Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act Does Not Mandate Differential FCC Review Standards for Public vs. Commercial Television Licenses

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act Does Not Mandate Differential FCC Review Standards for Public vs. Commercial Television Licenses

Date: Feb 23, 1983
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act Does Not Mandate Differential FCC Review Standards for Public vs. Commercial Television Licenses Introduction Community Television of Southern California v....
Protected Liberty Interests and Procedural Due Process in Administrative Segregation: Insights from Hewitt v. Helms

Protected Liberty Interests and Procedural Due Process in Administrative Segregation: Insights from Hewitt v. Helms

Date: Feb 23, 1983
Protected Liberty Interests and Procedural Due Process in Administrative Segregation: Insights from Hewitt v. Helms Introduction Hewitt et al. v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 (1983), is a pivotal Supreme...
Marshall v. Lonberger: Upholding the Presumption of Voluntary Guilty Pleas in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Marshall v. Lonberger: Upholding the Presumption of Voluntary Guilty Pleas in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Feb 23, 1983
Marshall v. Lonberger: Upholding the Presumption of Voluntary Guilty Pleas in Federal Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Marshall, Superintendent, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility v. Lonberger, 459...
South Dakota v. Neville: Refusal of Blood-Alcohol Test Admissible Under Fifth Amendment

South Dakota v. Neville: Refusal of Blood-Alcohol Test Admissible Under Fifth Amendment

Date: Feb 23, 1983
South Dakota v. Neville: Refusal of Blood-Alcohol Test Admissible Under Fifth Amendment Introduction South Dakota v. Neville (459 U.S. 553, 1983) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Strict Standing Requirements for Antitrust Claims Under Clayton Act §4: Analysis of Associated General Contractors v. Carpenters

Strict Standing Requirements for Antitrust Claims Under Clayton Act §4: Analysis of Associated General Contractors v. Carpenters

Date: Feb 23, 1983
Strict Standing Requirements for Antitrust Claims Under Clayton Act §4: Analysis of Associated General Contractors v. California State Council of Carpenters Introduction Associated General...
Balancing First Amendment Rights and Fair Trial Protections: KPNX Broadcasting Co. v. Arizona Superior Court

Balancing First Amendment Rights and Fair Trial Protections: KPNX Broadcasting Co. v. Arizona Superior Court

Date: Feb 12, 1983
Balancing First Amendment Rights and Fair Trial Protections: KPNX Broadcasting Co. v. Arizona Superior Court Introduction The case of KPNX Broadcasting Company v. The Arizona Superior Court, heard by...
Violation of Federal Tax Immunity under 31 U.S.C. § 742: Analysis of Memphis Bank Trust Co. v. Garner

Violation of Federal Tax Immunity under 31 U.S.C. § 742: Analysis of Memphis Bank Trust Co. v. Garner

Date: Jan 25, 1983
Violation of Federal Tax Immunity under 31 U.S.C. § 742: Analysis of Memphis Bank Trust Co. v. Garner Introduction Memphis Bank Trust Co. v. Garner, Shelby County Trustee, et al. (459 U.S. 392) is a...
Cumulative Remedies under Securities Laws and Proof Standards: Insights from Herman MacLean v. Huddleston

Cumulative Remedies under Securities Laws and Proof Standards: Insights from Herman MacLean v. Huddleston

Date: Jan 25, 1983
Cumulative Remedies under Securities Laws and Proof Standards: Insights from Herman MacLean v. Huddleston Introduction Herman MacLean v. Huddleston et al., 459 U.S. 375 (1983), is a landmark decision...
Affirming State Regulatory Authority Over Contractual Obligations: Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power Light Co. Explained

Affirming State Regulatory Authority Over Contractual Obligations: Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power Light Co. Explained

Date: Jan 25, 1983
Affirming State Regulatory Authority Over Contractual Obligations: Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power Light Co. Explained Introduction Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power Light Co.,...
Judicial Consistency in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Ernest Lee Miller v. Florida

Judicial Consistency in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Ernest Lee Miller v. Florida

Date: Jan 25, 1983
Judicial Consistency in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Ernest Lee Miller v. Florida Introduction The case of Ernest Lee Miller v. Florida (459 U.S. 1158) presents a pivotal examination of the...
Cumulative Sentencing Under Double Jeopardy: Insights from Missouri v. Hunter

Cumulative Sentencing Under Double Jeopardy: Insights from Missouri v. Hunter

Date: Jan 20, 1983
Cumulative Sentencing Under Double Jeopardy: Insights from Missouri v. Hunter Introduction Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359 (1983), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Discretionary Remedies in §8(e) Violations: Shepard v. NLRB Commentary

Discretionary Remedies in §8(e) Violations: Shepard v. NLRB Commentary

Date: Jan 19, 1983
Discretionary Remedies in §8(e) Violations: Shepard v. NLRB Commentary Introduction Shepard v. National Labor Relations Board (459 U.S. 344, 1983) is a pivotal Supreme Court case addressing the scope...
Remedial Standards in Capital Sentencing: Insights from William Lanay Harvard v. Florida

Remedial Standards in Capital Sentencing: Insights from William Lanay Harvard v. Florida

Date: Jan 18, 1983
Remedial Standards in Capital Sentencing: Insights from William Lanay Harvard v. Florida Introduction William Lanay Harvard v. Florida, 459 U.S. 1128 (1983), is a significant case in the realm of...
Use Immunity and Fifth Amendment in Civil Depositions: Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy

Use Immunity and Fifth Amendment in Civil Depositions: Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy

Date: Jan 12, 1983
Use Immunity and Fifth Amendment in Civil Depositions: Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy Introduction Case Citation: Pillsbury Co. et al. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248 (1983) Court: United States Supreme Court Date...
Apportionment of Damages in Union Breach of Duty: Bowen v. USPS

Apportionment of Damages in Union Breach of Duty: Bowen v. USPS

Date: Jan 12, 1983
Apportionment of Damages in Union Breach of Duty: BOWEN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ET AL. Introduction BOWEN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ET AL. (459 U.S. 212, 1983) is a landmark decision by...
Expansion of Maritime Employment Coverage under the LHWCA: Director v. Perini North River Associates

Expansion of Maritime Employment Coverage under the LHWCA: Director v. Perini North River Associates

Date: Jan 12, 1983
Expansion of Maritime Employment Coverage under the LHWCA: Director v. Perini North River Associates Introduction Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor...
Impact of Certificate of Probable Cause on Stay of Execution Petitions: Analysis of Brooks v. Estelle

Impact of Certificate of Probable Cause on Stay of Execution Petitions: Analysis of Brooks v. Estelle

Date: Jan 11, 1983
Impact of Certificate of Probable Cause on Stay of Execution Petitions: Analysis of Brooks v. Estelle Introduction Charlie Brooks, Jr. v. W.J. Estelle, Jr. is a significant 1983 decision by the...
Cross-Ownership and Antitrust Law: National Football League v. North American Soccer League

Cross-Ownership and Antitrust Law: National Football League v. North American Soccer League

Date: Jan 11, 1983
Cross-Ownership and Antitrust Law: National Football League v. North American Soccer League Introduction National Football League v. North American Soccer League (459 U.S. 1074) is a pivotal case in...
Independent Determination of Competency Standards: Insights from Robert Lee White v. W.J. Estelle, Jr.

Independent Determination of Competency Standards: Insights from Robert Lee White v. W.J. Estelle, Jr.

Date: Jan 11, 1983
Independent Determination of Competency Standards: Insights from Robert Lee White v. W.J. Estelle, Jr. Introduction Robert Lee White v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Texas Department of Corrections (459 U.S....
Imposition of Death Penalty Based Solely on Victim's Status: Insights from Robert Baker v. Missouri

Imposition of Death Penalty Based Solely on Victim's Status: Insights from Robert Baker v. Missouri

Date: Dec 24, 1982
Imposition of Death Penalty Based Solely on Victim's Status: Insights from Robert Baker v. Missouri Introduction Robert Baker v. Missouri, 459 U.S. 1183 (1982), presents a pivotal discussion on the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert