Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Jurisdictional Voidance of State Court Orders Post-Removal: Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Ace Introduction The case Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Ace, 140 S. Ct. 696 (2020),...
Supreme Court's Stance on Emergency Stay Applications: Analyzing Chad Wolf v. Cook County Introduction The case of Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. v. Cook County, Illinois,...
Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander: Defining Fiduciary Duties under ERISA in the Context of Insider Information Introduction Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander, 140 S. Ct. 592...
Finality and Appealability of Stay-Relief Motions in Bankruptcy: Insights from Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC Introduction Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582...
Application of the American Rule under 35 U.S.C. § 145 in Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. Introduction Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. (140 S. Ct. 365) is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court...
Rotkiske v. Klemm: Supreme Court Establishes Start of FDCPA Statute of Limitations Introduction Rotkiske v. Klemm (140 S. Ct. 355, 2019) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Freedom of Speech in Defamation Cases: Insights from National Review, Inc. v. Michael E. Mann Introduction The case of National Review, Inc. v. Michael E. Mann addresses pivotal issues surrounding...
Thompson v. Hebdon: Reevaluation of Alaska's Campaign Contribution Limits under First Amendment Standards Introduction Thompson v. Hebdon is a significant case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on...
Safeguarding Asylum Procedures: A Dissent in Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant Introduction The case of William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. brought...
Reevaluating Brady Obligations and Certificate of Appealability Standards: Insights from McGee v. McFadden Introduction Shannon D. McGee, Sr. v. Joseph McFadden, Warden is a pivotal case that...
Warrantless Blood Alcohol Tests Permitted for Unconscious Drivers Under Exigent Circumstances Introduction Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 139 S. Ct. 2525 (2019), represents a significant Supreme Court...
Rucho v. Common Cause: Federal Courts Decline to Rule on Partisan Gerrymandering as a Non-Justiciable Political Question Introduction Rucho v. Common Cause, 139 S. Ct. 2484 (2019), is a landmark...
Department of Commerce v. New York: Upholding Congressional Authority and Ensuring Reasoned Administrative Action in the Census Introduction Department of Commerce v. New York (139 S. Ct. 2551, 2019)...
Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Supervised Release Revocations and the Right to Jury Trial: United States v. Haymond Introduction United States v. Haymond (139 S. Ct. 2369, 2019) addresses the...
Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas: Commerce Clause Supersedes 21st Amendment Residency Restrictions Introduction In Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas, 139...
Kisor v. Wilkie: Refining Auer Deference in Administrative Law Introduction In Kisor v. Wilkie (139 S. Ct. 2400, 2019), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue in administrative...
Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media: Supreme Court Reinforces Broad Interpretation of FOIA's Exemption 4 Introduction In Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, the United States...
Iancu v. Brunetti: Striking Down the "Immoral or Scandalous" Trademark Bar Introduction Iancu v. Brunetti, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 24, 2019, marks a significant moment in trademark...
Limitation of Remedies: Punitive Damages Not Available in Unseaworthiness Claims – Dutra Group v. Batterton 1. Introduction Dutra Group v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 2275 (2019), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme...
United States v. Da: SCOTUS Declares 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B) Unconstitutionally Vague Introduction In United States v. Da, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C....