Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

UNITED STATES v. YERMIAN: Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1001

UNITED STATES v. YERMIAN: Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1001

Date: Jun 28, 1984
UNITED STATES v. YERMIAN: Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1001 Introduction UNITED STATES v. YERMIAN, 468 U.S. 63 (1984), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that redefined the interpretation of 18...
Burnett v. Grattan: Federal Courts and State Statutes of Limitations in Civil Rights Actions

Burnett v. Grattan: Federal Courts and State Statutes of Limitations in Civil Rights Actions

Date: Jun 28, 1984
Burnett v. Grattan: Federal Courts and State Statutes of Limitations in Civil Rights Actions Introduction Burnett et al. v. Grattan et al., 468 U.S. 42 (1984), is a seminal United States Supreme...
Establishing Cause and Prejudice in Federal Habeas Corpus: Reed v. Ross (1984)

Establishing Cause and Prejudice in Federal Habeas Corpus: Reed v. Ross (1984)

Date: Jun 28, 1984
Establishing Cause and Prejudice in Federal Habeas Corpus: Reed v. Ross (1984) Introduction Reed et al. v. Ross, 468 U.S. 1 (1984), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Due Process Protections Against Double Jeopardy in Roberts v. Mississippi

Due Process Protections Against Double Jeopardy in Roberts v. Mississippi

Date: Jun 28, 1984
Due Process Protections Against Double Jeopardy in Roberts v. Mississippi Introduction Thigpen, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, et al. v. Roberts, 468 U.S. 27 (1984), addresses...
Trade Secrets as Fifth Amendment Property: Insights from Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto

Trade Secrets as Fifth Amendment Property: Insights from Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto

Date: Jun 27, 1984
Trade Secrets Recognized as Fifth Amendment Property: Insights from Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co. Introduction Ruckelshaus, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Monsanto Co....
Standing in Overbreadth Challenges: An Analysis of Secretary of State of Maryland v. Joseph H. Munson Co., Inc.

Standing in Overbreadth Challenges: An Analysis of Secretary of State of Maryland v. Joseph H. Munson Co., Inc.

Date: Jun 27, 1984
Standing in Overbreadth Challenges: An Analysis of Secretary of State of Maryland v. Joseph H. Munson Co., Inc. Introduction Secretary of State of Maryland v. Joseph H. Munson Co., Inc. (467 U.S....
General Contractor Immunity under LHWCA Established in WMATA v. Johnson

General Contractor Immunity under LHWCA Established in WMATA v. Johnson

Date: Jun 27, 1984
General Contractor Immunity under LHWCA Established in Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Johnson Introduction In Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Johnson, 467 U.S....
Patton et al. v. Yount: Standards for Juror Impartiality Amidst Pretrial Publicity

Patton et al. v. Yount: Standards for Juror Impartiality Amidst Pretrial Publicity

Date: Jun 27, 1984
Patton et al. v. Yount: Standards for Juror Impartiality Amidst Pretrial Publicity Introduction Patton et al. v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025 (1984), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that...
Affirmation of NLRA Protections for Undocumented Aliens and the Limits of Judicial Remedial Authority in SURE-TAN, INC. v. NLRB

Affirmation of NLRA Protections for Undocumented Aliens and the Limits of Judicial Remedial Authority in SURE-TAN, INC. v. NLRB

Date: Jun 26, 1984
Affirmation of NLRA Protections for Undocumented Aliens and the Limits of Judicial Remedial Authority in SURE-TAN, INC., ET AL. v. NLRB Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in SURE-TAN, INC., ET...
Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond: Defining the Scope of Res Judicata in Employment Discrimination Class Actions

Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond: Defining the Scope of Res Judicata in Employment Discrimination Class Actions

Date: Jun 26, 1984
Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond: Defining the Scope of Res Judicata in Employment Discrimination Class Actions Introduction The case of Cooper et al. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond,...
State Public Defenders Subject to §1983 Liability for Intentional Misconduct - TOWER v. GLOVER

State Public Defenders Subject to §1983 Liability for Intentional Misconduct - TOWER v. GLOVER

Date: Jun 26, 1984
State Public Defenders Subject to §1983 Liability for Intentional Misconduct - TOWER v. GLOVER Introduction Tower, Public Defender of Douglas County, Oregon, et al. v. Glover (467 U.S. 914, 1984) is...
EPA's Plantwide Source Definition Upheld under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977

EPA's Plantwide Source Definition Upheld under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977

Date: Jun 26, 1984
EPA's Plantwide Source Definition Upheld under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 Introduction In the landmark case Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., decided on June...
Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.: Clarifying Conspiracy Rules Between Parent and Subsidiary Under §1 Sherman Act

Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.: Clarifying Conspiracy Rules Between Parent and Subsidiary Under §1 Sherman Act

Date: Jun 20, 1984
Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.: Clarifying Conspiracy Rules Between Parent and Subsidiary Under §1 Sherman Act Introduction Copperweld Corp. et al. v. Independence Tube Corp. is a...
United States v. Morton: Establishing Government Immunity in Federal Writs of Garnishment

United States v. Morton: Establishing Government Immunity in Federal Writs of Garnishment

Date: Jun 20, 1984
United States v. Morton: Establishing Government Immunity in Federal Writs of Garnishment Introduction United States v. Morton, 467 U.S. 822 (1984), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses...
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds FAA's Regulatory Certainty in FTCA Claims

Discretionary Function Exception Upholds FAA's Regulatory Certainty in FTCA Claims

Date: Jun 20, 1984
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds FAA's Regulatory Certainty in FTCA Claims Introduction United States v. S.A. Empresa de Viação Aérea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines) et al., 467 U.S. 797...
Supreme Court Confirms Federal Preemption Over State Alcohol Advertising Ban in Cable Television

Supreme Court Confirms Federal Preemption Over State Alcohol Advertising Ban in Cable Television

Date: Jun 19, 1984
Supreme Court Confirms Federal Preemption Over State Alcohol Advertising Ban in Cable Television Introduction In Capital Cities Cable, Inc., et al. v. Crisp, Director, Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage...
Supreme Court Affirms Constitutional Validity of Retroactive Withdrawal Liability Provisions in MPPAA

Supreme Court Affirms Constitutional Validity of Retroactive Withdrawal Liability Provisions in MPPAA

Date: Jun 19, 1984
Supreme Court Affirms Constitutional Validity of Retroactive Withdrawal Liability Provisions in MPPAA Introduction The case of Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. R. A. Gray Co. (467 U.S. 717,...
SEC Discretion on Notifying Targets of Subpoenas to Third Parties: SEC v. O'Brien

SEC Discretion on Notifying Targets of Subpoenas to Third Parties: SEC v. O'Brien

Date: Jun 19, 1984
SEC Discretion on Notifying Targets of Subpoenas to Third Parties: SEC v. O'Brien Introduction SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ET AL. v. JERRY T. O'BRIEN, INC., ET AL. (467 U.S. 735 (1984)) is a...
State Eminent Domain Not Preempted by Staggers Rail Act in Railroad Abandonments: Hayfield Northern Railroad Co. v. Chicago North Western Transportation Co.

State Eminent Domain Not Preempted by Staggers Rail Act in Railroad Abandonments: Hayfield Northern Railroad Co. v. Chicago North Western Transportation Co.

Date: Jun 13, 1984
State Eminent Domain Not Preempted by Staggers Rail Act in Railroad Abandonments Hayfield Northern Railroad Co. v. Chicago North Western Transportation Co., 467 U.S. 622 (1984) Introduction The...
Armco Inc. v. Hardesty: Commerce Clause and Gross Receipts Tax Discrimination

Armco Inc. v. Hardesty: Commerce Clause and Gross Receipts Tax Discrimination

Date: Jun 13, 1984
Armco Inc. v. Hardesty: Commerce Clause and Gross Receipts Tax Discrimination Introduction Armco Inc. v. Hardesty, Tax Commissioner of West Virginia (467 U.S. 638, 1984) is a significant Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert