Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Jurisdiction Over Bar Admission Waivers and Constitutional Challenges: Insights from District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman

Jurisdiction Over Bar Admission Waivers and Constitutional Challenges: Insights from District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman

Date: Mar 24, 1983
Jurisdiction Over Bar Admission Waivers and Constitutional Challenges: Insights from District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman (460 U.S. 462) Introduction In District of Columbia Court of...
Illegally Tainted Consent: Florida v. Royer and the Fourth Amendment

Illegally Tainted Consent: Florida v. Royer and the Fourth Amendment

Date: Mar 24, 1983
Illegally Tainted Consent: Florida v. Royer and the Fourth Amendment Introduction Florida v. Royer (460 U.S. 491, 1983) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delineates the boundaries of lawful...
Falls City Industries v. Vanco Beverage: Expanding the Scope of the Meeting-Competition Defense under the Robinson-Patman Act

Falls City Industries v. Vanco Beverage: Expanding the Scope of the Meeting-Competition Defense under the Robinson-Patman Act

Date: Mar 23, 1983
Falls City Industries v. Vanco Beverage: Expanding the Scope of the Meeting-Competition Defense under the Robinson-Patman Act Introduction Falls City Industries, Inc. v. Vanco Beverage, Inc., 460...
Broad Interpretation of "Drug" in Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Insights from UNITED STATES v. GENERIX DRUG CORP.

Broad Interpretation of "Drug" in Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Insights from UNITED STATES v. GENERIX DRUG CORP.

Date: Mar 23, 1983
Broad Interpretation of "Drug" in Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Insights from UNITED STATES v. GENERIX DRUG CORP. Introduction UNITED STATES v. GENERIX DRUG CORP. (460 U.S. 453), decided by...
Federal Supremacy in Wetlands Conservation: Irrevocability of Gubernatorial Consent in North Dakota v. United States

Federal Supremacy in Wetlands Conservation: Irrevocability of Gubernatorial Consent in North Dakota v. United States

Date: Mar 8, 1983
Federal Supremacy in Wetlands Conservation: Irrevocability of Gubernatorial Consent in North Dakota v. United States Introduction North Dakota v. United States, 460 U.S. 300 (1983), is a landmark...
BRISCOE v. LaHUE: Establishing the Scope of Witness Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

BRISCOE v. LaHUE: Establishing the Scope of Witness Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Mar 8, 1983
BRISCOE v. LaHUE: Establishing the Scope of Witness Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction BRISCOE v. LaHUE, 460 U.S. 325 (1983), is a seminal United States Supreme Court case that delves into...
Negligence Claims Against Government Agencies: Insights from Block v. Neal

Negligence Claims Against Government Agencies: Insights from Block v. Neal

Date: Mar 8, 1983
Negligence Claims Against Government Agencies: Insights from Block v. Neal Introduction In Block, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Neal, 460 U.S. 289 (1983), the United States Supreme Court...
Tax Benefit Rule Clarified: Insights from Hillsboro National Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Tax Benefit Rule Clarified: Insights from Hillsboro National Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Mar 8, 1983
Tax Benefit Rule Clarified: Insights from Hillsboro National Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction Hillsboro National Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is a landmark decision...
Commerce Clause Authority Affirmed: ADEA Extended to State and Local Governments in EEOC v. Wyoming

Commerce Clause Authority Affirmed: ADEA Extended to State and Local Governments in EEOC v. Wyoming

Date: Mar 3, 1983
Commerce Clause Authority Affirmed: ADEA Extended to State and Local Governments in EEOC v. Wyoming Introduction In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming et al. (460 U.S. 226, 1983), the...
Knotts v. United States: Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Beeper-Based Electronic Surveillance

Knotts v. United States: Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Beeper-Based Electronic Surveillance

Date: Mar 3, 1983
UNITED STATES v. KNOTTS: Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Beeper-Based Electronic Surveillance Introduction UNITED STATES v. KNOTTS, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), is a landmark Supreme Court case...
Supremacy of Federal Antitrust Law Over State Regulation: Insights from Maryland et al. v. United States et al.

Supremacy of Federal Antitrust Law Over State Regulation: Insights from Maryland et al. v. United States et al.

Date: Mar 1, 1983
Supremacy of Federal Antitrust Law Over State Regulation: Insights from Maryland et al. v. United States et al. Introduction Maryland Et Al. v. United States Et Al.; Tandy Corp. et al., 460 U.S. 1001...
Commerce Clause and Market Participation: Upholding Boston’s Workforce Preference in White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers

Commerce Clause and Market Participation: Upholding Boston’s Workforce Preference in White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers

Date: Mar 1, 1983
Commerce Clause and Market Participation: Upholding Boston’s Workforce Preference in White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers Introduction In the landmark case White, Mayor of Boston,...
Indemnity Rights Under FECA: Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States

Indemnity Rights Under FECA: Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States

Date: Feb 24, 1983
Indemnity Rights Under FECA: Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States Introduction The Supreme Court case Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States et al., 460 U.S. 190 (1983), addresses the complex...
Conclusive Presumptions on Intent: Irreparable Due Process Violation in Connecticut v. Johnson

Conclusive Presumptions on Intent: Irreparable Due Process Violation in Connecticut v. Johnson

Date: Feb 24, 1983
Conclusive Presumptions on Intent: Irreparable Due Process Violation in Connecticut v. Johnson Introduction Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73 (1983), is a landmark judgment by the United States...
Robinson-Patman Act Extends to State and Local Government Resales: Comprehensive Analysis of Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Association, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories

Robinson-Patman Act Extends to State and Local Government Resales: Comprehensive Analysis of Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Association, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories

Date: Feb 24, 1983
Robinson-Patman Act Extends to State and Local Government Resales Comprehensive Analysis of Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Association, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories Introduction The case of Jefferson...
Finality of Stay Orders and Arbitration Obligations in Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.

Finality of Stay Orders and Arbitration Obligations in Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.

Date: Feb 24, 1983
Finality of Stay Orders and Arbitration Obligations in Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. Introduction Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.,...
Federal Firearms Disabilities Persist Despite State Expunction: Analysis of DICKERSON v. NEW BANNER INSTITUTE

Federal Firearms Disabilities Persist Despite State Expunction: Analysis of DICKERSON v. NEW BANNER INSTITUTE

Date: Feb 24, 1983
Federal Firearms Disabilities Persist Despite State Expunction: Analysis of DICKERSON v. NEW BANNER INSTITUTE, INC. (460 U.S. 103) Introduction The Supreme Court case DICKERSON, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF...
CITY OF LOCKHART v. UNITED STATES: Defining the Scope of §5 Preclearance under the Voting Rights Act

CITY OF LOCKHART v. UNITED STATES: Defining the Scope of §5 Preclearance under the Voting Rights Act

Date: Feb 24, 1983
CITY OF LOCKHART v. UNITED STATES: Defining the Scope of §5 Preclearance under the Voting Rights Act Introduction City of Lockhart v. United States et al., 460 U.S. 125 (1983), presents a pivotal...
Exclusive Union Access to Internal Communication Systems Compliant with First Amendment and Equal Protection: Perry Education Association v. PLEA

Exclusive Union Access to Internal Communication Systems Compliant with First Amendment and Equal Protection: Perry Education Association v. PLEA

Date: Feb 24, 1983
Exclusive Union Access to Internal Communication Systems Compliant with First Amendment and Equal Protection: Perry Education Association v. PLEA Introduction Perry Education Association v. Perry...
Reevaluating Jury Instructions on Criminal Intent: Insights from Leroy Chasson v. Joseph Ponte

Reevaluating Jury Instructions on Criminal Intent: Insights from Leroy Chasson v. Joseph Ponte

Date: Feb 23, 1983
Reevaluating Jury Instructions on Criminal Intent: Insights from Leroy Chasson v. Joseph Ponte Introduction The case of Leroy Chasson v. Joseph Ponte (459 U.S. 1162) presents a critical examination...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert