Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Revocation of Probation for Indigence: Insights from BEARDEN v. GEORGIA

Revocation of Probation for Indigence: Insights from BEARDEN v. GEORGIA

Date: May 25, 1983
Revocation of Probation for Indigence: Insights from BEARDEN v. GEORGIA Introduction BEARDEN v. GEORGIA (461 U.S. 660, 1983) is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Tax-Exempt Status Denial for Racially Discriminatory Religious Schools

Tax-Exempt Status Denial for Racially Discriminatory Religious Schools

Date: May 25, 1983
Tax-Exempt Status Denial for Racially Discriminatory Religious Schools Introduction In BOB JONES UNIVERSITY v. UNITED STATES, 461 U.S. 574 (1983), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed whether private...
Due Process and Government Delay in Forfeiture Proceedings: An Analysis of UNITED STATES v. $8,850

Due Process and Government Delay in Forfeiture Proceedings: An Analysis of UNITED STATES v. $8,850

Date: May 24, 1983
Due Process and Government Delay in Forfeiture Proceedings: An Analysis of UNITED STATES v. $8,850 Introduction UNITED STATES v. EIGHT THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($8,850) IN UNITED...
Reaffirming the Harmless Error Doctrine in Prosecutorial Conduct: United States v. Hasting et al.

Reaffirming the Harmless Error Doctrine in Prosecutorial Conduct: United States v. Hasting et al.

Date: May 24, 1983
Reaffirming the Harmless Error Doctrine in Prosecutorial Conduct: United States v. Hasting et al. Introduction United States v. Hasting et al., 461 U.S. 499 (1983), is a significant Supreme Court...
Pallas Shipping Agency v. Duris: Clarifying Compensation Order Requirements under the LHWCA

Pallas Shipping Agency v. Duris: Clarifying Compensation Order Requirements under the LHWCA

Date: May 24, 1983
Pallas Shipping Agency v. Duris: Clarifying Compensation Order Requirements under the LHWCA Introduction The case of Pallas Shipping Agency, Ltd. v. Duris, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on May...
Tax Exemption and Lobbying: Insights from Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington

Tax Exemption and Lobbying: Insights from Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington

Date: May 24, 1983
Tax Exemption and Lobbying: Insights from Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington Introduction The Supreme Court case Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. Taxation With...
Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria: Expanding Jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria: Expanding Jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Date: May 24, 1983
Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria: Expanding Jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Introduction Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria, 461 U.S. 480 (1983), is a pivotal...
Hensley v. Eckerhart: Refining Attorney Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. §1988

Hensley v. Eckerhart: Refining Attorney Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. §1988

Date: May 17, 1983
Hensley v. Eckerhart: Refining Attorney Fee Awards Under 42 U.S.C. §1988 Introduction Hensley et al. v. Eckerhart et al. (461 U.S. 424) is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision delivered on...
Supreme Court Upholds FERC’s Full Avoided Cost Rate and Interconnection Rules under PURPA

Supreme Court Upholds FERC’s Full Avoided Cost Rate and Interconnection Rules under PURPA

Date: May 17, 1983
Supreme Court Upholds FERC’s Full Avoided Cost Rate and Interconnection Rules under PURPA Introduction American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp. et al. (461 U.S. 402,...
Heckler v. Campbell: Validation of Medical-Vocational Guidelines in Disability Determinations

Heckler v. Campbell: Validation of Medical-Vocational Guidelines in Disability Determinations

Date: May 17, 1983
Heckler v. Campbell: Validation of Medical-Vocational Guidelines in Disability Determinations Introduction Heckler v. Campbell (461 U.S. 458, 1983) is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Supreme Court Upholds State Jurisdiction Over Wholesale Power Rates: A New Precedent in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence

Supreme Court Upholds State Jurisdiction Over Wholesale Power Rates: A New Precedent in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence

Date: May 17, 1983
Supreme Court Upholds State Jurisdiction Over Wholesale Power Rates: A New Precedent in Commerce Clause Jurisprudence Introduction In the landmark case Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas...
Kolender v. Lawson: Unconstitutionality of Vague Stop-and-Identify Statutes under the Due Process Clause

Kolender v. Lawson: Unconstitutionality of Vague Stop-and-Identify Statutes under the Due Process Clause

Date: May 3, 1983
Kolender v. Lawson: Unconstitutionality of Vague Stop-and-Identify Statutes under the Due Process Clause Introduction Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983), is a landmark decision by the United...
Exclusivity of the Quiet Title Act and Statute of Limitations for State Claims: Comprehensive Commentary on BLOCK v. NORTH DAKOTA

Exclusivity of the Quiet Title Act and Statute of Limitations for State Claims: Comprehensive Commentary on BLOCK v. NORTH DAKOTA

Date: May 3, 1983
Exclusivity of the Quiet Title Act and Statute of Limitations for State Claims Comprehensive Commentary on BLOCK v. NORTH DAKOTA EX REL. BOARD OF UNIVERSITY AND SCHOOL LANDS (461 U.S. 273) 1....
Inclusion of Nonrecourse Liabilities in Partnership Interest Sales: Tufts v. Commissioner

Inclusion of Nonrecourse Liabilities in Partnership Interest Sales: Tufts v. Commissioner

Date: May 3, 1983
Inclusion of Nonrecourse Liabilities in Partnership Interest Sales: Tufts v. Commissioner 1. Introduction Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tufts et al., 461 U.S. 300 (1983), is a landmark Supreme...
Affirmation of Bona Fide Residence Requirements for Tuition-Free Public Schools in Martinez v. Bynum

Affirmation of Bona Fide Residence Requirements for Tuition-Free Public Schools in Martinez v. Bynum

Date: May 3, 1983
Affirmation of Bona Fide Residence Requirements for Tuition-Free Public Schools in Martinez v. Bynum Introduction Martinez, as Next Friend of Morales v. Bynum, Texas Commissioner of Education, et...
Enforceability of Section 8(f) Prehire Agreements in §301 Actions: Insights from JIM McNEFF, INC. v. TODD ET AL.

Enforceability of Section 8(f) Prehire Agreements in §301 Actions: Insights from JIM McNEFF, INC. v. TODD ET AL.

Date: Apr 28, 1983
Enforceability of Section 8(f) Prehire Agreements in §301 Actions: Insights from JIM McNEFF, INC. v. TODD ET AL. Introduction JIM McNEFF, INC. v. TODD ET AL. (461 U.S. 260) is a landmark 1983...
Interstate Prison Transfers and Due Process: Insights from OLIM ET AL. v. WAKINEKONA

Interstate Prison Transfers and Due Process: Insights from OLIM ET AL. v. WAKINEKONA

Date: Apr 27, 1983
Interstate Prison Transfers and Due Process: Insights from Olim et al. v. Wakinekona Introduction In Olim et al. v. Wakinekona (461 U.S. 238), decided on April 26, 1983, the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Affirms Non-Arbitrary Application of Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Alabama v. Evans

Supreme Court Affirms Non-Arbitrary Application of Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Alabama v. Evans

Date: Apr 23, 1983
Supreme Court Affirms Non-Arbitrary Application of Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Alabama v. Evans Introduction Alabama v. Evans (461 U.S. 230) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Connick v. Myers: Balancing Public Employee Free Speech and State Interests

Connick v. Myers: Balancing Public Employee Free Speech and State Interests

Date: Apr 21, 1983
Connick v. Myers: Balancing Public Employee Free Speech and State Interests Introduction Connick v. Myers (1983) stands as a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision that delineates the boundaries of...
Morris v. Slappy: Affirming Trial Courts' Discretion on Continuances and Rejecting 'Meaningful Attorney-Client Relationship' in Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel

Morris v. Slappy: Affirming Trial Courts' Discretion on Continuances and Rejecting 'Meaningful Attorney-Client Relationship' in Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel

Date: Apr 21, 1983
Morris v. Slappy: Affirming Trial Courts' Discretion on Continuances and Rejecting 'Meaningful Attorney-Client Relationship' in Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel Introduction In Morris v. Slappy (461...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert