Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Commerce Clause Preemption in Corporate Takeovers: Insights from EDGAR v. MITE CORP.

Commerce Clause Preemption in Corporate Takeovers: Insights from EDGAR v. MITE CORP.

Date: Jun 24, 1982
Commerce Clause Preemption in Corporate Takeovers: Insights from EDGAR v. MITE CORP. Introduction EDGAR v. MITE CORP. ET AL. (457 U.S. 624, 1982) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Foremost Insurance Co. v. Richardson: Broadening Admiralty Jurisdiction to Non-Commercial Pleasure Vessels

Foremost Insurance Co. v. Richardson: Broadening Admiralty Jurisdiction to Non-Commercial Pleasure Vessels

Date: Jun 24, 1982
Foremost Insurance Co. v. Richardson: Broadening Admiralty Jurisdiction to Non-Commercial Pleasure Vessels Introduction Foremost Insurance Co. et al. v. Richardson et al., 457 U.S. 668 (1982), is a...
Mandatory Courtroom Closures During Minor Victim Testimony Violates the First Amendment

Mandatory Courtroom Closures During Minor Victim Testimony Violates the First Amendment

Date: Jun 24, 1982
Mandatory Courtroom Closures During Minor Victim Testimony Violates the First Amendment Introduction In the landmark case GLOBE NEWSPAPER CO. v. SUPERIOR COURT for the County of Norfolk, 457 U.S. 596...
Exhaustion Not a Prerequisite in 42 U.S.C. §1983 Actions: Insights from Patsy v. Board of Regents of Florida

Exhaustion Not a Prerequisite in 42 U.S.C. §1983 Actions: Insights from Patsy v. Board of Regents of Florida

Date: Jun 22, 1982
Exhaustion Not a Prerequisite in 42 U.S.C. §1983 Actions: Insights from Patsy v. Board of Regents of Florida Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of...
Broadening Standing under §4 of the Clayton Act: Insights from Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCready

Broadening Standing under §4 of the Clayton Act: Insights from Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCready

Date: Jun 22, 1982
Broadening Standing under §4 of the Clayton Act: Insights from Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCready Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCready (457...
Supreme Court Upholds §1903(f) Medicaid Eligibility and its Alignment with Equal Protection in Schweiker v. Hogan

Supreme Court Upholds §1903(f) Medicaid Eligibility and its Alignment with Equal Protection in Schweiker v. Hogan

Date: Jun 22, 1982
Supreme Court Upholds §1903(f) Medicaid Eligibility and its Alignment with Equal Protection in Schweiker v. Hogan Introduction Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Hogan et al., 457...
Federal Court Abstention in State Bar Disciplinary Proceedings: Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Association

Federal Court Abstention in State Bar Disciplinary Proceedings: Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Association

Date: Jun 22, 1982
Federal Court Abstention in State Bar Disciplinary Proceedings: Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Association Introduction Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar...
Retroactive Application of Fourth Amendment Rulings: UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON (457 U.S. 537)

Retroactive Application of Fourth Amendment Rulings: UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON (457 U.S. 537)

Date: Jun 22, 1982
Retroactive Application of Fourth Amendment Rulings: UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON (457 U.S. 537) Introduction UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, delivered...
Rejection of Bottom-Line Defense in Disparate Impact Claims: Connecticut v. Teal

Rejection of Bottom-Line Defense in Disparate Impact Claims: Connecticut v. Teal

Date: Jun 22, 1982
Rejection of Bottom-Line Defense in Disparate Impact Claims: Connecticut v. Teal Introduction Connecticut et al. v. Teal et al., 457 U.S. 440 (1982), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Maximum Fee Agreements Among Physicians Ruled Per Se Illegal Under Sherman Act

Maximum Fee Agreements Among Physicians Ruled Per Se Illegal Under Sherman Act

Date: Jun 19, 1982
Maximum Fee Agreements Among Physicians Ruled Per Se Illegal Under Sherman Act Introduction Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society et al. (457 U.S. 332) is a landmark decision by the United...
Tax Injunction Act Limits on Federal Court Jurisdiction in Religious Tax Challenges

Tax Injunction Act Limits on Federal Court Jurisdiction in Religious Tax Challenges

Date: Jun 19, 1982
Tax Injunction Act Limits on Federal Court Jurisdiction in Religious Tax Challenges Introduction In the landmark case of California et al. v. Grace Brethren Church et al. (457 U.S. 393, 1982), the...
Presumption of Prosecutorial Vindictiveness Rejected in UNITED STATES v. GOODWIN

Presumption of Prosecutorial Vindictiveness Rejected in UNITED STATES v. GOODWIN

Date: Jun 19, 1982
Presumption of Prosecutorial Vindictiveness Rejected in UNITED STATES v. GOODWIN Introduction UNITED STATES v. GOODWIN (457 U.S. 368) is a pivotal Supreme Court case decided on June 18, 1982. The...
Supreme Court Vacates Court of Appeals' Decision in Mills v. Rogers: Impact of Massachusetts SJC's Roe Ruling on Involuntary Medication Rights

Supreme Court Vacates Court of Appeals' Decision in Mills v. Rogers: Impact of Massachusetts SJC's Roe Ruling on Involuntary Medication Rights

Date: Jun 19, 1982
Supreme Court Vacates Court of Appeals' Decision in Mills v. Rogers: Impact of Massachusetts SJC's Roe Ruling on Involuntary Medication Rights Introduction The case of Mills et al. v. Rogers et al.,...
Protected Liberty Interests for Involuntarily Committed Individuals Under the Fourteenth Amendment

Protected Liberty Interests for Involuntarily Committed Individuals Under the Fourteenth Amendment

Date: Jun 19, 1982
Protected Liberty Interests for Involuntarily Committed Individuals Under the Fourteenth Amendment Introduction The case of YOUNGBERG, SUPERINTENDENT, PENNHURST STATE SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL, ET AL. v....
Federal Primacy in Ownership of Accreted Oceanfront Lands: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Title

Federal Primacy in Ownership of Accreted Oceanfront Lands: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Title

Date: Jun 19, 1982
Federal Primacy in Ownership of Accreted Oceanfront Lands: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Federal Title Introduction California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. United States, 457 U.S. 273 (1982),...
Plyler v. Doe: Affirming the Right to Public Education for Undocumented Children under the Equal Protection Clause

Plyler v. Doe: Affirming the Right to Public Education for Undocumented Children under the Equal Protection Clause

Date: Jun 16, 1982
Plyler v. Doe: Affirming the Right to Public Education for Undocumented Children under the Equal Protection Clause Introduction Plyler v. Doe (457 U.S. 202, 1982) is a landmark United States Supreme...
State Court Authority under Voting Rights Act §5: An Analysis of Hathorn v. Lovorn

State Court Authority under Voting Rights Act §5: An Analysis of Hathorn v. Lovorn

Date: Jun 16, 1982
State Court Authority under Voting Rights Act §5: An Analysis of Hathorn v. Lovorn Introduction Hathorn v. Lovorn, 457 U.S. 255 (1982) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that examines the interplay...
Taxation of Conditional Gifts: Insights from Diedrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Taxation of Conditional Gifts: Insights from Diedrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Jun 16, 1982
Taxation of Conditional Gifts: Insights from Diedrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction The Supreme Court case Diedrich et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 457 U.S. 191 (1982),...
Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano et al.: Defining Corporate Nationality Under International Treaties

Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano et al.: Defining Corporate Nationality Under International Treaties

Date: Jun 16, 1982
Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano et al.: Defining Corporate Nationality Under International Treaties Introduction Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano et al. is a landmark 1982 decision...
Reaffirmation of Original Jurisdiction in Interstate Tax Disputes under 28 U.S.C. §1251(a)

Reaffirmation of Original Jurisdiction in Interstate Tax Disputes under 28 U.S.C. §1251(a)

Date: Jun 15, 1982
Reaffirmation of Original Jurisdiction in Interstate Tax Disputes under 28 U.S.C. §1251(a) Introduction CALIFORNIA v. TEXAS et al. (457 U.S. 164, 1982) is a significant United States Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert