Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Res Judicata in §1983 Actions: Analysis of Castor v. Brundage

Res Judicata in §1983 Actions: Analysis of Castor v. Brundage

Date: Oct 13, 1982
Res Judicata in §1983 Actions: Analysis of Castor v. Brundage Introduction Castor v. Brundage is a pivotal case decided by the United States Supreme Court on October 12, 1982. The plaintiffs, William...
Rule 19(b) and Necessary Parties: Analysis of Carpenters v. Eldredge

Rule 19(b) and Necessary Parties: Analysis of Carpenters v. Eldredge

Date: Oct 13, 1982
Rule 19(b) and Necessary Parties: Analysis of Carpenters v. Eldredge Introduction The case of Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and Training Board...
Unconstitutional Application of the Death Penalty: Rayfield Newlon v. State of Missouri

Unconstitutional Application of the Death Penalty: Rayfield Newlon v. State of Missouri

Date: Oct 5, 1982
Unconstitutional Application of the Death Penalty: Rayfield Newlon v. State of Missouri Introduction The case of Rayfield Newlon v. State of Missouri (459 U.S. 884) presents a pivotal moment in the...
Groundwater Regulation Under the Commerce Clause: A Comprehensive Analysis of NEBRASKA v. SPORHASE (1982)

Groundwater Regulation Under the Commerce Clause: A Comprehensive Analysis of NEBRASKA v. SPORHASE (1982)

Date: Jul 3, 1982
Groundwater Regulation Under the Commerce Clause: A Comprehensive Analysis of NEBRASKA v. SPORHASE (1982) Introduction The case of Sporhase et al. v. Nebraska Ex Rel. Douglas, Attorney General, 458...
Judicial Deference to School Board Regulations: An Analysis of Rogers Board v. McCluskey

Judicial Deference to School Board Regulations: An Analysis of Rogers Board v. McCluskey

Date: Jul 3, 1982
Judicial Deference to School Board Regulations: An Analysis of Rogers Board of Education of Rogers, Arkansas, et al. v. McCluskey, by his Next Friend, McCluskey (458 U.S. 966, 1982) Introduction The...
Federal Preemption of State Taxation on Tribal Educational Enterprises: Insights from Ramah Navajo School Board v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico

Federal Preemption of State Taxation on Tribal Educational Enterprises: Insights from Ramah Navajo School Board v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico

Date: Jul 3, 1982
Federal Preemption of State Taxation on Tribal Educational Enterprises: Insights from Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc., et al. v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico Introduction Ramah Navajo School...
First Amendment Protections in Collective Boycotts: A Comprehensive Analysis of NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.

First Amendment Protections in Collective Boycotts: A Comprehensive Analysis of NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.

Date: Jul 3, 1982
First Amendment Protections in Collective Boycotts: A Comprehensive Analysis of NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. Introduction National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) et al....
Balancing Immigration Enforcement and Defendant Rights: Insights from UNITED STATES v. VALENZUELA-BERNAL

Balancing Immigration Enforcement and Defendant Rights: Insights from UNITED STATES v. VALENZUELA-BERNAL

Date: Jul 3, 1982
Balancing Immigration Enforcement and Defendant Rights: Insights from UNITED STATES v. VALENZUELA-BERNAL Introduction UNITED STATES v. VALENZUELA-BERNAL, 458 U.S. 858 (1982), is a seminal Supreme...
New York v. Ferber: Upholding the State's Authority to Ban Child Pornography

New York v. Ferber: Upholding the State's Authority to Ban Child Pornography

Date: Jul 3, 1982
New York v. Ferber: Upholding the State's Authority to Ban Child Pornography Introduction New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982), addresses the constitutionality of a New York statute prohibiting...
Enmund v. Florida: Limiting the Death Penalty to Direct Killers under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

Enmund v. Florida: Limiting the Death Penalty to Direct Killers under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

Date: Jul 3, 1982
Enmund v. Florida: Limiting the Death Penalty to Direct Killers under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Introduction Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982), is a landmark decision by the United...
Parens Patriae Standing Affirmed: Puerto Rico v. Snapp Son, Inc.

Parens Patriae Standing Affirmed: Puerto Rico v. Snapp Son, Inc.

Date: Jul 2, 1982
Parens Patriae Standing Affirmed: Puerto Rico v. Snapp Son, Inc. Introduction The case of Alfred L. Snapp Son, Inc., et al. v. Puerto Rico ex rel. Barez addressed critical issues surrounding...
Rogers v. Lodge: Upholding the Right to Single-Member Districts in At-Large Electoral Systems

Rogers v. Lodge: Upholding the Right to Single-Member Districts in At-Large Electoral Systems

Date: Jul 2, 1982
Rogers v. Lodge: Upholding the Right to Single-Member Districts in At-Large Electoral Systems Introduction Rogers v. Lodge et al., 458 U.S. 613 (1982), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Eleventh Amendment Boundaries in Admiralty Property Seizure: Florida Dept. of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc.

Eleventh Amendment Boundaries in Admiralty Property Seizure: Florida Dept. of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc.

Date: Jul 2, 1982
Eleventh Amendment Boundaries in Admiralty Property Seizure: Florida Dept. of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc. Introduction Florida Department of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc., et al., 458 U.S. 670...
Preservation of State Distribution Regulations under Sherman Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Rice v. Norman Williams Co.

Preservation of State Distribution Regulations under Sherman Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Rice v. Norman Williams Co.

Date: Jul 2, 1982
Preservation of State Distribution Regulations under Sherman Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Rice v. Norman Williams Co. Introduction The Supreme Court case Rice, Director, Department of Alcoholic...
Single-Sex Admissions and Equal Protection: An In-Depth Analysis of Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan

Single-Sex Admissions and Equal Protection: An In-Depth Analysis of Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan

Date: Jul 2, 1982
Single-Sex Admissions and Equal Protection: An In-Depth Analysis of Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan Introduction Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan (1982) is a landmark U.S. Supreme...
Federal Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Excluded in State Child Custody Terminations: LEHMAN v. LYCOMING COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES Agency

Federal Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Excluded in State Child Custody Terminations: LEHMAN v. LYCOMING COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES Agency

Date: Jul 1, 1982
Federal Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Excluded in State Child Custody Terminations: LEHMAN v. LYCOMING COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES Agency Introduction In the landmark case Lehman on behalf of her...
Equal Protection and Racial Classification in School Busing: Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1 (1982)

Equal Protection and Racial Classification in School Busing: Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1 (1982)

Date: Jul 1, 1982
Equal Protection and Racial Classification in School Busing: Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1 (1982) Introduction Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1, 458 U.S. 457 (1982), is a...
Proposition I and the Fourteenth Amendment: An In-Depth Analysis of CRAWFORD v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (1982)

Proposition I and the Fourteenth Amendment: An In-Depth Analysis of CRAWFORD v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (1982)

Date: Jul 1, 1982
Proposition I and the Fourteenth Amendment: An In-Depth Analysis of CRAWFORD v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (1982) Introduction Crawford et al. v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles et al. (458...
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.: Permanent Physical Occupation Constitutes a Per Se Taking

Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.: Permanent Physical Occupation Constitutes a Per Se Taking

Date: Jul 1, 1982
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.: Permanent Physical Occupation Constitutes a Per Se Taking Introduction Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982), is a landmark...
Mandatory Imposition of Wage Penalty under 46 U.S.C. § 596: Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors

Mandatory Imposition of Wage Penalty under 46 U.S.C. § 596: Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors

Date: Jul 1, 1982
Mandatory Imposition of Wage Penalty under 46 U.S.C. § 596: Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors Introduction GRIFFIN v. OCEANIC CONTRACTORS, INC., 458 U.S. 564 (1982), is a pivotal case in maritime law...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert