Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission: Establishing Limits on State Taxation of Multistate Corporations

ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission: Establishing Limits on State Taxation of Multistate Corporations

Date: Jun 30, 1982
ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission: Establishing Limits on State Taxation of Multistate Corporations Introduction The Supreme Court case ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission, decided on...
Williams v. United States: Narrow Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 in Addressing Check Kiting

Williams v. United States: Narrow Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 in Addressing Check Kiting

Date: Jun 30, 1982
Williams v. United States: Narrow Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 in Addressing Check Kiting Introduction Williams v. United States, 458 U.S. 279 (1982), is a landmark decision by the United...
General Building Contractors Association, Inc. v. Pennsylvania: Supreme Court Upholds Intentional Discrimination Requirement under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Limits Vicarious Liability

General Building Contractors Association, Inc. v. Pennsylvania: Supreme Court Upholds Intentional Discrimination Requirement under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Limits Vicarious Liability

Date: Jun 30, 1982
General Building Contractors Association, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Supreme Court Decision: Upholding Intentional Discrimination Requirement under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Limiting Vicarious Liability...
Unitary-Business Principle Reinforced: Analysis of F.W. Woolworth Co. v. New Mexico Taxation

Unitary-Business Principle Reinforced: Analysis of F.W. Woolworth Co. v. New Mexico Taxation

Date: Jun 30, 1982
Unitary-Business Principle Reinforced: Analysis of F.W. Woolworth Co. v. New Mexico Taxation Introduction The Supreme Court case F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Department of New Mexico...
Peer Review Committees in Insurance Not Exempt Under McCarran-Ferguson: Union Labor Life Ins. Co. v. Pireno

Peer Review Committees in Insurance Not Exempt Under McCarran-Ferguson: Union Labor Life Ins. Co. v. Pireno

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Peer Review Committees in Insurance Not Exempt Under McCarran-Ferguson: Union Labor Life Ins. Co. v. Pireno Introduction Union Labor Life Insurance Co. v. Pireno (458 U.S. 119) is a landmark decision...
Defining Free Appropriate Public Education: Rowley v. Board of Education

Defining Free Appropriate Public Education: Rowley v. Board of Education

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Defining Free Appropriate Public Education: Rowley v. Board of Education Introduction Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District, Westchester County, et al. v. Rowley, by her...
Supremacy Clause and Higher Education: Analysis of TOLL v. MORENO

Supremacy Clause and Higher Education: Analysis of TOLL v. MORENO

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Supremacy Clause and Higher Education: Analysis of TOLL v. MORENO Introduction Toll, President, University of Maryland, et al. v. Moreno et al. (458 U.S. 1) is a significant United States Supreme...
Federal Preemption of State Due-on-Sale Restrictions in Savings and Loan Associations

Federal Preemption of State Due-on-Sale Restrictions in Savings and Loan Associations

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Federal Preemption of State Due-on-Sale Restrictions in Savings and Loan Associations Introduction In the landmark case of Fidelity Federal Savings Loan Association et al. v. De La Cuesta et al., 458...
Prosecutorial Vindictiveness Not Subject to Interlocutory Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Prosecutorial Vindictiveness Not Subject to Interlocutory Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Prosecutorial Vindictiveness Not Subject to Interlocutory Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 Introduction UNITED STATES v. HOLLYWOOD MOTOR CAR CO., INC., et al., 458 U.S. 263 (1982), represents a pivotal...
Bankruptcy Courts Must Comply with Article III Judicial Power Requirements

Bankruptcy Courts Must Comply with Article III Judicial Power Requirements

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Bankruptcy Courts Must Comply with Article III Judicial Power Requirements Introduction Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co. et al., 458 U.S. 50 (1982), is a landmark decision...
Tolling Backpay Liability through Unconditional Job Offers in Employment Discrimination Cases

Tolling Backpay Liability through Unconditional Job Offers in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Jun 29, 1982
Tolling Backpay Liability through Unconditional Job Offers in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (458 U.S. 219, 1982) is a seminal...
Texas Resignation Candidacy Provisions Upheld: Insights from Clements v. Fashing

Texas Resignation Candidacy Provisions Upheld: Insights from Clements v. Fashing

Date: Jun 26, 1982
Texas Resignation Candidacy Provisions Upheld: Insights from Clements v. Fashing Case: Clements, Governor of Texas, et al. v. Fashing et al. Court: United States Supreme Court Date: June 25, 1982...
RENDELL-BAKER v. KOHN: Clarifying State Action in §1983 Claims Against Publicly Funded Private Institutions

RENDELL-BAKER v. KOHN: Clarifying State Action in §1983 Claims Against Publicly Funded Private Institutions

Date: Jun 26, 1982
RENDELL-BAKER v. KOHN: Clarifying State Action in §1983 Claims Against Publicly Funded Private Institutions Introduction The case of RENDELL-BAKER ET AL. v. KOHN ET AL. (457 U.S. 830) addressed a...
State Action and Procedural Safeguards in Medicaid Transfers: An Analysis of Blum v. Yaretsky (1982)

State Action and Procedural Safeguards in Medicaid Transfers: An Analysis of Blum v. Yaretsky (1982)

Date: Jun 26, 1982
State Action and Procedural Safeguards in Medicaid Transfers: An Analysis of Blum v. Yaretsky (1982) Introduction Blum, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al. v....
Clarifying State Action and Color of Law in § 1983: Analysis of Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.

Clarifying State Action and Color of Law in § 1983: Analysis of Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.

Date: Jun 26, 1982
Clarifying State Action and Color of Law in § 1983: Analysis of Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. Introduction LUGAR v. EDMONDSON OIL CO., INC., ET AL. is a landmark 1982 decision by the United States...
Pico v. Board of Education: Defining First Amendment Limits on School Library Censorship

Pico v. Board of Education: Defining First Amendment Limits on School Library Censorship

Date: Jun 26, 1982
Pico v. Board of Education: Defining First Amendment Limits on School Library Censorship Introduction Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 et al. v. Pico, et al. is a...
Presidential Absolute Immunity from Civil Damages: NIXON v. FITZGERALD

Presidential Absolute Immunity from Civil Damages: NIXON v. FITZGERALD

Date: Jun 25, 1982
Presidential Absolute Immunity from Civil Damages: NIXON v. FITZGERALD Introduction Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed...
Qualified vs. Absolute Immunity for Presidential Aides: Insights from Harlow v. Fitzgerald

Qualified vs. Absolute Immunity for Presidential Aides: Insights from Harlow v. Fitzgerald

Date: Jun 25, 1982
Qualified vs. Absolute Immunity for Presidential Aides: Insights from Harlow v. Fitzgerald Introduction Harlow et al. v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), is a landmark case decided by the United...
Jacksonville Bulk Terminals v. International Longshoremen's Association: Reinforcing the Scope of the Norris-La Guardia Act

Jacksonville Bulk Terminals v. International Longshoremen's Association: Reinforcing the Scope of the Norris-La Guardia Act

Date: Jun 25, 1982
Jacksonville Bulk Terminals v. International Longshoremen's Association: Reinforcing the Scope of the Norris-La Guardia Act Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Jacksonville Bulk...
Taylor v. Alabama: Reinforcing the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Illegal Arrest

Taylor v. Alabama: Reinforcing the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Illegal Arrest

Date: Jun 24, 1982
Taylor v. Alabama: Reinforcing the Exclusionary Rule in Cases of Illegal Arrest Introduction Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 (1982), is a significant United States Supreme Court case that addresses...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert