Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Standing Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1983)

Reaffirming Standing Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1983)

Date: Apr 21, 1983
Reaffirming Standing Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1983) Introduction City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95 (1983), is a landmark Supreme Court decision...
United States v. Grace et al.: Expanding First Amendment Protections on Public Sidewalks

United States v. Grace et al.: Expanding First Amendment Protections on Public Sidewalks

Date: Apr 21, 1983
United States v. Grace et al.: Expanding First Amendment Protections on Public Sidewalks Introduction United States et al. v. Grace et al. (461 U.S. 171) is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on...
State Authority in Nuclear Waste Regulation: PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC CO. v. STATE ENERGY RESOURCES COMMISSION

State Authority in Nuclear Waste Regulation: PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC CO. v. STATE ENERGY RESOURCES COMMISSION

Date: Apr 21, 1983
State Authority in Nuclear Waste Regulation: PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC CO. v. STATE ENERGY RESOURCES COMMISSION Introduction Pacific Gas Electric Co. et al. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and...
Smith v. Wade: Establishing the Availability of Punitive Damages Under Section 1983 for Reckless Indifference to Protected Rights

Smith v. Wade: Establishing the Availability of Punitive Damages Under Section 1983 for Reckless Indifference to Protected Rights

Date: Apr 21, 1983
Smith v. Wade: Establishing the Availability of Punitive Damages Under Section 1983 for Reckless Indifference to Protected Rights Introduction Smith v. Wade (461 U.S. 30) is a landmark decision by...
Limiting NEPA's Scope to Physical Environmental Impacts: Insights from Metropolitan Edison Co. v. PANE

Limiting NEPA's Scope to Physical Environmental Impacts: Insights from Metropolitan Edison Co. v. PANE

Date: Apr 20, 1983
Limiting NEPA's Scope to Physical Environmental Impacts: Insights from Metropolitan Edison Co. v. PANE Introduction Metropolitan Edison Co. et al. v. People Against Nuclear Energy et al., 460 U.S....
Defining 'Directly Pertinent' Records: GAO Access in Fixed-Price Contracts – Bowser v. Merck

Defining 'Directly Pertinent' Records: GAO Access in Fixed-Price Contracts – Bowser v. Merck

Date: Apr 20, 1983
Defining 'Directly Pertinent' Records: GAO Access in Fixed-Price Contracts – Bowser v. Merck Introduction Bowser, Comptroller General of the United States, et al. v. Merck Co., Inc. was adjudicated...
Texas v. Brown: Affirming the Plain View Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Texas v. Brown: Affirming the Plain View Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Date: Apr 20, 1983
Texas v. Brown: Affirming the Plain View Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Introduction Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
UNITED STATES v. RYLANDER: Upholding the Burden of Proof in IRS Summons Contempt Proceedings

UNITED STATES v. RYLANDER: Upholding the Burden of Proof in IRS Summons Contempt Proceedings

Date: Apr 20, 1983
UNITED STATES v. RYLANDER: Upholding the Burden of Proof in IRS Summons Contempt Proceedings Introduction UNITED STATES v. RYLANDER, 460 U.S. 752 (1983), is a pivotal case decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Anderson v. Celebrezzze: Unconstitutional Burden on Independent Candidates

Anderson v. Celebrezzze: Unconstitutional Burden on Independent Candidates

Date: Apr 20, 1983
Anderson v. Celebrezzze: Unconstitutional Burden on Independent Candidates Introduction Anderson et al. v. Celebrezzze is a pivotal case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on April 19, 1983. The case...
Limiting Habeas Corpus for Stale Claims: Insights from James Spalding v. Arthur Nathaniel Aiken

Limiting Habeas Corpus for Stale Claims: Insights from James Spalding v. Arthur Nathaniel Aiken

Date: Apr 19, 1983
Limiting Habeas Corpus for Stale Claims: Insights from James Spalding v. Arthur Nathaniel Aiken Introduction James Spalding et al. v. Arthur Nathaniel Aiken (460 U.S. 1093, 1983) is a notable case in...
Massachusetts 15% Rule Ballot Access: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bellotti v. Connolly Langone

Massachusetts 15% Rule Ballot Access: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bellotti v. Connolly Langone

Date: Apr 5, 1983
Massachusetts 15% Rule Ballot Access: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bellotti v. Connolly Langone Introduction The case of Francis X. Bellotti, Attorney General of Massachusetts v. Michael J. Connolly...
No Requirement of Discriminatory Animus under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) for Federal Witness Intimidation Claims

No Requirement of Discriminatory Animus under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) for Federal Witness Intimidation Claims

Date: Apr 5, 1983
No Requirement of Discriminatory Animus under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) for Federal Witness Intimidation Claims Introduction Kush et al. v. Rutledge (460 U.S. 719) is a landmark decision by the United...
Preemption of State-Tort Claims Against Labor Unions under the NLRA: The Jones Decision

Preemption of State-Tort Claims Against Labor Unions under the NLRA: The Jones Decision

Date: Apr 5, 1983
Preemption of State-Tort Claims Against Labor Unions under the NLRA: The Jones Decision Introduction LOCAL 926, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO, ET AL. v. JONES, 460 U.S. 669...
Protection Against Discriminatory Discipline of Union Officials under §8(a)(3): Insights from Metropolitan Edison Co. v. NLRB

Protection Against Discriminatory Discipline of Union Officials under §8(a)(3): Insights from Metropolitan Edison Co. v. NLRB

Date: Apr 5, 1983
Protection Against Discriminatory Discipline of Union Officials under §8(a)(3): Insights from Metropolitan Edison Co. v. NLRB Introduction Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board ET...
Revisiting Prima Facie Discrimination: Insights from United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens

Revisiting Prima Facie Discrimination: Insights from United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens

Date: Apr 5, 1983
Revisiting Prima Facie Discrimination: Insights from United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, United States Postal Service Board of...
Strict Interpretation of YCA's Set-Aside Provision in TUTEN v. UNITED STATES

Strict Interpretation of YCA's Set-Aside Provision in TUTEN v. UNITED STATES

Date: Mar 31, 1983
Strict Interpretation of YCA's Set-Aside Provision in TUTEN v. UNITED STATES Introduction TUTEN v. UNITED STATES (460 U.S. 660, 1983) is a landmark Supreme Court case that examines the application of...
Preserving Finality in Interstate Water Rights: Supreme Court's Decision in ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA

Preserving Finality in Interstate Water Rights: Supreme Court's Decision in ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA

Date: Mar 31, 1983
Preserving Finality in Interstate Water Rights: Supreme Court's Decision in ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA et al., 460 U.S. 605...
Supremacy Clause and State Taxation: Analysis of Washington v. United States

Supremacy Clause and State Taxation: Analysis of Washington v. United States

Date: Mar 30, 1983
Supremacy Clause and State Taxation: Analysis of Washington et al. v. United States Introduction Washington et al. v. United States (460 U.S. 536), decided on March 29, 1983, is a significant Supreme...
Access to Grand Jury Materials under the Clayton Act: Illinois v. Abbott Associates

Access to Grand Jury Materials under the Clayton Act: Illinois v. Abbott Associates

Date: Mar 30, 1983
Access to Grand Jury Materials under the Clayton Act: Illinois v. Abbott Associates Introduction Illinois v. Abbott Associates, Inc., et al. (460 U.S. 557, 1983) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Special Taxation of the Press: First Amendment Implications in Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue

Special Taxation of the Press: First Amendment Implications in Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue

Date: Mar 30, 1983
Special Taxation of the Press: First Amendment Implications in Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue Introduction Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert