only Insanity Defense under Due Process

Kahler v. Kansas: Upholding Cognitive-Only Insanity Defense under Due Process

Date: Mar 24, 2020
Kahler v. Kansas: Upholding Cognitive-Only Insanity Defense under Due Process Introduction Kahler v. Kansas, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (2020), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr: Expanding the Scope of Judicial Review in Immigration Law

Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr: Expanding the Scope of Judicial Review in Immigration Law

Date: Mar 24, 2020
Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr: Expanding the Scope of Judicial Review in Immigration Law Introduction Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr (140 S. Ct. 1062, 2020) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case...
Non-Preemption of State Fraud Laws in IRCA Context: Analysis of Kansas v. Garcia

Non-Preemption of State Fraud Laws in IRCA Context: Analysis of Kansas v. Garcia

Date: Mar 4, 2020
Non-Preemption of State Fraud Laws in IRCA Context: Analysis of Kansas v. Garcia Introduction Kansas v. Garcia, 140 S. Ct. 791 (2020), is a significant Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Preserving Sentencing Challenges: Insights from Holguin-Hernandez v. United States

Preserving Sentencing Challenges: Insights from Holguin-Hernandez v. United States

Date: Feb 27, 2020
Preserving Sentencing Challenges: Insights from Holguin-Hernandez v. United States Introduction Overview of the Case Holguin-Hernandez v. United States (140 S. Ct. 762, 2020) is a landmark decision...
Actual Knowledge Requirement Under ERISA §1113(2): Supreme Court Affirms Need for Actual Awareness

Actual Knowledge Requirement Under ERISA §1113(2): Supreme Court Affirms Need for Actual Awareness

Date: Feb 27, 2020
Actual Knowledge Requirement Under ERISA §1113(2): Supreme Court Affirms Need for Actual Awareness Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Intel Corp. Investment Policy Comm. v. Sulyma,...
Shular v. United States: No Generic Offense Matching Required for ACCA's 'Serious Drug Offense' Enhancement

Shular v. United States: No Generic Offense Matching Required for ACCA's 'Serious Drug Offense' Enhancement

Date: Feb 27, 2020
Shular v. United States: No Generic Offense Matching Required for ACCA's 'Serious Drug Offense' Enhancement Introduction Shular v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 779 (2020), is a landmark decision by the...
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard for 'Habitual Residence' Established in Monasky v. Taglieri

Totality-of-Circumstances Standard for 'Habitual Residence' Established in Monasky v. Taglieri

Date: Feb 26, 2020
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard for 'Habitual Residence' Established in Monasky v. Taglieri Introduction Monasky v. Taglieri, 140 S. Ct. 719 (2020), is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme...
Limiting Federal Common Law in Corporate Tax Refund Distribution: Rodriguez v. FDIC

Limiting Federal Common Law in Corporate Tax Refund Distribution: Rodriguez v. FDIC

Date: Feb 26, 2020
Limiting Federal Common Law in Corporate Tax Refund Distribution: Rodriguez v. FDIC Introduction The Supreme Court case Rodriguez v. FDIC, 140 S. Ct. 713 (2020), addresses the contentious issue of...
Supreme Court Upholds Non-Extendibility of Bivens in Cross-Border Shooting Cases

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Extendibility of Bivens in Cross-Border Shooting Cases

Date: Feb 26, 2020
Supreme Court Upholds Non-Extendibility of Bivens in Cross-Border Shooting Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Hernández v. Mesa, 140 S. Ct. 735 (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the...
Appellate Reweighing in Collateral Review: The McKinney v. Arizona Precedent

Appellate Reweighing in Collateral Review: The McKinney v. Arizona Precedent

Date: Feb 26, 2020
Appellate Reweighing in Collateral Review: The McKinney v. Arizona Precedent Introduction McKinney v. Arizona, 140 S. Ct. 702 (2020), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Reevaluating Chevron Deference and Brand X: Insights from Justice Thomas’s Dissent in HOWARD L. BALDWIN, ET UX. v. UNITED STATES

Reevaluating Chevron Deference and Brand X: Insights from Justice Thomas’s Dissent in HOWARD L. BALDWIN, ET UX. v. UNITED STATES

Date: Feb 25, 2020
Reevaluating Chevron Deference and Brand X: Insights from Justice Thomas’s Dissent in Howard L. Baldwin, Et UX. v. United States Introduction In the landmark case Howard L. Baldwin, Et UX. v. United...
Denial of Certiorari in Rodney Reed v. Texas: Implications for Brady Violations and Actual Innocence Claims

Denial of Certiorari in Rodney Reed v. Texas: Implications for Brady Violations and Actual Innocence Claims

Date: Feb 25, 2020
Denial of Certiorari in Rodney Reed v. Texas: Implications for Brady Violations and Actual Innocence Claims Introduction The case of Rodney Reed v. Texas (140 S. Ct. 686) presents a complex interplay...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert